As­traZeneca inks $8.4B pact with Mer­ck as cru­cial MYS­TIC study fails and shares plunge

As­traZeneca’s cru­cial com­bi­na­tion tri­al of dur­val­um­ab (Imfinzi) and treme­li­mum­ab has failed the pri­ma­ry end­point on pro­gres­sion-free sur­vival as a first-line ther­a­py for non-small cell lung can­cer. The shock waves from that news im­me­di­ate­ly ripped through its share price, eras­ing bil­lions in mar­ket val­ue and spurring some fevered spec­u­la­tion about the phar­ma gi­ant’s fu­ture. And with­in hours an­a­lysts start­ed to raise the prospect that the fall­out just might be bad enough to in­spire a new megamerg­er takeover at­tempt.

The news marks a ma­jor set­back for As­traZeneca $AZN. An­a­lysts have been wait­ing months for the re­sults, see­ing it as a crit­i­cal test of CEO Pas­cal So­ri­ot’s plan to turn things around at the phar­ma gi­ant af­ter five years at the helm. A suc­cess here could have vault­ed As­traZeneca in­to the front ranks of a fu­ri­ous as­sault on a multi­bil­lion-dol­lar mar­ket; fail­ure was deemed a dis­as­ter. The com­bo study of the PD-L1 and CT­LA-4 check­point drugs is con­sid­ered the most im­por­tant tri­al that the phar­ma gi­ant has been pur­su­ing, and its biggest stock cat­a­lyst of the year.

Sean Bo­hen, As­traZeneca

As­traZeneca’s shares cratered on the news, plung­ing 15% and wip­ing out more than $12 bil­lion in mar­ket cap. Mer­ck shares $MRK, mean­while, surged 4% in pre-mar­ket trad­ing as the prospect of a di­rect threat to its lead po­si­tion on lung can­cer re­ced­ed. And once again Bris­tol-My­ers Squibb was dam­aged, drop­ping 6% as in­vestors con­sid­ered the con­se­quences of fail­ure for a PD-(L)1 and CT­LA-4 sim­i­lar to its own matchup for Op­di­vo and Yer­voy in the CM-227 tri­al.

As­traZeneca sought to take the sting out of the tri­al fail­ure by si­mul­ta­ne­ous­ly an­nounc­ing a ma­jor new de­vel­op­ment and com­mer­cial­iza­tion part­ner­ship with Mer­ck for its promis­ing PARP Lyn­parza along with the ex­per­i­men­tal MEK drug selume­tinib.

Mer­ck $MRK agreed to pay a whop­ping $2.35 bil­lion in an up­front and op­tion fee to co-de­vel­op and mar­ket the two drugs, work­ing on monother­a­py stud­ies as well as com­bi­na­tions along­side their ri­val PD-(L)1 drugs Imfinzi and Keytru­da. Mer­ck will al­so pay up to $6.15 bil­lion in mile­stones, mak­ing this an $8.4 bil­lion deal — one of the largest of its kind.

But it wasn’t enough to soft­en the blow.

As­traZeneca first ac­knowl­edged the fail­ure of MYS­TIC in a down­load ear­ly Thurs­day of new clin­i­cal tri­al re­sults, then con­firmed it in a re­lease. There was more bad news.

“As a sec­ondary end­point, al­though not for­mal­ly test­ed,” the com­pa­ny adds, “Imfinzi monother­a­py would not have met a pre-spec­i­fied thresh­old of PFS ben­e­fit over SoC in this dis­ease set­ting.”

“We now have to wait for over­all sur­vival da­ta in the first half of 2018,” said So­ri­ot in a call with re­porters, adding that he was dis­ap­point­ed by the ini­tial re­sults. “This is the main end­point,” he added about OS, look­ing to keep hope alive.

As­traZeneca was 5th to mar­ket with a PD-(L)1 drug. Mer­ck and Bris­tol-My­ers Squibb were able to seize the lead in the megablock­buster can­cer mar­ket, so As­traZeneca re­cal­i­brat­ed its de­vel­op­ment plans to em­pha­size its com­bi­na­tion strat­e­gy.

So­ri­ot has re­peat­ed­ly flashed signs of the stress that has been build­ing over MYS­TIC. It’s ex­tra­or­di­nary for any Big Phar­ma to be in a po­si­tion like this, where one tri­al can play such a cru­cial role in de­ter­min­ing a com­pa­ny’s fate.

This morn­ing, though, So­ri­ot and R&D chief Sean Bo­hen de­fend­ed their de­sign of the MYS­TIC study, putting PFS in for the first take.

