Gilead los­es key patent claims for So­val­di in Chi­na, open­ing door to ear­li­er gener­ic en­try

A par­tial patent in­val­i­da­tion by Chi­nese au­thor­i­ties has shak­en the case Gilead has been build­ing for its hep C star So­val­di by re­mov­ing a key bar­ri­er to gener­ic en­try.

The de­ci­sion means knock­offs of the high­ly ef­fec­tive hep C treat­ment can ar­rive as ear­ly as next year — rather than 2024, when the patent was orig­i­nal­ly set to ex­pire — ac­cord­ing to the Ini­tia­tive for Med­i­cines, Ac­cess, and Knowl­edge, or I-MAK. I-MAK filed one of the two re­quests for patent in­val­i­da­tion cit­ed in the rul­ing, to­geth­er with Chi­nese drug­mak­er Fu­jian Co­sunter Phar­ma.

Tahir Amin

Be­cause the patent con­cerns so­fos­bu­vir, a cru­cial base com­pound that’s al­so used to make com­bo drugs like Har­voni and Ep­clusa, this de­ci­sion could af­fect not just one prod­uct but Gilead’s whole hep C fran­chise in the coun­try.

In re­sponse to my ques­tion as to whether Gilead will ap­peal the rul­ing (they have three months to do so), a spokesper­son says the Fos­ter City, CA-based com­pa­ny has not with­drawn their claims to the so­fos­bu­vir com­pound patent ap­pli­ca­tion in Chi­na. Here’s the rest of the re­sponse:

This patent ap­pli­ca­tion is cur­rent­ly be­ing re­viewed by the Patent Re­view Board (PRB). Last week Chi­na’s PRB con­firmed the va­lid­i­ty of claims cov­er­ing the SOF metabo­lites. This de­ci­sion has no im­pact on our SOF com­pound patent ap­pli­ca­tion. Gilead is con­fi­dent in the in­tel­lec­tu­al prop­er­ty cov­er­ing the so­fos­bu­vir com­pound and all its he­pati­tis C med­i­cines, which bring the po­ten­tial of a cure to the vast ma­jor­i­ty of pa­tients suf­fer­ing from chron­ic he­pati­tis C virus (HCV) in­fec­tion. In the mean­time, we will con­tin­ue to work with the Chi­nese gov­ern­ment to fa­cil­i­tate broad ac­cess to Gilead’s he­pati­tis C med­i­cines.

While So­val­di was launched in Chi­na at one-fifth the con­tem­po­rary price in the US — al­most $9,000 for a 12-week regime — its price still fre­quent­ly comes un­der at­tack, as it has in many oth­er coun­tries around the world. In fact, Gilead has drawn crit­i­cism ever since it be­gan sell­ing the drug at $84,000 in the US. And where­as Gilead de­signed li­cens­ing deals with gener­ic com­pa­nies in coun­tries like Ukraine, Be­larus, Thai­land and Malaysia in re­sponse to com­plaints, no such agree­ment was struck in Chi­na.

Back in 2015, two years be­fore So­val­di would be ap­proved in Chi­na, the au­thor­i­ties had re­ject­ed Gilead’s ap­pli­ca­tion for an in­ac­tive pro­drug that is me­tab­o­lized once in the body.

I-MAK, which al­so played a role in that de­ci­sion, has been bring­ing le­gal chal­lenges against Gilead in a num­ber of oth­er coun­tries, in­clud­ing the US. Its co-founder Tahir Amin told STAT that even though Gilead still holds four re­main­ing patent claims on So­val­di and da­ta ex­clu­siv­i­ty in Chi­na, they shouldn’t hin­der gener­ic mak­ers as much as this patent had.

Co­sunter, which mar­ket­ed Chi­na’s first hep B gener­ic, is said to be de­vel­op­ing a copy­cat ver­sion of So­val­di.

The Price of Re­lief: Ex­plor­ing So­lu­tions to the Ris­ing Costs of On­col­o­gy Drugs

In 2020, The National Cancer Institute estimated about 1.8 million new cases of cancer diagnosed in the United States, while the costs associated with treatment therapies continued to escalate. Given the current legislative climate on drug pricing, it’s never been more important to look at the evolution of drug pricing globally and control concerns of sustainable and affordable treatments in oncology.

Lat­est news on Pfiz­er's $3B+ JAK1 win; Pacts over M&A at #JPM22; 2021 by the num­bers; Bio­gen's Aduhelm reck­on­ing; The sto­ry of sotro­vimab; and more

Welcome back to Endpoints Weekly, your review of the week’s top biopharma headlines. Want this in your inbox every Saturday morning? Current Endpoints readers can visit their reader profile to add Endpoints Weekly. New to Endpoints? Sign up here.

