Google’s Ver­i­ly and Glax­o­SmithK­line hatch a $713M plan to spark a biorev­o­lu­tion

Glob­al phar­ma gi­ant Glax­o­SmithK­line is team­ing up with Google’s life sci­ences ven­ture Ver­i­ly, chan­nel­ing its four-year ef­fort to cre­ate new nan­otech-based bio­elec­tron­ic ther­a­peu­tics in­to a start­up called Gal­vani Bio­elec­tron­ics, with joint plans to in­vest $713 mil­lion in­to the ven­ture over the next sev­en years.

GSK’s Chair­man of Vac­cines, Mon­cef Slaoui

GSK’s Mon­cef Slaoui has billed this ef­fort as a rev­o­lu­tion­ary at­tempt to break out of the tra­di­tion­al mode of ther­a­peu­tic de­vel­op­ment, re­think­ing the sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy of drug R&D to cre­ate a com­plete­ly new de­vel­op­ment field in elec­tro­ceu­ti­cals, which will now be fo­cused on in­flam­ma­to­ry, meta­bol­ic and en­docrine dis­or­ders, in­clud­ing type 2 di­a­betes. And now Ver­i­ly Life Sci­ences, for­mer­ly Google Life Sci­ences which op­er­ates un­der the new Al­pha­bet ban­ner, is mak­ing a big biotech bet that it can live up to its mis­sion to trans­form med­i­cine by part­ner­ing with GSK.

Gal­vani will be based in the UK biotech hub in Steve­nage, with an­oth­er re­search cen­ter at Ver­i­ly’s cam­pus in South San Fran­cis­co. They’ll get start­ed with a staff of 30 and GSK’s start­up en­deav­ors to date. Glaxo will own 55% of the com­pa­ny, with Ver­i­ly tak­ing the rest. Slaoui has been tapped to chair the new com­pa­ny and shep­herd one of his fa­vorite projects.

They’re not think­ing small. And they aren’t stop­ping at 30. A spokesper­son for Ver­i­ly of­fered End­points this in­sight on the new jobs that are ex­pect­ed to be cre­at­ed.

“In ad­di­tion to the 30 ini­tial FTEs, Gal­vani will fund and in­te­grate – both through strate­gic col­lab­o­ra­tions with the two par­ent com­pa­nies and with oth­ers – a broad range of oth­er col­lab­o­ra­tions in acad­e­mia and with R&D com­pa­nies, build­ing on the suc­cess­ful mod­el we’ve de­vel­oped in GSK Bio­elec­tron­ics over three years. It will in­volve ap­prox­i­mate­ly 100 FTEs (full time equiv­a­lents) at Ver­i­ly and about 100 FTEs across the spec­trum of oth­er part­ner­ships. By ef­fec­tive­ly ty­ing such a net­work of ex­perts to­geth­er, we be­lieve we can rapid­ly ac­cel­er­ate the de­vel­op­ment of bio­elec­tron­ic med­i­cines.”

“This is an am­bi­tious col­lab­o­ra­tion al­low­ing GSK and Ver­i­ly to com­bine forces and have a huge im­pact on an emerg­ing field,” said Ver­i­ly Chief Tech­nol­o­gy Of­fi­cer Bri­an Otis. “Bio­elec­tron­ic med­i­cine is a new area of ther­a­peu­tic ex­plo­ration, and we know that suc­cess will re­quire the con­flu­ence of deep dis­ease bi­ol­o­gy ex­per­tise and new high­ly minia­turised tech­nolo­gies.

Ver­i­ly’s big agen­da is to har­ness new life sci­ence tech­nol­o­gy in search of a mul­ti­tude of new ways to im­prove hu­man health and rev up a longer life with­out the many af­flic­tions that drag peo­ple down the longer they live.

In Glax­o­SmithK­line’s case, they start­ed out with spe­cif­ic dis­eases in mind, look­ing to di­rect nerve stim­u­la­tors that could, for ex­am­ple, in­flu­ence rheuma­toid arthri­tis. The com­pa­ny set up a spe­cial $50 mil­lion fund to help jump­start a small group of biotechs spe­cial­iz­ing in elec­tro­ceu­ti­cals. A $1 mil­lion sci­ence prize was set up to help gin up some ex­cite­ment. And col­lab­o­ra­tions fol­lowed with oth­er com­pa­nies in the field. More part­ner­ing is ex­pect­ed as the new com­pa­ny gets up and run­ning.

