One of the world's top ex­perts in coro­nary heart dis­ease is spear­head­ing a new gene edit­ing up­start out to trans­form the field

As head of the Cen­ter for Hu­man Ge­net­ic Re­search at Mass­a­chu­setts Gen­er­al Hos­pi­tal and the Broad’s Car­dio­vas­cu­lar Dis­ease Ini­tia­tive, Sekar Kathire­san has oc­cu­pied a sin­gu­lar po­si­tion as one of the world’s lead­ing ex­perts on the con­nec­tion be­tween ge­net­ics and coro­nary heart dis­ease. He’s tracked how peo­ple dealt a bad ge­net­ic hand — and the el­e­vat­ed risks that come with it — can lim­it in­her­ent dan­gers by lifestyle changes, and pon­dered over the ef­fects of dai­ly drugs used to treat mass pa­tient groups. And he’s reached a sim­ple con­clu­sion:

None of it is re­al­ly work­ing. 

In par­tic­u­lar, none of that is any­where near as use­ful as the ge­net­ic mu­ta­tions that he’s seen that con­fer a low­er risk of dy­ing and car­dio events. Par­tic­u­lar­ly the in­di­vid­u­als who car­ry mu­ta­tions “which break ei­ther of two genes — APOC3 or ANGPTL3 — rapid­ly clear triglyc­eride-rich lipopro­teins from the cir­cu­la­tion” and pro­tect them from heart at­tack.

Now, he’s mak­ing a pro­fes­sion­al leap to see if he and a squad of in­ves­ti­ga­tors at a new­ly launched biotech can dra­mat­i­cal­ly change the im­per­fect sta­tus quo through gene edit­ing.

“Imag­ine,” he tells me, “an in­jec­tion ad­min­is­tered once in life that safe­ly con­fers last­ing pro­tec­tion.”

No more pills. No fleet­ing com­mit­ments to healthy lifestyles that can’t stretch past Jan­u­ary. But a wide­spread and durable shar­ing of the same health ben­e­fits he’s seen in the very, very few. That’s the dream.

To­day, Kathire­san is step­ping down from his lofty aca­d­e­m­ic roles and mak­ing his de­but as CEO of Verve Ther­a­peu­tics, which is tak­ing its place in the hotbed of gene ther­a­py work around Cam­bridge, MA. The small team of 10 — soon to dou­ble in size — may not come close to ri­val­ing the big biotechs that oc­cu­py the streets in and around Har­vard and MIT. But rel­a­tive­ly few can claim the same kinds of con­nec­tions in the realms of drug sci­ence.

Ki­ran Musunuru

An­oth­er car­dio ge­net­ics ex­pert, Penn’s Ki­ran Musunuru and Har­vard pro­fes­sor J Kei­th Joung, who co-found­ed gene ther­a­py pi­o­neer Ed­i­tas, are on board as sci­en­tif­ic co-founders. There’s an al­liance with Beam Ther­a­peu­tics, the up­start next-gen gene edit­ing out­fit found­ed by Feng Zhang, one of 3 sci­en­tists wide­ly cred­it­ed with ush­er­ing in the CRISPR rev­o­lu­tion that has armed re­searchers around the world with ef­fec­tive tools to ac­com­plish their work. And Ver­i­ly will help work on the nanopar­ti­cles they plan to use for de­liv­ery.

Burt Adel­man, the for­mer EVP of R&D at Bio­gen, will chair the board, which in­cludes the Broad’s chief da­ta of­fi­cer, An­tho­ny Philip­pakis.

Beam will pro­vide some of the tech, and has an op­tion to step in on fu­ture com­mer­cial­iza­tion. Verve has al­so nailed down CRISPR patents, in­clud­ing Cas9 and Cas12a (Cpf1), from the Broad In­sti­tute and Har­vard Uni­ver­si­ty.

And they have $58.5 mil­lion in cash to do their work from GV (you prob­a­bly still think of them as Google Ven­tures), which is step­ping in with ARCH Ven­ture Part­ners, F-Prime Cap­i­tal, and Bio­mat­ics Cap­i­tal to form the orig­i­nal syn­di­cate.

To be suc­cess­ful, the Verve team un­der Kathire­san will not just have to demon­strate their ap­proach can safe­ly work, but al­so that it ul­ti­mate­ly can be done on a mass ba­sis in eco­nom­ic terms. That’s a tall or­der, but they do have some ad­van­tages, per­haps most no­tice­ably the ad­vances the ground­break­ers have made at the FDA, says the sci­en­tist.

“Gene edit­ing has the po­ten­tial to com­plete­ly trans­form the treat­ment par­a­digm for the dis­ease,” says Musunuru. “Pre­clin­i­cal stud­ies con­duct­ed in the field, in­clud­ing work done in my lab, have shown the promise of gene edit­ing to safe­ly re­duce cho­les­terol and oth­er coro­nary artery dis­ease risk fac­tors.”

So far, gene edit­ing in the le­git­i­mate R&D world has been cen­tered on the painstak­ing ad­vances of a hand­ful of pro­grams aimed at rare dis­eases. And Verve will start with its own rare ail­ments, tar­get­ing pa­tient pop­u­la­tions with the high­est un­met med­ical need. But Kathire­san isn’t drop­ping his pres­ti­gious aca­d­e­m­ic roles to search for mar­gin­al gains. He wants to tack­le the whole threat on a world­wide ba­sis.

That, of­fi­cial­ly, starts at Verve to­day.

