Young an­ti-ag­ing field takes big step with Mayo Clin­ic senolyt­ics show­case

The idea that flush­ing senes­cent cells — those old, fa­tigued cells that cease to di­vide — from the body may rid the body of harm­ful pro­teins has been one of the promi­nent pro­pos­als in the an­ti-ag­ing sphere. Hav­ing gen­er­at­ed a stream of an­i­mal da­ta to sup­port the hy­poth­e­sis, the Mayo Clin­ic now has re­sults from an ear­ly hu­man study sug­gest­ing they have found drugs that can do ex­act­ly that.

Latonya Hick­son

To be sure, the main goal of the Phase I tri­al wasn’t to show the ef­fects of de­creas­ing senes­cent cells in the body; rather, the sci­en­tists were keen to prove that a senolyt­ic reg­i­men they’ve test­ed in mice works the same way in hu­mans.

This is sig­nif­i­cant be­cause de­spite the pub­li­ca­tion of first-in-hu­man da­ta in Jan­u­ary, “so far, there has been no di­rect demon­stra­tion of senes­cent cell clear­ance by senolyt­ic drugs in peer-re­viewed pub­lished hu­man clin­i­cal tri­als,” the au­thors wrote in EBio­Med­i­cine.

For the small tri­al, re­searchers de­ployed dasa­tinib and quercetin; the for­mer is a can­cer drug al­so known as Spry­cel while the lat­ter is a plant de­riv­a­tive. Nine pa­tients with di­a­betes-re­lat­ed chron­ic kid­ney dis­ease were re­cruit­ed and giv­en the treat­ments for three days.

Laris­sa Langhi Pra­ta

While the drugs were out of the sys­tem with­in a few days, the ef­fects ap­peared to per­sist, the team — with LaTonya Hick­son and Laris­sa Langhi Pra­ta as the co-first au­thors — re­port­ed:

Key mark­ers of senes­cent cell bur­den were de­creased in adi­pose tis­sue and skin biop­sied from sub­jects 11 days af­ter com­plet­ing the 3-day course of D + Q, as were key cir­cu­lat­ing SASP fac­tors, com­pared to be­fore ad­min­is­tra­tion of these senolyt­ic drugs.

Such proof about the mech­a­nism of ac­tion bol­sters their pre­vi­ous work sug­gest­ing that a brief course of dasa­tinib plus quercetin im­proved phys­i­cal func­tions for pa­tients with id­io­path­ic pul­monary fi­bro­sis — a tough-to-treat dis­ease.

While small-scale, the tri­al is a sig­nif­i­cant step for­ward for the trans­la­tion of senolyt­ic ther­a­pies, ac­cord­ing to Ronald Ko­han­s­ki, deputy di­rec­tor of the di­vi­sion of ag­ing bi­ol­o­gy at the Na­tion­al In­sti­tute of Ag­ing.

“The demon­stra­tion that senes­cent cell num­bers can be re­duced in two tis­sues in hu­mans is an im­por­tant ad­vance based on the com­pelling ev­i­dence from stud­ies in lab­o­ra­to­ry mice,” he said in a state­ment.

James Kirk­land

Chron­ic kid­ney dis­ease is just one of many age-re­lat­ed ail­ments that the team be­lieves senolyt­ics can de­lay, pre­vent or treat, said se­nior au­thor James Kirk­land (who heads Mayo’s Robert and Ar­lene Ko­god Cen­ter on Ag­ing).

His col­leagues at Mayo have pre­vi­ous­ly flagged Alzheimer’s and Parkin­son’s as dis­eases where purg­ing senes­cent cells can make a big dif­fer­ence.

In case any­one gets over­ly ex­cit­ed, though, the sci­en­tists felt the need to con­clude their pa­per with a note of cau­tion:

The field of senolyt­ics is new. The first clin­i­cal tri­al of senolyt­ic agents was on­ly re­port­ed in Jan­u­ary 2019. The find­ings re­port­ed here are pre­lim­i­nary re­sults from an on­go­ing clin­i­cal tri­al of senolyt­ics for treat­ing dys­func­tion in pa­tients with di­a­bet­ic chron­ic kid­ney dis­ease. Few­er than 150 sub­jects have been treat­ed with these drugs in the con­text of clin­i­cal tri­als that we are aware of so far. In ad­di­tion to side ef­fects re­lat­ed to in­di­vid­ual senolyt­ic drugs known from oth­er con­texts in which those drugs have been used, there could turn out to be se­ri­ous side-ef­fects of senolyt­ics as a class, which are not yet known. We cau­tion against the use of senolyt­ic agents out­side the con­text of clin­i­cal tri­als un­til more is known about their ef­fects and side ef­fects.

De­vel­op­ment of the Next Gen­er­a­tion NKG2D CAR T-cell Man­u­fac­tur­ing Process

Celyad’s view on developing and delivering a CAR T-cell therapy with multi-tumor specificity combined with cell manufacturing success
Overview
Transitioning potential therapeutic assets from academia into the commercial environment is an exercise that is largely underappreciated by stakeholders, except for drug developers themselves. The promise of preclinical or early clinical results drives enthusiasm, but the pragmatic delivery of a therapy outside of small, local testing is most often a major challenge for drug developers especially, including among other things, the manufacturing challenges that surround the production of just-in-time and personalized autologous cell therapy products.

