Pfiz­er has run 41 tri­als over 15 years for tanezum­ab. As ad­comm nears, the FDA re­mains unim­pressed — and more than a lit­tle wor­ried

Ahead of an ad­vi­so­ry com­mit­tee meet­ing lat­er this week, the FDA on Mon­day re­leased its in-depth re­view of Pfiz­er and Eli Lil­ly’s an­ti-NGF os­teoarthri­tis drug tanezum­ab, con­clud­ing that it “pro­vides sub­stan­tial ev­i­dence of ef­fec­tive­ness” but al­so rais­ing con­cerns that the pro­posed risk eval­u­a­tion and mit­i­ga­tion strat­e­gy (REMS) may not be enough to lessen its sig­nif­i­cant safe­ty risks.

The safe­ty ques­tions at hand deal with re­ports of un­usu­al and un­ex­pect­ed joint-re­lat­ed ad­verse events in tanezum­ab-treat­ed pa­tients with os­teoarthri­tis, FDA ex­plained, not­ing, “The re­view team has con­cerns that the Ap­pli­cant’s pro­posed REMS is not suf­fi­cient to mit­i­gate the risk of RPOA [Rapid­ly Pro­gress­ing Os­teoarthri­tis] and would not en­sure that the ben­e­fits of tanezum­ab out­weigh the risks of RPOA.”

Endpoints News

Unlock this article instantly by becoming a free subscriber.

You’ll get access to free articles each month, plus you can customize what newsletters get delivered to your inbox each week, including breaking news.