Phar­ma­co­ge­net­ics: FDA re­leas­es ta­ble of gene-drug in­ter­ac­tions

The FDA on Thurs­day pub­lished a ta­ble iden­ti­fy­ing more than 50 gene-drug in­ter­ac­tions that the agency says are sup­port­ed by sci­en­tif­ic ev­i­dence and an­nounced it is con­sid­er­ing new ap­proach­es to eval­u­at­ing phar­ma­co­ge­net­ic as­so­ci­a­tions.

“Con­sis­tent with our mis­sion to pro­tect and pro­mote pub­lic health, we be­lieve it is im­por­tant to take steps now to help en­sure that claims be­ing made for phar­ma­co­ge­net­ic tests of­fered to­day are ground­ed in sound sci­ence to avoid in­ap­pro­pri­ate man­age­ment of pa­tients’ med­ica­tions,” said Cen­ter for De­vices and Ra­di­o­log­i­cal Health Di­rec­tor Jeff Shuren and Cen­ter for Drug Eval­u­a­tion and Re­search Di­rec­tor Janet Wood­cock.

Back­ground

The re­lease of the ta­ble comes af­ter years of grap­pling over how the FDA should ap­proach phar­ma­co­ge­net­ic (PGx) test­ing and the broad­er field of lab­o­ra­to­ry de­vel­oped tests (LDTs). In 2018, the FDA is­sued a safe­ty com­mu­ni­ca­tion and state­ment ad­vis­ing that many ge­net­ic tests pur­port­ing to pre­dict a pa­tient’s re­sponse to med­ica­tions have not been re­viewed by the agency and may not be sup­port­ed by sci­en­tif­ic or clin­i­cal ev­i­dence.

At the same time, var­i­ous in­dus­try groups, in­clud­ing the Amer­i­can Clin­i­cal Lab­o­ra­to­ry As­so­ci­a­tion (ACLA) and the Coali­tion to Pre­serve Ac­cess to Phar­ma­coge­nomics In­for­ma­tion, have pushed back against the FDA’s ef­forts to crack down on phar­ma­co­ge­net­ics tests.

In a cit­i­zen pe­ti­tion filed last month on be­half of the Coali­tion to Pre­serve Ac­cess to Phar­ma­coge­nomics In­for­ma­tion, law firm Hy­man, Phelps & Mc­Na­ma­ra called on the FDA to re­vise its safe­ty com­mu­ni­ca­tion to state that test mak­ers “may com­mu­ni­cate in­for­ma­tion about gene-drug in­ter­ac­tions as part of ge­net­ic test re­ports to the ex­tent that such in­for­ma­tion is sup­port­ed by ad­e­quate ev­i­dence and is not con­traindi­cat­ed by in­for­ma­tion in drug la­bels.”

Phar­ma­co­ge­net­ics As­so­ci­a­tions Table

The FDA says the ta­ble is “in­tend­ed to pro­vide the agency’s view of the state of the cur­rent sci­ence in phar­ma­co­ge­net­ics” and in­cludes es­tab­lished gene-drug in­ter­ac­tions that ap­pear in la­bel­ing and some in­ter­ac­tions that, while not ap­pear­ing in la­bel­ing, are sup­port­ed by suf­fi­cient sci­en­tif­ic ev­i­dence.

The ta­ble al­so de­notes phar­ma­co­ge­net­ic as­so­ci­a­tions that may in­di­cate an im­pact on a drug’s safe­ty or a pa­tient’s re­sponse and gene-drug as­so­ci­a­tions for which an im­pact has not been es­tab­lished.

The FDA stress­es that the ta­ble is not com­plete and that it will con­tin­ue to re­view sci­en­tif­ic ev­i­dence, in­clud­ing guide­lines de­vel­oped by the Clin­i­cal Phar­ma­co­ge­net­ics Im­ple­men­ta­tion Con­sor­tium, to ex­pand the list. The agency has al­so opened a pub­lic dock­et to so­lic­it com­ments from stake­hold­ers on spe­cif­ic phar­ma­co­ge­net­ic as­so­ci­a­tions that should or should not be con­sid­ered for the ta­ble.

