Pro­tein degra­da­tion 2.0? Third Rock sinks $56M in­to Cedil­la's un­usu­al ap­proach

Third Rock Ven­tures is trot­ting out the lat­est play­er in the hot space of pro­tein degra­da­tion, in­fus­ing the new start­up with $56 mil­lion in launch mon­ey to find out if its un­con­ven­tion­al ap­proach to junk­ing pro­teins works bet­ter than its ri­vals.

The up­start goes by Cedil­la Ther­a­peu­tics, and it’s en­ter­ing a field of drug de­vel­op­ment that’s pick­ing up a lot of steam this year. The con­cept be­hind the emerg­ing space is sim­ple enough: where pro­tein in­hi­bi­tion has led to some ad­vanced med­i­cines, de­grad­ing pro­teins could prove a more fruit­ful so­lu­tion. The ap­proach could have ma­jor ben­e­fits over tra­di­tion­al small-mol­e­cule strate­gies, in­clud­ing the po­ten­tial to cut down sys­temic drug ex­po­sure and the abil­i­ty to tack­le tar­get pro­teins once con­sid­ered un­drug­gable.

Many play­ers in pro­tein degra­da­tion are tack­ling the field by hi­jack­ing the ubiq­ui­tin process, es­sen­tial­ly tag­ging dis­ease-caus­ing pro­teins for de­struc­tion by re­cruit­ing an E3 lig­ase to the tar­get, which sends the pro­tein to the cell’s nat­ur­al “garbage dis­pos­al.” It’s a smart idea, but it’s al­so quite com­plex to build these mol­e­cules. Ear­ly pi­o­neers in the pro­tein degra­da­tion space are tak­ing this ap­proach now, in­clud­ing Arv­inas, Kymera, and C4 Ther­a­peu­tics, among oth­ers.

Cedil­la is tak­ing aim at a dif­fer­ent av­enue, the com­pa­ny’s CEO Alexan­dra (San­dra) Glucks­mann tells me.

“What we’re try­ing to do is up­stream of that whole process,” she said. “In­stead of start­ing with a tech­nol­o­gy and then hav­ing to find a tar­get — and be­ing lim­it­ed by the tech we have — we are in­stead start­ing with a tar­get of in­ter­est and ap­ply­ing dif­fer­ent method­olo­gies to de­grade it.”

Bri­an Jones

Third Rock has been gun­ning away on this idea for months now, re­cruit­ing Glucks­mann, a found­ing em­ploy­ee and the ex-COO of Ed­i­tas, to serve as en­tre­pre­neur-in-res­i­dence at the ven­ture firm six months ago (with plans to put her at the helm of Cedil­la straight away). Glucks­mann said the com­pa­ny al­ready em­ploys 12 peo­ple.

In short, Cedil­la is us­ing more tra­di­tion­al small mol­e­cule drugs to desta­bi­lize dis­ease-caus­ing pro­teins ahead of the ubiq­ui­ti­na­tion process. Once the pro­teins are un­sta­ble, the cell rec­og­nizes them as dys­func­tion­al and toss­es them in the garbage dis­pos­al.

One way the com­pa­ny is go­ing about this is by map­ping out the chem­i­cal bonds be­tween pro­teins. The goal, Glucks­mann says, is to “or­phan” a tar­get pro­tein by dis­rupt­ing its bonds with oth­er pro­teins, tip­ping the tar­get in­to an un­sta­ble state.

Cedil­la is al­ready run­ning 8 ear­ly-stage pro­grams in par­al­lel, Glucks­mann said, us­ing the new funds from Third Rock to ID which can­di­dates they’ll take to the clin­ic. The com­pa­ny thinks this tech could be have wide­spread ap­pli­ca­tions.

“We are ini­tial­ly fo­cused on on­col­o­gy tar­gets,” said Cedil­la’s CSO Bri­an Jones. “We al­so be­lieve our small mol­e­cule ap­proach is broad­ly ap­plic­a­ble, for ex­am­ple to ac­cess tar­gets in the cen­tral ner­vous sys­tem.”

A new era of treat­ment: How bio­mark­ers are chang­ing the way we think about can­cer

AJ Patel was recovering from a complicated brain surgery when his oncologist burst into the hospital room yelling, “I’ve got some really great news for you!”

For two years, Patel had been going from doctor to doctor trying to diagnose his wheezing, only to be dealt the devastating news that he had stage IV lung cancer and only six months to live. And then they found the brain tumors.

“What are you talking about?” Patel asked. He had never seen an oncologist so happy.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Mihael Polymeropoulos, Vanda Pharmaceuticals CEO

Phar­ma com­pa­ny con­tin­ues its FDA law­suit spree, this time af­ter agency de­nies fast-track des­ig­na­tion

Vanda Pharmaceuticals is making a name for itself, at least in terms of suing the FDA.

The DC-headquartered firm on Monday filed its latest suit against the agency, with the company raising concerns over the FDA’s failure to grant a fast track designation for Vanda’s potential chronic digestive disorder drug tradipitant, which is a neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist.

