Sobered by mount­ing costs, Dy­navax $DVAX last month made the de­ci­sion to fo­cus all its re­sources on its 2017-ap­proved he­pati­tis B vac­cine Hep­lisav-B, which ri­vals and su­per­sedes the ef­fi­ca­cy and con­ve­nience pro­file of GSK’s $GSK es­tab­lished En­ger­ix-B. The Cal­i­for­nia-based com­pa­ny will be on the look­out for an­oth­er com­peti­tor — VBI Vac­cines, which on Mon­day un­veiled late-stage da­ta on its hep B vac­cine: Sci-B-Vac.

Sci-B-Vac, which has al­ready se­cured ap­proval in Is­rael and 10 oth­er coun­tries, is in Phase III de­vel­op­ment in North Amer­i­ca and Eu­rope. It is en­gi­neered to mim­ic all three sur­face anti­gens of the hep B virus to in­duce a po­tent im­mune re­sponse and is be­ing de­vel­oped to work at low­er dos­es than ex­ist­ing hep B vac­cines.

VBI on Mon­day broke out da­ta from the PRO­TECT study, in which 1,607 sub­jects aged 18 years and old­er were ei­ther giv­en a three-dose course of Sci-B-Vac (10 µg) or a three-dose course of En­ger­ix-B (20 µg).

Sci-B-Vac failed to show that two dos­es of the drug were equal­ly ef­fec­tive as three dos­es of En­ger­ix-B in the study — a key sec­ondary end­point. In­vestors were not im­pressed, and the Cam­bridge, Mass­a­chu­setts-based com­pa­ny’s shares $VBIV cratered 58% tak­ing VBI in­to pen­ny stock ter­ri­to­ry at 81 cents be­fore the open­ing bell on Mon­day.

Mean­while, the VBI vac­cine was found to be as pro­tec­tive as En­ger­ix-B at the end of the third vac­ci­na­tion — meet­ing the main goal of the study. In fact, da­ta showed that the rate of sero­pro­tec­tion (an an­ti­body re­sponse ca­pa­ble of pre­vent­ing in­fec­tion) — was 91.4% for Sci-B-Vac-treat­ed sub­jects, ver­sus 76.5% for En­ger­ix-B — a sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant dif­fer­ence.

In ad­di­tion, the sero­pro­tec­tion rate (SPR) in sub­jects aged 45 and over was 89.4% for Sci-B-Vac, ver­sus 73.1% for En­ger­ix-B af­ter the third vac­ci­na­tion — meet­ing the co-pri­ma­ry end­point. It al­so cleared oth­er sec­ondary goals in sub-analy­ses strat­i­fied by age, gen­der, body mass in­dex, di­a­bet­ic sta­tus and smok­ing sta­tus.

Jeff Bax­ter VBI

Da­ta from an­oth­er late-stage tri­al, CON­STANT, com­par­ing Sci-B-Vac and En­ger­ix-B is ex­pect­ed by the end of 2019. Pend­ing the suc­cess­ful com­ple­tion of CON­STANT, VBI is on to sub­mit mar­ket­ing ap­pli­ca­tions in the U.S., Eu­rope, and Cana­da next year, com­pa­ny chief Jeff Bax­ter said on Mon­day.

Hep B is trans­mit­ted through con­tact with blood and bod­i­ly flu­ids of an in­fect­ed per­son and is a high­ly in­fec­tious virus, 50 to 100 times more in­fec­tious than HIV — even slight laps­es in in­fec­tion con­trol can re­sult in pa­tient-to-pa­tient trans­mis­sion. Since the ear­ly 1990’s the Unit­ed States has im­ple­ment­ed vac­ci­na­tion pro­grams in new­born chil­dren, but those born be­fore re­main sus­cep­ti­ble. CDC da­ta now sug­gests 95% per­cent of new hep B in­fec­tions in the Unit­ed States oc­cur in adults, as there is no stan­dard­ized sys­tem for vac­ci­nat­ing peo­ple af­ter school age, and par­tic­u­lar­ly since spikes in in­jec­tion drug use may be lead­ing to acute out­breaks.

