Gene ther­a­py pi­o­neer James Wil­son sounds an alarm on high-dose AAV stud­ies fol­low­ing tox­ic re­ac­tions in mon­keys

James Wil­son. Penn News

Click on the im­age to see the full-sized ver­sion

Penn pro­fes­sor James Wil­son is one of the pre­em­i­nent sci­en­tists work­ing to­day in gene ther­a­py. He’s al­so the key fig­ure in a fa­tal gene ther­a­py tri­al back in the late ’90s that left the field in lim­bo for years, un­til a new gen­er­a­tion of biotechs hus­tled ahead with the cur­rent wave of vec­tor-car­ried cor­rec­tive genes in the clin­ic — with an his­toric first ap­proval in the US for Spark.

So when it sur­faced that Wil­son had quit an ad­vi­so­ry role at Sol­id Bio $SLDB over safe­ty is­sues as­so­ci­at­ed with high-dose AAV gene ther­a­py treat­ments — which co­in­cid­ed with a par­tial FDA hold on Sol­id’s high-dose work that was an­nounced just hours be­fore it priced its $125 mil­lion IPO — that sound­ed an alarm to some peo­ple in the field.

On Mon­day, Wil­son and his team un­veiled the rea­sons for his safe­ty con­cerns in an on­line pub­li­ca­tion of a new an­i­mal study that out­lined their use of a high-dose AAV de­liv­ery of a cor­rec­tive gene for the sur­vival of mo­tor neu­ron (SMN) pro­tein.

Fol­low­ing suc­cess­ful work in­volv­ing in­fants with spinal mus­cu­lar at­ro­phy, a link that al­so dinged AveX­is $AVXS to­day, Wil­son and his team at Penn want­ed to see how the same ap­proach could cor­rect a ge­net­ic de­fi­cien­cy of low­er mo­tor neu­rons — a con­di­tion linked to neu­ro­mus­cu­lar dis­eases.

The an­i­mal study, us­ing three rhe­sus macaque mon­keys and three pigs, was a tox­ic dis­as­ter.

Four days af­ter one of the macaques had re­ceived 2×1014 GC/kg AAVhu68 vec­tor ex­press­ing hu­man SMN, the mon­key ex­pe­ri­enced a se­vere cri­sis, go­ing in­to shock af­ter suf­fer­ing se­vere liv­er dam­age, which forced re­searchers to eu­th­a­nize the pri­mate. The two oth­er macaques sur­vived, but al­so suf­fered a tox­ic re­ac­tion.

All three piglets treat­ed with a high, sys­temic IV dose were al­so eu­th­a­nized, with the first ex­pe­ri­enc­ing atax­ia and the oth­er two re­spond­ing with neu­ro­log­i­cal symp­toms.

“The ad­verse events ob­served in these two NHP (non­hu­man pri­mate) stud­ies pro­vide provoca­tive but in­com­plete ev­i­dence for a uni­fy­ing mech­a­nism of tox­i­c­i­ty re­sult­ing from high dose sys­temic AAV ad­min­is­tra­tion,” the team writes. “Find­ings com­mon to both ex­per­i­ments in­clude he­pa­to­cel­lu­lar in­jury and de­vel­op­ment of a bleed­ing diathe­sis con­sis­tent with DIC with­in 5 days of vec­tor ad­min­is­tra­tion. It is present­ly un­clear whether liv­er dam­age is the pri­ma­ry in­sult lead­ing to the co­ag­u­lopa­thy, or if the co­ag­u­lopa­thy is a man­i­fes­ta­tion of sys­temic tox­i­c­i­ty that re­sults in sec­ondary liv­er dam­age.”

And there’s this:

Go­ing for­ward we sug­gest that clin­i­cal tri­als of high dose sys­temic AAV in­clude care­ful pre‐clin­i­cal vet­ting in NH­Ps and ear­ly lab­o­ra­to­ry and clin­i­cal eval­u­a­tions for sys­temic tox­i­c­i­ty, liv­er dam­age, and co­ag­u­lopa­thy as well as de­layed symp­toms of sen­so­ry neu­ropa­thy.

Sol­id Bio says it is out to cure Duchenne MD us­ing a gene ther­a­py. And af­ter see­ing its IPO get start­ed with a quick peak, the stock slipped from its high but was still trad­ing well over its ini­tial price. As news of the study spread, though, the stock plunged 12% on Tues­day. Shares of Re­genxbio $RGNX, where Wil­son has pro­vid­ed much of the AAV patent work, slid 4%.

What­ev­er wor­ries Wil­son may have now about high-dose AAV work, the biotechs in the field have yet to see much of it spread among the in­vestors who back their com­pa­nies.

Biotech Half­time Re­port: Af­ter a bumpy year, is biotech ready to re­bound?

The biotech sector has come down firmly from the highs of February as negative sentiment takes hold. The sector had a major boost of optimism from the success of the COVID-19 vaccines, making investors keenly aware of the potential of biopharma R&D engines. But from early this year, clinical trial, regulatory and access setbacks have reminded investors of the sector’s inherent risks.

