Kite Phar­ma hits its Q1 dead­line on fil­ing a BLA for its pi­o­neer­ing CAR-T, posts im­proved da­ta

Kite CEO Arie Bellde­grun

With the clock tick­ing down the fi­nal hours of Q1, Kite Phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals $KITE has kept its pledge to file an ap­pli­ca­tion for its pi­o­neer­ing CAR-T ther­a­py in the first quar­ter. The move puts Kite one step be­hind No­var­tis $NVS, which two days ago an­nounced that it had the FDA’s com­mit­ment for a speedy re­view of its own CAR-T.

The ques­tion now is whether the FDA will give the Kite’s ap­pli­ca­tion a pri­or­i­ty re­view as well, per­haps lin­ing up back-to-back ad­vi­so­ry com­mit­tee meet­ings to ex­am­ine the pros and cons of this new wave of can­cer ther­a­py.

Kite filed the BLA for axi­cab­ta­gene ciloleu­cel (KTE-C19, des­ig­nat­ed as a break­through ther­a­py by the FDA) as a treat­ment for pa­tients with re­lapsed or re­frac­to­ry ag­gres­sive non-Hodgkin lym­phoma who are in­el­i­gi­ble for au­tol­o­gous stem cell trans­plant.

Kite was held up a few months by the need to com­plete 6-month da­ta on axi­cab­ta­gene ciloleu­cel, a goal it ac­com­plished a month ago.

At six months, the ORR in dif­fuse large B-cell lym­phoma (DL­B­CL) hit 36%, down on­ly three points from month three. The CR rate was 31%, down two points. Big­ger drops were al­so record­ed for pri­ma­ry me­di­asti­nal B-cell lym­phoma (PM­B­CL) and trans­formed fol­lic­u­lar lym­phoma (TFL) en­rolled in Co­hort 2, but the six-month num­bers post­ed were all clear­ly sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant, which helped qui­et some dogged crit­i­cism of the drug’s abil­i­ty to pro­vide a durable re­sponse.

On Fri­day, Kite al­so up­dat­ed its da­ta at AACR in an oral ple­nary pre­sen­ta­tion. And the num­bers had im­proved with more pa­tients to re­port on:

The ORR in the mITT analy­sis set of 101 pts was 82% (CR 54%, PR 28%), and was con­sis­tent across key co­vari­ates in­clud­ing dis­ease sub­type, re­frac­to­ry sta­tus, stage, and IPI score. At a me­di­an fol­low up of 8.7 m, 44% of pts were in re­sponse and 39% were in CR.

That’s up from 41% and 36% re­port­ed in Feb­ru­ary.

Kite — led by CEO Arie Bellde­grun — and No­var­tis are rac­ing to be right at the fore­front of in­tro­duc­ing per­son­al­ized cell ther­a­pies that reengi­neer pa­tients’ im­mune cells to tar­get can­cer. And it’s of­fered some sig­nif­i­cant re­spons­es for a num­ber of pa­tients with ad­vanced cas­es of blood can­cer.

Now Kite and No­var­tis will try to out­do each oth­er on man­u­fac­tur­ing and de­liv­ery, with the phar­ma gi­ant and the biotech need­ing to show that they can pro­vide quick and re­li­able treat­ment.

That may be a par­tic­u­lar­ly dif­fi­cult ques­tion for No­var­tis. As we re­port­ed Thurs­day af­ter­noon, the phar­ma gi­ant’s head of cell man­u­fac­tur­ing — Karen Walk­er, re­spon­si­ble for CAR-T — is leav­ing the com­pa­ny to­day af­ter a lengthy stint. Her de­par­ture fol­lows the un­ex­pect­ed move at No­var­tis to dis­solve its cell ther­a­py unit last sum­mer, lay­ing off staffers and ab­sorb­ing the group in its on­col­o­gy R&D di­vi­sion.

Walk­er and two oth­er ex­ecs were put in charge of No­var­tis’ ef­forts on CAR-T last fall, af­ter the com­pa­ny chopped up the sep­a­rate cell and gene ther­a­py group that had been cre­at­ed specif­i­cal­ly to dri­ve these new ther­a­pies to com­mer­cial­iza­tion. That move fol­lowed the de­par­ture of Us­man “Oz” Azam, who left No­var­tis in the wake of the re­or­ga­ni­za­tion.

Left on the side­lines to­day: Juno Ther­a­peu­tics. Once a leader in the CAR-T area, Juno was forced to shelve its lead ther­a­py af­ter it killed a string of pa­tients. Two of those pa­tients died af­ter a brief R&D halt or­dered by the FDA. But Juno nev­er was able to firm­ly es­tab­lish why the CAR-T caused lethal cas­es of brain swelling. Now the biotech has moved on to a fol­low-up pro­gram, putting the com­pa­ny well be­hind the fron­trun­ners.

That big neu­ro­sciences R&D group Eli Lil­ly built is be­ing dis­man­tled, with lay­offs and parts shipped home

Seven years after Eli Lilly bulked up its neurosciences research group in Surrey and heralded the move as an indication of its commitment to the field, the pharma giant is shutting down and locking up labs.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 62,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Med­ical an­i­ma­tion: Mak­ing it eas­i­er for the site and the pa­tient to un­der­stand

Medical animation has in recent years become an increasingly important tool for conveying niche information to a varied audience, particularly to those audiences without expertise in the specialist area. Science programmes today, for example, have moved from the piece-to-camera of the university professor explaining how a complex disease mechanism works, to actually showing the viewer first-hand what it might look like to shrink ourselves down to the size of an ant’s foot, and travel inside the human body to witness these processes in action. Effectively communicating a complex disease pathophysiology, or the novel mechanism of action of a new drug, can be complex. This is especially difficult when the audience domain knowledge is limited or non-existent. Medical animation can help with this communication challenge in several ways.
Improved accessibility to visualisation
Visualisation is a core component of our ability to understand a concept. Ask 10 people to visualise an apple, and each will come up with a slightly different image, some apples smaller than others, some more round, some with bites taken. Acceptable, you say, we can move on to the next part of the story. Now ask 10 people to visualise how HIV’s capsid protein gets arranged into the hexamers and pentamers that form the viral capsid that holds HIV’s genetic material. This request may pose a challenge even to someone with some virology knowledge, and it is that inability to effectively visualise what is going on that holds us back from fully understanding the rest of the story. So how does medical animation help us to overcome this visualisation challenge?