For those of you who attended #JPM22 in any shape or form, we hope you had a fruitful time. Regardless of how you spent the past hectic week, may your weekend be just what you need it to be.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 128,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

A $3B+ peak sales win? Pfiz­er thinks so, as FDA of­fers a tardy green light to its JAK1 drug abroc­i­tinib

Back in the fall of 2020, newly crowned Pfizer chief Albert Bourla confidently put their JAK1 inhibitor abrocitinib at the top of the list of blockbuster drugs in the late-stage pipeline with a $3 billion-plus peak sales estimate.

Since then it’s been subjected to serious criticism for the safety warnings associated with the class, held back by a cautious FDA and questioned when researchers rolled out a top-line boast that their heavyweight contender had beaten the champ in the field of atopic dermatitis — Dupixent — in a head-to-head study.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 128,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Robert Califf, FDA commissioner nominee (Graeme Sloan/Sipa USA/Sipa via AP Images)

Rob Califf ad­vances as Biden's FDA nom­i­nee, with a close com­mit­tee vote

Rob Califf’s second confirmation process as FDA commissioner is already much more difficult than his near unanimous confirmation under the Obama administration.

The Senate Health Committee on Thursday voted 13-8 in favor of advancing Califf’s nomination to a full Senate vote. Several Democrats voted against Califf, including Sen. Bernie Sanders and Sen. Maggie Hassan. Several other Democrats who aren’t on the committee, like West Virginia’s Joe Manchin and Ed Markey of Massachusetts, also said Thursday that they would not vote for Califf. Markey, Hassan and Manchin all previously expressed reservations about the prospect of Janet Woodcock as an FDA commissioner nominee too.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 128,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Michel Vounatsos, Biogen CEO (World Economic Forum/Ciaran McCrickard)

Bio­gen vows to fight CM­S' draft cov­er­age de­ci­sion for Aduhelm be­fore April fi­nal­iza­tion

Biogen executives made clear in an investor call Thursday they are not preparing to run a new CMS-approved clinical trial for their controversial Alzheimer’s drug anytime soon.

As requested in a draft national coverage decision from CMS earlier this week, Biogen and other anti-amyloid drugs will need to show “a meaningful improvement in health outcomes” for Alzheimer’s patients in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to get paid for their drugs, rather than just the reduction in amyloid plaques that won Aduhelm its accelerated approval in June.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 128,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

CRO own­er pleads guilty to ob­struct­ing FDA in­ves­ti­ga­tion in­to fal­si­fied clin­i­cal tri­al da­ta

The co-owner of a Florida-based clinical research site pleaded guilty to lying to an FDA investigator during a 2017 inspection, revealing that she falsely portrayed part of a GlaxoSmithKline pediatric asthma study as legitimate, when in fact she knew that certain data had been falsified, the Department of Justice said Wednesday.

Three other employees — Yvelice Villaman Bencosme, Lisett Raventos and Maytee Lledo — previously pleaded guilty and were sentenced in connection with falsifying data associated with the trial at the CRO Unlimited Medical Research.

Susan Galbraith, AstraZeneca EVP, Oncology R&D

Can­cer pow­er­house As­traZeneca rolls the dice on a $75M cash bet on a buzzy up­start in the on­col­o­gy field

After establishing itself in the front ranks of cancer drug developers and marketers, AstraZeneca is putting its scientific shoulder — and a significant amount of cash — behind the wheel of a brash new upstart in the biotech world.

The pharma giant trumpeted news this morning that it is handing over $75 million upfront to ally itself with Scorpion Therapeutics, one of those biotechs that was newly birthed by some top scientific, venture and executive talent and bequeathed with a fortune by way of a bankroll to advance an only hazily explained drug platform. And they are still very much in the discovery and preclinical phase.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 128,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

‘Skin­ny la­bels’ on gener­ics can save pa­tients mon­ey, re­search shows, but re­cent court de­ci­sions cloud fu­ture

New research shows how generic drug companies can successfully market a limited number of approved indications for a brand name drug, prior to coming to market for all of the indications. But several recent court decisions have created a layer of uncertainty around these so-called “skinny” labels.

While courts have generally allowed generic manufacturers to use their statutorily permitted skinny-label approvals, last summer, a federal circuit court found that Teva Pharmaceuticals was liable for inducing prescribers and patients to infringe GlaxoSmithKline’s patents through advertising and marketing practices that suggested Teva’s generic, with its skinny label, could be employed for the patented uses.

A patient in Alaska receiving an antibody infusion to prevent Covid hospitalizations in September. All but one of these treatments has been rendered useless by Omicron (Rick Bowmer/AP Images)

How a tiny Swiss lab and two old blood sam­ples cre­at­ed one of the on­ly ef­fec­tive drugs against Omi­cron (and why we have so lit­tle of it)

Exactly a decade before a novel coronavirus broke out in Wuhan, Davide Corti — a newly-minted immunologist with frameless glasses and a quick laugh — walked into a cramped lab on the top floor of an office building two hours outside Zurich. He had only enough money for two technicians and the ceiling was so low in parts that short stature was a job requirement, but Corti believed it’d be enough to test an idea he thought could change medicine.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.