RBC Capital Markets recently surveyed investors to take the temperature of the market, a mix of specialists/generalists and long-only/ long-short investment strategies. Heading into the second half of the year, investors mostly see the sector as undervalued (49%), a large change from the first half of the year when only 20% rated it as undervalued. Around 41% of investors now believe that biotech will underperform the S&P500 in the second half of 2021. Despite that view, 54% plan to maintain their position in the market and 41% still plan to increase their holdings.

David Livingston (Credit: Michael Sazel for CeMM)

Renowned Dana-Far­ber sci­en­tist, men­tor and bio­phar­ma ad­vi­sor David Liv­ingston has died

David Livingston, the Dana-Farber/Harvard Med scientist who helped shine a light on some of the key molecular drivers of breast and ovarian cancer, died unexpectedly last Sunday.

One of the senior leaders at Dana-Farber during his nearly half century of work there, Livingston was credited with shedding light on the genes that regulate cell growth, with insights into inherited BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations that helped lay the scientific foundation for targeted therapies and earlier detection that have transformed the field.

How to col­lect and sub­mit RWD to win ap­proval for a new drug in­di­ca­tion: FDA spells it out in a long-await­ed guid­ance

Real-world data is messy. There can be differences in the standards used to collect different types of data, differences in terminologies and curation strategies, and even in the way data is exchanged.

While acknowledging this somewhat controlled chaos, the FDA is now explaining how biopharma companies can submit study data derived from real-world data (RWD) sources in applicable regulatory submissions, including new drug indications.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

David Lockhart, ReCode Therapeutics CEO

Pfiz­er throws its weight be­hind LNP play­er eye­ing mR­NA treat­ments for CF, PCD

David Lockhart did not see the meteoric rise of messenger RNA and lipid nanoparticles coming.

Thanks to the worldwide fight against Covid-19, mRNA — the genetic code that can be engineered to turn the body into a mini protein factory — and LNPs, those tiny bubbles of fat carrying those instructions, have found their way into hundreds of millions of people. Within the biotech world, pioneers like Alnylam and Intellia have demonstrated just how versatile LNPs can be as a delivery vehicle for anything from siRNA to CRISPR/Cas9.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 120,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Leen Kawas (L) has resigned as CEO of Athira and will be replaced by COO Mark Litton

Ex­clu­sive: Athi­ra CEO Leen Kawas re­signs af­ter in­ves­ti­ga­tion finds she ma­nip­u­lat­ed da­ta

Leen Kawas, CEO and founder of the Alzheimer’s upstart Athira Pharma, has resigned after an internal investigation found she altered images in her doctoral thesis and four other papers that were foundational to establishing the company.

Mark Litton, the company’s COO since June 2019 and a longtime biotech executive, has been named full-time CEO. Kawas, meanwhile, will no longer have ties to the company except for owning a few hundred thousand shares.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL, foreground) and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) (Patrick Semansky/AP Images)

Sen­a­tors back FDA's plan to re­quire manda­to­ry pre­scriber ed­u­ca­tion for opi­oids

Three Senate Democrats are backing an FDA plan to require mandatory prescriber education for opioids as overdose deaths have risen sharply over the past decade, with almost 97,000 American opioid-related overdose deaths in the past year alone.

While acknowledging a decline in overall opioid analgesic dispensing in recent years, the FDA said it’s reconsidering the need for mandatory prescriber training through a REMS given the current situation with overdoses, and is seeking input on the aspects of the opioid crisis that mandatory training could potentially mitigate.

Bris­tol My­ers pledges to sell its Ac­celeron shares as ac­tivist in­vestors cir­cle Mer­ck­'s $11.5B buy­out — re­port

Just as Avoro Capital’s campaign to derail Merck’s proposed $11.5 billion buyout of Acceleron gains steam, Bristol Myers Squibb is leaning in with some hefty counterweight.

The pharma giant is planning to tender its Acceleron shares, Bloomberg reported, which add up to a sizable 11.5% stake. Based on the offer price, the sale would net Bristol Myers around $1.3 billion.

To complete its deal, Merck needs a majority of shareholders to agree to sell their shares.

Ep­i­darex, Sofinno­va dou­ble down on a par­al­lel take on 3rd-gen CAR-T — aim­ing straight at ovar­i­an can­cer

When John Maher treated the first head and neck cancer patient at Guy’s Hospital in London with his pan-ErbB CAR-T back in 2015, he was among a small club of researchers convinced they had an answer to the challenges that had kept those engineered T cells — wildly successful in hematological cancers — either too dangerous or out of reach for patients with solid tumors.

The field has blossomed since then, with a proliferation of technologies that promise to address any number of challenges identified as unique to solid tumors. And Maher himself has rethought his approach and come up with a new CAR-T platform to generate the next slate of candidates.

Boost­er bo­nan­za: FDA en­dors­es 'mix-and-match' scheme, and Mod­er­na and J&J too

The FDA late Wednesday signed off on authorizing the use of heterologous — or what FDA calls a “mix and match” of a primary vaccine series and different booster doses — for all currently available Covid-19 vaccines, in addition to separately authorizing Moderna and J&J boosters.

On the mix-and-match approach, which FDA officials insisted isn’t too confusing in a press conference, the agency offered the example of an 18-year-old who received the J&J shot at least two months ago and may now receive a single booster of the J&J, a half dose of the Moderna, or the Pfizer-BioNTech booster.