ICER chas­tis­es J&J for over­pric­ing de­pres­sion drug es­ke­t­a­mine ‘where there is such need for treat­ment’

Cog­nizant of the myr­i­ad of ap­proved an­ti­de­pres­sants that of­ten don’t work, reg­u­la­tors en­dorsed J&J’s $JNJ phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal ver­sion of the hal­lu­cino­genic anes­thet­ic ke­t­a­mine — es­ke­t­a­mine — in March for treat­ment-re­sis­tant de­pres­sion, well aware that the orig­i­nal cat tran­quil­iz­er is fre­quent­ly used off-la­bel for se­vere de­pres­sion. On Thurs­day, ICER con­clud­ed that while the drug, sold as Spra­va­to, does con­fer a “promis­ing” clin­i­cal ben­e­fit, its cur­rent list price ex­ceeds a com­mon cost-ef­fec­tive­ness thresh­old by a mod­est mar­gin.

In 2017, an es­ti­mat­ed 17.3 mil­lion adults in the Unit­ed States — rough­ly 7% of all US adults — had at least one ma­jor de­pres­sive episode, ac­cord­ing to the NIH. Most an­ti­de­pres­sants usu­al­ly take a few weeks to work – and half of the pa­tients fail to ful­ly re­spond. The par­ty drug (some­times re­ferred to as Kit Kat or Vi­t­a­min K) and anes­thet­ic ke­t­a­mine which can lift de­pres­sion in many pa­tients with­in hours, must be ad­min­is­tered through in­fu­sion but can have pro­found dis­so­cia­tive side-ef­fects, and pa­tients typ­i­cal­ly re­lapse af­ter treat­ment ends.

Es­ke­t­a­mine is a low-dose, nasal-spray for­mu­la­tion of ke­t­a­mine — but due to its side-ef­fect pro­file, the J&J treat­ment is de­signed to be ad­min­is­tered in the pres­ence of a health­care prac­ti­tion­er.  It was ap­proved on the ba­sis of five piv­otal Phase III stud­ies in pa­tients with treat­ment-re­sis­tant de­pres­sion.

The da­ta used to ap­prove the drug sug­gests it is clin­i­cal­ly ef­fec­tive — but with the ab­sence of long-term safe­ty da­ta, the ev­i­dence is “promis­ing but in­con­clu­sive,” ICER re­searchers said. Since there are no head-to-head tri­als com­par­ing es­ke­t­a­mine with any com­para­tors — such as ke­t­a­mine, elec­tro­con­vul­sive ther­a­py, tran­scra­nial mag­net­ic stim­u­la­tion, oral an­ti­de­pres­sants, or aug­men­ta­tion with an­tipsy­chotics (e.g., olan­za­p­ine) — its rel­a­tive ben­e­fit is al­so hard to judge, they added.

Akin to NICE in the UK, ICER is an in­de­pen­dent body that an­a­lyzes the cost-ef­fec­tive­ness of drugs and oth­er med­ical ser­vices in the Unit­ed States. Un­like NICE, though, ICER is not gov­ern­ment-af­fil­i­at­ed, but its de­ter­mi­na­tions are in­creas­ing­ly be­com­ing in­flu­en­tial with pay­ers.

ICER con­duct­ed its analy­ses us­ing two mea­sures: 1) QALYs, or qual­i­ty-ad­just­ed life-years, a mea­sure of the state of health of a per­son or group in which the ben­e­fits — in terms of length of life — are ad­just­ed to re­flect the qual­i­ty of life. Es­sen­tial­ly, one QALY is equal to one year of life in per­fect health. 2) Life years gained (LYG), which ex­press­es the ad­di­tion­al num­ber of years of life that a per­son lives as a re­sult of re­ceiv­ing treat­ment.

Com­pared with no ad­di­tion­al treat­ment be­yond a back­ground an­ti­de­pres­sant, treat­ment with es­ke­t­a­mine plus a back­ground an­ti­de­pres­sant re­sult­ed in im­por­tant QALY gains in pa­tients with treat­ment-re­sis­tant de­pres­sion (TRD), ICER said.

Us­ing the es­ke­t­a­mine list price of $295 per 28 mg in­tranasal de­vice, the treat­ment’s use re­sults in an in­cre­men­tal cost-ef­fec­tive­ness ra­tio of ap­prox­i­mate­ly $198,000 per QALY com­pared to no ad­di­tion­al treat­ment, ex­ceed­ing the com­mon­ly cit­ed cost-ef­fec­tive­ness thresh­olds of be­tween $50,000-$150,000 per QALY. Mean­while, es­ke­t­a­mine is es­ti­mat­ed to cost ap­prox­i­mate­ly $2.6 mil­lion per life year gained, ICER found.

