FDA so­lic­its in­dus­try in­put for OND pol­i­cy pri­or­i­ties

A Fri­day FDA no­tice is so­lic­it­ing pol­i­cy sug­ges­tions from the in­dus­try that re­view staff at the FDA’s Of­fice of New Drugs (OND) can im­ple­ment in the near fu­ture.

To hear from in­dus­try on “spe­cif­ic, ac­tion­able pol­i­cy sug­ges­tions that could be im­ple­ment­ed in the near-term,” the FDA is so­lic­it­ing pre­sen­ta­tions for dis­cus­sions at a pub­lic meet­ing set via the Fed­er­al Reg­is­ter no­tice as well as invit­ing com­ments on the top­ics that the no­tice dis­cuss­es.

The meet­ing is set for 7 No­vem­ber, with the goal of so­lic­it­ing sug­ges­tions on read­i­ly and broad­ly ap­plic­a­ble poli­cies across var­i­ous ther­a­peu­tic ar­eas or dis­eases. This dif­fers from the in­put in­dus­try can of­fer for guid­ances and frame­works on high-pol­i­cy ini­tia­tives, such as to in­cor­po­rate re­al-world ev­i­dence and the sci­ence of pa­tient in­put in­to reg­u­la­to­ry de­ci­sion-mak­ing.

The fo­cus of the no­tice is cen­tered on di­rect­ing the at­ten­tion to five top­ics that are of par­tic­u­lar in­ter­est for the sug­ges­tions to aid OND in fo­cus­ing on pol­i­cy pri­or­i­ties while the FDA- and Cen­ter for Drug Eval­u­a­tion and Re­search (CDER)-wide high-pol­i­cy ini­tia­tives are un­der­way.

The FDA so­lic­its in­put about where OND can fa­cil­i­tate ad­di­tion­al guid­ance or sci­en­tif­ic dis­cus­sion in the near fu­ture to im­prove clar­i­ty and pro­mote ef­fec­tive drug de­vel­op­ment “for var­i­ous clin­i­cal ar­eas linked by a shared ther­a­peu­tic con­text,” such as drugs that are in­tend­ed for the treat­ment of se­ri­ous, life-threat­en­ing rare dis­eases. Spe­cif­ic sug­ges­tions can al­so be about where OND can un­der­take guid­ance or pol­i­cy de­vel­op­ment sup­port­ing drug de­vel­op­ment for dis­eases that are cur­rent­ly un­a­menable to tar­get­ed ther­a­pies. In­dus­try can share views on guid­ance, ben­e­fits, draw­backs to ex­tend­ing nov­el tri­al de­signs to ad­di­tion­al ther­a­peu­tic ar­eas and how to pro­mote ef­fec­tive drug de­vel­op­ment pro­grams when such ap­proach­es cause un­cer­tain­ty-re­lat­ed ten­sion.

The re­main­ing top­ic of par­tic­u­lar in­ter­est to the agency re­lates to the FDA guid­ances that are not dis­ease- or in­di­ca­tion-spe­cif­ic. The FDA wants to hear from those who may “be­lieve that OND re­view di­vi­sions are im­ple­ment­ing these guid­ances in dif­fer­ent ways.” It seeks rec­om­men­da­tions for top­ics where, “This may re­flect a need for guid­ance re­vi­sion or ad­di­tion­al pol­i­cy de­vel­op­ment.”

“Con­sis­tent with FDA’s broad­er ini­tia­tives and mod­ern­iza­tion ef­forts, the clin­i­cal and sci­en­tif­ic lead­ers of OND are seek­ing sug­ges­tions on where we can pro­vide reg­u­la­to­ry clar­i­ty to pro­mote in­no­v­a­tive and ef­fec­tive drug de­vel­op­ment across mul­ti­ple ther­a­peu­tic ar­eas,” the agency states in the no­tice. The move comes amid the mod­ern­iza­tion of OND, a FY 2019 pri­or­i­ty, and CDER.

RAPS: First pub­lished in Reg­u­la­to­ry Fo­cus™ by the Reg­u­la­to­ry Af­fairs Pro­fes­sion­als So­ci­ety, the largest glob­al or­ga­ni­za­tion of and for those in­volved with the reg­u­la­tion of health­care prod­ucts. Click here for more in­for­ma­tion.

So­cial im­age: FDA, AP Im­ages

Brian Kaspar. AveXis via Twitter

AveX­is sci­en­tif­ic founder fires back at No­var­tis CEO Vas Narasimhan, 'cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly de­nies any wrong­do­ing'

Brian Kaspar’s head was among the first to roll at Novartis after company execs became aware of the fact that manipulated data had been included in its application for Zolgensma, now the world’s most expensive therapy.