GSK said ear­li­er this year that it plans to be in the clin­ic with its first pro­grams in 2017.

A cou­ple of years ago, GSK’s Slaoui, who now runs the vac­cines group for GSK, had this to say in an in­ter­view with The Chi­na Post:

(W)e re­al­ized that when we use chem­i­cal struc­ture or re­com­bi­nant pro­tein as a med­i­cine, what we use in fact are the struc­tures of these med­i­cines to in­ter­act with the struc­ture of a re­cep­tor or pro­tein in our body … Our body us­es struc­ture to com­mu­ni­cate with bi­ol­o­gy, but it al­so us­es elec­tri­cal im­puls­es which go through our nerves. So we asked the ques­tion: ‘Can we use elec­tri­cal im­puls­es to mod­i­fy the way or­gans func­tion?’”

“We have ev­i­dence that our body can read elec­tri­cal mes­sages we give it. This has cre­at­ed a new vi­sion to de­sign nano-tech­no­log­i­cal de­vices that will be able to read the elec­tri­cal sig­nals that are trans­mit­ting in our nerves, and hope­ful­ly (we will) be able to iden­ti­fy ab­nor­mal sig­nals … and cor­rect it by giv­ing it a dif­fer­ent sig­nal.”

To test that con­cept, in­ves­ti­ga­tors found that the right elec­tron­ic puls­es could spur the pan­creas to pro­duce in­sulin, to treat di­a­betes. And an­oth­er pre­clin­i­cal test worked on blood pres­sure.

Cre­at­ing a new modal­i­ty for ther­a­peu­tic de­vel­op­ment, though, presents huge and ex­pen­sive hur­dles, es­pe­cial­ly when you’re talk­ing about mass ail­ments like di­a­betes and heart dis­ease. Reg­u­la­tors put up high bars on safe­ty that most biotechs could nev­er hope to clear with a small, lim­it­ed re­search bud­get.

Ver­i­ly and Google, though, are a whole dif­fer­ent mat­ter.

Google has the kind of deep pock­ets that most com­pa­ny ex­ecs can on­ly dream about. That’s al­so help­ing fund Cal­i­co, which has stealth­ily moved ahead on a num­ber of pro­grams aimed at healthy longevi­ty.

STAT has been tak­ing some round­house swings at Ver­i­ly, claim­ing that its top de­vel­op­ment pro­grams are more sci­ence fic­tion than po­ten­tial near-term tools for the life sci­ences mar­ket.

GSK doesn’t ap­pear to be both­ered by that, though.

2023 Spot­light on the Fu­ture of Drug De­vel­op­ment for Small and Mid-Sized Biotechs

In the context of today’s global economic environment, there is an increasing need to work smarter, faster and leaner across all facets of the life sciences industry.  This is particularly true for small and mid-sized biotech companies, many of which are facing declining valuations and competing for increasingly limited funding to propel their science forward.  It is important to recognize that within this framework, many of these smaller companies already find themselves resource-challenged to design and manage clinical studies themselves because they don’t have large teams or in-house experts in navigating the various aspects of the drug development journey. This can be particularly challenging for the most complex and difficult to treat diseases where no previous pathway exists and patients are urgently awaiting breakthroughs.

Albert Bourla, Pfizer CEO (Efren Landaos/Sipa USA/Sipa via AP Images)

Pfiz­er makes an­oth­er bil­lion-dol­lar in­vest­ment in Eu­rope and ex­pands again in Michi­gan

Pfizer is continuing its run of manufacturing site expansions with two new large investments in the US and Europe.

The New York-based pharma giant’s site in Kalamazoo, MI, has seen a lot of attention over the past year. As a major piece of the manufacturing network for Covid-19 vaccines and antivirals, Pfizer is gearing up to place more money into the site. Pfizer announced it will place $750 million into the facility, mainly to establish “modular aseptic processing” (MAP) production and create around 300 jobs at the site.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 154,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Yuling Li, Innoforce CEO

In­no­force opens new man­u­fac­tur­ing site in Chi­na

Innoforce is off to the races at its new site in the city of Hangzhou, China.

