From left to right: Charles Nichols, Meghan Hibicke and Shlomi Raz

How do de­pressed rats re­spond to psy­che­delics? New da­ta of­fer in­sight in­to the hu­man ex­pe­ri­ence

De­spite tricky reg­u­la­tions, re­search eval­u­at­ing the an­ti­de­pres­sant po­ten­tial of psy­che­delics in hu­mans is mush­room­ing — and the FDA has al­ready ap­proved a nasal spray con­coc­tion of the cat tran­quil­iz­er ke­t­a­mine for pa­tients whose de­pres­sion per­sists de­spite con­ven­tion­al ther­a­py.

But sci­en­tists still don’t quite ful­ly un­der­stand the an­ti­de­pres­sant im­pact of psy­che­delics on the brain — are the ef­fects pure­ly bi­o­log­i­cal or psy­cho­log­i­cal? A new study looks in­to the de­gree and du­ra­tion of an­ti­de­pres­sant ef­fects in­duced by these drugs — large­ly brand­ed by gov­ern­ments as il­le­gal he­do­nis­tic com­pounds with no ther­a­peu­tic po­ten­tial — in an an­i­mal mod­el.

“You re­al­ly can’t take the brain of a pa­tient and grind it up and ex­tract the genes and look at gene ex­pres­sion and see what’s changed in that brain — the best we have right now is imag­ing. But that’s still just a win­dow in­to the black box — to get in­to the black box, we ac­tu­al­ly need the brain tis­sue to be able to an­a­lyze,” said Charles Nichols, the di­rec­tor of the study and pro­fes­sor of phar­ma­col­o­gy at Louisiana State Uni­ver­si­ty (LSU).

“But to get that we have to have a mod­el where the drug works and no­body had yet been able to re­ca­pit­u­late the long term ef­fects or even an­ti­de­pres­sants ef­fects to a re­al­ly con­vinc­ing lev­el in an an­i­mal mod­el.”

Nichols, the son of long­time psy­che­del­ic re­search pro­po­nent David Nichols, has been study­ing the ef­fects of psy­che­delics in the brain for near­ly 25 years. In this study, Nichols and his team com­pared the im­pact of a one-time dose of psilo­cy­bin (the psy­choac­tive in­gre­di­ent in mag­ic mush­rooms), ly­ser­gic acid di­ethy­lamide (LSD, or acid as it is fond­ly known), and ke­t­a­mine in a rat mod­el for de­pres­sion.

There are al­ready emerg­ing da­ta sug­gest­ing the ben­e­fi­cial ef­fects of psy­che­delics in hu­mans — apart from the FDA-ap­proved ke­t­a­mine prod­uct, psilo­cy­bin is be­ing test­ed as an an­ti­de­pres­sant in a range of tri­als. Re­cent­ly, a psy­che­del­ic re­search cen­ter was opened at Johns Hop­kins.

Da­ta from Nichols’ study — the first di­rect pre­clin­i­cal com­par­i­son of the an­ti­de­pres­sant ef­fi­ca­cy of ke­t­a­mine and oth­er psy­che­delics — showed that both psilo­cy­bin and LSD sig­nif­i­cant­ly re­duces de­pres­sive-like be­hav­iors five weeks af­ter a sin­gle ad­min­is­tra­tion in rats, while on­ly the low­est dose of ke­t­a­mine eval­u­at­ed (5 mg/kg) was ef­fi­ca­cious in de­creas­ing de­pres­sive-like be­hav­iors. In ad­di­tion, the as­so­ci­at­ed an­ti­de­pres­sant-like ef­fects of ke­t­a­mine were tran­sient com­pared to psilo­cy­bin and LSD-treat­ed rats — and last­ed less than two weeks.

“Be­cause there’s so much po­lit­i­cal dis­cus­sion tied up in­to the re­search, it’s great…this can be a much more da­ta, ev­i­dence-based progress to­wards psy­che­del­ic ther­a­pies as op­posed to a more po­lit­i­cal grass­roots piece,” said Ro­nan Levy, ex­ec­u­tive chair­man of Toron­to-based com­pa­ny Field Trip Psy­che­delics that is open­ing up clin­ics to de­liv­er psy­che­del­ic-based psy­chother­a­py.

