Lee Kraus, UT Southwestern

PARP in­hibitors some­times work be­yond BR­CA-mu­ta­tions, re­searchers may fi­nal­ly know why

A class of po­tent can­cer treat­ments could shine brighter than pre­vi­ous­ly thought in a broad­er ar­ray of pa­tients, new re­search sug­gests.

PARP in­hibitors, in­clud­ing As­traZeneca’s $AZN pi­o­neer­ing Lyn­parza, Clo­vis’ $CLVS Rubra­ca and GSK’s $GSK Ze­ju­la — work by thwart­ing PARP pro­teins that help re­pair dam­aged DNA in cell — there­by steer­ing can­cer cells on­to a path of an­ni­hi­la­tion. So far, their use has pri­mar­i­ly been in ovar­i­an can­cers con­tain­ing BR­CA mu­ta­tions, rare ge­net­ic mu­ta­tions that dis­able a DNA re­pair path­way in can­cer cells, as well as BR­CA-mu­tat­ed breast can­cer. (Al­though last month, Ze­ju­la was grant­ed pri­or­i­ty re­view to ex­pand its use in late-stage ovar­i­an can­cer pa­tients with or with­out BR­CA mu­ta­tions).

While the as­sault on DNA re­pair is be­ing waged, these drugs are al­so at­tack­ing ri­bo­somes — the ma­chin­ery that makes pro­teins, said Lee Kraus, di­rec­tor of the Green Cen­ter for Re­pro­duc­tive Bi­ol­o­gy Sci­ences at UT South­west­ern. “These find­ings could in­crease the pa­tient pop­u­la­tion ben­e­fit­ing from these drugs by two, three, or four-fold. Up to 70 per­cent of breast can­cer pa­tients could now be good can­di­dates.”

The da­ta, pub­lished in the jour­nal Mol­e­c­u­lar Cell on Wednes­day, could ex­plain why breast can­cer pa­tients can be re­spon­sive to PARP in­hibitors, de­spite not car­ry­ing BR­CA mu­ta­tions.

Kraus and his team iden­ti­fied a po­ten­tial bio­mark­er — a pro­tein called DDX21, which is re­quired for the pro­duc­tion of ri­bo­somes in small sub­cel­lu­lar com­part­ments called nu­cle­oli. But DDX21 in the nu­cle­o­lus re­quires PARP-1, which is tar­get­ed by ex­ist­ing PARP in­hibitors. The use of these drugs, there­fore, blocks DDX21, there­by in­hibit­ing ri­bo­some pro­duc­tion. This means en­hanced DDX21 lev­els in the nu­cle­o­lus could in­di­cate can­cers that might be the most re­spon­sive to PARP in­hibitors, the re­searchers posit­ed.

“Can­cer cells are ad­dict­ed to ri­bo­somes. Can­cer cells grow fast and must make pro­teins to sup­port cell di­vi­sion and oth­er es­sen­tial process­es go­ing on in the cell. If you can slow down or in­hib­it the pro­duc­tion of ri­bo­somes, then you can slow down the growth of the can­cer cell,” Kraus said in a state­ment.

Kraus et al are now work­ing on de­sign­ing clin­i­cal tri­als with UT South­west­ern on­col­o­gists to test their the­o­ry.

Kraus is a founder and con­sul­tant of Ri­bon Ther­a­peu­tics, which ear­li­er this year raised $65 mil­lion to tar­get oth­er PARPs in the broad fam­i­ly of 17 en­zymes. The Cam­bridge, Mass­a­chu­setts-based biotech’s lead pro­gram is first go­ing af­ter PARP7, a pro­tein al­so sim­i­lar­ly ac­ti­vat­ed by stress and cel­lu­lar re­sponse mech­a­nisms.

Brian Kaspar. AveXis via Twitter

AveX­is sci­en­tif­ic founder fires back at No­var­tis CEO Vas Narasimhan, 'cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly de­nies any wrong­do­ing'

Brian Kaspar’s head was among the first to roll at Novartis after company execs became aware of the fact that manipulated data had been included in its application for Zolgensma, now the world’s most expensive therapy.

But in his first public response, the scientific founder at AveXis — acquired by Novartis for $8.7 billion — is firing back. And he says that not only was he not involved in any wrongdoing, he’s ready to defend his name as needed.

I reached out to Brian Kaspar after Novartis put out word that he and his brother Allen had been axed in mid-May, two months after the company became aware of the allegations related to manipulated data. His response came back through his attorneys.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: An em­bold­ened As­traZeneca splurges $95M on a pri­or­i­ty re­view vouch­er. Where do they need the FDA to hus­tle up?

AstraZeneca is in a hurry.

We learned this morning that the pharma giant — not known as a big spender, until recently — forked over $95 million to get its hands on a priority review voucher from Sobi, otherwise known as Swedish Orphan Biovitrum.

