May the can­dle burn for­ev­er: Po­lite re­minders about the JP­Mor­gan con­fab

Ed­i­tor’s Note: Biotech Voic­es is a con­tributed col­umn from se­lect End­points News read­ers. Be­low is an anony­mous com­men­tary from a pub­lic biotech CEO who was in­spired to write a de­fense of JP­Mor­gan fol­low­ing a litany of com­plaints.


Every year we start the biotech cal­en­dar with a busy Jan­u­ary pil­grim­age where JP­Mor­gan hosts a wide­ly at­tend­ed get to­geth­er that at­tracts big and small to the San Fran­cis­co Union Square neigh­bor­hood. De­spite the peren­ni­al suc­cess of this event, it is in­ter­est­ing to hear re­cent com­plaints from mul­ti­ple voic­es, sug­gest­ing di­min­ish­ing re­turns and wan­ing en­thu­si­asm for fu­ture par­tic­i­pa­tion. While all of these com­plaints may be valid, let’s not go over­board and for­get why this event is a key land­mark.

On be­half of the many ben­e­fi­cia­ries of the JP­Mor­gan con­fab, I would like to pro­vide re­spect­ful and po­lite re­minders re­gard­ing the un­par­al­leled val­ue of this meet­ing. I have been com­ing to JP­Mor­gan for ap­prox­i­mate­ly 20 years, no spe­cif­ic fi­nan­cial con­nec­tion with JP­Mor­gan it­self, but I like many oth­ers hope and pray that our in­dus­try’s can­dle burns bright­ly, and that the Jan­u­ary mo­men­tum cre­at­ed by JP­Mor­gan’s con­fab is peren­ni­al.

Re­minder #1: The core pur­pose is pub­lic bio­phar­ma com­pa­ny guid­ance. The heart of this event, lo­cat­ed on the mez­za­nine floor of the West­in St. Fran­cis, is the need for each pub­lic com­pa­ny to es­tab­lish guid­ance for what they seek to achieve dur­ing the cal­en­dar year. An as­ton­ish­ing­ly high num­ber of well-qual­i­fied pub­lic mar­ket in­vestors come to pre­sen­ta­tions, have 1-on-1 sched­uled meet­ings with com­pa­nies and ex­change ideas in­side the hall­ways of the West­in through­out the week. The qual­i­ty and quan­ti­ty of in­flu­en­tial in­vestors at JP­Mor­gan al­lows large phar­ma, and fledg­ling pub­lic biotechs, to reach a wide au­di­ence in per­son on a sin­gle trip. This is why the event ex­ists and is high­ly re­spect­ed.

Re­minder #2: Gets the buzz go­ing. An enor­mous, per­haps un­re­al­ized, ben­e­fit of JP­Mor­gan is how it tends to ig­nite in­dus­try mo­men­tum each year. We should all re­mem­ber that we are in a high­ly risky busi­ness with more fre­quent fail­ures than suc­cess­es, and it would be easy for us to be­come dour on the chal­lenges of drug de­vel­op­ment. The in­ten­tion­al hold-back of good news by many com­pa­nies un­til JP­Mor­gan cre­ates a spring-load ef­fect that like­ly dri­ves in­vest­ment and risk cap­i­tal cy­cles through the rest of the year. The event ma­te­ri­al­izes themes re­gard­ing how phar­ma is like­ly to be­have, how the mar­kets are like­ly to play and what tech­nol­o­gy waves are go­ing to be an­tic­i­pat­ed for the rest of the year. With­out this, we would like­ly grap­ple for pos­i­tive news, or even di­rec­tion, for months in the new year.

Re­minder #3: The by­stander ef­fect. Many, many biotech com­pa­nies have been launched, fi­nanced, bought and part­nered dur­ing this week with­out hold­ing an ac­tu­al in­vite to JP­Mor­gan it­self. A by­stander ef­fect is cre­at­ed be­cause every ma­jor phar­ma hosts meet­ings out­side of the core meet­ing, pro­vid­ing a tar­get rich en­vi­ron­ment for emerg­ing com­pa­nies to sell their wares. Even if these meet­ings are short, and mere­ly in­tro­duc­to­ry in na­ture, they pro­vide an av­enue for phar­ma mon­ey to meet biotech as­sets. Al­lows phar­ma to triage who they want to li­cense or buy for their strate­gic ther­a­peu­tic area needs dur­ing the com­ing year. This is worth gold for every emerg­ing biotech com­pa­ny that wants to con­tem­plate a part­ner­ship to fur­ther their busi­ness. While per­haps not as large as some oth­er part­ner­ing-on­ly fo­cused events, the by­stander ef­fect of JP­Mor­gan is a life-line for key parts of the in­dus­try.

