Richard Gonzalez, AP Images

House com­mit­tee un­cov­ers how Hu­mi­ra’s price spiked by 470% as Ab­b­Vie ex­ecs cashed bonus­es tied to the hikes

Pri­or to the House Com­mit­tee on Over­sight’s grilling of Ab­b­Vie CEO Richard Gon­za­lez on Tues­day, the com­mit­tee staff re­leased a 57-page re­port fol­low­ing a two year in­ves­ti­ga­tion in­to how and why the com­pa­ny spiked the price of Hu­mi­ra (adal­i­mum­ab) and made it the high­est-gross­ing drug of all time.

While the com­mit­tee in­ves­ti­ga­tion and pub­lic lash­ing aren’t like­ly to do ac­tu­al dam­age to Ab­b­Vie’s bot­tom line or bring new Hu­mi­ra biosim­i­lar com­pe­ti­tion be­fore 2023 in the US, the re­port digs in­to how Ab­b­Vie used more than two dozen price in­creas­es, shad­ow pric­ing with Am­gen’s block­buster En­brel, and patent thick­ets to block com­pe­ti­tion while amass­ing more than $170 bil­lion in net rev­enue from Hu­mi­ra since 2003.

Reps. Car­olyn Mal­oney (D-NY), chair of the Over­sight Com­mit­tee, Jar­rold Nadler (D-NY), chair of the House Ju­di­cia­ry Com­mit­tee, and sub­com­mit­tee chair David Ci­cilline (D-RI) al­so sent a let­ter to the Fed­er­al Trade Com­mis­sion on Tues­day, call­ing for a for­mal in­quiry in­to Ab­b­Vie’s ac­tions to de­lay the en­try of Hu­mi­ra biosim­i­lars in the US (more on the de­lays be­low).

Price In­creas­es

Near­ly a decade af­ter Ab­bott Lab­o­ra­to­ries first launched Hu­mi­ra in 2003, the list price rose from $522 per 40-mil­ligram sy­ringe to $1,024 by 2013, with 13 price hikes, pri­or to spin­ning off Ab­b­Vie as a sep­a­rate com­pa­ny. Un­der Ab­b­Vie, the price of Hu­mi­ra spiked an­oth­er 14 times, in­clud­ing by 30% with­in a 10-month win­dow.

“Hu­mi­ra is now priced at $2,984 per sy­ringe, or $77,586 an­nu­al­ly — a 470% in­crease from when the drug en­tered mar­ket,” the re­port says.

And those con­sis­tent price hikes were dri­ven by ex­ec­u­tive bonus­es from 2015 to 2018, which were di­rect­ly linked to Hu­mi­ra’s fi­nan­cial per­for­mance, the re­port says.

In that first year that the in­cen­tives were cre­at­ed, ex­ecs pushed Hu­mi­ra’s US net rev­enue to rise from $6.5 bil­lion in 2014 to $8.4 bil­lion in 2015, af­ter Ab­b­Vie ex­ec­u­tives im­ple­ment­ed a 9.9% price in­crease in April 2015 — the largest-ever price in­crease for the drug — and a 7.9% price in­crease in Au­gust 2015.

While Gon­za­lez will like­ly tell Con­gress Tues­day that the price in­creas­es were used to fund more re­search & de­vel­op­ment, the com­mit­tee shows that wasn’t the case.

“Ab­b­Vie’s to­tal re­search and de­vel­op­ment ex­pen­di­tures for Hu­mi­ra rep­re­sent­ed on­ly a small frac­tion of its net rev­enue from this drug. In re­sponse to the Com­mit­tee’s re­quest, Ab­b­Vie iden­ti­fied a to­tal of $5.19 bil­lion in ‘Hu­mi­ra Re­search & De­vel­op­ment’ be­tween 2009 and 2018 — ap­prox­i­mate­ly 7.4% of its Hu­mi­ra U.S. net rev­enue and 4.2% of its Hu­mi­ra world­wide net rev­enue over that pe­ri­od,” the re­port shows.

What the US would’ve saved

The re­port al­so tracks how much the US gov­ern­ment could’ve saved over­all by fac­tor­ing in some of the dis­counts that some fed­er­al de­part­ments re­ceive. Over­all, Ab­b­Vie’s Hu­mi­ra net rev­enue from Medicare — a fig­ure that sub­tracts dis­counts and re­bates— was $9.9 bil­lion from 2010 to 2018.

“If Medicare had re­ceived the same dis­counts as the De­part­ment of De­fense, it would have saved more than $7.4 bil­lion on Hu­mi­ra from 2010 to 2018. Sim­i­lar­ly, if Medicare had re­ceived the same dis­counts as the De­part­ment of Vet­er­ans Af­fairs, it would have saved $7 bil­lion on Hu­mi­ra from 2010 to 2018,” the re­port notes.