Af­ter be­ing linked to a string of in­ex­plic­a­ble safe­ty is­sues, Hep­lisav-B was fi­nal­ly ap­proved in No­vem­ber 2017. De­spite its check­ered path to the fin­ish line, the vac­cine’s ef­fi­ca­cy and con­ve­nience pro­file su­per­sedes En­ger­ix-B.

So­cial im­age: Shut­ter­stock

The top career staff at the FDA has vowed not to let politics overrule science when looking at vaccine data this fall. But Alex Azar, who happens to be their boss’s boss, apparently won’t even give them a chance to stand in the way.

In a new memorandum issued Tuesday last week, the HHS chief stripped the FDA and other health agencies under his purview of their rule making ability, asserting all such power “is reserved to the Secretary.” Sheila Kaplan of the New York Times first obtained and reported the details of the September 15 bulletin.

President Donald Trump, who seems intent on announcing a COVID-19 vaccine before Election Day, could legally authorize a vaccine over the objections of experts, officials at the FDA and even vaccine manufacturers, who have pledged not to release any vaccine unless it’s proved safe and effective.

In podcasts, public forums, social media and medical journals, a growing number of prominent health leaders say they fear that Trump — who has repeatedly signaled his desire for the swift approval of a vaccine and his displeasure with perceived delays at the FDA — will take matters into his own hands, running roughshod over the usual regulatory process.

Having worked in parallel for years to move their respective PD-1 inhibitors up to the first-line treatment of gastrointestinal cancers, Merck and Bristol Myers Squibb finally have the data at ESMO for a showdown.

Comparing KEYNOTE-590 and CheckMate-649, of course, comes with the usual caveats. But a side-by-side look at the overall survival numbers also offer some perspective on a new frontier for the reigning checkpoint rivals, both of whom are claiming to have achieved a first.

William B Crews had been a public affairs specialist at the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

That ended today when he informed the agency of his decision to retire, after he was identified as the managing editor at RedState, a prominent Trump loyalist website.

Crews’ RedState duties are performed under the alias streiff. While enjoying the benefits of pseudonymity, he disparaged and worked against NIAID with an incendiary level of rhetoric in the midst of a pandemic.

Moving into earlier and earlier treatment lines, Bristol Myers Squibb is reporting that adjuvant treatment with Opdivo has doubled the time that esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer patients stay free of disease.

With the CheckMate-577 data at ESMO, CMO Samit Hirawat said, the company believes it can change the treatment paradigm.

While a quarter to 30% of patients typically achieve a complete response following chemoradiation therapy and surgery, the rest do not, said Ronan Kelly of Baylor University Medical Center. The recurrence rate is also high within the first year, Hirawat added.

Does Seattle Genetics have another approval on its hands?

The last 12 months, not so great for the world, has been great for Seattle Genetics. The company landed two separate FDA approvals, signed a $4.5 billion deal with Merck and watched antibody-drug conjugates — the technology they spent years developing to broad industry skepticism — emerge suddenly as one of the most popular approaches in oncology. And on Monday at ESMO, the company and their partners at Genmab unveiled the data behind the ADC it hopes will provide its next major FDA approval.

A little under two years after a company rebranding, Immune Regulation is taking an even bigger step toward advancing its goals.

Formerly known as Peptinnovate, the British biotech announced a $53.4 million Series B early Monday morning, helping to further advance two clinical programs in rheumatoid arthritis and asthma. Though those are the two initial indications the company is focusing on, CEO Jonathan Rigby told Endpoints News he hopes the candidates can be applied to a broad swath of autoimmune disorders.

Regeneron entered the PD-(L)1 game late, so they devised a two-pronged strategy to catch up with Big Pharma rivals: They would push it into cancers where PD-1s had yet been tested, and they would prove that it’s as powerful in the big indications as any other on the market.

They cleared a hurdle on the first goal Friday, showing a 31% response in patients with the rare skin cancer basal cell carcinoma. And with the data they’re rolling out Monday, Regeneron cancer chief Israel Lowy is ready to declare success on the second.