No­var­tis sac­ri­fices its top at­tor­ney in an at­tempt to quell clam­or over $1.2M in Co­hen pay­ments — while ex-CEO Jimenez strug­gles to ex­plain

BioReg­num — The view from John Car­roll


Faced with a grow­ing cri­sis over its $1.2 mil­lion in pay­ments to Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump’s per­son­al at­tor­ney Michael Co­hen, No­var­tis an­nounced ear­ly Wednes­day that the com­pa­ny’s top lawyer has abrupt­ly re­signed in hopes of bring­ing the whole tawdry af­fair to an end.

“Al­though the con­tract (with Co­hen) was legal­ly in or­der, it was an er­ror,” said Fe­lix Ehrat, group gen­er­al coun­sel of No­var­tis, in a state­ment. “As a co-sig­na­to­ry with our for­mer CEO, I take per­son­al re­spon­si­bil­i­ty to bring the pub­lic de­bate on this mat­ter to an end.”

The chances of that hap­pen­ing, though, are ze­ro. If any­thing, this move will on­ly height­en pres­sure on No­var­tis to ful­ly ex­plain why it agreed to pay $1.2 mil­lion to an at­tor­ney whose on­ly rel­e­vant at­trac­tion to the phar­ma gi­ant was his close per­son­al tie to the pres­i­dent. That re­mains the bot­tom line af­ter ex-CEO Joe Jimenez gave an in­ter­view to Forbes’ Matthew Her­p­er, where he strug­gled to ex­plain why the com­pa­ny hired Co­hen.

“If we were the ex­perts on pol­i­cy, he was the ex­pert on the way that they think, to­geth­er as a team it could be a way for us to bet­ter nav­i­gate what was go­ing to be a pret­ty sticky Af­ford­able Care Act Re­peal-and-Re­place,” Jimenez told Her­p­er in the in­ter­view.

Jimenez al­so took “full re­spon­si­bil­i­ty,” say­ing that his re­place­ment, Vas Narasimhan, was not in­volved. And he re­peat­ed­ly em­pha­sized the un­cer­tain­ty around Trump’s elec­tion for the move to gain some clar­i­ty.

“He was one of the very few num­ber of peo­ple who knew peo­ple in the ad­min­is­tra­tion,” Jimenez not­ed.

Ehrat’s sud­den ex­it — as well as the Jimenez in­ter­view — un­der­score how deeply the com­pa­ny has been bat­tered by the con­tro­ver­sy and the grow­ing list of ques­tions Narasimhan still faces. Com­pa­ny ex­ecs had pri­vate­ly been pin­ning the blame on Jimenez, who stepped down from the CEO’s job at the end of Jan­u­ary. Adding the gen­er­al coun­sel to the list of re­spon­si­ble play­ers — and send­ing him through the ex­its — does noth­ing to ad­dress the many ques­tions the com­pa­ny faces , while clum­sy at­tempts to apol­o­gize and re­fo­cus on the busi­ness un­der­score its in­abil­i­ty to man­age events.

The 41-year-old Narasimhan — who has nev­er ex­plained when he first heard about the Co­hen deal — is still fac­ing a drum­beat of omi­nous news.

We now hear that Switzer­land’s Of­fice of the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al has been dis­cussing the pos­si­bil­i­ty of launch­ing their own probe in­to the pay­ments, though the of­fi­cials there say that no for­mal probe is now un­der­way. And two promi­nent De­mo­c­ra­t­ic sen­a­tors, Eliz­a­beth War­ren and Richard Blu­men­thal, joined Ron Wyden and Pat­ty Mur­ray in scold­ing the com­pa­ny and ask­ing some point­ed ques­tions about ex­act­ly why it paid Co­hen that much and what it got in re­turn.

“Giv­en these on­go­ing mat­ters, the un­usu­al se­ries of pay­ments.by No­var­tis to the Pres­i­dent’s per­son­al at­tor­ney raise ob­vi­ous ques­tions about cor­rup­tion and whether No­var­tis and the Trump Ad­min­is­tra­tion were en­gaged in a pay-for-play op­er­a­tion,” War­ren and Blu­men­thal wrote, ahead of their list of queries.