A WIN­DOW TO NEW COP­ING STRATE­GIES

In or­der to see how the “de­pressed’ rats re­act­ed to the psy­che­del­ic com­pounds, the an­i­mals were first put through what is com­mon­ly known as a ‘forced swim test’ to mea­sure if they were de­pressed.

“The short sto­ry is you throw them in a buck­et of wa­ter,” said Meghan Hi­bicke, the study’s lead au­thor and post­doc­tor­al re­searcher at LSU Health Sci­ences Cen­ter, Phar­ma­col­o­gy and Ex­per­i­men­tal Ther­a­peu­tics.

“You see how much they swim ver­sus how much they float. And then you can mea­sure that be­hav­ior — so that’s the plan­ning and the pas­sive cop­ing strat­e­gy that can be kind of com­pa­ra­ble to a de­pressed per­son in bed.”

De­pressed peo­ple find it dif­fi­cult to get up and brush their teeth — dai­ly func­tion­ing is re­al­ly hard and ac­tive, prob­lem-solv­ing is ar­du­ous, she said.

“So ba­si­cal­ly, what makes hu­mans feel bad, makes a rat float, and what makes a hu­man feel bet­ter, makes a rat swim … they are just dif­fer­ent mea­sures of pas­sive ver­sus ac­tive cop­ing strate­gies — like get­ting shocked and freez­ing when you’re hu­man would be a pas­sive cop­ing strat­e­gy ver­sus run­ning around and try­ing to get away.”

Con­verse­ly, if you give rats an­ti­de­pres­sant med­ica­tions that have been shown to be ef­fec­tive in hu­mans, the same rats will start to be­have more nor­mal­ly. They’ll start swim­ming in the wa­ter and ex­hib­it food-seek­ing be­hav­iors, Nichols added.

While con­duct­ing the study, Nichols and Hi­bicke were cau­tious in choos­ing the dos­es of the tri­fec­ta of psy­che­del­ic com­pounds, re­ly­ing on lit­er­a­ture re­views and con­sul­ta­tions with David Nichols to hone in on op­ti­mal dos­es. “If you use too much, the rat is go­ing to be ba­si­cal­ly su­per-stoned and it’s not go­ing to be able to per­form. And if you don’t use enough, you might not hit a ther­a­peu­tic lev­el,” Nichols said.

The study find­ings were sig­nif­i­cant on two lev­els. The re­searchers first ac­com­plished their pri­ma­ry goal of gen­er­at­ing a ro­dent ex­per­i­men­tal sys­tem that could be used to study the mol­e­c­u­lar, cel­lu­lar ef­fects with psilo­cy­bin as an an­ti­de­pres­sant.

“So we now have an an­i­mal mod­el, where psilo­cy­bin has long-last­ing ef­fects af­ter a sin­gle dose and we can go and take the (rat) brains out and be­gin to ask ques­tions on how is it (the drug) chang­ing the brain to do this,” Nichols said.

The sec­ond goal was broad­er — gath­er­ing in­sight in­to whether the ther­a­peu­tic ben­e­fit is pure­ly psy­cho­log­i­cal or bi­o­log­i­cal.

“What our re­sults have shown is that it’s re­al­ly kind of nei­ther — that at its core the an­ti­de­pres­sant ef­fects are bi­o­log­i­cal be­cause the rat doesn’t re­al­ly have the ex­is­ten­tial angst — the same rea­sons for de­pres­sion that a hu­man would have. But what we did find was that we could shape the an­ti­de­pres­sant ef­fect by the en­vi­ron­ment that the rat was placed in af­ter the treat­ment,” Nichols said.

What the rats en­coun­tered dur­ing their first week af­ter their psy­che­del­ic ex­pe­ri­ence ei­ther re­in­forces a cop­ing strat­e­gy that was al­ready there, or it taught them a new cop­ing strat­e­gy.

“So it seems like psilo­cy­bin at least is open­ing this kind of win­dow where a new cop­ing strat­e­gy is learn­able which would be re­al­ly re­al­ly help­ful for peo­ple who are suf­fer­ing from chron­ic life prob­lems like de­pres­sion and anx­i­ety and stress and drug ad­dic­tion or gam­bling ad­dic­tion — where there’s a pe­ri­od of time in which, af­ter their psy­che­del­ic ex­pe­ri­ence, they can learn a new way to be­have un­der old cir­cum­stances or un­der chal­leng­ing cir­cum­stances,” Hi­bicke said.

