Genen­tech dives in­to mR­NA, bet­ting $310M on BioN­Tech's per­son­al­ized can­cer vac­cine tech

Genen­tech is tap­ping in­to the promise of mes­sen­ger RNA for build­ing per­son­al­ized can­cer vac­cines. The gi­ant Roche sub­sidiary is part­ner­ing with Ger­many’s BioN­Tech on its in­di­vid­u­al­ized can­cer ther­a­pies, promis­ing $310 mil­lion in near-term pay­outs to col­lab­o­rate on a com­bo with its new­ly ap­proved check­point in­hibitor Tecen­triq (ate­zolizum­ab).

James Sabry, Genen­tech

In this deal, BioN­Tech will con­tribute its per­son­al­ized can­cer vac­cine plat­form spot­light­ing unique neoanti­gens that can be iden­ti­fied in a can­cer pa­tient’s tu­mors, a trendy new tar­get of drug de­vel­op­ers like Grit­stone, Mod­er­na and Neon Ther­a­peu­tics. Phase I stud­ies are slat­ed to be­gin next year.

BioN­Tech’s work is fo­cused on cre­at­ing syn­thet­ic mR­NAs de­signed to pro­duce ther­a­peu­tic pro­teins, turn­ing a pa­tient’s cells in­to drug fac­to­ries. Batch­es of code spur cells to cre­ate a ther­a­peu­tic pro­tein. And the part­ners are look­ing to kick up a broad as well as spe­cif­ic im­mune re­sponse to fight can­cer. In this case, the tech starts with se­quenc­ing a pa­tient’s genome for their tu­mor, then en­cod­ing the neoanti­gens for that par­tic­u­lar tu­mor in­to a mes­sage de­liv­ered by mR­NA as a vac­cine. Den­drit­ic cells de­code the in­for­ma­tion, and use it to mark tu­mor cells for de­struc­tion by the im­mune sys­tem.

These new per­son­al­ized can­cer vac­cines promise to help ex­pand on the ef­fec­tive­ness of check­point in­hibitors, which dis­man­tle hur­dles set up by can­cer cells, and hope to suc­ceed where the first wave of off-the-shelf can­cer vac­cines large­ly failed.

BioN­Tech gets rights to co-com­mer­cial­ize new ther­a­pies in the US and cer­tain Eu­ro­pean mar­kets, in­clud­ing Ger­many. And it will al­so co-fund the up­com­ing R&D work.

BioN­Tech COO Sean Marett

The deal an­nounce­ment is char­ac­ter­is­ti­cal­ly light on fi­nan­cial de­tails. But in light of the up­front and near-term cash in the deal, that sum is like­ly to be no­table.

Found­ed in 2008, Mainz, Ger­many-based BioN­Tech has been large­ly fund­ed by the Strüng­mann group, a fam­i­ly firm led by Ger­man bil­lion­aires Thomas and An­dreas Strüng­mann, iden­ti­cal twins who have been fu­el­ing a va­ri­ety of biotechs in Ger­many.

The com­pa­ny is keep­ing qui­et about the mile­stones in the deal and isn’t talk­ing about prospec­tive time­lines on the work with Genen­tech, anx­ious to keep some of its cards close to its vest.

“Im­muno-on­col­o­gy is un­be­liev­ably com­pet­i­tive,” says BioN­Tech COO Sean Marett, and that re­quires some cir­cum­spec­tion on the de­tails.

The com­pa­ny, though, laid out a sig­nif­i­cant piece of the on­col­o­gy puz­zle it’s been work­ing on in two pa­pers pub­lished last year and then last June in Na­ture. The first out­lined its work with se­quenc­ing tu­mors for neoepi­topes and in the sec­ond pa­per in­ves­ti­ga­tors out­lined how they used RNA-lipoplex­es to pre­cise­ly tar­get den­drit­ic cells, over­com­ing a key hur­dle by en­cod­ing shared tu­mor anti­gens and get­ting the T cell re­sponse they were look­ing for.

BioN­Tech has com­plet­ed one Phase I study in pa­tients, and Marett isn’t re­luc­tant to claim the lead in the field, not­ing that some U.S. biotechs start­ed af­ter the first pub­li­ca­tion in 2015. The Ger­man biotech now has a staff of 500, even larg­er than Mod­er­na’s 460, and it’s build­ing its sec­ond man­u­fac­tur­ing fa­cil­i­ty in Mainz to back up the ex­pand­ing clin­i­cal plans.

Next steps in­clude tak­ing a close look at how BioN­Tech will re­al­ize its plans, in­clud­ing co-fund­ing the work with Genen­tech, ex­pand­ing man­u­fac­tur­ing, push­ing part­nered and in-house pro­grams, with a pos­si­ble IPO on the ta­ble as one re­al pos­si­bil­i­ty.