2023 Spot­light on the Fu­ture of Drug De­vel­op­ment for Small and Mid-Sized Biotechs

In the context of today’s global economic environment, there is an increasing need to work smarter, faster and leaner across all facets of the life sciences industry.  This is particularly true for small and mid-sized biotech companies, many of which are facing declining valuations and competing for increasingly limited funding to propel their science forward.  It is important to recognize that within this framework, many of these smaller companies already find themselves resource-challenged to design and manage clinical studies themselves because they don’t have large teams or in-house experts in navigating the various aspects of the drug development journey. This can be particularly challenging for the most complex and difficult to treat diseases where no previous pathway exists and patients are urgently awaiting breakthroughs.

Albert Bourla, Pfizer CEO (Efren Landaos/Sipa USA/Sipa via AP Images)

Pfiz­er makes an­oth­er bil­lion-dol­lar in­vest­ment in Eu­rope and ex­pands again in Michi­gan

Pfizer is continuing its run of manufacturing site expansions with two new large investments in the US and Europe.

The New York-based pharma giant’s site in Kalamazoo, MI, has seen a lot of attention over the past year. As a major piece of the manufacturing network for Covid-19 vaccines and antivirals, Pfizer is gearing up to place more money into the site. Pfizer announced it will place $750 million into the facility, mainly to establish “modular aseptic processing” (MAP) production and create around 300 jobs at the site.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 154,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Vas Narasimhan, Novartis CEO (Thibault Camus/AP Images, Pool)

No­var­tis bol­sters Plu­vic­to's case in prostate can­cer with PhI­II re­sults

The prognosis is poor for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Novartis wants to change that by making its recently approved Pluvicto available to patients earlier in their course of treatment.

The Swiss pharma giant unveiled Phase III results Monday suggesting that Pluvicto was able to halt disease progression in certain prostate cancer patients when administered after androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) therapy, but without prior taxane-based chemotherapy. The drug is currently approved for patients after they’ve received both ARPI and chemo.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 154,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Rick Modi, Affinia Therapeutics CEO

Ver­tex-part­nered gene ther­a­py biotech Affinia scraps IPO plans

Affinia Therapeutics has ditched its plans to go public in a relatively closed-door market that has not favored Nasdaq debuts for the drug development industry most of this year. A pandemic surge in 2020 and 2021 opened the doors for many preclinical startups, which caught Affinia’s attention and gave the gene therapy biotech confidence in the beginning days of 2022 to send in its S-1.

But on Friday, Affinia threw in the S-1 towel and concluded now is not the time to step onto Wall Street. The biotech has put out few public announcements since the spring of this year. Endpoints News picked the startup as one of its 11 biotechs to watch last year.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 154,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Up­dat­ed: FDA re­mains silent on or­phan drug ex­clu­siv­i­ty af­ter last year's court loss

Since losing a controversial court case over orphan drug exclusivity last year, the FDA’s Office of Orphan Products Development has remained entirely silent on orphan exclusivity for any product approved since last November, leaving many sponsors in limbo on what to expect.

That silence means that for more than 70 orphan-designated indications for more than 60 products, OOPD has issued no public determination on the seven-year orphan exclusivity in the Orange Book, and no new listings of orphan exclusivity appear in OOPD’s searchable database, as highlighted recently by George O’Brien, a partner in Mayer Brown’s Washington, DC office.

FDA grants or­phan drug des­ig­na­tion to Al­ger­non's ifen­prodil, while ex­clu­siv­i­ty re­mains un­clear

As the FDA remains silent on orphan drug exclusivity in the wake of a controversial court case, the agency continues to hand out new designations. The latest: Algernon Pharmaceuticals’ experimental lung disease drug ifenprodil.

The Vancouver-based company announced on Monday that ifenprodil received orphan designation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a chronic lung condition that results in scarring of the lungs.  Most IPF patients suffer with a dry cough, and breathing can become difficult.

‘Catchy’ de­sign tops big ad buys on­line for grab­bing on­col­o­gists’ at­ten­tion — sur­vey

The cancer drug ads that get oncologists’ attention online are informative and use clear, eye-catching designs. That’s ZoomRx’s assessment in its most recent tracking survey, and while not necessarily surprising, the details in the research do break a few common misconceptions.

One of those is frequency, also known as the number of impressions an ad gets. No matter how many times oncologists saw a particular cancer drug ad, effectiveness prevailed in the survey across five drug brands. ZoomRx measured effectiveness as a combination of most attention-getting, relevant information and improved perception as reported by the doctors.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 154,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Tim Walbert, Horizon Therapeutics CEO (via YouTube)

And then there were two: Janssen bows out of Hori­zon takeover ne­go­ti­a­tions

Horizon Therapeutics announced last week that it was in talks with three pharmaceutical giants that could take over the company. You can now remove one of them from the equation.

J&J’s Janssen, after Horizon reported its initial involvement in early discussions to acquire the rare disease biotech, issued a statement Saturday that said Janssen “does not intend to make an offer for Horizon,” and that Janssen is bound by restrictions set in Rule 2.8 of the Irish Takeover Rules. These rules are in place for any company interested in taking over Irish companies, with Horizon Therapeutics currently based in Dublin.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 154,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Nkarta CEO Paul Hastings at Endpoints' #BIO22 panel (J.T. MacMillan Photography for Endpoints News)

Nkar­ta un­der­scores safe­ty of CAR-NK, boasts ear­ly re­spons­es

The first generation of personalized CAR-T therapies made big waves in the treatment of lymphoma for their stunning efficacy. Nkarta is hoping its off-the-shelf natural killer cell approach will stand out on safety — while keeping some of those impressive numbers on responses.

In a new update from its Phase I dose escalation study, the South San Francisco-based biotech reported that seven out of 10 patients treated with the highest doses of its NK cell therapy, NKX019, achieved a complete response, translating to a complete response rate of 70%.