IM­PLI­CA­TIONS FOR IN­DUS­TRY 

What does this mean for the ex­plo­sion of com­pa­nies and re­searchers look­ing in­to the ther­a­peu­tic po­ten­tial of dif­fer­ent psy­che­del­ic com­pounds for a range of con­di­tions?

“Be­ing able to com­bine our dig­i­tal health ca­pa­bil­i­ties with the new in­sights in­to the bi­o­log­i­cal mech­a­nisms, giv­ing rise to an­ti­de­pres­sant-like ef­fects will en­hance our abil­i­ty to iden­ti­fy why some pa­tients may re­spond bet­ter to psilo­cy­bin or LSD ver­sus ke­t­a­mine…fur­ther jus­ti­fy­ing re­im­burse­ment for care,” said Shlo­mi Raz, the chief of Eleu­sis Ben­e­fit Cor­po­ra­tion, which spon­sored Nichols’ study.

“When you can make pre­dic­tions that have a high de­gree of ac­cu­ra­cy, the whole per­spec­tive on the use of these oth­er­wise cost­ly ther­a­pies will be­gin to change.”

For ATAI Life Sci­ences — an um­brel­la en­ti­ty that is be­hind com­pa­nies such as Com­pass Path­ways (which cur­rent­ly has a mid-stage treat­ment-re­sis­tant de­pres­sion study test­ing a psilo­cy­bin com­pound) and Per­cep­tion Neu­ro­science (which took its ke­t­a­mine de­riv­a­tive in­to clin­i­cal tri­als last year) — the study adds more ro­bust ev­i­dence sup­port­ing the ther­a­peu­tic use of psy­che­delics.

Pre­vi­ous­ly, the an­i­mal mod­els were large­ly in mice, Srini­vas Rao, ATAI’s chief sci­en­tif­ic of­fi­cer not­ed. “With rats, you’re just go­ing up the evo­lu­tion­ary lad­der a lit­tle bit,” he said. “Rats have much more com­plex be­hav­ior than mice — it’s just more brain there.”

Nick Galakatos, Blackstone global head of life sciences

Nick Galakatos and the Black­stone team now have a record $4.6B to in­vest in bio­phar­ma, with a big fo­cus on push­ing com­pa­nies over the top

Nick Galakatos and his team at Blackstone Life Sciences have seen their biggest opportunities swell up in mostly established players who don’t have all the money they need to accomplish everything on the to-do list. And right now, with the industry booming, that’s a long list with some hefty needs.

The Blackstone team has neatly tied up the largest private fund ever raised in life sciences for making big dreams come true in biopharma. Late Thursday, Blackstone put out word that they had closed their highly anticipated fund with the projected $4.6 billion all in.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 85,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: Bio­gen shares spike as ex­ecs com­plete a de­layed pitch for their con­tro­ver­sial Alzheimer's drug — the next move be­longs to the FDA

Biogen is stepping out onto the high wire today, reporting that the team working on the controversial Alzheimer’s drug aducanumab has now completed their submission to the FDA. And they want the agency to bless it with a priority review that would cut the agency’s decision-making time to a mere 6 months.

The news drove a 10% spike in Biogen’s stock $BIIB ahead of the bell.

Part of that spike can be attributed to a relief rally. Biogen execs rattled backers and a host of analysts earlier in the year when they unexpectedly delayed their filing to the third quarter. That delay provoked all manner of speculation after CEO Michel Vounatsos and R&D chief Al Sandrock failed to persuade influential observers that the pandemic and other factors had slowed the timeline for filing. Actually making the pitch at least satisfies skeptics that the FDA was not likely pushing back as Biogen was pushing in. From the start, Biogen execs claimed that they were doing everything in cooperation with the FDA, saying that regulators had signaled their interest in reviewing the submission.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 85,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Gilead boasts of pos­i­tive remde­sivir da­ta on mor­tal­i­ty — but their analy­sis pro­vokes the skep­tics

Gilead is surging again off data that suggest its antiviral remdesivir might improve survival.

The new data come from an analysis Gilead conducted comparing the death rate and recovery time of patients in one of its remdesivir trials to a group of 800 patients “with similar baseline characteristics and disease severity” who received only standard-of-care around the same time. The result, they said, suggested that patients who received remdesivir had a 62% better chance at surviving than those who did not.

