From mice to dogs, and some­day man: George Church's gene ther­a­py cock­tail for ag­ing-re­lat­ed dis­eases

George Chruch Re­ju­ve­nate

Emerg­ing gene-ther­a­py tech­nol­o­gy could help dogs live health­i­er, if not longer, lives as man’s best friend.

A start­up called Re­ju­ve­nate Bio — launched out of George Church’s lab at Har­vard Med­ical School (HMS) and the Wyss In­sti­tute for Bi­o­log­i­cal­ly In­spired En­gi­neer­ing at Har­vard Uni­ver­si­ty — on Thurs­day, with big plans to make work on gene ther­a­py tech­nol­o­gy en­gi­neered to pre­vent and treat a slew of age-re­lat­ed dis­eases in dogs and ex­tend their healthspan.

“Sci­ence hasn’t yet found a way to make com­plex an­i­mals like dogs live for­ev­er, so the next best thing we can do is find a way to main­tain health for as long as pos­si­ble dur­ing the ag­ing process,” said Church in a re­port by the Wyss In­sti­tute.

As we age, the propen­si­ty to be af­flict­ed with dis­ease(s) ris­es. But dis­eases are typ­i­cal­ly re­searched and treat­ed in­di­vid­u­al­ly, and the ex­ist­ing ar­ma­men­tar­i­um of treat­ments does not ac­com­mo­date the in­ter­con­nect­ed­ness of ill­ness­es that arise in lock­step with age. So, Har­vard re­searchers took a macro-lev­el ap­proach to the prob­lem of age-re­lat­ed dis­eases and de­vel­oped a gene ther­a­py fo­cused on a tri­fec­ta of longevi­ty as­so­ci­at­ed genes: FGF21, αK­lotho and sTGF𝝱R2 — which have pre­vi­ous­ly been shown to be as­so­ci­at­ed with in­creased health and lifes­pan ben­e­fits in mice that were ge­net­i­cal­ly en­gi­neered to over­ex­press them.

“We be­lieve that gene ther­a­py is a great tool for ac­tu­al­ly go­ing af­ter chron­ic age-re­lat­ed con­di­tions, par­tic­u­lar­ly if you have tar­get sets that have re­al­ly strong safe­ty pro­files,” Re­ju­ve­nate CEO Daniel Oliv­er said in an in­ter­view with End­points News.

“The genes we’re us­ing in­side of our gene ther­a­pies have been shown in trans­genic mouse mod­els to ex­tend their life. And so we have built-in safe­ty pro­files for the genes we’re us­ing — we have three-plus years of safe­ty da­ta in mice be­fore we even start.”

Noah David­sohn Re­ju­ve­nate

The re­searchers cre­at­ed sep­a­rate gene ther­a­py de­liv­ery ve­hi­cles for each gene us­ing a serotype of ade­no-as­so­ci­at­ed virus (AAV8) and then in­ject­ed the AAV con­structs in­to mouse mod­els of obe­si­ty, type II di­a­betes, heart fail­ure, and re­nal fail­ure to as­sess ef­fi­ca­cy.

The da­ta were strik­ing. FGF21 alone caused a com­plete re­ver­sal of weight gain and type II di­a­betes in obese, di­a­bet­ic mice fol­low­ing a sin­gle shot, and a com­bi­na­tion with sTGF𝝱R2 al­so di­min­ished kid­ney at­ro­phy by 75% in mice with re­nal fi­bro­sis. The gene sTGF𝝱R2 alone and in com­bi­na­tion with ei­ther of the oth­er two gene ther­a­pies im­proved heart func­tion in mice with heart fail­ure, sug­gest­ing that that co-ad­min­is­tra­tion of FGF21 and sTGF𝝱R2 could treat all four age-re­lat­ed con­di­tions.

To be sure, in this ini­tial study in mice the in­ject­ed genes did not stray in­to the an­i­mals’ genomes and did not mod­i­fy their nat­ur­al DNA — which is a con­cern giv­en the ex­ist­ing eu­genic prac­tices preva­lent in the pet in­dus­try.

Re­ju­ve­nate Bio on Thurs­day un­veiled plans to kick off a pi­lot study test­ing the ef­fi­ca­cy of this gene ther­a­py tech­nol­o­gy in ar­rest­ing mi­tral valve dis­ease, which af­fects most Cav­a­lier King Charles spaniels by age eight and caus­es heart fail­ure.

The plan is to en­roll 10 dogs with mi­tral valve dis­ease, in­ject them with the gene ther­a­py, and as­sess whether they progress to the next stage of the dis­ease over a giv­en pe­ri­od, Oliv­er said. This pi­lot study — which will take at least a year to read­out — will serve as a lit­mus test for an an­i­mal drug tri­al with the FDA, which tends to take about three years to com­plete. If all goes well, the com­pa­ny hopes to ex­pand the treat­ment to all ca­nine breeds, as more than 7 mil­lion dogs in the Unit­ed States suf­fer from mi­tral valve dis­ease.

