Months af­ter an­oth­er lethal set­back, Juno fi­nal­ly opts to kill lead CAR-T

Juno CEO Hans Bish­op

Months af­ter one of the worst set­backs in the re­cent his­to­ry of drug de­vel­op­ment left a string of pa­tients dead, Juno has fi­nal­ly de­cid­ed that it will ter­mi­nate its lead drug pro­gram, hop­ing for a bet­ter out­come with an­oth­er CAR-T ther­a­py in its pipeline.

Juno CEO Hans Bish­op claimed $JUNO that its de­ci­sion to shelve JCAR015 was all due to the “un­ex­pect­ed” tox­i­c­i­ty that it dis­cov­ered af­ter the drug killed five pa­tients due to cere­bral ede­ma, or brain swelling. The sec­ond tal­ly of deaths, though, oc­curred in No­vem­ber, af­ter the com­pa­ny con­vinced the FDA to swift­ly lift a clin­i­cal hold on the drug by mak­ing the du­bi­ous claim that elim­i­nat­ing flu­dara­bine from the pre­con­di­tion­ing reg­i­men for pa­tients would re­solve the safe­ty is­sue that had al­ready killed sev­er­al late-stage can­cer pa­tients.

Flu­dara­bine is still com­mon­ly used in most CAR-T stud­ies, need­ed to help these cell ther­a­pies take ef­fect in pa­tients. This first wave of drugs ex­tracts T cells from pa­tients and then reengi­neers them to go af­ter can­cer cells, and progress has been reg­u­lar­ly marred by se­ri­ous safe­ty is­sues. But there’s still been no clear ex­pla­na­tion of why JCAR015 de­railed.

Shares of Juno dropped 8% Wednes­day evening on the biotech’s re­minder of its se­ri­ous­ly flawed ef­forts.

“We con­tin­ue to ex­pe­ri­ence en­cour­ag­ing signs of clin­i­cal ben­e­fit in our tri­al ad­dress­ing NHL, but we al­so rec­og­nize the un­for­tu­nate and un­ex­pect­ed tox­i­c­i­ty we saw in our tri­al ad­dress­ing ALL with JCAR015,” said Bish­op in a state­ment. “We have de­cid­ed not to move for­ward with the ROCK­ET tri­al or JCAR015 at this time, even though it gen­er­at­ed im­por­tant learn­ings for us and the im­munother­a­py field.”

Juno threw out sev­er­al vague fac­tors that may have trig­gered the deaths. But they all added up to a re­turn to Phase I to prove their point. And there was no time to go back to the draw­ing board. From the state­ment:

Through the in­ves­ti­ga­tion Juno iden­ti­fied mul­ti­ple fac­tors that may have con­tributed to this in­creased risk, in­clud­ing pa­tient spe­cif­ic fac­tors, the con­di­tion­ing chemother­a­py pa­tients re­ceived, and fac­tors re­lat­ed to the prod­uct. Al­though Juno be­lieves there are pro­to­col mod­i­fi­ca­tions and process im­prove­ments that could en­able Juno to pro­ceed with JCAR015 in clin­i­cal test­ing in adult r/r ALL, Juno would first need to es­tab­lish pre­lim­i­nary safe­ty and dose in a Phase I tri­al. As a re­sult of the tim­ing de­lay that would en­tail and Juno’s be­lief that it has oth­er prod­uct can­di­dates in its pipeline that are like­ly to pro­vide im­proved ef­fi­ca­cy and tol­er­a­bil­i­ty,

As just about every­one who fol­lows this field has ex­pect­ed for some time now, Juno is turn­ing to JCAR017, hop­ing to get back on track af­ter falling far be­hind the two lead­ers in the field: Kite and No­var­tis. In its state­ment to­day, Juno out­lined plans to launch a piv­otal study for r/r dif­fuse large B cell lym­phoma lat­er this year. The biotech, though, has now fall­en be­hind ri­vals by more than a year.

At one point Juno was con­sid­ered a con­tender for a pi­o­neer­ing ap­proval, run­ning neck-and-neck with Kite. Yes­ter­day, though, Kite post­ed im­pres­sive 6-month re­sults for its CAR-T ahead of its ap­pli­ca­tion for ap­proval, as Juno was just get­ting ready to for­mal­ly ter­mi­nate its trou­bled lead pro­gram.

Added Bish­op:

Look­ing for­ward in­to 2017, we con­tin­ue to be op­ti­mistic about the progress we are mak­ing with JCAR017 and our pipeline more broad­ly. We ex­pect 2017 will be a da­ta-rich year of key in­sights, based on up to 20 on­go­ing tri­als by year end, and we plan to present da­ta from these tri­als as ap­pro­pri­ate through­out the year.

2023 Spot­light on the Fu­ture of Drug De­vel­op­ment for Small and Mid-Sized Biotechs

In the context of today’s global economic environment, there is an increasing need to work smarter, faster and leaner across all facets of the life sciences industry.  This is particularly true for small and mid-sized biotech companies, many of which are facing declining valuations and competing for increasingly limited funding to propel their science forward.  It is important to recognize that within this framework, many of these smaller companies already find themselves resource-challenged to design and manage clinical studies themselves because they don’t have large teams or in-house experts in navigating the various aspects of the drug development journey. This can be particularly challenging for the most complex and difficult to treat diseases where no previous pathway exists and patients are urgently awaiting breakthroughs.