Specifically, Vanda said FDA’s “essential point” in its one-page denial letter on the designation pointed to “the lack of necessary safety data,” which was “inconsistent with the criteria for … Fast Track designation.”

Mod­er­na seeks to dis­miss Al­ny­lam suit over Covid-19 vac­cine com­po­nent, claim­ing wrong venue

RNAi therapeutics juggernaut Alnylam Pharmaceuticals made a splash in March when it sued and sought money from both Pfizer and Moderna regarding their use of Alnylam’s biodegradable lipids, which Alnylam claims have been integral to the way both companies’ mRNA-based Covid-19 vaccines work.

But now, Moderna lawyers are firing back, telling the same Delaware district court that Alnylam’s claims can only proceed against the US government in the Court of Federal Claims because of the way the company’s contract is set up with the US government. The US has spent almost $10 billion on Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine so far.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 142,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

(Credit: Shutterstock)

Cracks in the fa­cade: Is phar­ma's pan­dem­ic ‘feel good fac­tor’ wan­ing?

The discordant effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on pharma reputation continues. While the overall industry still retains a respectable halo from its Covid-19 quick response and leadership, a new patient group study reveals a different story emerging in the details.

On one hand, US patient advocacy groups rated the industry higher-than-ever overall. More than two-thirds (67%) of groups gave the industry a thumbs up for 2021, a whopping 10 percentage point increase over the year before, according to the PatientView annual study, now in its 9th year.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 142,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Alan Wise (L) and Peter Trill (Duke Street Bio)

They sold their last biotech to Mer­ck. Now they're back with a PARP out­fit named af­ter a Lon­don street

In 2016, Peter Trill and Alan Wise sold IOmet Pharma (an I/O outfit as the name suggests) to Merck for $400 million.

Now, some six years later, the duo has returned with another cancer biotech, Duke Street Bio, that emerged from stealth Tuesday. Duke Street Bio, named for the street where it’s located in London, is making its public debut as a next-gen PARP player, hoping to break into a field that already has a number of Big Pharma competitors.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 142,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Michael Corbo, Pfizer CDO of inflammation & immunology

UP­DAT­ED: Plan­ning ahead for crowd­ed ul­cer­a­tive col­i­tis mar­ket, Pfiz­er spells out PhI­II da­ta on $6.7B Are­na drug

Pfizer has laid out the detailed results behind its boast that etrasimod — the S1P receptor modulator at the center of its $6.7 billion buyout of Arena Pharma — is the winner of the class, potentially leapfrogging an earlier entrant from Bristol Myers Squibb.

Pivotal data from the ELEVATE program in ulcerative colitis — which consists of two Phase III trials, one lasting 52 weeks and the other just 12 weeks — illustrate an “encouraging balance of efficacy and safety,” according to Michael Corbo, chief development officer of inflammation & immunology at Pfizer. The company is presenting the results as a late breaker at Digestive Disease Week.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 142,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Robert Califf (Michael Brochstein/Sipa USA via AP Images)

House Re­pub­li­cans at­tack Chi­na-on­ly da­ta in FDA sub­mis­sions, seek new in­ves­ti­ga­tion in­to re­search in­spec­tions

Three Republican representatives are calling on the FDA to take a closer look at the applications including only clinical data from China.

The letter to FDA commissioner Rob Califf late last week comes as the agency recently rejected Eli Lilly’s anti-PD-1 antibody, which attempted to bring China-only data but ran into a bruising adcomm that may crush the hopes of any other companies looking to bring cheaper follow-ons based only on Chinese data.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 142,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Amid mon­key­pox fears, biotechs spring to ac­tion; Mod­er­na’s CFO trou­ble; Cuts, cuts every­where; Craft­ing the right pro­teins; and more

Welcome back to Endpoints Weekly, your review of the week’s top biopharma headlines. Want this in your inbox every Saturday morning? Current Endpoints readers can visit their reader profile to add Endpoints Weekly. New to Endpoints? Sign up here.

It’s always a bittersweet moment saying goodbye, but as Josh Sullivan goes off to new adventures we are grateful for the way he’s built up the Endpoints Manufacturing section — which the rest of the team will now carry forward. If you’re not already, this may be a good time to sign up for your weekly dose of drug manufacturing news. Thank you for reading and wish you a restful weekend.

Bris­tol My­ers Squibb sues No­var­tis for roy­al­ties sur­round­ing the use of trans­genic mice

Two Big Pharma companies are going to the mat over genetically modified mice in a licensing dispute.

Bristol Myers Squibb is suing Novartis in New York over a dispute concerning an evaluation, research and commercialization agreement stretching back to the late ’90s initially inked between Novartis and BMS’ predecessor Medarex. The deal in question allowed Novartis to use Medarex’s patented transgenic mice to develop therapeutic drugs. Novartis agreed to pay Medarex – and subsequently BMS – a royalty on sales of drugs it developed using the mice.