CSL ac­cus­es ri­val Pharm­ing of par­tic­i­pat­ing in a scheme to rip off IP on HAE while re­cruit­ing se­nior R&D staffer

Pharming has landed in the middle of a legal donnybrook after recruiting a senior executive from a rival R&D team at CSL. The Australian pharma giant slapped Pharming with a lawsuit alleging that the Dutch biotech’s new employee, Joseph Chiao, looted a large cache of proprietary documents as he hit the exit. And they want it all back.
Federal Judge Juan Sanchez in the Eastern District Pennsylvania court issued an injunction on Tuesday prohibiting Chiao from doing any work on HAE or primary immune deficiency in his new job and demanding that he return any material from CSL that he may have in his possession. And he wants Pharming to tell its employees not to ask for any information on the forbidden topics.
For its part, Pharming fired off an indignant response this morning denying any involvement in extracting any kind of IP from CSL, adding that it’s cooperating in the internal probe that CSL has underway.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 62,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Eli Lil­ly’s first PhI­II show­down for their $1.6B can­cer drug just flopped — what now?

When Eli Lilly plunked down $1.6 billion in cash to acquire Armo Biosciences a little more than a year ago, the stars seemed aligned in its favor. The jewel in the crown they were buying was pegilodecakin, which had cleared the proof-of-concept stage and was already in a Phase III trial for pancreatic cancer.

And that study just failed.

Lilly reported this morning that their cancer drug flopped on overall survival when added to FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-FU, oxaliplatin), compared to FOLFOX alone among patients suffering from advanced pancreatic cancer.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 62,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: Alex­ion pays $930M to buy out Achillion and its promis­ing com­pan­ion drug to Soliris

After a series of stock-crunching setbacks over the years, Achillion enjoyed a turn in the sun a few weeks ago as the FDA blessed their lead drug danicopan (ACH-4471) — a complementary therapy for PNH patients taking Alexion’s Soliris — with a breakthrough drug designation after taking a look at some solid supporting Phase II data.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 62,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Hal Barron, GSK's president of R&D and CSO, speaks to Endpoints News founder and editor John Carroll in London at Endpoints' #UKBIO19 summit on October 8, 2019

[Video] Cel­e­brat­ing tri­al fail­ures, chang­ing the cul­ture and al­ly­ing with Cal­i­for­nia dream­ers: R&D chief Hal Bar­ron talks about a new era at GSK

Last week I had a chance to sit down with Hal Barron at Endpoints’ #UKBIO19 summit to discuss his views on R&D at GSK, a topic that has been central to his life since he took the top research post close to 2 years ago. During the conversation, Barron talked about changing the culture at GSK, a move that involves several new approaches — one of which involves celebrating their setbacks as they shift resources to the most promising programs in the pipeline. Barron also discussed his new alliances in the Bay Area — including his collaboration pact with Lyell, which we covered here — frankly assesses the pluses and minuses of the UK drug development scene, and talks about his plans for making GSK a much more effective drug developer.

This is one discussion you won’t want to miss. Insider and Enterprise subscribers can log-in to watch the video.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

From left to right: Lilian Kim, Associate Director Business Development; John Moller, CEO; Yooni Kim, Executive Director, Asia Operations; Michelle Park, Director South Korea Operations.

Novotech CRO sees 26% growth in Asia tri­al ac­tiv­i­ty from biotechs, but still plen­ty of ca­pac­i­ty

As the Asia-Pacific clinical trials sector continues to grow rapidly, Novotech the Asia-Pacific-based CRO is seeing biotech clinical activity up by 26%. But says there is still plenty of capacity in the region that features advanced medical facilities, supportive regulatory environments, and more than 2.3 billion people, largely treatment naïve, living in urban areas.

China, South Korea and Australia have the most studies registered as recruiting or about to recruit according to ClinicalTrials.Gov.

In­cyte's cash cow Jakafi chugs along with pos­i­tive front­line re­sults for GVHD

Five months after the FDA approved Incyte to expand its flagship Jakafi drug to patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), the company announced positive topline results from its Phase III study.

“This announcement, while a positive, is not surprising given the recent label expansion for Jakafi in the U.S. into this setting based on results from the single-arm REACH1 trial,” Baird’s Brian Skorney wrote, adding that it should allow Novartis, Incyte’s partner, to begin registering the drug abroad.

With biosim­i­lar threat un­der con­trol (for now), Roche sa­vors de­mand for its new drugs

Roche $RHBBY unveiled a cheerful update on its performance in the first nine months of this year, with demand for its newer drugs — primarily in oncology/immunology — driving sales, particularly in China where cancer is on the rise. In its press release, the Swiss drugmaker mentioned its pending $4.3 billion acquisition of Spark Therapeutics $ONCE, promising the deal — which has seen delay after delay due to unrelenting scrutiny by competition regulators — will be consummated by the end of the year.