Got­tlieb, Marks de­tail plans to ad­vance de­vel­op­ment of cell and gene ther­a­pies

FDA Com­mis­sion­er Scott Got­tlieb and Cen­ter for Bi­o­log­ics Eval­u­a­tion and Re­search (CBER) Di­rec­tor Pe­ter Marks on Tues­day de­tailed plans for the agency to keep pace with an ex­pect­ed in­flux of ap­pli­ca­tions for cell and gene ther­a­pies over the com­ing years.

“The FDA is wit­ness­ing a surge of cell and gene ther­a­py prod­ucts en­ter­ing ear­ly de­vel­op­ment, ev­i­denced by a large up­swing in the num­ber of in­ves­ti­ga­tion­al new drug (IND) ap­pli­ca­tions,” Got­tlieb and Marks say.

Scott Got­tlieb

By 2020, Got­tlieb and Marks say they ex­pect to be re­ceiv­ing up­wards of 200 INDs for cell and gene ther­a­pies each year, adding to the 800 ac­tive INDs for such prod­ucts al­ready filed with the agency. By 2025, they pre­dict the agency will be ap­prov­ing be­tween 10 and 20 cell and gene ther­a­py prod­ucts an­nu­al­ly.

The two FDA lead­ers draw a com­par­i­son be­tween the cur­rent land­scape for cell and gene ther­a­pies to the pro­lif­er­a­tion of an­ti­body drugs in the late 1990s once plat­forms for cre­at­ing an­ti­bod­ies that wouldn’t be re­ject­ed by a pa­tient’s im­mune sys­tem were wide­ly avail­able.

“In this case, it was the ad­vent of safe and ef­fec­tive vec­tors for the de­liv­ery of gene ther­a­py prod­ucts, such as the adop­tion of ade­no-as­so­ci­at­ed virus (AAV) vec­tors,” Got­tlieb and Marks say.

Pe­ter Marks

To pro­mote the con­tin­ued de­vel­op­ment of new cell and gene ther­a­pies, Got­tlieb and Marks say that the FDA will take a num­ber of steps, in­clud­ing adding as many as 50 ad­di­tion­al re­view­ers to its staff, lever­ag­ing ex­pe­dit­ed path­ways, is­su­ing new guid­ance and tak­ing en­force­ment ac­tion against clin­ics that fail to com­ply with FDA reg­u­la­tions.

Ac­cord­ing to Got­tlieb and Marks, ac­cel­er­at­ed ap­proval is par­tic­u­lar­ly rel­e­vant for gene ther­a­pies as the agency can man­date post­mar­ket stud­ies to mea­sure the dura­bil­i­ty of the treat­ment and long-term safe­ty is­sues that would be dif­fi­cult to ad­dress in the pre­mar­ket set­ting.

As for new guid­ance, Got­tlieb and Marks say the agency will de­vel­op a se­ries of clin­i­cal guid­ance doc­u­ments for dif­fer­ent ar­eas of prod­uct de­vel­op­ment, such as gene ther­a­pies for in­her­it­ed blood dis­or­ders and neu­rode­gen­er­a­tive dis­eases.

In some cas­es, Got­tlieb and Marks say that a more tra­di­tion­al ap­proach to drug de­vel­op­ment may be war­rant­ed for cer­tain gene ther­a­pies, such as those in­tend­ed to ad­dress the symp­toms of a neu­rode­gen­er­a­tive dis­ease or tar­get an “ex­pres­sion of a pro­tein or en­zyme be­lieved to play a role in the ad­vance of the dis­ease.”

In an­oth­er planned guid­ance, Got­tlieb and Marks say the agency will tack­le the man­u­fac­tur­ing com­plex­i­ties of cell-based gene ther­a­pies, such as chimeric anti­gen re­cep­tor (CAR) T-cell ther­a­pies, in a fu­ture guid­ance.

“The guid­ance that we in­tend to is­sue will pro­mote a bet­ter un­der­stand­ing of the crit­i­cal qual­i­ty at­trib­ut­es and oth­er fac­tors re­lat­ed to prod­uct man­u­fac­tur­ing,” they write, adding that one of their goals will be to min­i­mize the need for bridg­ing stud­ies for mi­nor man­u­fac­tur­ing changes for cell ther­a­pies.

The two al­so say that the FDA will is­sue a guid­ance lat­er this year out­lin­ing how re­searchers can “pool their clin­i­cal da­ta af­ter fol­low­ing a com­mon man­u­fac­tur­ing pro­to­col, and there­by de­vel­op a more ro­bust da­ta set for pur­pos­es of gain­ing a [Bi­o­log­ics Li­cense Ap­pli­ca­tion] BLA.”


First pub­lished here. Reg­u­la­to­ry Fo­cus is the flag­ship on­line pub­li­ca­tion of the Reg­u­la­to­ry Af­fairs Pro­fes­sion­als So­ci­ety (RAPS), the largest glob­al or­ga­ni­za­tion of and for those in­volved with the reg­u­la­tion of health­care and re­lat­ed prod­ucts, in­clud­ing med­ical de­vices, phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals, bi­o­log­ics and nu­tri­tion­al prod­ucts. Email news@raps.org for more in­for­ma­tion.

Brian Kaspar. AveXis via Twitter

AveX­is sci­en­tif­ic founder fires back at No­var­tis CEO Vas Narasimhan, 'cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly de­nies any wrong­do­ing'

Brian Kaspar’s head was among the first to roll at Novartis after company execs became aware of the fact that manipulated data had been included in its application for Zolgensma, now the world’s most expensive therapy.