“We want to get rid of the mor­bidi­ties as­so­ci­at­ed with ag­ing, so dogs can be as hap­py and healthy as pos­si­ble through­out their lives,” said Re­ju­ve­nate Bio’s chief tech­nol­o­gy of­fi­cer Noah David­sohn, who is a for­mer Re­search Sci­en­tist at the Wyss In­sti­tute and HMS. David­sohn’s dog, named Bear, serves as Re­ju­ve­nate’s “chief in­spi­ra­tion of­fi­cer.”

Bear David­sohn Re­ju­ve­nate

The first crop of FDA-ap­proved gene ther­a­pies for hu­mans — such as Spark Ther­a­peu­tics’ Lux­tur­na and No­var­tis’ Zol­gens­ma — treat rare dis­eases. If Re­ju­ve­nate’s ther­a­py is found to be safe and ef­fec­tive in dogs, it could open the door to sim­i­lar ther­a­pies for age-re­lat­ed ill­ness­es and in­deed ag­ing in hu­mans, a field that has at­tract­ed an ex­plo­sion of in­ter­est and fund­ing.

Al­though ear­ly, the study in mice showed that these so-called longevi­ty gene ther­a­pies can be com­bined in­to a sin­gle ther­a­peu­tic mix­ture — com­pared to the tra­di­tion­al par­a­digm that dic­tates dif­fer­ent dis­eases ne­ces­si­tate mul­ti­ple in­ter­ven­tions (and ar­guably ac­cu­mu­la­tive ex­po­sure to side-ef­fects), the re­searchers con­clud­ed.

In tan­dem with the ex­cite­ment that came in re­ac­tion to the FDA ap­proval of pi­o­neer­ing hu­man gene-ther­a­pies was the push­back on what some crit­ics call as­tro­nom­i­cal prices.  Zol­gens­ma, for in­stance, is the world’s most ex­pen­sive ther­a­py at $2.1 mil­lion a pop, al­though its mak­er No­var­tis in­sists its cu­ra­tive po­ten­tial and in­stall­ment-based pric­ing makes it worth it. The com­pa­ny has al­so ini­ti­at­ed a con­tro­ver­sial lot­tery scheme to give away 100 dos­es of Zol­gens­ma in coun­tries out­side the Unit­ed States where it is not yet ap­proved.

“I think go­ing for­ward as gene ther­a­py is ap­plied to dis­eases with much high­er preva­lence — you will see the price come down,” Oliv­er said.

Mean­while, the in­ter­est in treat­ing dis­eases in pets — if their hu­man own­ers may be so in­clined — is on the rise, giv­en that 67% of US house­holds, or about 85 mil­lion fam­i­lies, own a pet, ac­cord­ing to the 2019-2020 sur­vey con­duct­ed by the Amer­i­can Pet Prod­ucts As­so­ci­a­tion.

For in­stance, to treat dis­eases like can­cer in dogs — surgery, chemother­a­py, or ra­di­a­tion are ex­ist­ing al­ter­na­tives. But tar­get­ed ther­a­pies are the next fron­tier. A Sil­i­con Val­ley start­up — called the One Health Com­pa­ny — raised $5 mil­lion last month to help fig­ure out which hu­man treat­ments can be re­pur­posed for their ca­nine coun­ter­parts. The com­pa­ny, which likened its tech­nol­o­gy to Foun­da­tion Med­i­cine’s next-gen­er­a­tion se­quenc­ing pan­el in an in­ter­view with STAT, helps se­quence the dog’s tu­mor and gen­er­ates rec­om­men­da­tions for treat­ment.

Qual­i­ty Con­trol in Cell and Gene Ther­a­py – What’s Re­al­ly at Stake?

In early 2021, Bluebird Bio was forced to suspend clinical trials of its gene therapy for sickle cell disease after two patients in the trial developed cancer. As company scientists rushed to assess whether there was any causal link between the therapy and the cancer cases, Bluebird’s stock value plummeted – as did those of multiple other biopharma companies developing similar therapies.

While investigations concluded that the gene therapy was unlikely to have caused cancer, investors and the public may be more skittish regarding the safety of gene and cell therapies after this episode. This recent example highlights how delicate the fields of cell and gene therapy remain today, even as they show great promise.