“If it had been suc­cess­ful every­one would have been thrilled,” Bo­hen said about MYS­TIC PFS da­ta. So­ri­ot al­so bat­ted back con­cerns about the po­ten­tial neg­a­tive im­pact of crossovers on the OS end­point, which sev­er­al an­a­lysts have raised as a po­ten­tial hur­dle on sur­vival rates.

“Peo­ple are com­ment­ing on the dan­ger of crossover,” the CEO told re­porters. “We have lim­it­ed crossover. The risk there is much low­er than in oth­er stud­ies.”

We may nev­er know, though, what role the da­ta played in the strange sto­ry about Te­va’s re­port­ed move to of­fer the CEO’s job to So­ri­ot. Over sev­er­al days As­traZeneca’s stock shed bil­lions in mar­ket cap as ru­mors float­ed about his pos­si­ble de­par­ture from As­traZeneca. So­ri­ot dis­pelled those ru­mors with an in­ter­nal memo un­der­scor­ing his in­ten­tion to stay and fight it out. Back when Pfiz­er was look­ing to buy the com­pa­ny, he pledged As­traZeneca will al­most dou­ble last year’s $23 bil­lion in rev­enue by 2023.

That goal, how­ev­er, looks like it’s re­ced­ing — at least to­day. In H1 As­traZeneca’s to­tal rev­enue de­clined 11% com­pared to the same pe­ri­od in 2016 as fran­chise rev­enue con­tin­ued to erode in the face of gener­ic com­pe­ti­tion. The com­pa­ny ex­pects a sin­gle-dig­it de­cline for the year in what has been pre­sent­ed as the bot­tom point for the num­bers.

So­ri­ot re­peat­ed­ly re­fused to di­rect­ly ad­dress the Te­va sto­ry to­day, but he pub­licly re­it­er­at­ed his in­ten­tion to stay fo­cused on his goals at the phar­ma gi­ant.

“I’m com­mit­ted to de­liv­er­ing on our strat­e­gy to re­turn­ing to growth,” he said. Not every­thing has worked out, he not­ed, but So­ri­ot in­sist­ed that the com­pa­ny had made “enor­mous progress.”

Pressed on Te­va, he added:

“I’m not a quit­ter. That is as far as I will go.”

Asked by Reuters’ Ben Hirschler about a share price that fell to £43 this morn­ing, com­pared to the £55 that Pfiz­er of­fered, the CEO said: “Over­all the pipeline is de­liv­er­ing…You have to give these things time,” says So­ri­ot. “There’s a lot more in our pipeline than MYS­TIC.”

As the dust set­tled lat­er in the day, new pre­dic­tions be­gan to cir­cu­late that the weak­ened share price could at­tract a new bid for the com­pa­ny. And As­traZeneca is in a much worse po­si­tion now to fight off an ac­qui­si­tion.


Im­age: Pas­cal So­ri­ot AP Im­ages

John Hood [file photo]

UP­DATE: Cel­gene and the sci­en­tist who cham­pi­oned fe­dra­tinib's rise from Sanofi's R&D grave­yard win FDA OK

Six years after Sanofi gave it up for dead, the FDA has approved the myelofibrosis drug fedratinib, now owned by Celgene.

The drug will be sold as Inrebic, and will soon land in the portfolio at Bristol-Myers Squibb, which is finalizing a deal to acquire Celgene.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Ab­b­Vie gets its FDA OK for JAK in­hibitor upadac­i­tinib, but don’t look for this one to hit ex­ecs’ lofty ex­pec­ta­tions

Another big drug approval came through on Friday afternoon as the FDA OK’d AbbVie’s upadacitinib — an oral JAK1 inhibitor that is hitting the rheumatoid arthritis market with a black box warning of serious malignancies, infections and thrombosis reflecting fears associated with the class.

It will be sold as Rinvoq — at a wholesale price of $59,000 a year — and will likely soon face competition from a drug that AbbVie once controlled, and spurned. Reuters reports that a 4-week supply of Humira, by comparison, is $5,174, adding up to about $67,000 a year.

UP­DAT­ED: AveX­is sci­en­tif­ic founder was axed — and No­var­tis names a new CSO in wake of an ethics scan­dal

Now at the center of a storm of controversy over its decision to keep its knowledge of manipulated data hidden from regulators during an FDA review, Novartis CEO Vas Narasimhan has found a longtime veteran in the ranks to head the scientific work underway at AveXis, where the incident occurred. And the scientific founder has hit the exit.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

The top 10 fran­chise drugs in bio­phar­ma his­to­ry will earn a to­tal of $1.4T (tril­lion) by 2024 — what does that tell us?