Joe Jimenez

While the din of dis­ap­proval rose around the Basel head­quar­ters, Narasimhan him­self re­port­ed­ly took to the phone to tell thou­sands of the com­pa­ny’s man­agers that No­var­tis needs to clean up its act. Ac­cord­ing to a re­port from Bloomberg, Narasimhan told his man­agers by phone that the com­pa­ny had to move to re­think its re­la­tion­ship with lob­by­ists and re­gain the pub­lic’s trust.

Com­pa­ny ex­ecs knew back in No­vem­ber that they could face a hue and cry, when Robert Mueller’s team came in to ask ques­tions about the re­la­tion­ship. Co­hen him­self has been at the cen­ter of a me­dia cir­cus sur­round­ing the rev­e­la­tion that he had paid porn star Stormy Daniels $130,000 to keep qui­et about an al­leged af­fair with Trump — writ­ing a check from the same shell com­pa­ny that No­var­tis paid in­to. But No­var­tis nev­er dis­closed any­thing about the fed­er­al in­ves­ti­ga­tion in pub­lic fil­ings.

Ex­act­ly how Narasimhan plans to re­spond while re­main­ing hun­kered down in­side the com­pa­ny’s walls, though, re­mains to be seen. Does the CEO — now stout­ly de­fend­ed by a pha­lanx of me­dia con­tacts who in­sist the com­pa­ny will co­op­er­ate with all in­ves­ti­ga­tions — sub­mit to a Q&A with a friend­ly or per­haps high­ly rep­utable me­dia out­let? Does he start to pub­licly ad­dress the per­sis­tent ques­tions sur­round­ing No­var­tis pay­ments? Does some­one else get the ax?

No­var­tis rec­og­nizes it faces a cri­sis. But for now, there’s still no clear plan to deal with it in any kind of pub­lic way.


Im­age: Vas Narasimhan. GET­TY IM­AGES

Gilead CEO Dan O'­Day of­fers a de­tailed ex­pla­na­tion on remde­sivir ac­cess — re­as­sur­ing an­a­lysts that Covid-19 da­ta are com­ing fast

After coming under heavy fire from consumer groups ready to pummel them for grabbing the FDA’s orphan status for remdesivir — reserved to encourage the development of rare disease therapies — Gilead CEO Daniel O’Day had some explaining to do about the company’s approach to providing access to this drug to patients suffering from Covid-19. And he set aside time over the weekend to patiently explain how they are making their potential pandemic drug available in a new program — one he feels can better be used to address a growing pack of infected patients desperately seeking remdesivir under compassionate use provisions.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 76,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Ven­ture Cap­i­tal as a Strate­gic Part­ner: Fu­el­ing In­no­va­tion be­yond Fi­nance

The average level of investment required for a biotech start-up to succeed is increasing every year, elevating the pressure even further on venture capital to make smart financial investments. Financial investment alone, however, does not always guarantee that exciting innovations can be transformed into real businesses that make a meaningful difference to patients.

Beyond just capital

At Astellas Venture Management (AVM) – a wholly-owned venture capital organization within Astellas, headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area – capital is just one of the ingredients we offer to add value to our biotechnology investments and partnerships. We generally take a strategic investor approach for companies in our invested portfolio, providing access to expertise, technology and/or resources in addition to the injection of finance. An equity investment from AVM can include access to Astellas’ research and development (R&D) capabilities and expertise, and a global network of partner academic institutions and biotechnology companies, to help advance and accelerate the start-up’s innovation.