Re­pub­li­cans in Con­gress have fo­cused their at­ten­tion less on low­er­ing drug prices and more on low­er­ing out-of-pock­et costs, the re­port re­veals how out-of-pock­et costs for Hu­mi­ra have spiked too.

A 2019 Kaiser Fam­i­ly Foun­da­tion study found that the me­di­an an­nu­al out-of-pock­et cost for Medicare pa­tients on Hu­mi­ra was $5,471 in 2019, which is $606 more than in 2016.

A re­tired teacher and Medicare ben­e­fi­cia­ry with Crohn’s dis­ease told the com­mit­tee that de­spite hav­ing a sup­ple­men­tal health in­sur­ance plan, her out-of-pock­et costs for Hu­mi­ra were more than $2,600 for a month’s sup­ply, pre­vent­ing her from re­ceiv­ing treat­ment.

Rock­ford, Illi­nois May­or Tom Mc­Na­ma­ra al­so re­port­ed that be­tween Au­gust 2013 and Ju­ly 2020, his city spent more than $2.5 mil­lion on Hu­mi­ra alone, which means more than 5% of the city’s em­ploy­ee health plan ex­pen­di­tures were for Hu­mi­ra.

Don’t blame the play­er, blame the game?

In ad­di­tion to rais­ing the price, Ab­b­Vie al­so halt­ed any po­ten­tial com­pe­ti­tion un­til 2023 (de­spite the launch of Hu­mi­ra biosim­i­lars in Eu­rope in 2018), and that sup­pres­sion oc­curred even be­yond Ab­b­Vie’s own in­ter­nal pro­jec­tions.

In Feb­ru­ary 2014, ac­cord­ing to the com­mit­tee re­port, Ab­b­Vie ex­ec­u­tives cir­cu­lat­ed a pre­sen­ta­tion on “US Hu­mi­ra Biosim­i­lar Ero­sion” that pro­ject­ed that three to five biosim­i­lar com­peti­tors would en­ter the mar­ket by the first quar­ter of 2017.

What’s more, Ab­b­Vie’s patent on Hu­mi­ra’s ac­tive in­gre­di­ent ex­pired on De­cem­ber 31, 2016.

“At that time, com­peti­tors should have been free to en­ter the mar­ket. How­ev­er, the com­pa­ny ex­ploit­ed the patent sys­tem to ob­tain or ap­ply for over 200 ad­di­tion­al patents on Hu­mi­ra to block biosim­i­lar com­pe­ti­tion,” the re­port says.

Am­gen’s block­buster bi­o­log­ic En­brel, which won’t see biosim­i­lar com­pe­ti­tion in the US un­til 2029, is al­so one of Hu­mi­ra’s top com­peti­tors, and the com­mit­tee showed how the two com­pa­nies raised the prices of their drugs in lock-step with each oth­er.

“In­ter­nal Ab­b­Vie doc­u­ments ob­tained by the Com­mit­tee re­veal that the com­pa­ny viewed Am­gen’s price in­creas­es as pro­vid­ing cov­er for its own price in­creas­es. For ex­am­ple, one com­pa­ny ex­ec­u­tive re­port­ed to the cur­rent CEO and then-Ex­ec­u­tive Vice Pres­i­dent Richard Gon­za­lez that it was a ‘Great week-end’ af­ter learn­ing that Am­gen had in­creased the price of En­brel on Jan­u­ary 20, 2012, to $25,150 an­nu­al­ly. The email thread not­ed that ear­li­er that month, Ab­b­Vie had in­creased the price of Hu­mi­ra to $24,913 an­nu­al­ly. In Ju­ly, Ab­b­Vie would top Am­gen again by rais­ing the price of Hu­mi­ra to $26,632. Less than 3 weeks lat­er, Am­gen fol­lowed suit with an­oth­er price in­crease,” the re­port says.

Pi­o­neer­ing Click Chem­istry in Hu­mans

Reimagining cancer treatments

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, accounting for nearly 10 million deaths in 2020, which is nearly one in six deaths. Recently, we have seen incredible advances in novel cancer therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, cell therapies, and antibody-drug conjugates that have revamped cancer care and improved survival rates for patients.

Despite this significant progress in therapeutic targeting, why are we still seeing such a high mortality rate? The reason is that promising therapies are often limited by their therapeutic index, which is a measure of the effective dose of a drug, relative to its safety. If we could broaden the therapeutic indices of currently available medicines, it would revolutionize cancer treatments. We are still on the quest to find the ultimate cancer medicine – highly effective in several cancer types, safe, and precisely targeted to the tumor site.

Ivan Cheung, Eisai US chairman and CEO

Bio­gen, Ei­sai re­fresh amy­loid hy­poth­e­sis with PhI­II show­ing Alzheimer's med slows cog­ni­tive de­cline

In the first look at Phase III data for lecanemab, Eisai and Biogen’s follow-up Alzheimer’s drug to the embattled Aduhelm launch, results show the drug passed with flying colors on a test looking at memory, problem solving and other dementia metrics.

