When Bi­ol­yse, an On­tario-based man­u­fac­tur­er of ster­ile in­jecta­bles, forged a deal with Bo­livia last week to man­u­fac­ture up to 50 mil­lion J&J Covid-19 vac­cine dos­es, the agree­ment kicked off what will prove to be a test case for how dif­fi­cult the sys­tem of com­pul­so­ry li­cens­es is to nav­i­gate.

The first prob­lem: When Bi­ol­yse asked J&J, via a March let­ter, to li­cense its Covid-19 vac­cine, man­u­fac­ture it in Cana­da and pay 5% roy­al­ties on ship­ments to needy, low-in­come coun­tries, J&J re­ject­ed the of­fer, re­fus­ing to ne­go­ti­ate. J&J al­so did not re­spond to a re­quest for com­ment.

With an un­will­ing J&J, Bi­ol­yse then turned to the Cana­di­an gov­ern­ment to li­cense the patents un­der a pro­gram called the Cana­di­an Ac­cess to Med­i­cines Regime, which al­lows the ex­port of drugs and vac­cines to low-in­come coun­tries like Bo­livia, with the hopes of bet­ter­ing their re­spons­es to pub­lic health crises like HIV/AIDS, tu­ber­cu­lo­sis and oth­ers.

But for those drugs or vac­cines to be ex­port­ed from Cana­da, they need to be in­clud­ed in a list cre­at­ed by the Cana­di­an gov­ern­ment, known as Sched­ule 1, which is part of the coun­try’s Patent Act.

James Love

So far, Cana­da has not added Covid-19 drugs or vac­cines to that list.

“Block­ing the list­ing on Sched­ule 1 is re­al­ly bull­shit,” James Love, di­rec­tor of the NGO Knowl­edge Ecol­o­gy In­ter­na­tion­al, who’s been push­ing to in­crease ac­cess to Covid-re­lat­ed vac­cines and ther­a­peu­tics, told End­points News. “It’s bizarre that Covid-19 is not con­sid­ered a glob­al health is­sue in Cana­da.”

A spokesper­son for the Cana­di­an gov­ern­ment’s In­no­va­tion, Sci­ence and Eco­nom­ic De­vel­op­ment pro­gram ex­plained to End­points that it’s al­so not just about adding Covid-19 vac­cines to Sched­ule 1.

“It’s im­por­tant to note that adding a COVID vac­cine to Sched­ule 1 would not al­low a com­pul­so­ry li­cense for the pro­duc­tion and ex­port of these vac­cines. A com­pa­ny seek­ing au­tho­riza­tion un­der Cana­da’s Ac­cess to Med­i­cines Regime must be able to man­u­fac­ture the drug and con­duct nec­es­sary tri­als to es­tab­lish that the drug meets Cana­di­an safe­ty and ef­fi­ca­cy re­quire­ments be­fore au­tho­riza­tion would be grant­ed,” she said.

John Ful­ton

Bi­ol­yse’s EVP John Ful­ton told End­points that his com­pa­ny could re­verse en­gi­neer the J&J vac­cine from a cou­ple drops from a vial, but the com­pa­ny would need J&J’s co­op­er­a­tion to run a tri­al and it will need ad­di­tion­al gov­ern­ment funds to scale up.

And while the gov­ern­ment spokesper­son said she’s “close­ly fol­low­ing the sit­u­a­tion” be­tween Bi­ol­yse and Bo­livia, Ful­ton said the gov­ern­ment has not been straight­for­ward in ex­plain­ing how to add Covid-19 vac­cines to Sched­ule 1.

“I start­ed in­quir­ing in late Feb­ru­ary 2021 and still they won’t give me an an­swer on how to start the process,” Ful­ton said via text mes­sage. “I’ve had meet­ings with close to 30 dif­fer­ent high-lev­el of­fi­cials and no straight an­swer on how to trig­ger the ad­di­tion.”

Bi­ol­yse said in its agree­ment with Bo­livia that it should be able to pro­duce 200,000 dos­es per week, if it ob­tains the com­pul­so­ry li­cense.

