From mice to dogs, and some­day man: George Church's gene ther­a­py cock­tail for ag­ing-re­lat­ed dis­eases

George Chruch Re­ju­ve­nate

Emerg­ing gene-ther­a­py tech­nol­o­gy could help dogs live health­i­er, if not longer, lives as man’s best friend.

A start­up called Re­ju­ve­nate Bio — launched out of George Church’s lab at Har­vard Med­ical School (HMS) and the Wyss In­sti­tute for Bi­o­log­i­cal­ly In­spired En­gi­neer­ing at Har­vard Uni­ver­si­ty — on Thurs­day, with big plans to make work on gene ther­a­py tech­nol­o­gy en­gi­neered to pre­vent and treat a slew of age-re­lat­ed dis­eases in dogs and ex­tend their healthspan.

“Sci­ence hasn’t yet found a way to make com­plex an­i­mals like dogs live for­ev­er, so the next best thing we can do is find a way to main­tain health for as long as pos­si­ble dur­ing the ag­ing process,” said Church in a re­port by the Wyss In­sti­tute.

As we age, the propen­si­ty to be af­flict­ed with dis­ease(s) ris­es. But dis­eases are typ­i­cal­ly re­searched and treat­ed in­di­vid­u­al­ly, and the ex­ist­ing ar­ma­men­tar­i­um of treat­ments does not ac­com­mo­date the in­ter­con­nect­ed­ness of ill­ness­es that arise in lock­step with age. So, Har­vard re­searchers took a macro-lev­el ap­proach to the prob­lem of age-re­lat­ed dis­eases and de­vel­oped a gene ther­a­py fo­cused on a tri­fec­ta of longevi­ty as­so­ci­at­ed genes: FGF21, αK­lotho and sTGF𝝱R2 — which have pre­vi­ous­ly been shown to be as­so­ci­at­ed with in­creased health and lifes­pan ben­e­fits in mice that were ge­net­i­cal­ly en­gi­neered to over­ex­press them.

“We be­lieve that gene ther­a­py is a great tool for ac­tu­al­ly go­ing af­ter chron­ic age-re­lat­ed con­di­tions, par­tic­u­lar­ly if you have tar­get sets that have re­al­ly strong safe­ty pro­files,” Re­ju­ve­nate CEO Daniel Oliv­er said in an in­ter­view with End­points News.

“The genes we’re us­ing in­side of our gene ther­a­pies have been shown in trans­genic mouse mod­els to ex­tend their life. And so we have built-in safe­ty pro­files for the genes we’re us­ing — we have three-plus years of safe­ty da­ta in mice be­fore we even start.”

Noah David­sohn Re­ju­ve­nate

The re­searchers cre­at­ed sep­a­rate gene ther­a­py de­liv­ery ve­hi­cles for each gene us­ing a serotype of ade­no-as­so­ci­at­ed virus (AAV8) and then in­ject­ed the AAV con­structs in­to mouse mod­els of obe­si­ty, type II di­a­betes, heart fail­ure, and re­nal fail­ure to as­sess ef­fi­ca­cy.

The da­ta were strik­ing. FGF21 alone caused a com­plete re­ver­sal of weight gain and type II di­a­betes in obese, di­a­bet­ic mice fol­low­ing a sin­gle shot, and a com­bi­na­tion with sTGF𝝱R2 al­so di­min­ished kid­ney at­ro­phy by 75% in mice with re­nal fi­bro­sis. The gene sTGF𝝱R2 alone and in com­bi­na­tion with ei­ther of the oth­er two gene ther­a­pies im­proved heart func­tion in mice with heart fail­ure, sug­gest­ing that that co-ad­min­is­tra­tion of FGF21 and sTGF𝝱R2 could treat all four age-re­lat­ed con­di­tions.

To be sure, in this ini­tial study in mice the in­ject­ed genes did not stray in­to the an­i­mals’ genomes and did not mod­i­fy their nat­ur­al DNA — which is a con­cern giv­en the ex­ist­ing eu­genic prac­tices preva­lent in the pet in­dus­try.

Re­ju­ve­nate Bio on Thurs­day un­veiled plans to kick off a pi­lot study test­ing the ef­fi­ca­cy of this gene ther­a­py tech­nol­o­gy in ar­rest­ing mi­tral valve dis­ease, which af­fects most Cav­a­lier King Charles spaniels by age eight and caus­es heart fail­ure.

The plan is to en­roll 10 dogs with mi­tral valve dis­ease, in­ject them with the gene ther­a­py, and as­sess whether they progress to the next stage of the dis­ease over a giv­en pe­ri­od, Oliv­er said. This pi­lot study — which will take at least a year to read­out — will serve as a lit­mus test for an an­i­mal drug tri­al with the FDA, which tends to take about three years to com­plete. If all goes well, the com­pa­ny hopes to ex­pand the treat­ment to all ca­nine breeds, as more than 7 mil­lion dogs in the Unit­ed States suf­fer from mi­tral valve dis­ease.