Get­ting a pow­er­house U.S. part­ner like Genen­tech in their cor­ner moves BioN­Tech clos­er to the day it can ef­fec­tive­ly start sell­ing the ther­a­pies they’re now test­ing in the clin­ic.

“We’ve got a lot of el­e­ments in the com­pa­ny that we need,” says Marett. “The thing we were miss­ing, this abil­i­ty to be able to not on­ly man­u­fac­ture but al­so com­mer­cial­ize. That’s some­thing that this deal will al­low us to do.”

The pact marks the lat­est in a string of Big Phar­ma tie-ups with the Ger­man biotech. Sanofi signed on in a $1.5 bil­lion deal last spring. Both Mod­er­na and Cure­Vac are al­so el­bow­ing in­to the mR­NA field, with big mon­ey deals of their own. And Sanofi fol­lowed up af­ter a sep­a­rate deal BioN­Tech struck with Eli Lil­ly, which has its own plans for the on­col­o­gy field.

Com­bos are the fu­ture of can­cer drugs, and BioN­Tech is acute­ly aware of the po­ten­tial the al­liance of­fers with com­bin­ing its per­son­al­ized vac­cines with Roche’s re­cent­ly ap­proved PD-L1 check­point Tecen­triq, or ate­zolizum­ab. So is Roche/Genen­tech.

“Un­like any med­i­cine we have ever de­vel­oped, vir­tu­al­ly all can­cer pa­tients may po­ten­tial­ly ben­e­fit from a cus­tom-built can­cer vac­cine,” said James Sabry, M.D., Ph.D., Se­nior Vice Pres­i­dent and Glob­al Head of Genen­tech Part­ner­ing, in pre­pared text. “By col­lab­o­rat­ing with BioN­Tech on this cut­ting edge ap­proach, we hope to tru­ly ad­vance can­cer treat­ments by us­ing a com­mon mol­e­c­u­lar back­bone – mR­NA – that is unique­ly tai­lored to an in­di­vid­ual pa­tient.”

Paul Hudson, Getty Images

Sanofi CEO Hud­son lays out new R&D fo­cus — chop­ping di­a­betes, car­dio and slash­ing $2B-plus costs in sur­gi­cal dis­sec­tion

Earlier on Monday, new Sanofi CEO Paul Hudson baited the hook on his upcoming strategy presentation Tuesday with a tell-tale deal to buy Synthorx for $2.5 billion. That fits squarely with hints that he’s pointing the company to a bigger future in oncology, which also squares with a major industry tilt.

In a big reveal later in the day, though, Hudson offered a slate of stunners on his plans to surgically dissect and reassemble the portfoloio, saying that the company is dropping cardio and diabetes research — which covers two of its biggest franchise arenas. Sanofi missed the boat on developing new diabetes drugs, and now it’s pulling out entirely. As part of the pullback, it’s dropping efpeglenatide, their once-weekly GLP-1 injection for diabetes.

“To be out of cardiovascular and diabetes is not easy for a company like ours with an incredibly proud history,” Hudson said on a call with reporters, according to the Wall Street Journal. “As tough a choice as that is, we’re making that choice.”

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Amarin CEO John Thero discussing the company's plans for Vascepa, August 2019 — via Bloomberg

Amarin wins a block­buster ap­proval from the FDA. Now every­one can shift fo­cus to the patent

For all those people who could never quite believe that Amarin $AMRN would get an expanded label with blockbuster implications, the stress and anxiety on display right up to the last minute on Twitter can now end. But new, pressing questions will immediately surface now that the OK has come through.

On Friday afternoon, the FDA stamped its landmark approval on the industrial strength fish oil for reducing cardio risks for a large and well defined population of patients. The approval doesn’t give Amarin everything it wants in expanding its use, losing out on the primary prevention group, but it goes a long way to doing what the company needed to make a major splash. The approval was cited for patients with “elevated triglyceride levels (a type of fat in the blood) of 150 milligrams per deciliter or higher. Patients must also have either established cardiovascular disease or diabetes and two or more additional risk factors for cardiovascular disease.”

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Sarep­ta was stunned by the re­jec­tion of Vyondys 53. Now it's stun­ning every­one with a sur­prise ac­cel­er­at­ed ap­proval

Sarepta has a friend in the FDA after all. Four months after the agency determined that it would be wrong to give Sarepta an accelerated approval for their Duchenne MD drug golodirsen, regulators have executed a stunning about face and offered the biotech a quick green light in any case.