One of the most-watched Alzheimer’s therapies in the clinic, lecanemab met the study’s primary goal on the CDR-SB — Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes — giving the biotech the confidence to ask for full approval in the US, EU and Japan by next March 31. The experimental drug reduced clinical decline on the scale by 27% compared to placebo at 18 months, the companies said Tuesday night Eastern time and Wednesday morning in Japan.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 151,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Gilead names 'k­ing­pin­s' in coun­ter­feit HIV med law­suit

Gilead is mounting its counterfeit drug lawsuit, naming two “kingpins” and a complex network of conspirators who allegedly sold imitation bottles of its HIV meds, some of which ended up in US pharmacies.

The pharma giant on Wednesday provided an update on what it called a “large-scale, sophisticated counterfeiting conspiracy,” accusing two new defendants of “leading and orchestrating” a scheme to sell hundreds of millions of dollars in illegitimate drugs posing as meds such as Biktarvy and Descovy.

Nooman Haque, head of life sciences and healthcare at Silicon Valley Bank, and John Carroll

I’m head­ed to Lon­don soon for #EU­BIO22. Care to join me?

It was great getting back to a live ESMO conference/webinar in Paris followed by a live pop-up event for the Endpoints 11 in Boston. We’re staying on the road in October with our return for a live/streaming EUBIO22 in London.

Silicon Valley Bank’s Nooman Haque and I are once again jumping back into the thick of it with a slate of virtual and live events on October 12. I’ll get the ball rolling with a virtual fireside chat with Novo Nordisk R&D chief Marcus Schindler, covering their pipeline plans and BD work.

Work taking place in the clean rooms at Vor (Credit: Vor)

Vor Bio opts to keep man­u­fac­tur­ing op­er­a­tions in-house for de­vel­op­ing stem cell, CAR-T ther­a­pies

While it is not uncommon for a biotech to go down the route of having the product manufactured by a contract organization, one small biotech is looking to keep its card close to its chest.

Vor Biopharma has started manufacturing operations at an in-house facility at its HQ in Cambridge, MA after beginning construction last summer.

According to the biotech, the facility aims to develop Vor’s hematopoietic stem cells (eHSCs) and CAR-T therapies for patients with blood cancers. The site will initially manufacture a clinical supply of its candidate VCAR33allo to support its IND, which is slated to be submitted in the first half of next year. It also plans to transfer the production of VOR33 to the facility. Vor is getting to work quickly as engineering runs for VCAR33allo has started this week.

Tar­sus looks to raise aware­ness of eye­lid mite dis­ease in cam­paign aimed at eye­care spe­cial­ists

Eyelid mite disease may be “gross” but it’s also fairly common, affecting about 25 million people in the US.

Called demodex blepharitis, it’s a well-known condition among eyecare professionals, but they often don’t always realize how common it is. Tarsus Pharmaceuticals wants to change that with a new awareness campaign called “Look at the Lids.”

The campaign and website debut Thursday — just three weeks after Tarsus filed for FDA approval for a drug that treats the disease.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 151,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Vlad Coric, Biohaven CEO (Photo Credit: Andrew Venditti)

As Amy­lyx de­ci­sion waits in the wings, Bio­haven’s ALS drug sinks (again) in plat­form tri­al

The FDA’s decision on Amylyx’s ALS drug is set to come out sometime Thursday. In a space with few drugs, any approval would be a major landmark.

But elsewhere in the ALS field, things are a bit more tepid.

Thursday morning, Biohaven announced that its drug verdiperstat failed its arm of an ALS platform trial led by Massachusetts General Hospital. According to a press release, the drug did not meet its primary endpoint — improvement on an ALS functional status test — or any key secondary endpoints at 24 weeks. The trial had enrolled 167 patients, giving them either verdiperstat or placebo twice a day.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 151,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

An­oth­er Avastin biosim­i­lar joins the par­ty as Roche's grip on the mar­ket loosens

Avastin has attracted quite the crowd of biosimilars in recent years, and one more pharma company has elbowed its way in.

Regulators on Wednesday approved Celltrion’s biosimilar Vegzelma in six cancer types, including metastatic colorectal cancer; recurrent or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC); recurrent glioblastoma; metastatic renal cell carcinoma; persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer; and epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 151,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Elisabeth Stampa, Medicines for Europe president

As win­ter ap­proach­es, a Eu­ro­pean gener­ics group rais­es alarm over en­er­gy prices for man­u­fac­tur­ers

While colder temperatures are fast approaching, the situation surrounding the rise of energy prices in Europe is hitting businesses of every kind, including generic drug manufacturers.

Medicines for Europe, a group that represents the generic industry on the continent, sent a letter addressed to energy ministers and commissioners concerning inflation and the costs of energy on the supply of generic medicines.