Re­minder #4: The de­mand-and-sup­ply pen­du­lum. The cost of at­tend­ing JP­Mor­gan, or be­ing a by­stander, has in­creased re­mark­ably over the years. The in­dus­try is gath­er­ing mo­men­tum, hir­ing more peo­ple, de­ploy­ing more cap­i­tal and there­fore it is no sur­prise that peo­ple are will­ing to spend more to at­tend the bio­phar­ma su­per­bowl. We are at a tip­ping point where peo­ple are dis­gust­ed, but this will not lead to a dra­mat­ic pull back but more of a grad­ual re­cal­i­bra­tion. De­pend­ing on busi­ness mod­els, some com­pa­nies ap­pro­pri­ate­ly will not find the cost to be worth­while and will hence make de­ci­sions ac­cord­ing­ly next year, which will bring the pen­du­lum back to a point where San Fran­cis­co ho­tels and restau­rants will ad­just prices clos­er to nor­mal lev­els. For most of us, the cost is def­i­nite­ly worth­while.

Re­minder #5: Thank you JP­Mor­gan an­a­lysts. If any­one has the right to com­plain, it’s the JP­Mor­gan an­a­lyst team that is re­spon­si­ble for cov­er­ing >200 pre­sent­ing com­pa­nies at this con­fer­ence. It is their work that at­tracts pub­lic com­pa­nies and in­vestors to at­tend. I can­not imag­ine the hours they (Chris, Cory, Anu­pam, Jes­si­ca, Er­ic and oth­ers) must put in to pre­pare for com­pa­ny guid­ance and then write re­ports on each com­pa­ny post-pre­sen­ta­tion. Every pub­lic com­pa­ny CEO ap­pre­ci­ates your ef­fort.

I wrote this anony­mous­ly in or­der to avoid dis­trac­tion from my of­fi­cial com­pa­ny nar­ra­tive, but I rep­re­sent a con­tin­gent of bio­phar­ma CEOs that are thank­ful for what our in­dus­try has be­come and the role that the JP­Mor­gan con­fer­ence has played over the years. May the can­dle burn for­ev­er.


Im­age: West­in St. Fran­cis ho­tel SHEHLA SHAKOOR for END­POINTS NEWS

Covid-19 roundup: Eu­rope pur­chas­es 80M dos­es of Mod­er­na's vac­cine; CO­V­AXX se­cures $2.8B in emerg­ing mar­ket pre-or­ders

With the announcement of its vaccine efficacy data last week, Moderna is starting to line up customers for its Covid-19 mRNA jabs.

The Massachusetts-based biotech announced Wednesday it has agreed to sell an initial round of 80 million doses to the European Commission, with the option to double the amount to 160 million. Once the member states rubber stamp the approval, the deal will be finalized.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 94,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Pascal Soriot (AP Images)

UP­DAT­ED: As­traZeneca, Ox­ford on the de­fen­sive as skep­tics dis­miss 70% av­er­age ef­fi­ca­cy for Covid-19 vac­cine

On the third straight Monday that the world wakes up to positive vaccine news, AstraZeneca and Oxford are declaring a new Phase III milestone in the fight against the pandemic. Not everyone is convinced they will play a big part, though.

With an average efficacy of 70%, the headline number struck analysts as less impressive than the 95% and 94.5% protection that Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna have boasted in the past two weeks, respectively. But the British partners say they have several other bright spots going for their candidate. One of the two dosing regimens tested in Phase III showed a better profile, bringing efficacy up to 90%; the adenovirus vector-based vaccine requires minimal refrigeration, which may mean easier distribution; and AstraZeneca has pledged to sell it at a fraction of the price that the other two vaccine developers are charging.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 94,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Jason Kelly, Ginkgo Bioworks CEO (Kyle Grillot/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Af­ter Ko­dak de­ba­cle, US lends $1.1B to a syn­thet­ic bi­ol­o­gy com­pa­ny and their big Covid-19, mR­NA plans

In mid-August, as Kodak’s $765 million government-backed push into drug manufacturing slowly fell apart in national headlines, Ginkgo Bioworks CEO Jason Kelly got a message from his company’s government liaison: HHS wanted to know if they, too, might want a loan.