Just in case you were looking for more evidence of just how important Amgen’s patent win on Enbrel is for the company and its investors, EvaluatePharma has come up with a forward-looking consensus estimate on what the list of top 10 drugs will look like in 2024.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: Sci­en­tist-CEO ac­cused of im­prop­er­ly us­ing con­fi­den­tial in­fo from uni­corn Alec­tor

The executive team at Alector $ALEC has a bone to pick with scientific co-founder Asa Abeliovich. Their latest quarterly rundown has this brief note buried inside:

On June 18, 2019, we initiated a confidential arbitration proceeding against Dr. Asa Abeliovich, our former consulting co-founder, related to alleged breaches of his consulting agreement and the improper use of our confidential information that he learned during the course of rendering services to us as our consulting Chief Scientific Officer/Chief Innovation Officer. We are in the early stage of this arbitration proceeding and are unable to assess or provide any assurances regarding its possible outcome.

There’s no explicit word in the filing on what kind of confidential info was involved, but the proceeding got started 2 days ahead of Abeliovich’s IPO.

Abeliovich, formerly a tenured associate professor at Columbia, is a top scientist in the field of neurodegeneration, which is where Alector is targeted. More recently, he’s also helped start up Prevail Therapeutics as the CEO, which raised $125 million in an IPO. And there he’s planning on working on new gene therapies that target genetically defined subpopulations of Parkinson’s disease. Followup programs target Gaucher disease, frontotemporal dementia and synucleinopathies.

But this time Abeliovich is the CEO rather than a founding scientist. And some of their pipeline overlaps with Alector’s.

Abeliovich and Prevail, though, aren’t taking this one lying down.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Chi­na has be­come a CEO-lev­el pri­or­i­ty for multi­na­tion­al phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­nies: the trend and the im­pli­ca­tions

After a “hot” period of rapid growth between 2009 and 2012, and a relatively “cooler” period of slower growth from 2013 to 2015, China has once again become a top-of-mind priority for the CEOs of most large, multinational pharmaceutical companies.

At the International Pharma Forum, hosted in March in Beijing by the R&D Based Pharmaceutical Association Committee (RDPAC) and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), no fewer than seven CEOs of major multinational pharmaceutical firms participated, including GSK, Eli Lilly, LEO Pharma, Merck KGaA, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB. A few days earlier, the CEOs of several other large multinationals attended the China Development Forum, an annual business forum hosted by the research arm of China’s State Council. It’s hard to imagine any other country, except the US, having such drawing power at CEO level.

As dis­as­ter struck, Ab­b­Vie’s Rick Gon­za­lez swooped in on Al­ler­gan with an of­fer Brent Saun­ders couldn’t say no to

Early March was a no good, awful, terrible time for Allergan CEO Brent Saunders. His big lead drug had imploded in a Phase III disaster and activists were after his hide — or at least his chairman’s title — as the stock price continued a steady droop that had eviscerated share value for investors.

But it was a perfect time for AbbVie CEO Rick Gonzalez to pick up the phone and ask Saunders if he’d like to consider a “strategic” deal.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

CEO Pascal Soriot via Getty Images

As­traZeneca's jug­ger­naut PARP play­er Lyn­parza scoops up an­oth­er dom­i­nant win in PhI­II as the FDA adds a 'break­through' for Calquence

AstraZeneca’s oncology R&D group under José Baselga keeps churning out hits.

Wednesday morning the pharma giant and their partners at Merck parted the curtains on a successful readout for their Phase III PAOLA-1 study, demonstrating statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival for women with ovarian cancer in a first-line maintenance setting who added their PARP Lynparza to Avastin. This is their second late-stage success in ovarian cancer, which will help stave off rivals like GSK.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

ICER blasts FDA, PTC and Sarep­ta for high prices on DMD drugs Em­flaza, Ex­ondys 51

ICER has some strong words for PTC, Sarepta and the FDA as the US drug price watchdog concludes that as currently priced, their respective new treatments for Duchenne muscular dystrophy are decidedly not cost-effective.

The final report — which cements the conclusions of a draft issued in May — incorporates the opinion of a panel of 17 experts ICER convened in a public meeting last month. It also based its analysis of Emflaza (deflazacort) and Exondys 51 (eteplirsen) on updated annual costs of $81,400 and over $1 million, respectively, after citing “incorrect” lower numbers in the initial calculations.