“We want to get rid of the mor­bidi­ties as­so­ci­at­ed with ag­ing, so dogs can be as hap­py and healthy as pos­si­ble through­out their lives,” said Re­ju­ve­nate Bio’s chief tech­nol­o­gy of­fi­cer Noah David­sohn, who is a for­mer Re­search Sci­en­tist at the Wyss In­sti­tute and HMS. David­sohn’s dog, named Bear, serves as Re­ju­ve­nate’s “chief in­spi­ra­tion of­fi­cer.”

Bear David­sohn Re­ju­ve­nate

The first crop of FDA-ap­proved gene ther­a­pies for hu­mans — such as Spark Ther­a­peu­tics’ Lux­tur­na and No­var­tis’ Zol­gens­ma — treat rare dis­eases. If Re­ju­ve­nate’s ther­a­py is found to be safe and ef­fec­tive in dogs, it could open the door to sim­i­lar ther­a­pies for age-re­lat­ed ill­ness­es and in­deed ag­ing in hu­mans, a field that has at­tract­ed an ex­plo­sion of in­ter­est and fund­ing.

Al­though ear­ly, the study in mice showed that these so-called longevi­ty gene ther­a­pies can be com­bined in­to a sin­gle ther­a­peu­tic mix­ture — com­pared to the tra­di­tion­al par­a­digm that dic­tates dif­fer­ent dis­eases ne­ces­si­tate mul­ti­ple in­ter­ven­tions (and ar­guably ac­cu­mu­la­tive ex­po­sure to side-ef­fects), the re­searchers con­clud­ed.

In tan­dem with the ex­cite­ment that came in re­ac­tion to the FDA ap­proval of pi­o­neer­ing hu­man gene-ther­a­pies was the push­back on what some crit­ics call as­tro­nom­i­cal prices.  Zol­gens­ma, for in­stance, is the world’s most ex­pen­sive ther­a­py at $2.1 mil­lion a pop, al­though its mak­er No­var­tis in­sists its cu­ra­tive po­ten­tial and in­stall­ment-based pric­ing makes it worth it. The com­pa­ny has al­so ini­ti­at­ed a con­tro­ver­sial lot­tery scheme to give away 100 dos­es of Zol­gens­ma in coun­tries out­side the Unit­ed States where it is not yet ap­proved.

“I think go­ing for­ward as gene ther­a­py is ap­plied to dis­eases with much high­er preva­lence — you will see the price come down,” Oliv­er said.

Mean­while, the in­ter­est in treat­ing dis­eases in pets — if their hu­man own­ers may be so in­clined — is on the rise, giv­en that 67% of US house­holds, or about 85 mil­lion fam­i­lies, own a pet, ac­cord­ing to the 2019-2020 sur­vey con­duct­ed by the Amer­i­can Pet Prod­ucts As­so­ci­a­tion.

For in­stance, to treat dis­eases like can­cer in dogs — surgery, chemother­a­py, or ra­di­a­tion are ex­ist­ing al­ter­na­tives. But tar­get­ed ther­a­pies are the next fron­tier. A Sil­i­con Val­ley start­up — called the One Health Com­pa­ny — raised $5 mil­lion last month to help fig­ure out which hu­man treat­ments can be re­pur­posed for their ca­nine coun­ter­parts. The com­pa­ny, which likened its tech­nol­o­gy to Foun­da­tion Med­i­cine’s next-gen­er­a­tion se­quenc­ing pan­el in an in­ter­view with STAT, helps se­quence the dog’s tu­mor and gen­er­ates rec­om­men­da­tions for treat­ment.

UP­DAT­ED: A small, ob­scure biotech just won big with their IPO. In this mar­ket. Are you kid­ding me?

How could a small, largely unknown biotech that emerged from stealth mode just months ago with early-stage cancer programs jump onto Wall Street in the middle of a Category 6 financial hurricane and sail through with a $165 million IPO?

And what does that mean for the rest of the industry waiting to see just how much damage global lockdowns will wreak on clinical development?

The biotech is a company called Zentalis. The crew there nabbed an $85 million crossover round late last year — notably waiting 5 years before waving the numbers around to attract attention, according to my read of a FierceBiotech story. Perceptive joined in, but the syndicate was not in general the kind of marquee affair that gets tongues wagging.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Gilead CEO Daniel O'Day attends a meeting with the President and other biopharma leaders at the White House on March 2, 2020 (AP Photo)

Ramp­ing up glob­al pro­duc­tion of remde­sivir, Gilead CEO Dan O’Day de­tails plans to dis­trib­ute 1.5M dos­es to fight Covid-19 — for free

Gilead is still some days away from turning the card on its first round of data on remdesivir’s ability to fight severe cases of Covid-19, but the big biotech is ramping up an emergency supply of a million courses of therapy as it starts free distribution of the drug to tens of thousands of patients under their compassionate use and expanded access program as well as clinical trials.