That marks another step down on price for a PRV, which allows the holder to slash 4 months off of any FDA review time.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Martin Shkreli [via Getty]

Pris­on­er #87850-053 does not get to add drug de­vel­op­er to his list of cred­its

Just days after Retrophin shed its last ties to founder Martin Shkreli, the biotech is reporting that the lead drug he co-invented flopped in a pivotal trial. Fosmetpantotenate flunked both the primary and key secondary endpoints in a placebo-controlled trial for a rare disease called pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration, or PKAN.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

We­bi­nar: Re­al World End­points — the brave new world com­ing in build­ing fran­chise ther­a­pies

Several biopharma companies have been working on expanding drug labels through the use of real world endpoints, combing through the data to find evidence of a drug’s efficacy for particular indications. But we’ve just begun. Real World Evidence is becoming an important part of every clinical development plan, in the soup-through-nuts approach used in building franchises.

I’ve recruited a panel of 3 top experts in the field — the first in a series of premium webinars — to look at the practical realities governing what can be done today, and where this is headed over the next few years, at the prodding of the FDA.

ZHEN SU — Merck Serono’s Senior Vice President and Global Head of Oncology
ELLIOTT LEVY — Amgen’s Senior Vice President of Global Development
CHRIS BOSHOFF — Pfizer Oncology’s Chief Development Officer

A premium subscription to Endpoints News is required to attend this webinar. Please upgrade to either an Insider or Enterprise plan for access. Already have Endpoints Premium? Please sign-in below. You can contact our Subscriptions team at help@endpointsnews.com with any issues.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Am­gen, Al­ler­gan biosim­i­lar of Roche's block­buster Rit­ux­an clears an­oth­er US piv­otal study 

Novartis $NVS may have given up, but Amgen $AMGN and Allergan $AGN are plowing ahead with their knockoff of Roche’s blockbuster biologic Rituxan in the United States.

Their copycat, ABP 798, was found to have a clinically equivalent impact as Rituxan — meeting the main goal of the study involving CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients. This is the second trial supporting the profile of the biosimilar. In January, it came through with positive PK results in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BeiGene and Mus­tang nail down spe­cial FDA sta­tus for top drugs; Roche bags added cov­er­age for Hem­li­bra

→ BeiGene $BGNE is getting a boost in its drive to field a rival to Imbruvica. The FDA has offered an accelerated review to zanubrutinib, a BTK inhibitor that has posted positive results for mantle cell lymphoma. The PDUFA date lands on February 27, 2020. The drug scored breakthrough status at the beginning of the year.

→ BeiGene isn’t the only biopharma company to gain special regulatory status today. Mustang Bio $MBIO and St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital announced that MB-107, a lentiviral gene therapy for the treatment of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency, also known as bubble boy disease, has been granted Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy status.

Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion re­vives bid to get drug list prices on TV ads

The Trump administration is not giving up just yet. On Wednesday, the HHS filed an appeal against a judge’s decision in July to overturn a ruling obligating drug manufacturers to disclose the list price of their therapies in television adverts — hours before it was stipulated to go into effect.

In May, the HHS published a final ruling requiring drugmakers to divulge the wholesale acquisition cost— of a 30-day supply of the drug — in tv ads in a bid to enhance price transparency in the United States. The pharmaceutical industry has vehemently opposed the rule, asserting that list prices are not what a typical patient in the United States pays for treatment — that number is typically determined by the type of (or lack thereof) insurance coverage, deductibles and out-of-pocket costs. Although there is truth to that claim, the move was considered symbolic in the Trump administration’s healthcare agenda to hold drugmakers accountable in a climate where skyrocketing drug prices have incensed Americans on both sides of the aisle.

Bob Smith, Pfizer

Pfiz­er is mak­ing a $500M state­ment to­day: Here’s how you be­come a lead play­er in the boom­ing gene ther­a­py sec­tor

Three years ago, Pfizer anted up $150 million in cash to buy Bamboo Therapeutics in Chapel Hill, NC as it cautiously stuck a toe in the small gene therapy pool of research and development.

Company execs followed up a year later with a $100 million expansion of the manufacturing operations they picked up in that deal for the UNC spinout, which came with $495 million in milestones.

And now they’re really going for it.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Video: Putting the AI in R&D — with Badhri Srini­vasan, Tony Wood, Rosana Kapeller, Hugo Ceule­mans, Saurabh Sa­ha and Shoibal Dat­ta

During BIO this year, I had a chance to moderate a panel among some of the top tech experts in biopharma on their real-world use of artificial intelligence in R&D. There’s been a lot said about the potential of AI, but I wanted to explore more about what some of the larger players are actually doing with this technology today, and how they see it advancing in the future. It was a fascinating exchange, which you can see here. The transcript has been edited for brevity and clarity. — John Carroll