Ned Sharp­less is not play­ing with the FDA’s gold stan­dard — any more than Scott Got­tlieb did

Ned Sharp­less got a chance to out­line just what kind of act­ing FDA chief he’ll be in the wake of Scott Got­tlieb’s de­par­ture from the agency. And aside from a more con­ser­v­a­tive se­lec­tion of socks, he’s clear­ly plan­ning to adopt the ex­act same fash­ions laid down by his pre­de­ces­sor.

Ned Sharp­less. (DARR BEIS­ER/NA­TION­AL CAN­CER IN­STI­TUTE)

Click on the im­age to see the full-sized ver­sion


In an all-hands-on-deck ad­dress to staffers, Sharp­less promised to fit the Got­tlieb mold per­fect­ly, vow­ing to main­tain the agency’s gold stan­dard on drug ap­provals while do­ing what he can to keep the copy­cats com­ing to help tamp down on drug costs.

So let me re­as­sure you, I am not plan­ning any rad­i­cal changes from what the FDA has been try­ing to ac­com­plish.

Bioreg­num Opin­ion Col­umn by John Car­roll

That’s a theme that will be mu­sic to the ears of the bio­phar­ma in­dus­try, which quick­ly swooned to Got­tlieb’s en­er­getic mes­sages on speed­ing ap­provals when­ev­er ap­pro­pri­ate while hold­ing the line on safe­ty and ef­fi­ca­cy stan­dards. The fu­ture of the FDA proved to be a huge is­sue at the start of Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump’s term in of­fice, as Trump en­ter­tained some lib­er­tar­i­an no­tions that fright­ened the be­je­sus out of com­pa­nies that clear­ly want­ed a more re­cep­tive reg­u­la­to­ry ap­proach — with­out any reg­u­la­to­ry an­ar­chy that would de­stroy the val­ue of an FDA OK.

Sharp­less got right to it. His bot­tom line:

Nec­es­sar­i­ly, there will be course ad­just­ments as new facts emerge, but es­sen­tial­ly, I feel I am walk­ing in­to an or­ga­ni­za­tion on a good tra­jec­to­ry, and my main job is to fig­ure out how keep that go­ing.

Now how to do that:  let me sug­gest two guid­ing prin­ci­ples.

First, I be­lieve our ef­forts should re­ly on and be guid­ed by the sci­ence. As a re­searcher, I am used to let­ting da­ta dri­ve my de­ci­sion-mak­ing, and I know this has al­ways been the ap­proach at FDA.

Sec­ond, when wran­gling with the com­plex is­sues that face the agency, we will keep top of mind our mis­sion of pro­tect­ing and pro­mot­ing pub­lic health, and what that means to the Amer­i­can pub­lic.

So that’s what will steer my pri­or­i­ties as act­ing com­mis­sion­er: a com­mit­ment to sci­ence-based de­ci­sion-mak­ing and pri­or­i­tiz­ing our ef­forts for the ben­e­fit of the pub­lic health.

That mes­sage on con­ti­nu­ity ex­tends to the agency’s work hus­tling up less ex­pen­sive knock­offs.

I promise you, for ex­am­ple, that we’ll con­tin­ue our im­por­tant and suc­cess­ful work to in­crease com­pe­ti­tion and reign in pre­scrip­tion drug costs through ad­vances in our gener­ic drug and biosim­i­lars pro­grams

And we’ll con­tin­ue to do every­thing we can to make the de­vel­op­ment of new treat­ments and cures more ef­fi­cient across our med­ical prod­uct cen­ters, while en­sur­ing that we main­tain FDA’s gold stan­dard of safe­ty and ef­fi­ca­cy.

What could be more re­as­sur­ing to the in­dus­try, law­mak­ers and the pub­lic?

In­ter­est­ing­ly, Got­tlieb’s de­par­ture from the FDA was al­so marked by his in­sis­tence that the rank-and-file drug de­vel­op­ers of the world need­ed to do more to adopt the re­forms he had pushed, look­ing for faster, more ef­fi­cient ways to de­vel­op drugs. The chal­lenge for Sharp­less will be to see if he con­tin­ues that push as an in­dus­try train­er look­ing to get some out-of-shape de­vel­op­ers up to speed with the new or­der. And that means urg­ing reg­u­la­tors as well to get the lead out.

Scott Got­tlieb

Con­ti­nu­ity may sound like the ex­act right mes­sage here and now. But if that be­comes a con­ser­v­a­tive ap­proach to main­tain­ing stan­dards and tra­di­tions, plea­sure may soon be re­placed by an un­easy feel­ing that the FDA may once again be­come more of an ob­sta­cle and less of a part­ner. And that won’t be wel­come.

Up­dat­ed: FDA re­mains silent on or­phan drug ex­clu­siv­i­ty af­ter last year's court loss

Since losing a controversial court case over orphan drug exclusivity last year, the FDA’s Office of Orphan Products Development has remained entirely silent on orphan exclusivity for any product approved since last November, leaving many sponsors in limbo on what to expect.

That silence means that for more than 70 orphan-designated indications for more than 60 products, OOPD has issued no public determination on the seven-year orphan exclusivity in the Orange Book, and no new listings of orphan exclusivity appear in OOPD’s searchable database, as highlighted recently by George O’Brien, a partner in Mayer Brown’s Washington, DC office.

Illustration: Assistant Editor Kathy Wong for Endpoints News

As mon­ey pours in­to dig­i­tal ther­a­peu­tics, in­sur­ance cov­er­age crawls



Talk therapy didn’t help Lily with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD. But a video game did.