JP Gabriel, Ocugen

JP Gabriel watched from the bleach­ers as the pan­dem­ic raged. Now head of sup­ply chain at Ocu­gen, he's ready to bat

The world was in the middle of the most pressing public health risk his generation had ever seen, and JP Gabriel felt like he was sitting on the sidelines. As a VP of biologics and mRNA manufacturing at Ultragenyx, Gabriel watched from the sidelines as players like Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna used mRNA tech to chase their own Covid-19 vaccines.

This month, Gabriel got the chance to get his hands dirty against the pandemic — but it won’t be with mRNA.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 107,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) (Graeme Sloan/Sipa USA/Sipa via AP Images)

Sen­a­tors to NIH: Do more to pro­tect US bio­med­ical re­search from for­eign in­flu­ence

Although Thursday’s Senate health committee hearing was focused on how foreign countries and adversaries might be trying to steal or negatively influence biomedical research in the US, the only country mentioned by the senators and expert witnesses was China.

Committee chair Patty Murray (D-WA) made clear in her opening remarks that the US cannot “let the few instances of bad actors” overshadow the hard work of the many immigrant researchers in the US, many of which have won Nobel prizes for their work. But she also said, “There is more the NIH can be doing here.”

Brad Bolzon (Versant)

Ver­sant pulls the wraps off of near­ly $1B in 3 new funds out to build the next fleet of biotech star­tups. And this new gen­er­a­tion is built for speed

Brad Bolzon has an apology to offer by way of introducing a set of 3 new funds that together pack a $950 million wallop in new biotech creation and growth.

“I want to apologize,” says the Versant chairman and managing partner, laughing a little in the intro, “that we don’t have anything fancy or flashy to tell you about our new fund. Same team, around the same amount of capital, same investment strategy. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”

But then there’s the flip side, where everything has changed. Or at least speeded into a relative blur. Here’s Bolzon:

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Law pro­fes­sors call for FDA to dis­close all safe­ty and ef­fi­ca­cy da­ta for drugs

Back in early 2018 when Scott Gottlieb led the FDA, there was a moment when the agency seemed poised to release redacted complete response letters and other previously undisclosed data. But that initiative never gained steam.

Now, a growing chorus of researchers are finding that a dearth of public data on clinical trials and pharmaceuticals means industry and the FDA cannot be held accountable, two law professors from Yale and New York University write in an article published Wednesday in the California Law Review.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Novavax CEO Stanley Erck at the White House in 2020 (Andrew Harnik, AP Images)

As fears mount over J&J and As­traZeneca, No­vavax en­ters a shaky spot­light

As concerns rise around the J&J and AstraZeneca vaccines, global attention is increasingly turning to the little, 33-year-old, productless, bankruptcy-flirting biotech that could: Novavax.

In the now 16-month race to develop and deploy Covid-19 vaccines, Novavax has at times seemed like the pandemic’s most unsuspecting frontrunner and at times like an overhyped also-ran. Although they started the pandemic with only enough cash to last 6 months, they leveraged old connections and believers into $2 billion and emerged last summer with data experts said surpassed Pfizer and Moderna. They unveiled plans to quickly scale to 2 billion doses. Then they couldn’t even make enough material to run their US trial and watched four other companies beat them to the finish line.

FDA of­fers scathing re­view of Emer­gent plan­t's san­i­tary con­di­tions, em­ploy­ee train­ing af­ter halt­ing pro­duc­tion

The FDA wrapped up its inspection of Emergent’s troubled vaccine manufacturing plant in Baltimore on Tuesday, after halting production there on Monday. By Wednesday morning, the agency already released a series of scathing observations on the cross contamination, sanitary issues and lack of staff training that caused the contract manufacturer to dispose of millions of AstraZeneca and J&J vaccine doses.

Covid-19 man­u­fac­tur­ing roundup: Mary­land looks to grow biotech ca­pac­i­ty with $400M check; Rus­sia lands sec­ond Sput­nik V part­ner this week

A Maryland real estate project has added three new biotech-focused manufacturing and research buildings to an office park to keep up with demand created by the pandemic, the Washington Business Journal reported.

The Milestone Business Park — located off of I-270 in Germantown, MD — will see the new buildings and a total of 532,000 square feet as the campus rebrands to Milestone Innovation Park.

From left: James Brown, Michael Chambers, John Ballantyne

Alde­vron founders back a biotech start­up that's look­ing to end the moral de­bate over cell lines once and for all

For millions of Catholics around the world, the development of new vaccines to combat Covid-19 has sparked a moral dilemma. All the approved vaccines in use relied — in some fashion — on cell lines that were derived from aborted fetal tissue.

While church leaders accepted the vaccines and recommended their use to end the pandemic, a number also highlighted their preference for the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna over the J&J and AstraZeneca shots, which they noted were more heavily dependent on cell lines that they found morally objectionable.