But in his first public response, the scientific founder at AveXis — acquired by Novartis for $8.7 billion — is firing back. And he says that not only was he not involved in any wrongdoing, he’s ready to defend his name as needed.

I reached out to Brian Kaspar after Novartis put out word that he and his brother Allen had been axed in mid-May, two months after the company became aware of the allegations related to manipulated data. His response came back through his attorneys.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Novartis CEO Vas Narasimhan [via Bloomberg/Getty]

I’m not per­fect: No­var­tis chief Vas Narasimhan al­most apol­o­gizes in the wake of a new cri­sis

Vas Narasimhan has warily stepped up with what might pass as something close to a borderline apology for the latest scandal to engulf Novartis.

But he couldn’t quite get there.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

FDA to Sarep­ta: Your wide­ly an­tic­i­pat­ed fol­lowup to Ex­ondys 51 is not get­ting an ac­cel­er­at­ed OK for Duchenne MD

In one of the least anticipated moves of the year, the FDA has rejected Sarepta’s application for an accelerated approval of its Duchenne MD drug golodirsen after fretting over safety issues.

In a statement that arrived after the bell on Monday, Sarepta explained the CRL, saying:

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Levi Garraway. Broad Institute via Youtube

Roche raids Eli Lil­ly for its next chief med­ical of­fi­cer as San­dra Horn­ing plans to step down

We found out Monday morning where Levi Garraway was headed after he left Eli Lilly as head of oncology R&D a few days ago. Roche named Garraway as their new chief medical officer, replacing Sandra Horning, who they say is retiring from the company.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Af­ter a posse of Wall Street an­a­lysts pre­dict a like­ly new win for Sarep­ta, we're down to the wire on a crit­i­cal FDA de­ci­sion

As Bloomberg notes, most of the Wall Street analysts that cover Sarepta $SRPT are an upbeat bunch, ready to cheer on the team when it comes to their Duchenne MD drugs, or offer explanations when an odd setback occurs — as happened recently with a safety signal that was ‘erroneously’ reported last week.

Ritu Baral Cowen
Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: No­var­tis spin­off Nabri­va fi­nal­ly scores its first an­tibi­ot­ic ap­proval

In May, Nabriva Therapeutics suffered a setback after the FDA rejected its antibiotic for complicated urinary tract infections — the Novartis spinoff has now had some better luck with the US agency, which on Monday approved its other drug for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

The drug, lefamulin, has been developed as an intravenous and oral formulation and been tested in two late-stage clinical trials. The semi-synthetic compound, whose dosing can be switched between the two formulations, is engineered to inhibit the synthesis of bacterial protein by binding to a part of the bacterial ribosome.

Saqib Islam. CheckRare via YouTube

Spring­Works seeks $115M to push Pfiz­er drugs across fin­ish line while Sat­suma sells mi­graine play in $86M IPO

SpringWorks and Satsuma — both biotech spinouts that have closed B rounds in April — are loading up with IPO cash to boost their respective late-stage plans.

Bain-backed SpringWorks is the better-known company of the two, and it’s gunning for a larger windfall of $115 million to add to $228 million from previous financings. In the process, the Stamford, CT-based team is also drawing the curtains on the partnerships it has in mind for the pair of assets it had initially licensed from Pfizer.

Mi­nor­i­ty racial groups con­tin­ue to be dis­mal­ly rep­re­sent­ed in can­cer tri­als — study

Data reveal that different racial and ethnic groups — by nature and/or nurture — can respond differently in terms of pharmacokinetics, efficacy, or safety to therapeutics, but this disparity is not necessarily accounted for in clinical trials. A fresh analysis of the last decade of US cancer drug approvals suggests the trend continues, cementing previous research that suggests oncology trials are woefully under-representative of the racial makeup of the real world.

Van­da shares slide af­ter FDA spurns their big end­point and re­jects a pitch on jet lag re­lief

Back in the spring of last year, Vanda Pharmaceuticals $VNDA served up a hot stew of mixed data for a slate of endpoints related to what they called clear evidence that their melatonin sleep drug Hetlioz (tasimelteon) could help millions of travelers suffering from jet lag.

Never mind that they couldn’t get a planned 90 people in the study, settling for 25 instead; Vanda CEO Mihael H. Polymeropoulos said they were building on a body of data to prove it would help jet-lagged patients looking for added sleep benefits. And that, they added, would be worth a major upgrade from the agency as they sought to tackle a big market.