Vas Narasimhan. AP Images

No­var­tis makes new da­ta in­tegri­ty com­mit­ment

Look­ing to slow the fall­out from No­var­tis’ da­ta ma­nip­u­la­tion fi­as­co with its bil­lion-dol­lar gene ther­a­py Zol­gens­ma (onasemno­gene abepar­vovec-xioi), CEO Vas­ant Narasimhan told an in­vestor con­fer­ence on Mon­day that the com­pa­ny will be more proac­tive in re­port­ing da­ta in­tegri­ty is­sues to the FDA.

“We are vol­un­tar­i­ly and proac­tive­ly tak­ing a pledge with the FDA to en­sure that we will in­form them with­in five busi­ness days of any cred­i­ble al­le­ga­tion re­lat­ed to da­ta in­tegri­ty,” Narasimhan said.

He al­so said No­var­tis has re­spond­ed to the FDA’s Form 483 and is mak­ing doc­u­ments avail­able as re­quest­ed, while re­it­er­at­ing that the da­ta ma­nip­u­la­tion un­cov­ered at the San Diego site “does not im­pact the safe­ty, ef­fi­ca­cy or qual­i­ty of Zol­gens­ma.”

The pledge fol­lows sharp com­ments made last week by act­ing FDA Com­mis­sion­er Ned Sharp­less, who did not men­tion No­var­tis by name, but clear­ly sin­gled the com­pa­ny out in his re­marks be­fore the Re­search!Amer­i­ca 2019 Na­tion­al Health Fo­rum.

While ad­dress­ing da­ta fraud, Sharp­less said: “So it should not be sur­pris­ing to me now at FDA that if peo­ple will lie to get their pa­per pub­lished or get their grant fund­ed, then peo­ple will al­so lie to get a bil­lion dol­lar med­ical prod­uct ap­proved.”

Five De­mo­c­ra­t­ic sen­a­tors (in­clud­ing pres­i­den­tial hope­fuls Bernie Sanders and Eliz­a­beth War­ren) al­so pounced on the da­ta ma­nip­u­la­tion last month, say­ing this “scan­dal smacks of the phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal in­dus­try’s priv­i­lege and greed.” They al­so called on the FDA to hold No­var­tis ac­count­able and they ques­tioned whether FDA has plans to re-is­sue a fi­nal rule on fal­si­fied da­ta that the agency with­drew last Sep­tem­ber.

No­var­tis’ com­mit­ment Mon­day to re­port al­le­ga­tions of da­ta in­tegri­ty trans­gres­sions with­in five busi­ness days brings up an in­ter­est­ing gray area in FDA’s reg­u­la­tions for when com­pa­nies should re­port such is­sues that do not re­sult in se­ri­ous ad­verse events.

As Green­leaf Health ex­perts and for­mer FDA of­fi­cials wrote on the Food and Drug Law In­sti­tute’s web­site, “While it is clear sus­pen­sion or ter­mi­na­tion of the tri­al re­quires the spon­sor to no­ti­fy FDA, spon­sors are of­ten per­plexed about when to no­ti­fy FDA when the pro­to­col non­com­pli­ance is­sue is sig­nif­i­cant, but yet not so sig­nif­i­cant that it re­quires sus­pen­sion or ter­mi­na­tion of the tri­al.”

In ad­di­tion, they note that in the case of emer­gency de­vi­a­tions made to pro­tect the life or well-be­ing of a sub­ject, the FDA must re­ceive no­tice with­in five work­ing days of the de­vi­a­tion, al­though the FDA’s reg­u­la­tions “are not so clear­ly de­fined con­cern­ing when the spon­sor’s du­ty aris­es to re­port a se­ri­ous breach of pro­to­col that does not re­sult in a se­ri­ous ad­verse event, but may cause FDA to ques­tion the re­li­a­bil­i­ty of the da­ta.”

But the ex­perts note that proac­tive re­port­ing to the agency and work­ing with the FDA can be help­ful. Spon­sors “of­ten will find that it is ad­van­ta­geous to re­port da­ta in­tegri­ty is­sues to FDA soon af­ter dis­cov­ery rather than wait­ing for FDA to dis­cov­er the da­ta in­tegri­ty is­sue dur­ing an in­spec­tion,” they added.


RAPS: First pub­lished in Reg­u­la­to­ry Fo­cus™ by the Reg­u­la­to­ry Af­fairs Pro­fes­sion­als So­ci­ety, the largest glob­al or­ga­ni­za­tion of and for those in­volved with the reg­u­la­tion of health­care prod­ucts. Click here for more in­for­ma­tion.

Health­care Dis­par­i­ties and Sick­le Cell Dis­ease

In the complicated U.S. healthcare system, navigating a serious illness such as cancer or heart disease can be remarkably challenging for patients and caregivers. When that illness is classified as a rare disease, those challenges can become even more acute. And when that rare disease occurs in a population that experiences health disparities, such as people with sickle cell disease (SCD) who are primarily Black and Latino, challenges can become almost insurmountable.