Covid-19 roundup: In­ter­cept, blue­bird and a grow­ing list of biotechs feel the pain as pan­dem­ic man­gles FDA, R&D sched­ules

Around 100 staffers at Boston area hospitals have now tested positive for Covid-19, spotlighting the growing risk that the pandemic will sideline many of the most essential workers in healthcare as caseloads peak in the US and around the globe. With more than 3,400 deaths, Spain has become the latest country to surpass the official death count attributed to the new coronavirus in China, where the outbreak originated. As of Thursday morning, confirmed global cases had crossed 470,000 and the death count eclipsed 21,000.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 76,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Af­ter crit­ics lam­bast­ed Gilead for grab­bing the FDA's spe­cial rare drug sta­tus on remde­sivir, they're giv­ing it back

Two days after Gilead won orphan drug status for remdesivir as a potential treatment for Covid-19, they’re handing it back.

The company was slammed from several sides after Gilead reported that the FDA had come through with the special status, which comes with 7 years of market exclusivity, the waiver of FDA fees and some tax credits as well. Typically, everyone who can get orphan status lands it without much of a fuss, but Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, Public Citizen and other consumer groups were outraged.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 76,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Mod­er­na CEO Stéphane Ban­cel out­lines a short path for emer­gency use of a coro­n­avirus vac­cine

NIAID director Anthony Fauci has left no doubts that it takes 12 to 18 months to get a new vaccine tested and in commercial use, in the best of circumstances. But in times of a global emergency — like these — maybe there’s another, faster route to follow.

In an SEC filing on Tuesday, Moderna $MRNA staked out a record-setting pathway to getting their mRNA vaccine into the frontline of the healthcare response as early as this fall. The SEC filing notes that CEO Stéphane Bancel told Goldman Sachs that an emergency use approval could allow the vaccine to go to healthcare workers and certain individuals in a matter of months — presumably provided the NIH sees the safety and efficacy data they would need from the Phase I.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 76,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Caught in a Covid-19 mael­strom, Eli Lil­ly locks down clin­i­cal tri­als as multi­bil­lion-dol­lar R&D ops de­rail

The Covid-19 pandemic has derailed Eli Lilly’s $6 billion R&D operations.

The pharma giant reported Monday morning that it has decided to hit the brakes on most new study starts and pause enrollment for most ongoing studies. Lilly adds that it is continuing dosing for ongoing studies, “but with study-by-study consideration.”

The pandemic has severely disrupted healthcare systems around the globe, says Lilly, making it difficult or impossible to conduct studies at many research sites. And there’s no timeline for when it expects to get back on track.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 76,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: Ver­tex joins Mer­ck, Pfiz­er — re­vamp­ing multi­bil­lion-dol­lar tri­al strat­e­gy as biotech R&D crum­bles

You can add Pfizer, Merck and — as we found out Friday morning — Vertex to the growing list of pharma giants hitting the pause button on a range of clinical trials. But not everyone in R&D is getting a red light.

Vertex says that it’s doing its best to keep working its pipeline strategy, coming up with a plan “to enable virtual clinic visits and home delivery of study drug to ensure study continuity and medical monitoring, and to facilitate study procedures.”

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 76,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Covid-19 roundup: Bris­tol My­ers sus­pends clin­i­cal tri­als, grounds field team; Vir ush­ers an­ti­body can­di­dates to hu­man test­ing

The global nature of the Covid-19 pandemic is manifesting more profoundly every day. With Spain’s death toll now surpassing China’s and India on full lockdown, the number of confirmed cases around the world has exceeded 436,000 while recoveries edged close to 112,000.

While the outbreak derails R&D at another pharma giant, several drugmakers have some encouraging updates on both experimental and repurposed molecules. Philanthropic campaigns in anticipation of the economic fallout continue. An Australian biotech is taking extreme measures to hunker down. There’s also an alternative epidemiology model emerging out of the UK, stirring up more discussion regarding the true extent of the infections in the country.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 76,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

As share buy­backs come un­der scruti­ny, what's in store for the bio­phar­ma in­dus­try?

Stock buybacks are not to be permitted for companies that will be bailed out in the coronavirus stimulus package, Congressional leaders have signaled. To what degree the biopharma industry has relied on buybacks for earnings growth in recent years, and if the trend continues, are the big questions as scrutiny into the practice heightens and balance sheets weaken with the coronavirus pandemic wreaking havoc on global economies.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 76,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.