But in his first public response, the scientific founder at AveXis — acquired by Novartis for $8.7 billion — is firing back. And he says that not only was he not involved in any wrongdoing, he’s ready to defend his name as needed.

I reached out to Brian Kaspar after Novartis put out word that he and his brother Allen had been axed in mid-May, two months after the company became aware of the allegations related to manipulated data. His response came back through his attorneys.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

As­traZeneca’s Imfinzi/treme com­bo strikes out — again — in lung can­cer. Is it time for last rites?

AstraZeneca bet big on the future of their PD-L1 Imfinzi combined with the experimental CTLA-4 drug tremelimumab. But once again it’s gone down to defeat in a major Phase III study — while adding damage to the theory involving targeting cancer with a high tumor mutational burden.

Early Wednesday the pharma giant announced that their NEPTUNE study had failed, with the combination unable to beat standard chemo at overall survival in high TMB cases of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. We won’t get hard data until later in the year, but the drumbeat of failures will call into question what — if any — future this combination can have left.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

We­bi­nar: Re­al World End­points — the brave new world com­ing in build­ing fran­chise ther­a­pies

Several biopharma companies have been working on expanding drug labels through the use of real world endpoints, combing through the data to find evidence of a drug’s efficacy for particular indications. But we’ve just begun. Real World Evidence is becoming an important part of every clinical development plan, in the soup-through-nuts approach used in building franchises.

I’ve recruited a panel of 3 top experts in the field — the first in a series of premium webinars — to look at the practical realities governing what can be done today, and where this is headed over the next few years, at the prodding of the FDA.


ZHEN SU — Merck Serono’s Senior Vice President and Global Head of Oncology


ELLIOTT LEVY — Amgen’s Senior Vice President of Global Development


CHRIS BOSHOFF — Pfizer Oncology’s Chief Development Officer

A premium subscription to Endpoints News is required to attend this webinar. Please upgrade to either an Insider or Enterprise plan for access. Already have Endpoints Premium? Please sign-in below. You can contact our Subscriptions team at help@endpointsnews.com with any issues.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

UP­DAT­ED: Pay­back? An­a­lysts say Sarep­ta was blind­sided by an FDA re­jec­tion dri­ven by reg­u­la­to­ry re­venge

In one of the least anticipated moves of the year, the FDA has rejected Sarepta’s application for an accelerated approval of its Duchenne MD drug golodirsen after fretting over safety issues.

In a statement that arrived after the bell on Monday, Sarepta explained the CRL, saying:

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Levi Garraway. Broad Institute via Youtube

Roche raids Eli Lil­ly for its next chief med­ical of­fi­cer as San­dra Horn­ing plans to step down

We found out Monday morning where Levi Garraway was headed after he left Eli Lilly as head of oncology R&D a few days ago. Roche named Garraway as their new chief medical officer, replacing Sandra Horning, who they say is retiring from the company.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Af­ter a posse of Wall Street an­a­lysts pre­dict a like­ly new win for Sarep­ta, we're down to the wire on a crit­i­cal FDA de­ci­sion

As Bloomberg notes, most of the Wall Street analysts that cover Sarepta $SRPT are an upbeat bunch, ready to cheer on the team when it comes to their Duchenne MD drugs, or offer explanations when an odd setback occurs — as happened recently with a safety signal that was ‘erroneously’ reported last week.

Ritu Baral Cowen
Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

FDA de­ci­sion on Ver­tex's CF triple will come just ahead of planned CEO shake­up

Vertex has clinched a priority review for the all-important cystic fibrosis triple that will blaze the trail for treating a large group of patients unhelped by its current drugs.

FDA regulators have set a PDUFA date of March 19, 2020, just a year after the Boston biotech posted positive Phase III results showing that people with two F508del mutations experienced statistically significant improvements in lung function after a 4-week regimen of VX-445, tezacaftor and ivacaftor. After reviewing 24-week data among patients with one F508del mutation and one minimal function mutation — and thoroughly comparing the VX-445 triple with another combo featuring VX-659 on scores like safety, drug-drug interactions, and photosensitivity — Vertex ultimately went with VX-445.

An MIT spin­out kills one of its ‘liv­ing ther­a­peu­tics’ af­ter flunk­ing an ear­ly-stage study — shares rout­ed

Just a few weeks after bagging $80 million in a deal to collaborate with Gingko Bioworks on its special blend of engineered bacteria used for “living therapeutics,” little Synlogic in Boston $SYBX is tossing one of its two clinical programs after watching an early-stage study go down in defeat.

Their Phase Ib/IIa study for SYNB1020 to counter the accumulation of ammonia in the body, a condition called hyperammonemia or urea cycle disorder, floundered at the interim readout, forcing the biotech to kill it and reserve its cash for pipeline therapies with greater potential.

Elan­co to buy Bay­er's an­i­mal health busi­ness for $7.6B, as deal­mak­ing gath­ers steam in the sec­tor

Last week, Elanco explicitly dodged answering questions about its rumored interest in Bayer’s animal health business in its post-earnings call. On Tuesday, the Eli Lilly spinoff disclosed it was purchasing the German drug maker’s veterinary unit in a cash-and-stock deal worth $7.6 billion. 

Elanco $ELAN has been busy on the deal-making front. In April, it laid out plans to swallow its partner, Kansas-based pet therapeutics company Aratana $PETX. A July report by Reuters suggested a potential Bayer deal was being explored, and Bloomberg last week said the deal was imminent, citing sources.