Regeneron CEO Leonard Schleifer speaks at a meeting with President Donald Trump, members of the Coronavirus Task Force, and pharmaceutical executives in the Cabinet Room of the White House (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

OWS shifts spot­light to drugs to fight Covid-19, hand­ing Re­gen­eron $450M to be­gin large scale man­u­fac­tur­ing in the US

The US government is on a spending spree. And after committing billions to vaccines defense operations are now doling out more of the big bucks through Operation Warp Speed to back a rapid flip of a drug into the market to stop Covid-19 from ravaging patients — possibly inside of 2 months.

The beneficiary this morning is Regeneron, the big biotech engaged in a frenzied race to develop an antibody cocktail called REGN-COV2 that just started a late-stage program to prove its worth in fighting the virus. BARDA and the Department of Defense are awarding Regeneron a $450 million contract to cover bulk delivery of the cocktail starting as early as late summer, with money added for fill/finish and storage activities.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 85,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Hal Barron, GSK

Win or lose on the mar­ket­ing OK, the FDA just gunned down GSK’s bright hopes for their BC­MA ther­a­py

The FDA’s ODAC — the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee — has a well-known bias in favor of adding new cancer drugs to the market, even if efficacy is at best marginal and serious safety issues demand careful management.

Doctors want as many arrows in their quiver as they can get. And when patients are dying after failing multiple drugs, why not give it a go one more time?

GlaxoSmithKline, though, is about to test out how their new BCMA antibody drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin can do after being mauled in an in-house FDA review, ahead of the Tuesday expert panel discussion. Even if the agency goes ahead with an expected green light, this drug will likely be constrained to a small niche — icing any plans they may have for making waves in oncology anytime soon.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Covid-19 roundup: BioN­Tech go­ing head-to-head with Mod­er­na as PhI­II mR­NA launch looms; Tri­al on Shin­zo Abe’s once-fa­vorite an­tivi­ral is in­con­clu­sive

It’s a race to the Phase III finish line now for the 2 leading mRNA vaccines in the pipeline for Covid-19.

BioNTech chief Ugur Sahin told the Wall Street Journal that his company will start Phase III testing of their vaccine later this month, setting them up to lateral the data to regulators before the end of this year.

That puts them essentially on the exact same schedule as Moderna is dedicated to. The Massachusetts rival to BioNTech also expects to launch Phase III this month. Lots of rumors have circulated about delays and conflict among the scientists advancing the Moderna jab, but the biotech has consistently stuck to its plan to start a late-stage pivotal this month.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 85,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Andrew Kruegel, Kures president and co-founder (Columbia Tech Ventures via Vimeo)

Af­ter psilo­cy­bin and ke­t­a­mine, a new biotech comes along de­vel­op­ing a drug Scott Got­tlieb fought

Andrew Kruegel was six years into his chemistry work at Columbia University, when, one day in August 2016, he learned he might have only 30 days before the government made him destroy his research.

Kruegel had been studying kratom, a leaf long used in Southeast Asia as a stimulant or for pain. It had opioid-like properties, he found, but seemed to offer pain relief without the addictive potential or respiratory side effects of traditional opioids — a riddle that might help illuminate how human opioid receptors work.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 85,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

The home run count: The $100M+ mega-round boom in biotech in­spired a $7.3B feed­ing fren­zy — so far this year

Over the last 6 months there’s been a blizzard of money piling up drifts of the green stuff through the biotech landscape. And the forecast calls for more cash windfalls ahead.

Even as a global pandemic has killed more than half a million people, blighted economies and divided nations over the proper response, it’s also helped ignite an unprecedented burst of big-time investing. And not just in Covid-19 deals, as we’ve looked at before.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Atul Deshpande, Harbour BioMed chief strategy officer & head, US operations (Harbour BioMed)

An­oth­er biotech IPO set-up? Multi­na­tion­al biotech leaps from round to round, scoop­ing up cash at a blis­ter­ing pace

A short four months after announcing a $75 million haul in Series B+ fundraising, the multinational biotech Harbour BioMed pulled in another round of investments and eclipsed the nine-digit mark in the process.

Harbour completed its Series C financing, the company announced Thursday morning, raising $102.8 million and bringing its total investment sum to over $300 million since its founding in late 2016. The biotech plans to use the money to transition early-stage candidates from the discovery phase, fund candidates already in the clinic, and prep late-stage candidates for commercialization.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 85,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.