In his latest open letter posted over the weekend, Gilead CEO Dan O’Day outlined how the company has been successful in cutting production time on remdesivir while repurposing some of their own facilities and turning to contract manufacturers to build a near-term supply of 1.5 million doses. They are still working on efficacy and dosing, but that supply could cover 140,000 courses of treatment. That supply, he added, would be more widely available following a potential approval.

Bob Nelsen at the Milken Institute Global Conference on April 29, 2019 in Beverly Hills, California. (Photo by Michael Kovac/Getty Images)

ARCH chief Bob Nelsen has $1.5B to prove 2 sim­ple points: ‘We’re in the most in­no­v­a­tive time ever’ and in­vestors are stay­ing

ARCH co-founder and managing director Bob Nelsen has a well known yen for the home run swing, betting big on potentially transformative meds and tech and the biotech teams he helps bring together. He thrives and bleeds on the cutting edge. And now Nelsen and the ARCH group have debuted 2 big funds to prove that this is the time for the best of biotech to shine — deadly pandemic be damned.

Two new funds, ARCH Venture Fund X and ARCH Venture Fund X Overage, gathered a combined $1.46 billion. And that’s a record. ARCH Venture Fund IX and ARCH Venture Fund IX Overage closed in 2016 with a combined $1.1 billion. ARCH Venture Fund VIII and ARCH Venture Fund VIII Overage closed in 2014 with a combined $560 million.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Have a new drug that promis­es to fight Covid-19? The FDA promis­es fast ac­tion but some de­vel­op­ers aren't hap­py

After providing an emergency approval to use malaria drugs against coronavirus with little actual evidence of their efficacy or safety in that setting, the FDA has already proven that it has set aside the gold standard when it comes to the pandemic. And now regulators have spelled out a new approach to speeding development that promises immediate responses in no uncertain terms — promising a program offering the ultimate high-speed pathway to Covid-19 drug approvals.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Once fu­ri­ous over No­var­tis’ da­ta ma­nip­u­la­tion scan­dal, the FDA now says it’s noth­ing they need to take ac­tion on

Back in the BP era — Before Pandemic — the FDA ripped Novartis for its decision to keep the agency in the dark about manipulated data used in its application for Zolgensma while its marketing application for the gene therapy was under review.

Civil and criminal sanctions were being discussed, the agency noted in a rare broadside at one of the world’s largest pharma companies. Notable lawmakers cheered the angry regulators on, urging the FDA to make an example of Novartis, which fielded Zolgensma at $2.1 million — the current record for a one-off therapy.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Covid-19 roundup: GSK, Am­gen tai­lor R&D work to fit the coro­n­avirus age; Doud­na's ge­nomics crew launch­es di­ag­nos­tic lab

You can add Amgen and GSK to the list of deep-pocket drug R&D players who are tailoring their pipeline work to fit a new age of coronavirus.

Following in the footsteps of a lineup of big players like Eli Lilly — which has suspended patient recruitment for drug studies — Amgen and GSK have opted to take a more tailored approach. Amgen is intent on circling the wagons around key studies that are already fully enrolled, and GSK has the red light on new studies while the pandemic plays out.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

In a stun­ning set­back, Amarin los­es big patent fight over Vas­cepa IP. And its high-fly­ing stock crash­es to earth

Amarin’s shares $AMRN were blitzed Monday evening, losing billions in value as reports spread that the company had lost its high-profile effort to keep its Vascepa patents protected from generic drugmakers.

Amarin had been fighting to keep key patents under lock and key — and away from generic rivals — for another 10 years, but District Court Judge Miranda Du in Las Vegas ruled against the biotech. She ruled that:
(A)ll the Asserted Claims are invalid as obvious under 35 U.S.C.§ 103. Thus, the Court finds in favor of Defendants on Plaintiff’s remaining infringementclaim, and in their favor on their counterclaims asserting the invalidity of the AssertedClaims under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Aaron Royston, venBio

In­vest­ing in the time of coro­n­avirus: the good, the bad and the hope­ful, as biotech VC firms close funds worth $3B

Apart from disrupting biopharma R&D and regulatory timelines, the coronavirus pandemic has inevitably ravaged financial markets and eroded investor risk appetite. Investing in the time of coronavirus feels reckless, but if biotech venture funds are any indication, the time is ripe.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Drug dis­cov­ery in the age of coro­n­avirus

Developing new drugs is incredibly hard. That’s why, despite superhuman efforts from the industry, we’re still looking at 12-18 months minimum before we can realistically hope for a vaccine for Covid-19, and probably months before there’s a proven viable drug treatment.

But our increasing ability to begin to industrialize the drug discovery and development process through an engineering approach means that we have more hope for speeding up this process than ever before — and not just to defeat coronavirus, but to benefit the development of all new medicines in the future.