Paul Hudson, Getty Images

UP­DAT­ED: Sanofi CEO Hud­son lays out new R&D fo­cus — chop­ping di­a­betes, car­dio and slash­ing $2B-plus costs in sur­gi­cal dis­sec­tion

Earlier on Monday, new Sanofi CEO Paul Hudson baited the hook on his upcoming strategy presentation Tuesday with a tell-tale deal to buy Synthorx for $2.5 billion. That fits squarely with hints that he’s pointing the company to a bigger future in oncology, which also squares with a major industry tilt.

In a big reveal later in the day, though, Hudson offered a slate of stunners on his plans to surgically dissect and reassemble the portfoloio, saying that the company is dropping cardio and diabetes research — which covers two of its biggest franchise arenas. Sanofi missed the boat on developing new diabetes drugs, and now it’s pulling out entirely. As part of the pullback, it’s dropping efpeglenatide, their once-weekly GLP-1 injection for diabetes.

“To be out of cardiovascular and diabetes is not easy for a company like ours with an incredibly proud history,” Hudson said on a call with reporters, according to the Wall Street Journal. “As tough a choice as that is, we’re making that choice.”

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

What does $6.9B buy these days in on­col­o­gy R&D? As­traZeneca has a land­mark an­swer

Given the way the FDA has been whisking through new drug approvals months ahead of their PDUFA date, AstraZeneca and their partners Daiichi Sankyo may not have to wait until Q2 of next year to get a green light on trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201).

The pharma giant this morning played their ace in the hole, showing off why they were willing to commit to a $6.9 billion deal — with $1.35 billion in a cash upfront — to partner on the drug.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Large advertisements for the drug Vivitrol decorate the walls of Grand Central Station on June 15, 2017 in New York City. (Photo: Andrew Lichtenstein via Getty)

FDA slaps down Alk­er­mes for mis­lead­ing Viv­it­rol ads — don't for­get vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty to opi­oid over­dose

The ads piqued interest as soon as they started appearing in 2016: at Grand Central Station, on the Red Line in Cambridge, and on a billboard off the New Jersey Turnpike. All showed a young person, generally with his or her arms crossed, and the question, “what is Vivitrol?”

Vivitrol’s maker, Alkermes, was in the midst of a marketing and lobbying campaign to promote the anti-opioid addiction drug — a campaign that would face significant backlash for tarnishing competitors despite little evidence for Vivitrol’s superiority.

Paul Hudson, Sanofi

Paul Hud­son promis­es a bright new fu­ture at Sanofi, kick­ing loose me-too drugs and fo­cus­ing on land­mark ad­vances. But can he de­liv­er?

Paul Hudson was on a mission Tuesday morning as he stood up to address Sanofi’s new R&D and business strategy.

Still fresh into the job, the new CEO set out to convince his audience — including the legions of nervous staffers inevitably devoting much of their day to listening in — that the pharma giant is shedding the layers of bureaucracy that had held them back from making progress in the past, dropping the duds in the pipeline and reprioritizing a more narrow set of experimental drugs that were promised as first-in-class or best-in-class.  The company, he added, is now positioned to “go after other opportunities” that could offer a transformational approach to treating its core diseases.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

FDA in-house re­view spot­lights an is­sue with one of Hori­zon's end­points but notes ef­fi­ca­cy for lead drug

The FDA in-house review highlights a disagreement of investigators’ use of a key endpoint by Horizon Pharma in the late-stage trial for the top drug in its pipeline, but largely agreed that the antibody was effective.

Horizon submitted a BLA for thyroid eye disease (TED) drug teprotumumab in March, less than two years after they bought the drug (and the rest of a division) from Narrow River for $145 million upfront. With breakthrough status, priority review, orphan designation and in-house sales projections of up to $750 million, the one-time Roche reject became the marquee pipeline asset for a company that’s developed some of the world’s most expensive drugs.

Seat­tle Ge­net­ics de­tails pos­i­tive OS and PFS da­ta for tu­ca­tinib in breast can­cer

Seattle Genetics $SGEN is showing off more positive data around tucatinib, its pivotal-stage drug for HER2 positive breast cancer.

A month after hearing about solidly upbeat hazard ratios, we learned today that the estimated progression-free survival rate at one year was 33% in the tucatinib arm compared to 12% for patients taking trastuzumab and capecitabine alone.

Median PFS was 7.8 months (95% CI: 7.5, 9.6) in the tucatinib arm, compared to 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.2, 7.1) in the control arm.

Bat­tered, cash hun­gry In­tec feels the burn of No­var­tis re­jec­tion

It’s a case of some bad timing for Intec.

Just when a key trial testing the company’s Accordion drug delivery tech imploded in Parkinson’s disease, they handed Novartis data from a successful PK study of a custom Accordion pill engineered to deliver a Novartis compound to entice the Swiss drugmaker into signing a licensing agreement.

Novartis said thanks, but no thanks.

For the cash-strapped Israeli drug developer, the failure to clinch the deal marks a big blow. As of the third quarter, the company has $15.7 million in cash and equivalents, which HC Wainwright analysts estimate will keep the lights on into mid-2020.

Bris­tol-My­ers shows off a low-pro­file AML con­tender it gained from Cel­gene buy­out — and they’re tak­ing it straight to the FDA

Bristol-Myers Squibb reaped an enormous pipeline with its much-criticized $64 billion megadeal to buy Celgene. And it got a few hidden gems in the deal.

One of those gems was brought out for display on Tuesday, with a late-breaker at ASH on CC-486, which is now being prepped for regulatory filings at the FDA and elsewhere.

Celgene top-lined the positive results in a maintenance setting for acute myeloid leukemia a few months ago, but at ASH investigators pulled back the curtains on the all-important data they believe will give them an advantage in the commercial wars to come.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.