On the same day that Glax­o­SmithK­line sought to as­sure in­vestors that the com­pa­ny’s new R&D team would de­liv­er im­por­tant drugs in the fu­ture, its re­searchers work­ing on Nu­cala (mepolizum­ab) were slapped down in their at­tempt to gain an added OK for COPD.

A pan­el of out­side ex­perts vot­ed 16 to 3 against a mar­ket­ing ap­proval. That isn’t bind­ing, but af­ter the in­ter­nal re­view­ers at the FDA of­fered a scathing re­view of their da­ta, it’s all but a done deal now — bar­ring some un­ex­pect­ed last minute in­ter­ven­tion in its fa­vor.

AD­COMM VOTE: Is the ben­e­fit-risk pro­file ad­e­quate to sup­port ap­proval of #mepolizum­ab as add-on treat­ment to in­haled cor­ti­cos­teroid-based main­te­nance treat­ment for the re­duc­tion of ex­ac­er­ba­tions in pa­tients with #COPD guid­ed by blood eosinophil counts? $GSK
3-Yes
16-No
0-Ab­stain

— SAC Track­er (@FDAad­comm) Ju­ly 25, 2018

The FDA was clear­ly unim­pressed with GSK’s pack­age.

GSK’s drug failed one late-stage test while scor­ing a suc­cess in the oth­er. With on­ly two Phase III stud­ies in this in­di­ca­tion, that left the pan­el to con­sid­er an ap­proval with­out sup­port­ing da­ta from two well-con­trolled stud­ies — the agency gold stan­dard.

There was no dose re­sponse they could find in the two dosage arms, which didn’t help.

The FDA added:

Some key sec­ondary end­points, such as time to first mod­er­ate-to-se­vere COPD ex­ac­er­ba­tion showed nu­mer­i­cal trends fa­vor­ing mepolizum­ab. How­ev­er, there were no con­sis­tent and clin­i­cal­ly mean­ing­ful dif­fer­ences in se­vere COPD ex­ac­er­ba­tion rate, FEV1, or SGRQ be­tween mepolizum­ab 100 mg and place­bo.

GSK’s tri­al de­sign al­so spurred ques­tions, with no base­line col­lec­tion of asth­ma his­to­ry — which could have in­flu­enced the out­come of the study. How will GSK prop­er­ly de­fine the pa­tient pop­u­la­tion for this drug?

For a pharma company with about $5 billion in revenue, a couple of respectably sized blockbuster drugs on the market and some high-profile partners like Amgen, Belgium’s UCB has kept an unusually low profile on the pipeline side of things over the years.
Until now.
Just days after striking a $2.1 billion deal to buy Ra Pharmaceuticals and its C5 rival to Soliris, UCB is posting positive top-line Phase III results for a dual IL-17 inhibitor that it’s steering into one of the most competitive commercial spaces in the industry. And despite plenty of obvious challenges as they struggle to roll out Evenity with Amgen and patent expirations loom on its franchise drugs, including Cimzia, the company just may be ready to tackle some of the biggest players on the planet.
In their first of 3 Phase III studies for bimekizumab, researchers touted top-line wins on statistically significant results on clearing plaque psoriasis, including a victory over J&J’s IL-23 contender Stelara on key endpoints. The drug targets both IL-17A and IL-17F, a modification on the IL-17A strategy laid out for Taltz (Eli Lilly) and Cosentyx (Novartis). And the new group also includes J&J’s Tremfya and AbbVie’s Skyrizi.
We don’t know the PASI90 and IGA scores — but UCB knows that with the kind of heavyweight competition it faces with Novartis and others, marginal gains for patients won’t stack up. So we’ll be watching for the hard numbers. And there’s another head-to-head with Cosentyx that will play a big role in pushing up analysts’ projections on peak sales, which currently fall well short of blockbuster status.
UCB hasn’t exactly been in the spotlight for the last few years, but it’s in a position now that the company has to win some respect in R&D, with blockbuster projects that can keep investors’ attention at a time the industry is experiencing booming R&D development efforts around the planet.
It hasn’t been easy. There was a setback on a lupus drug partnered with Biogen. But there have been some advances, with a deal to buy Proximagen’s NDA-ready nasal spray therapy USL261, designed as a rescue therapy for acute repetitive seizures, for $150 million in cash and another $220 million in sales and regulatory milestones. There was even a report that the company was kicking the deflated tires at Acorda, though nothing came of that.
Late last year UCB also committed to spend up to £200 million on a new R&D hub in the UK.
That may not translate into a lot of excitement right now, but they’re trying. And there’s a subtle promise that more deals may be in the works.

For years, the idea of protein degradation — utilizing the cell’s natural garbage disposal system to mark problematic proteins for destruction — remained an elegant but technically difficult concept. But now established as a promising clinical strategy, with major biopharma players such as Bayer, Gilead and Vertex trying to grab a foothold via partnership deals, a San Diego startup is looking to exploit it and push its limits.

Medical animation has in recent years become an increasingly important tool for conveying niche information to a varied audience, particularly to those audiences without expertise in the specialist area. Science programmes today, for example, have moved from the piece-to-camera of the university professor explaining how a complex disease mechanism works, to actually showing the viewer first-hand what it might look like to shrink ourselves down to the size of an ant’s foot, and travel inside the human body to witness these processes in action. Effectively communicating a complex disease pathophysiology, or the novel mechanism of action of a new drug, can be complex. This is especially difficult when the audience domain knowledge is limited or non-existent. Medical animation can help with this communication challenge in several ways.
Improved accessibility to visualisation
Visualisation is a core component of our ability to understand a concept. Ask 10 people to visualise an apple, and each will come up with a slightly different image, some apples smaller than others, some more round, some with bites taken. Acceptable, you say, we can move on to the next part of the story. Now ask 10 people to visualise how HIV’s capsid protein gets arranged into the hexamers and pentamers that form the viral capsid that holds HIV’s genetic material. This request may pose a challenge even to someone with some virology knowledge, and it is that inability to effectively visualise what is going on that holds us back from fully understanding the rest of the story. So how does medical animation help us to overcome this visualisation challenge?