David Meek, new Mirati CEO (Marlene Awaad/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Fresh off Fer­Gene's melt­down, David Meek takes over at Mi­rati with lead KRAS drug rac­ing to an ap­proval

In the insular world of biotech, a spectacular failure can sometimes stay on any executive’s record for a long time. But for David Meek, the man at the helm of FerGene’s recent implosion, two questionable exits made way for what could be an excellent rebound.

Meek, most recently FerGene’s CEO and a past head at Ipsen, has become CEO at Mirati Therapeutics, taking the reins from founding CEO Charles Baum, who will step over into the role of president and head of R&D, according to a release.

Who are the women su­per­charg­ing bio­phar­ma R&D? Nom­i­nate them for this year's spe­cial re­port

The biotech industry has faced repeated calls to diversify its workforce — and in the last year, those calls got a lot louder. Though women account for just under half of all biotech employees around the world, they occupy very few places in C-suites, and even fewer make it to the helm.

Some companies are listening, according to a recent BIO survey which showed that this year’s companies were 2.5 times more likely to have a diversity and inclusion program compared to last year’s sample. But we still have a long way to go. Women represent just 31% of biotech executives, BIO reported. And those numbers are even more stark for women of color.

When ef­fi­ca­cy is bor­der­line: FDA needs to get more con­sis­tent on close-call drug ap­provals, agency-fund­ed re­search finds

In the exceedingly rare instances in which clinical efficacy is the only barrier to a new drug’s approval, new FDA-funded research from FDA and Stanford found that the agency does not have a consistent standard for defining “substantial evidence” when flexible criteria are used for an approval.

The research comes as the FDA is at a crossroads with its expedited-review pathways. The accelerated approval pathway is under fire as the agency recently signed off on a controversial new Alzheimer’s drug, with little precedent to explain its decision. Meanwhile, top officials like Rick Pazdur have called for a major push to simplify and clarify all of the various expedited pathways, which have grown to be must-haves for sponsors of nearly every newly approved drug.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 117,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Jacob Van Naarden (Eli Lilly)

Ex­clu­sives: Eli Lil­ly out to crash the megablock­buster PD-(L)1 par­ty with 'dis­rup­tive' pric­ing; re­veals can­cer biotech buy­out

It’s taken 7 years, but Eli Lilly is promising to finally start hammering the small and affluent PD-(L)1 club with a “disruptive” pricing strategy for their checkpoint therapy allied with China’s Innovent.

Lilly in-licensed global rights to sintilimab a year ago, building on the China alliance they have with Innovent. That cost the pharma giant $200 million in cash upfront, which they plan to capitalize on now with a long-awaited plan to bust up the high-price market in lung cancer and other cancers that have created a market worth tens of billions of dollars.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

FDA hands ac­cel­er­at­ed nod to Seagen, Gen­mab's so­lo ADC in cer­vi­cal can­cer, but com­bo stud­ies look even more promis­ing

Biopharma’s resident antibody-drug conjugate expert Seagen has scored a clutch of oncology approvals in recent years, finding gold in what are known as “third-gen” ADCs. Now, another of their partnered conjugates is ready for prime time.

The FDA on Monday handed an accelerated approval to Seagen and Genmab’s Tivdak (tisotumab vedotin-tftv, or “TV”) in second-line patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer who previously progressed after chemotherapy rather than PD-(L)1 systemic therapy, the companies said in a release.

The biggest ques­tions fac­ing gene ther­a­py, the XLMTM com­mu­ni­ty, and Astel­las af­ter fourth pa­tient death

After three patients died last year in an Astellas gene therapy trial, the company halted the study and began figuring out how to safely get the program back on track. They would, executives eventually explained, cut the dose by more than half and institute a battery of other measures to try to prevent the same thing from happening again.

Then tragically, Astellas announced this week that the first patient to receive the new regimen had died, just weeks after administration.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Jay Bradner (Jeff Rumans for Endpoints News)

Div­ing deep­er in­to in­her­it­ed reti­nal dis­or­ders, No­var­tis gob­bles up an­oth­er bite-sized op­to­ge­net­ics biotech

Right about a year ago, a Novartis team led by Jay Bradner and Cynthia Grosskreutz at NIBR swooped in to scoop up a Cambridge, MA-based opthalmology gene therapy company called Vedere. Their focus was on a specific market niche: inherited retinal dystrophies that include a wide range of genetic retinal disorders marked by the loss of photoreceptor cells and progressive vision loss.

But that was just the first deal that whet their appetite.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 117,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Take­da snaps up the Japan­ese rights to an old Shire cast-off; Boehringer In­gel­heim ac­quires Abexxa Bi­o­log­ics

A week before the FDA is set to decide on Mirum Pharmaceuticals’ lead liver disease drug — an old Shire cast-off called maralixibat — Takeda is swooping in to secure the rights in Japan.

Maralixibat’s roots trace back to Lumena, which was snapped up by Shire for $260 million-plus back in 2014. While the candidate had failed mid-stage studies at Shire, Mirum believes better trial design and patient selection will deliver the wins it needs. The drug is currently in development for Alagille syndrome (a condition called ALGS in which bile builds up in the liver), progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC, which causes progressive liver disease) and biliary atresia (a blockage in the ducts that carry bile from the liver to the gallbladder).