But the odds of that oc­cur­ring are low, be­cause, as Ful­ton ex­plained, it will re­quire Cana­di­an gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials to go out on a limb, and “spend the po­lit­i­cal cap­i­tal and have the courage to wade in­to the geopo­lit­i­cal storm that will en­sue when they sig­nal they sup­port the loos­en­ing of IP to vac­ci­nate LMIC [low-to-mid­dle in­come coun­tries].”

Adding Covid-19 vac­cines to Sched­ule 1 al­so would open the door for Bi­ol­yse and oth­ers to make not just J&J’s vac­cine, but Pfiz­er and Mod­er­na’s mR­NA vac­cines too, which fur­ther com­pli­cates the sit­u­a­tion.

“150 dif­fer­ent things need to hap­pen for a CL [com­pul­so­ry li­cense] to be is­sued in Cana­da just on the ex­port side,” Ful­ton added. “The TRIPS waiv­er stream­lines this process on the im­porter side.”

Pfiz­er and Mod­er­na have both made clear in re­cent weeks that they are not go­ing to help any com­pa­nies try­ing to make copy­cat ver­sions of their prod­ucts, es­pe­cial­ly as they would be vy­ing for the same raw ma­te­ri­als and nec­es­sary equip­ment.

And the Cana­di­an gov­ern­ment does not seem ready to budge, at least for now.

In­stead, the spokesper­son said the coun­try will in­vest about $2.2 bil­lion over sev­en years to­wards grow­ing a vi­brant do­mes­tic bio­man­u­fac­tur­ing and life sci­ences sec­tor, while al­so pro­vid­ing $940 mil­lion in sup­port for low- and mid­dle-in­come coun­tries to ac­cess COVID-19 vac­cines, tests, and treat­ments through the WHO’s ACT-Ac­cel­er­a­tor.

So will Bi­ol­yse raise funds and move their op­er­a­tions to an­oth­er coun­try where ob­tain­ing a com­pul­so­ry li­cense and reg­u­la­to­ry clear­ance might be eas­i­er?

No, ac­cord­ing to Ful­ton, ex­plain­ing that Bi­ol­yse has the req­ui­site fa­cil­i­ty now, and adding a fill line to a new site would add be­tween 18 months and two years to the en­tire process. But he al­so thinks that ob­tain­ing a com­pul­so­ry li­cense is about more than deal­ing with Covid-19 in the short term

“I think Covid will be with us for a long time, and I hate to say it, but we have the time. What’s hap­pen­ing in In­dia could hap­pen to us in Cana­da,” Ful­ton added. “If a com­pul­so­ry li­cense sys­tem can’t work now, dur­ing a world­wide pan­dem­ic, what’s it for? What’s the use?”

Despite whispers of a busy year for M&A, deal activity in the pharma space is actually down 30% on a semi-annualized basis, according to PwC’s latest report on deal activity. But don’t rule out larger deals in the second half of the year, the consultants said.

PwC pharmaceutical and life sciences consulting solutions leader Glenn Hunzinger expects to see Big Pharma companies picking up earlier stage companies to try and fill pipeline gaps ahead of a slew of big patent cliffs. Though a bear market continues to maul the biotech sector, Hunzinger said recent deals indicate that pharma companies are still paying above current trading prices.

Following the Supreme Court’s historic decision on Friday to overturn Americans’ constitutional right to an abortion after almost 50 years, Attorney General Merrick Garland sought to somewhat reassure women that states will not be able to ban the prescription drug sometimes used for abortions.

Following the decision, the New England Journal of Medicine also published an editorial strongly condemning the reversal, saying it “serves American families poorly, putting their health, safety, finances, and futures at risk.”

The story of Amryt Pharma’s candidate for the genetic skin condition epidermolysis bullosa, or EB, will soon enter another chapter.

After the Irish drugmaker’s candidate, dubbed Oleogel-S10 and marketed as Filsuvez, was handed a CRL earlier this year, the company announced in a press release that it plans to submit a formal dispute resolution request for the company’s NDA for Oleogel-S10.

North Carolina Republican Sen. Thom Tillis made a name for himself in the 2020 election cycle as the darling of the pharma industry, accepting hundreds of thousands in campaign contributions, even from the likes of Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla.

Those contributions have led Tillis to attempt to re-write patent laws in pharma’s favor, a move which failed to gain steam in 2019, and request for a third time since January that the FDA should help stop “the false narrative that patent protections are to blame for high drug prices.”