The Chinese CDMO announced last week that it has started manufacturing at the new facility, which was built to offer process development and manufacturing operations for RNA, plasmid DNA, viral vectors and other cell therapeutics. It will also serve as Innoforce’s corporate HQ.

The company said it’s investing more than $200 million in the 550,000-square-foot manufacturing base for advanced therapies. The GMP manufacturing facility features space for producing plasmids with three 30-liter bioreactors. For viral vector manufacturing, Innoforce also has 200- and 500-liter bioreactors at its disposal, along with eight suites to make cell therapies. The site also includes several labs and warehouse spaces.

Vas Narasimhan, Novartis CEO (Thibault Camus/AP Images, Pool)

No­var­tis bol­sters Plu­vic­to's case in prostate can­cer with PhI­II re­sults

The prognosis is poor for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Novartis wants to change that by making its recently approved Pluvicto available to patients earlier in their course of treatment.

The Swiss pharma giant unveiled Phase III results Monday suggesting that Pluvicto was able to halt disease progression in certain prostate cancer patients when administered after androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) therapy, but without prior taxane-based chemotherapy. The drug is currently approved for patients after they’ve received both ARPI and chemo.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 154,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Up­dat­ed: FDA re­mains silent on or­phan drug ex­clu­siv­i­ty af­ter last year's court loss

Since losing a controversial court case over orphan drug exclusivity last year, the FDA’s Office of Orphan Products Development has remained entirely silent on orphan exclusivity for any product approved since last November, leaving many sponsors in limbo on what to expect.

That silence means that for more than 70 orphan-designated indications for more than 60 products, OOPD has issued no public determination on the seven-year orphan exclusivity in the Orange Book, and no new listings of orphan exclusivity appear in OOPD’s searchable database, as highlighted recently by George O’Brien, a partner in Mayer Brown’s Washington, DC office.

FDA grants or­phan drug des­ig­na­tion to Al­ger­non's ifen­prodil, while ex­clu­siv­i­ty re­mains un­clear

As the FDA remains silent on orphan drug exclusivity in the wake of a controversial court case, the agency continues to hand out new designations. The latest: Algernon Pharmaceuticals’ experimental lung disease drug ifenprodil.

The Vancouver-based company announced on Monday that ifenprodil received orphan designation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a chronic lung condition that results in scarring of the lungs.  Most IPF patients suffer with a dry cough, and breathing can become difficult.

Nkarta CEO Paul Hastings at Endpoints' #BIO22 panel (J.T. MacMillan Photography for Endpoints News)

Nkar­ta un­der­scores safe­ty of CAR-NK, boasts ear­ly re­spons­es

The first generation of personalized CAR-T therapies made big waves in the treatment of lymphoma for their stunning efficacy. Nkarta is hoping its off-the-shelf natural killer cell approach will stand out on safety — while keeping some of those impressive numbers on responses.

In a new update from its Phase I dose escalation study, the South San Francisco-based biotech reported that seven out of 10 patients treated with the highest doses of its NK cell therapy, NKX019, achieved a complete response, translating to a complete response rate of 70%.

Pfiz­er-backed Me­di­ar Ther­a­peu­tics ropes in an­oth­er Big Phar­ma in­vestor

A biotech centered on treating fibrosis — born out of Mass General and Brigham and Women’s Hospital — has received a financial boost.

According to an SEC filing, the company has raised $31,761,186 in its latest funding round, which includes 17 investors. The filing lists six names attached to the company, including Meredith Fisher, a partner at Mass General Brigham Ventures and Mediar’s acting CEO.

Sekar Kathiresan, Verve Therapeutics CEO

Verve re­veals let­ter from FDA that lays out con­di­tions to lift base edit­ing tri­al hold

We now know why Verve’s lead candidate was placed on hold last month by US regulators.

In an SEC filing, Verve laid out the FDA’s conditions for lifting the hold on its lead therapy, VERVE-101. That includes submitting preclinical data about potency differences in human versus non-human cells, risks of gene editing germline cells, and off-target analyses in non-hepatocyte cell types.

The FDA also wants clinical data from the ongoing Heart-1 trial, and to modify the trial protocol in the US to add additional contraceptive measures and increase the length of a staggering interval between the dosing of participants.