Es­ke­t­a­mine’s ap­proval was al­so meant to en­hance ac­cess to treat­ment — since ke­t­a­mine is not cov­ered by health in­sur­ers — al­though there is a con­cern that there may still be high out-of-pock­et ex­pens­es through de­ductibles or non-cov­er­age poli­cies.

David Rind

“Es­ke­t­a­mine shows some ben­e­fits for such pa­tients and pro­vides an FDA-ap­proved treat­ment for TRD that may be cov­ered by pay­ers; how­ev­er, it is con­cern­ing to have an over­priced ther­a­py where there is such need for treat­ment. Ad­di­tion­al­ly, the sim­i­lar­i­ty of ke­t­a­mine to es­ke­t­a­mine rais­es is­sues for all stake­hold­ers about how to con­sid­er off-la­bel pre­scrip­tion and cov­er­age of a treat­ment that has not been as well stud­ied but is be­ing in­creas­ing­ly used for TRD,” said ICER’s CMO David Rind in a state­ment.

The ICER re­port was pub­lished on Thurs­day hav­ing in­cor­po­rat­ed the feed­back from pa­tient groups, clin­i­cians, drug man­u­fac­tur­ers, and oth­er stake­hold­ers to the draft ver­sion orig­i­nal­ly un­veiled in March. A fi­nal re­port is ex­pect­ed to be pub­lished in June, fol­low­ing a vote lat­er this month.

J&J dis­agrees with this re­port, a Janssen spokesper­son told End­points News. “It un­der­es­ti­mates the proven short- and long-term ben­e­fits that this treat­ment…brings to TRD pa­tients in need. The in­ac­cu­rate as­sump­tions in the draft re­port re­lat­ed to the pos­i­tive ben­e­fit risk pro­file of Spra­va­to and the com­par­i­son be­tween this FDA ap­proved treat­ment and ke­t­a­mine, a treat­ment be­ing used off-la­bel that has not been ad­e­quate­ly stud­ied and is viewed as ex­per­i­men­tal for TRD, are reck­less.”

Due to a lack of com­par­a­tive da­ta be­tween es­ke­t­a­mine and ke­t­a­mine, ICER was not able to ex­am­ine rel­a­tive cost-ef­fec­tive­ness be­tween the two ther­a­pies. In­stead, the in­sti­tute com­pared the in­di­vid­ual one-year costs and found that es­ke­t­a­mine was ten times more ex­pen­sive than ke­t­a­mine in the first year of use — de­spite the ad­min­is­tra­tion costs as­so­ci­at­ed with pro­vid­ing ke­t­a­mine in­tra­venous­ly.

MedTech clinical trials require a unique regulatory and study design approach and so engaging a highly experienced CRO to ensure compliance and accurate data across all stages is critical to development milestones.

In­no­v­a­tive MedTech De­mands Spe­cial­ist Clin­i­cal Tri­al Reg­u­la­to­ry Af­fairs and De­sign

Avance Clinical is the Australian CRO for international biotechs providing world-class clinical research services with FDA-accepted data across all phases. With Avance Clinical, biotech companies can leverage Australia’s supportive clinical trials environment which includes no IND requirement plus a 43.5% Government incentive rebate on clinical spend. The CRO has been delivering clinical drug development services for international biotechs for FDA and EMA regulatory approval for the past 24 years. The company has been recognized for the past two consecutive years with the prestigious Frost & Sullivan CRO Best Practices Award and a finalist in Informa Pharma’s Best CRO award for 2022.

Tony Coles, Cerevel CEO

Cerev­el takes the pub­lic of­fer­ing route, with a twist — rais­ing big mon­ey thanks to ri­val da­ta

As public biotechs seek to climb out of the bear market, a popular strategy to raise cash has been through public offerings on the heels of positive data. But one proposed raise Wednesday appeared to take advantage not of a company’s own data, but those from a competitor.

Cerevel Therapeutics plans to raise $250 million in a public offering and another $250 million in debt, the biotech announced Wednesday afternoon, even though it did not report any news on its pipeline. However, the move comes days after rival Karuna Therapeutics touted positive Phase III data in schizophrenia, a field where Cerevel is pursuing a similar program.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 147,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Up­dat­ed: Amid mas­sive re­struc­tur­ing, Bio­gen looks to re­duce phys­i­cal pres­ence in Boston

Biogen is putting a sizable chunk of office and research space in Kendall Square and Weston, MA up for sublease, marking another big change as the biotech grapples with the aftershock of a disastrous and controversial rollout for its Alzheimer’s drug.