As the 10-year-old zooms through icy waters and targets flying creatures on the snow-capped planet Frigidus, she builds attention skills, thanks to Akili Interactive Labs’ video game EndeavorRx. She’s now less anxious and scattered, allowing her to stay on a low dose of ADHD medication, according to her mom Violet Vu.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Eli Lil­ly’s Alzheimer’s drug clears more amy­loid ear­ly than Aduhelm in first-ever head-to-head. Will it mat­ter?

Ahead of the FDA’s decision on Eli Lilly’s Alzheimer’s drug donanemab in February, the Big Pharma is dropping a first cut of data from one of the more interesting trials — but less important in a regulatory sense — at an Alzheimer’s conference in San Francisco.

In the unblinded 148-person study, Eli Lilly pitted its drug against Aduhelm, Biogen’s drug that won FDA approval but lost Medicare coverage outside of clinical trials. Notably, the study didn’t look at clinical outcomes, but rather the clearance of amyloid, a protein whose buildup is associated with Alzheimer’s disease, in the brain.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 153,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

SQZ Biotech slash­es head­count by 60% as founder/CEO hits ex­it — while Syn­log­ic lays off 25%

It’s a tough time for early-stage companies developing highly promising, but largely unproven, new technologies.

Just ask SQZ Biotechnologies and Synlogic. The former is bidding farewell to its founder and CEO and slashing the headcount by 60% as it pivots from its original cell therapy platform to a next-gen approach; the latter — a synthetic biology play founded by MIT’s Jim Collins and Tim Lu — is similarly “optimizing” the company to focus on lead programs. The resulting realignment means 25% of the staffers will be laid off.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 153,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Lynn Baxter, Viiv Healthcare's head of North America

Vi­iV dri­ves new cor­po­rate coali­tion in­clud­ing Uber, Tin­der and Wal­mart, aimed at end­ing HIV

ViiV Healthcare is pulling together an eclectic coalition of consumer businesses in a new White House-endorsed effort to end HIV by the end of the decade.

The new US Business Action to End HIV includes pharma and health companies — Gilead Sciences, CVS Health and Walgreens — but extends to a wide range of consumer companies that includes Tinder, Uber and Walmart.

ViiV is the catalyst for the group, plunking down more than half a million dollars in seed money and taking on ringmaster duties for launch today on World AIDS Day, but co-creator Health Action Alliance will organize joint activities going forward. ViiV and the alliance want and expect more companies to not only join the effort, but also pitch in funding.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 153,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Matt Gline, Roivant Sciences CEO (Photo by John Sciulli/Getty Images for GLG)

Pfiz­er and Roivant team up again for an­oth­er 'Van­t', set­ting up an­ti-in­flam­ma­to­ry show­down with Prometheus

Pfizer and Roivant are teaming up to launch a new ‘Vant’ aimed at bringing a mid-stage anti-inflammatory drug to market, the pair announced Thursday.

There’s no name for the startup yet, nor are there any employees. Thus far, the new company and Roivant can be considered “one and the same,” Roivant CEO Matt Gline tells Endpoints News. But Pfizer is so enthusiastic about the target that it elected to keep 25% of equity in the drug rather than take upfront cash from Roivant, Gline said.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 153,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Roche HQ in Basel, Switzerland. (Image credit: Kyle LaHucik/Endpoints News)

As com­peti­tors near FDA goal­post, Roche spells out its re­peat Alzheimer's set­back

Before Roche can turn all eyes on a new version of its more-than-once-failed Alzheimer’s drug gantenerumab, the Big Pharma had to flesh out data on the November topline failure at an annual conference buzzier than in years past thanks to hotly watched rivals in the field: Eisai and Biogen’s lecanemab, and Eli Lilly’s donanemab.

There was less than a 10% difference between Roche’s drug and placebo at slowing cognitive decline across two Phase III trials, which combined enrolled nearly 2,000 Alzheimer’s patients. In its presentation at the conference Wednesday, Roche said it saw less sweeping away of toxic proteins than it had anticipated. For years, researchers and investors have put their resources behind the idea that more amyloid removal would equate to reduced cognitive decline.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 153,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Ei­sai’s ex­pand­ed Alzheimer’s da­ta leave open ques­tions about safe­ty and clin­i­cal ben­e­fit

Researchers still have key questions about Eisai’s investigational Alzheimer’s drug lecanemab following the publication of more Phase III data in the New England Journal of Medicine Tuesday night.

In the paper, which was released in conjunction with presentations at an Alzheimer’s conference, trial investigators write that a definition of clinical meaningfulness “has not been established.” And the relative lack of new information, following topline data unveiled in September, left experts asking for more — setting up a potential showdown to precisely define how big a difference the drug makes in patients’ lives.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Illustration: Assistant Editor Kathy Wong for Endpoints News

Twit­ter dis­ar­ray con­tin­ues as phar­ma ad­ver­tis­ers ex­tend paus­es and look around for op­tions, but keep tweet­ing

Pharma advertisers on Twitter are done — at least for now. Ad spending among the previous top spenders flattened even further last week, according to the latest data from ad tracker Pathmatics, amid ongoing turmoil after billionaire boss Elon Musk’s takeover now one month ago.

Among 18 top advertisers tracked for Endpoints News, only two are spending: GSK and Bayer. GSK spending for the full week through Sunday was minimal at just under $1,900. Meanwhile, German drugmaker Bayer remains the industry outlier upping its spending to $499,000 last week from $480,000 the previous week. Bayer’s spending also marks a big increase from a month ago and before the Musk takeover, when it spent $16,000 per week.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.