The ta­ble comes with a host of dis­claimers, in­clud­ing that, “Each pa­tient’s ge­net­ic make­up is on­ly one of many fac­tors that may im­pact drug con­cen­tra­tions and re­sponse,” and that the FDA does not nec­es­sar­i­ly en­dorse phar­ma­co­ge­net­ic tests for in­ter­ac­tions in­clud­ed on the list.

The FDA al­so says the ta­ble “is not in­tend­ed to af­fect cur­rent reg­u­la­to­ry re­quire­ments or poli­cies, in­clud­ing the FDA’s pol­i­cy re­gard­ing com­pan­ion di­ag­nos­tics. Nor is the ta­ble in­tend­ed to make an as­sess­ment on the safe and ef­fec­tive use of, or reg­u­la­to­ry re­quire­ments for, tests that de­tect vari­ants in the ref­er­enced genes, or to pro­vide com­pre­hen­sive in­for­ma­tion on the de­scribed gene-drug in­ter­ac­tions.”

De­spite those dis­claimers, the list could of­fer in­sight to phar­ma­co­ge­net­ic test mak­ers on what the agency con­sid­ers suf­fi­cient ev­i­dence to sup­port spe­cif­ic phar­ma­co­ge­net­ic as­so­ci­a­tions.


RAPS: First pub­lished in Reg­u­la­to­ry Fo­cus™ by the Reg­u­la­to­ry Af­fairs Pro­fes­sion­als So­ci­ety, the largest glob­al or­ga­ni­za­tion of and for those in­volved with the reg­u­la­tion of health­care prod­ucts. Click here for more in­for­ma­tion.

Tesla and SpaceX founder Elon Musk gestures to the audience after being recognized by President Trump following the successful launch of a Falcon 9 rocket at the Kennedy Space Center. (via Getty Images)

Tes­la chief Elon Musk teams up with Covid-19 play­er Cure­Vac to build 'R­NA mi­cro­fac­to­ries'

Elon Musk has joined the global tech crusade now underway to revolutionize vaccine manufacturing — now aimed at delivering billions of doses of a new mRNA vaccine to fight Covid-19. And he’s cutting right to the front.

In a late-night tweet Wednesday, the Tesla chief announced:

Tesla, as a side project, is building RNA microfactories for CureVac & possibly others.

That’s not a lot to go on. But the tweet comes a year after Tesla’s German division in Grohmann and CureVac filed a patent on a “bioreactor for RNA in vitro transcription, a method for RNA in vitro transcription, a module for transcribing DNA into RNA and an automated apparatus for RNA manufacturing.” CureVac, in the meantime, has discussed a variety of plans to build microfactories that can speed up the whole process for a global supply chain.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 84,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Elias Zerhouni (Photo by Vincent Isore/IP3/Getty Images)

Elias Zer­houni dis­cuss­es ‘am­a­teur hour’ in DC, the de­struc­tion of in­fec­tious dis­ease R&D and how we need to prep for the next time

Elias Zerhouni favors blunt talk, and in a recent discussion with NPR, the ex-Sanofi R&D and ex-NIH chief had some tough points to make regarding the pandemic response.

Rather than interpret them, I thought it would be best to provide snippets straight from the interview.

On the Trump administration response:

It was basically amateur hour. There is no central concept of operations for preparedness, for pandemics, period. This administration doesn’t want to or has no concept of what it takes to protect the American people and the world because it is codependent. You can’t close your borders and say, “OK, we’re going to be safe.” You’re not going to be able to do that in this world. So it’s a lack of vision, basically just a lack of understanding, of what it takes to protect the American people.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 84,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

George Yancopoulos (Regeneron)

UP­DAT­ED: Re­gen­eron co-founder George Yan­copou­los of­fers a com­bat­ive de­fense of the po­lice at a high school com­mence­ment. It didn’t go well

Typically, the commencement speech at Yorktown Central School District in Westchester — like most high schools — is an opportunity to encourage students to face the future with confidence and hope. Regeneron president and co-founder George Yancopoulos, though, went a different route.

In a fiery speech, the outspoken billionaire defended the police against the “prejudice and bias against law enforcement” that has erupted around the country in street protests from coast to coast. And for many who attended the commencement, Yancopoulos struck the wrong note at the wrong time, especially when he combatively challenged someone for interrupting his speech with a honk for “another act of cowardness.”