Rick Modi, Affinia Therapeutics CEO

Ver­tex-part­nered gene ther­a­py biotech Affinia scraps IPO plans

Affinia Therapeutics has ditched its plans to go public in a relatively closed-door market that has not favored Nasdaq debuts for the drug development industry most of this year. A pandemic surge in 2020 and 2021 opened the doors for many preclinical startups, which caught Affinia’s attention and gave the gene therapy biotech confidence in the beginning days of 2022 to send in its S-1.

But on Friday, Affinia threw in the S-1 towel and concluded now is not the time to step onto Wall Street. The biotech has put out few public announcements since the spring of this year. Endpoints News picked the startup as one of its 11 biotechs to watch last year.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 154,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Up­dat­ed: FDA re­mains silent on or­phan drug ex­clu­siv­i­ty af­ter last year's court loss

Since losing a controversial court case over orphan drug exclusivity last year, the FDA’s Office of Orphan Products Development has remained entirely silent on orphan exclusivity for any product approved since last November, leaving many sponsors in limbo on what to expect.

That silence means that for more than 70 orphan-designated indications for more than 60 products, OOPD has issued no public determination on the seven-year orphan exclusivity in the Orange Book, and no new listings of orphan exclusivity appear in OOPD’s searchable database, as highlighted recently by George O’Brien, a partner in Mayer Brown’s Washington, DC office.

Albert Bourla, Pfizer CEO (Efren Landaos/Sipa USA/Sipa via AP Images)

Pfiz­er makes an­oth­er bil­lion-dol­lar in­vest­ment in Eu­rope and ex­pands again in Michi­gan

Pfizer is continuing its run of manufacturing site expansions with two new large investments in the US and Europe.

The New York-based pharma giant’s site in Kalamazoo, MI, has seen a lot of attention over the past year. As a major piece of the manufacturing network for Covid-19 vaccines and antivirals, Pfizer is gearing up to place more money into the site. Pfizer announced it will place $750 million into the facility, mainly to establish “modular aseptic processing” (MAP) production and create around 300 jobs at the site.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 154,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Vas Narasimhan, Novartis CEO (Thibault Camus/AP Images, Pool)

No­var­tis bol­sters Plu­vic­to's case in prostate can­cer with PhI­II re­sults

The prognosis is poor for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Novartis wants to change that by making its recently approved Pluvicto available to patients earlier in their course of treatment.

The Swiss pharma giant unveiled Phase III results Monday suggesting that Pluvicto was able to halt disease progression in certain prostate cancer patients when administered after androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) therapy, but without prior taxane-based chemotherapy. The drug is currently approved for patients after they’ve received both ARPI and chemo.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 154,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Nkarta CEO Paul Hastings at Endpoints' #BIO22 panel (J.T. MacMillan Photography for Endpoints News)

Nkar­ta un­der­scores safe­ty of CAR-NK, boasts ear­ly re­spons­es

The first generation of personalized CAR-T therapies made big waves in the treatment of lymphoma for their stunning efficacy. Nkarta is hoping its off-the-shelf natural killer cell approach will stand out on safety — while keeping some of those impressive numbers on responses.

In a new update from its Phase I dose escalation study, the South San Francisco-based biotech reported that seven out of 10 patients treated with the highest doses of its NK cell therapy, NKX019, achieved a complete response, translating to a complete response rate of 70%.

Pfiz­er-backed Me­di­ar Ther­a­peu­tics ropes in an­oth­er Big Phar­ma in­vestor

A biotech centered on treating fibrosis — born out of Mass General and Brigham and Women’s Hospital — has received a financial boost.

According to an SEC filing, the company has raised $31,761,186 in its latest funding round, which includes 17 investors. The filing lists six names attached to the company, including Meredith Fisher, a partner at Mass General Brigham Ventures and Mediar’s acting CEO.

Ken Greenberg, SonoThera CEO

Gene ther­a­py goes acoustic as ARCH-backed biotech launch­es with ul­tra­sound gene de­liv­ery plat­form

After co-founding two biotechs off virus-based therapies, one for pain and one for cancer, Ken Greenberg decided to go in a different direction for his newest biotech, SonoThera.

Based out of San Francisco, SonoThera announced Monday morning that it raised $60.75 million to develop new gene therapies — but delivered by ultrasound, which Greenberg says can address the major challenges facing more conventional viral gene therapies.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 154,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Sekar Kathiresan, Verve Therapeutics CEO

Verve re­veals let­ter from FDA that lays out con­di­tions to lift base edit­ing tri­al hold

We now know why Verve’s lead candidate was placed on hold last month by US regulators.

In an SEC filing, Verve laid out the FDA’s conditions for lifting the hold on its lead therapy, VERVE-101. That includes submitting preclinical data about potency differences in human versus non-human cells, risks of gene editing germline cells, and off-target analyses in non-hepatocyte cell types.

The FDA also wants clinical data from the ongoing Heart-1 trial, and to modify the trial protocol in the US to add additional contraceptive measures and increase the length of a staggering interval between the dosing of participants.