The government’s decision to lend Kodak three quarters of a billion dollars raised eyebrows because Kodak had never made drugs before. But Ginkgo, while not a manufacturing company, had spent the last decade refining new ways to produce materials inside cells and building automated facilities across Boston.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 94,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

FDA hands Liq­uidia and Re­vance a CRL and de­fer­ral, re­spec­tive­ly, as Covid-19 cre­ates in­spec­tion chal­lenge

Two biotechs said they got turned away by the FDA on Wednesday, in part due to pandemic-related travel restrictions.

North Carolina-based Liquidia Technologies was handed a CRL for its lead pulmonary arterial hypertension drug, citing the need for more CMC data and on-site pre-approval inspections, which the FDA hasn’t been able to conduct due to travel restrictions. The agency also deferred its decision on Revance Therapeutics’ BLA for its frown line treatment, because it needs to inspect the company’s northern California manufacturing facility. The action, Revance emphasized, was not a CRL.

News brief­ing: FDA re­quests new tri­al for Reata's Friedre­ich's atax­ia pro­gram; J&J's Trem­fya picks up ex­pand­ed la­bel in Eu­rope

Three months after Reata Pharmaceuticals suggested its Friedreich’s ataxia program omaveloxolone could be delayed, the company revealed that is indeed going to be the case.

Reata $RETA shares took a nosedive Wednesday after the biotech revealed that the FDA said supplemental data for its pivotal trial did not strengthen the case for approval. As a result, the drug is likely to need another study before the FDA takes up the case.

Jef­frey Hat­field takes over from Diego Mi­ralles as CEO of Vi­vid­ion; Drag­on­fly scores a new ex­ec with COO Alex Lu­gov­skoy

→ San Diego protein degradation startup Vividion Therapeutics has made a change at the top with Jeffrey Hatfield taking the helm as CEO, replacing Diego Miralles six months after Roche forked over $135 million to collaborate with Vividion on their small molecule degraders. Hatfield is chairman of the board at miRagen Therapeutics and previously held the CEO job at Zafgen and Vitae Pharmaceuticals. He also had a series of leadership roles at Bristol Myers Squibb from 1996-2004, including SVP, immunology and virology divisions.

Chi­na opens the door for biotech in­vestors in Hong Kong to buy Shang­hai stocks, and vice ver­sa

When Shanghai’s STAR board began opening its doors to biotech, it was considered not just a rival to Nasdaq but also the stock exchange in Hong Kong. Those perceptions may take an amicable turn as China expands a mutual access program with the city.

The changes mean investors in mainland China will be able to own Hong Kong biotech chapter stocks, while those in Hong Kong — a much more internationally connected group — would have access to those listed on STAR. In effect, it turns the Shanghai market into a globally accessible exchange overnight while also broadening a key source of revenue for HKEX.

Bax­ter con­tin­ues on-shoring push with $50M In­di­ana ex­pan­sion

It’s been a banner year for the once humdrum business of manufacturing drugs, particularly vaccines. Billions have been spent ramping up facilities for Covid-19 jabs, while individual CDMOs have expanded their facilities, apparently anticipating demand or responding to a government-led push to onshore drug manufacturing.

Now Baxter Biopharma Solutions, the CDMO wing of the many-armed healthcare giant Baxter, is getting in on the game. On Tuesday, they announced plans to spend $50 million to expand their flagship, 600,000 square-foot facility in Bloomington, IN.

Eu­ro­pean Union aims to es­tab­lish patent workaround in case of emer­gen­cies while try­ing to strength­en its own IP

The European Union is looking at ways to bypass patent protections and make it easier to make generic drugs in cases of emergency such as the Covid-19 pandemic, a new document says.

Normally, under WTO regulations, the practice known as “compulsory licensing” is allowed in exceptional circumstances and could be applied as a waiver to bypass patent holders. Wednesday’s document was published as part of the EU’s plan to shore up the intellectual property rights of its member states.