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 84,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

New stan­dard of care? FDA hands Pfiz­er, Mer­ck KGaA an OK for Baven­cio in blad­der can­cer

The breakthrough therapy designation Pfizer and Merck KGaA notched for Bavencio in bladder cancer has quickly paved way for a full approval.

The PD-L1 drug is now sanctioned as a first-line maintenance treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, applicable in cases where cancer hasn’t progressed after platinum-containing chemotherapy.

Petros Grivas, the principal investigator of the supporting Phase III JAVELIN Bladder 100, called the approval “one of the most significant advances in the treatment paradigm in this setting in 30 years.”

Sec­ond death trig­gers hold on Astel­las' $3B gene ther­a­py biotech's lead pro­gram, rais­ing fresh con­cerns about AAV

Seven months after Astellas shelled out $3 billion to acquire the gene therapy player Audentes, the biotech company’s lead program has been put on hold following the death of 2 patients taking a high dose of their treatment. And there was another serious adverse event recorded in the study as well, with a total of 3 “older” patients in the study affected.

The incidents are derailing plans to file for a near-term approval, which had been expected right about now.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 84,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

An ex­pe­ri­enced biotech is stitched to­geth­er from transpa­cif­ic parts, with 265 staffers and a fo­cus on ‘new bi­ol­o­gy’

Over the past few years, different teams at a pair of US-based biotechs and in labs in Japan have labored to piece together a group of cancer drug programs, sharing a single corporate umbrella with research colleagues in Japan. But now their far-flung operations have been knit together into a single unit, creating a pipeline with 10 cancer drug development programs — going from early-stage right into Phase III — and a host of discovery projects managed by a collective staff of some 265 people.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 84,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

On a roll, Mer­ck blazes through a new seg­ment of the bio­mark­er trail

Merck has notched an approval for using Keytruda to treat a biomarker-based subset of first-line colorectal cancer patients with unresectable or metastatic tumors, as the pharma giant continues to find new niches for its blockbuster PD-1 star.

The OK is significant in a number of ways. Not only does it build on an accelerated approval for all tumors characterized as microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR); it also marks the first single treatment for colorectal cancer that doesn’t contain chemotherapy.

No­var­tis los­es biosim­i­lar ap­peal as court up­holds a 31-year mo­nop­oly by Am­gen's En­brel

A new court ruling has strengthened Amgen’s grip on the IP estate around Enbrel, keeping biosimilars of the autoimmune and inflammatory drug at bay until 2029.

Novartis, the patent challenger, isn’t throwing in the towel yet. In a statement noting the failed appeal, its generics division Sandoz noted its reviewing options, “including potential appeal to US Supreme Court.”

It’s been almost four years since the FDA approved Erelzi, Sandoz’s copycat version of Enbrel. While sales of the Pfizer-partnered drug in the US — the market Amgen is in charge of — have dipped slightly during that time, it remains a solid megablockbuster with 2019 revenue slightly above $5 billion.

Vas Narasimhan, Novartis CEO (Patrick Straub/​EPA-EFE/​Shutterstock)

No­var­tis pays $678M for kick­back scheme as Vas Narasimhan tries to dis­tance phar­ma gi­ant from shady be­hav­ior

Novartis has reached another large settlement to resolve misconduct allegations, agreeing to pay more than $678 million to settle claims that it had spent hundreds of millions of dollars on lavish dinners, so-called speaking fees and expensive alcohol “that were nothing more than bribes” to get doctors to prescribe Novartis medications.

The top-shelf alcohol and lavish meals included a $3,250 per person night at Nobu in Dallas, a $672-per person dinner at Washington DC’s Smith & Wollensky and a $314 per person meal at Sushi Roku in Pasadena, according to the Justice Department complaint. There were at least 7 trips to Hooters and fishing trips in Alaska and off the Florida coast. Each of these events were supposed to be “speaker programs” where doctors educated other doctors on a drug, but the DOJ alleged many were “bogus” wine-and-dine events where the drug was barely mentioned, if at all.  (“Nobody presented slides on the fishing trips,” the complaint says.)