It was the agency that first put out the news late Thursday, announcing that Duchenne MD patients with a mutation amenable to exon 53 skipping will now have their first targeted treatment: Vyondys 53, or golodirsen. Having secured the OK via a dispute resolution mechanism, the biotech said the new drug has been priced on par with their only other marketed drug, Exondys 51 — which for an average patient costs about $300,000 per year, but since pricing is based on weight, that sticker price can even cross $1 million.

Sarepta shares $SRPT surged 23% after-market to $124.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Paul Biondi (File photo)

Paul Biondi's track record at Bris­tol-My­ers cov­ered bil­lions in deals of every shape and size. Here's the com­plete break­down

Paul Biondi was never afraid to bet big during his stint as business development chief at Bristol-Myers Squibb. And while the gambles didn’t all pay out, by any means, his roster of pacts illustrates the broad ambitions the pharma giant has had over the last 5 years — capped by the $74 billion Celgene buyout.

On Thursday, we learned that Biondi had exited the company. And Chris Dokomajilar at DealForma came up with the complete breakdown on every buyout, licensing pact and product purchase Bristol-Myers forged during his tenure in charge of the BD team at one of the busiest companies in biopharma.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Paul Biondi (File photo)

Bris­tol-My­er­s' strat­e­gy, BD chief Paul Bion­di ex­it­ed the com­pa­ny — just ahead of the $74B Cel­gene deal close

Paul Biondi, who orchestrated billions of dollars in deals for Bristol-Myers Squibb over the 5 years he’s run their business development team, has exited the company. Biondi left last month, according to a company spokesperson, in pursuit of another — unspecified — external opportunity.

After 17 years with Bristol-Myers Squibb, Paul Biondi, Head of Strategy and Business Development, decided to leave the company to pursue an external opportunity. The company wishes him well in his new endeavors. Bristol-Myers Squibb  is actively searching for Paul’s successor, and will make an announcement, as appropriate.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Arie Belldegrun at UKBIO 2019. Shai Dolev for Endpoints News

Kite Phar­ma's ex-CEO con­tra­dicts founder as CAR-T patent tri­al heats up, with con­flict­ing val­u­a­tions

Two days after Kite Pharma founder Arie Belldegrun told a federal courtroom that a meeting he had with a Memorial Sloan Kettering executive wasn’t about licensing their immunotherapy patent, Kite’s ex-CEO Aya Jakobovits said it was.

The admission came Tuesday during cross-examination in a patent infringement case that features two of the biggest cancer biotechs and some of the most well-known names in American medicine.

Jakobovits initially said she was not in attendance, didn’t know it was going to happen and didn’t know what took place, according to Law360. But then the plaintiff’s lawyer handed her a document – whose contents were not publicly revealed – and asked again if she learned after-the-fact that the meeting involved a potential patent license.

“Yes,” Jakobovits eventually said.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

On the heels of promis­ing MCL da­ta, Kite hus­tles its 2nd CAR-T to the FDA as the next big race in the field draws to the fin­ish line

Three days after Gilead’s Kite subsidiary showed off stellar data on their number 2 CAR-T KTE-X19 at ASH, the executive team has pivoted straight to the FDA with a BLA filing and a shot at a near-term approval.

In a small, 74-patient Phase II trial reported out at the beginning of the week, investigators tracked a 93% response rate with two out of three mantle cell lymphoma patients experiencing a complete response.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

What does $6.9B buy these days in on­col­o­gy R&D? As­traZeneca has a land­mark an­swer

Given the way the FDA has been whisking through new drug approvals months ahead of their PDUFA date, AstraZeneca and their partners Daiichi Sankyo may not have to wait until Q2 of next year to get a green light on trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201).

The pharma giant this morning played their ace in the hole, showing off why they were willing to commit to a $6.9 billion deal — with $1.35 billion in a cash upfront — to partner on the drug.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Arie Belldegrun (Photo: Jeff Rumans for Endpoints News)

Ju­ry finds Gilead li­able for $585M and big roy­al­ties in Kite CAR-T patent case

A Kite deal that’s already become a burden on Gilead’s back just got heavier as a California jury has ruled Gilead must pay Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sloan Kettering $585 million plus a 27.6% royalty for patent infringement committed by its subsidiary. The ruling is almost certain to be appealed.

Kite Pharma — founded by Arie Belldegrun, now focused on a next-gen CAR-T company — has been facing a lawsuit since the day its first CAR–T therapy won approval in October, 2017. Juno Therapeutics and Sloan Kettering filed a complaint saying Kite had copied its technology. Gilead acquired Kite in June of that year for $11.9 billion.  Juno was acquired the following year by Celgene for $9 billion, before Celgene was acquired by Bristol-Myers Squibb in 2019.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.