The subbleases are “part of Biogen’s overall implementation of the ‘Future of Work,’ which is allowing us to optimize our footprint and reduce the amount of space we occupy, taking into consideration new elements such as the hybrid work model,” Biogen spokesperson Ashleigh Koss wrote in a statement to Endpoints News, adding that the company has had subleases across several buildings for years.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 147,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Who are the women blaz­ing trails in bio­phar­ma R&D? Nom­i­nate them for End­points' 2022 spe­cial re­port

Over the past three years, Endpoints News has spotlighted 60 women who have blazed trails and supercharged R&D across the biopharma world. And judging from the response we’ve received, to both our special reports and live events, telling their stories — including any obstacles they may have had to overcome — has inspired our readers in many different ways.

But change takes time, and the fact remains that women are still underrepresented at the upper ranks of the drug-making world.

Bernat Olle, Vedanta Biosciences CEO

Cit­ing 'chal­leng­ing eco­nom­ic en­vi­ron­ment,' PhI­II-ready mi­cro­bio­me biotech lays off 20% of staffers

The market downturn isn’t just sweeping up public biotechs.

Vedanta Biosciences, a developer of oral drugs derived from the human microbiome, is laying off about 20% of its staff — an unfortunately common occurrence these days. But CEO Bernat Olle took the unusual step of sharing the decision on LinkedIn and offering to connect the employees being let go with any company that’s hiring in their areas.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 147,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Hervé Affagard, MaaT Pharma CEO

One year in­to clin­i­cal hold, FDA has more ques­tions about 'pooled' mi­cro­bio­me ther­a­py

The FDA is still wary about a trial testing a microbiome therapy in patients with steroid-resistant acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD).

A year after MaaT Pharma’s IND application in the US was first met with a clinical hold, the French biotech said the agency is maintaining the hold. The crux of the matter, MaaT suggested, has to do with the way it puts together its drug candidate, which is administered as an enema (i.e. an injection of fluid into the bowel).

Pfiz­er launch­es re­bate pro­gram for rare dis­ease pa­tients who have to stop tak­ing Panzy­ga

Pfizer is launching its second-ever rebate program, this time for Panzyga, its treatment for a rare neurological disease of the peripheral nerves.

The program began last month, according to STAT which first reported the news, and offers a refund of out-of-pocket costs for patients who must discontinue their course before the fifth treatment for “clinical reasons.”

Panzyga was approved back in 2018 to treat primary immunodeficiency (PI) in patients two years and older and chronic immune thrombocytopenia (cITP) in adults. It has since picked up an indication in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), a condition that’s characterized by weakness of the arms or legs, tingling or numbness, and a loss of deep tendon reflexes, according to the NIH.

Horizon's back-to-school campaign for children with cystinosis includes an all about me poster as part of a care package box.

Hori­zon read­ies kids and fam­i­lies for back to school with week­long ac­tiv­i­ties around rare dis­ease cysti­nosis

Going back to school is usually a bumpy readjustment from summer freedom for all kids, but especially for kids with chronic health conditions. Horizon Therapeutics is hoping to help smooth the way for some who have the rare disease cystinosis. Cystinosis is a genetic disease that causes the amino acid cystine to build up in different tissues and organs.

The “Gear Up” for school campaign is running all week with different online and at-home events and activities for families and children with cystinosis. Each family who signed up receives a care package mailed to their home including an activity coloring book “Michael’s Show-and-Tell.” The book tells Michael’s story about living with cystinosis while offering kids matching, coloring and finding object games along with information.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 147,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Phar­mas spend mil­lions on di­a­betes ad­ver­tis­ing, but few pa­tients can re­call brand names — sur­vey

While many Big Pharma diabetes brands spend millions of dollars on TV ads every year, most people with type 2 diabetes don’t recognize specific drug brand names, according to a new study.

No brand garnered more than 30% recognition in Phreesia Life Science’s latest in-office patient survey of more than 4,000 adults with type 2 diabetes. Eli Lilly’s Trulicity topped the list as the most recognized brand with 29% of those surveyed recalling it, followed by Boehringer Ingelheim and Lilly’s Jardiance at 27% and Merck’s Januvia and Novo Nordisk tying for the third spot with 24%. Meanwhile, 76% of the patients surveyed were familiar with the generic treatment metformin.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 147,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.