Prothena’s lead drug NEOD001 just im­plod­ed in 2 late-stage stud­ies — and there’s noth­ing left to sal­vage

Prothena’s lead drug has de­ci­sive­ly failed a cru­cial Phase IIb study for rare, sec­ond-line cas­es of AL amy­loi­do­sis. And af­ter con­clud­ing that their Phase III for front­line use is al­so head­ed to fail­ure, the biotech’s ex­ec­u­tive team is scrap­ping the whole pro­gram.

Gene Kin­ney

In a pre­view of the re­sults be­ing re­leased this morn­ing for one of the most close­ly watched cat­a­lysts of Q2, Prothena $PR­TA CEO Gene Kin­ney said the com­pa­ny faced a very dif­fi­cult de­ci­sion, and had on­ly one re­al op­tion.

“We are a sci­ence-led com­pa­ny,” Kin­ney told me. “I’m a sci­en­tist my­self.” And when you’re up against some­thing like this, he said, you have to “pay at­ten­tion to the da­ta and take the most ap­pro­pri­ate steps for­ward.”

It’s not pret­ty, and there will be no hunt for sil­ver lin­ings for a drug once reck­oned as a po­ten­tial block­buster worth around $1.5 bil­lion in peak sales. There will be no at­tempt to re­vive the ef­fort.

Prothena’s shares dropped 62% Mon­day morn­ing. And as an­a­lysts’ bleak as­sess­ments hit, things got even worse. By mid-af­ter­noon the stock was down near­ly 70%, wip­ing out close to a bil­lion dol­lars in mar­ket cap af­ter start­ing the day at $1.4 bil­lion.

“We’ve had a large set­back here with this pro­gram,” says the CEO, who is turn­ing to re­view “the most op­ti­mal way of mov­ing for­ward…All of us at Prothena had gen­uine­ly hoped that we had a drug that would help pa­tients suf­fer­ing from this dis­ease.”

Neil Wood­ford

Right now, Prothena plans to bring the Phase III to an end as they look over the fi­nal da­ta. But there’s no ques­tion in Kin­ney’s mind that the tri­als had foundered, with the Phase IIb de­liv­er­ing noth­ing sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant on the pri­ma­ry or sec­ondary end­points. 

Some of those end­points slight­ly fa­vored the drug, oth­ers slight­ly fa­vored the place­bo.

The haz­ard ra­tio in the Phase III tri­al was at 0.84 when they de­cid­ed to drop the ef­fort at the rec­om­men­da­tion of the in­de­pen­dent mon­i­tor­ing board.

The pri­ma­ry end­point of the Phase IIb PRON­TO study was a mea­sure­ment of car­diac best re­sponse us­ing the high­ly re­gard­ed bio­mark­er for NT-proB­NP as a like­ly sur­ro­gate for sur­vival. Prothena had told in­vestors and an­a­lysts that a suc­cess here could trig­ger a re­quest for ac­cel­er­at­ed ap­proval at the FDA. 

“This is the worst case sce­nario for this pro­gram un­for­tu­nate­ly for PR­TA at this time,” not­ed Jef­feries an­a­lyst Michael Lee.

The re­sults will be a par­tic­u­lar­ly bit­ter pill for Neil Wood­ford to swal­low. The UK in­vestor bet heav­i­ly on Prothena’s suc­cess with NEOD001, reg­u­lar­ly of­fer­ing his en­thu­si­as­tic en­dorse­ment of the com­pa­ny and the team in charge. Now he’ll have to ac­count for an­oth­er painful set­back on the port­fo­lio, af­ter the stock falls far be­low what he paid to buy in.

The bru­tal­ly bad news for in­vestors comes on the heels of a sig­nif­i­cant step for­ward for Prothena. The biotech re­cent­ly signed a rich, pre­clin­i­cal li­cens­ing deal with Cel­gene to beef up its fledg­ling neu­ro­sciences pipeline — with $150 mil­lion in cash tied to it — in­clud­ing an Alzheimer’s pro­gram for tau.

That ef­fort will take the spot­light, along with an­oth­er clin­i­cal pro­gram and the pre­clin­i­cal work un­der way on oth­er drugs.

AL amy­loi­do­sis is a rare con­di­tion that’s di­ag­nosed in about 3,000 peo­ple a year in the US, though it may al­so well be un­der­diag­nosed, ac­cord­ing to Memo­r­i­al Sloan Ket­ter­ing Can­cer Cen­ter. In the dis­ease, rogue plas­ma cells pro­duce an im­munoglob­u­lin light-chain pro­tein that pro­duces amy­loid, which is de­posit­ed in or­gans and gums the works, ca­pa­ble of se­vere dam­age. 

As there are no drugs ap­proved for the con­di­tion, doc­tors of­ten turn to au­tol­o­gous stem cell trans­plants fol­low­ing chemother­a­py to erad­i­cate the er­rant plas­ma cells. Treat­ment al­so some­times in­volved mul­ti­ple myelo­ma drugs like Vel­cade, with ev­i­dence that carfil­zomib and dara­tu­mum­ab can tamp down on the pro­duc­tion of the plas­ma cells. There are a va­ri­ety of stud­ies now in the clin­ic for myelo­ma drugs in this con­di­tion, but any ded­i­cat­ed drug that can mod­i­fy the dis­ease will find a big mar­ket.

Prothena’s share­hold­ers have had a lot to fret about on this de­vel­op­ment pro­gram. The com­pa­ny’s chief med­ical of­fi­cer, Sarah Noon­berg, abrupt­ly re­signed in Feb­ru­ary — less than a year af­ter the Bio­Marin vet joined Prothena — which in­evitably spurred some buzz on Twit­ter. More sig­nif­i­cant­ly, Sahm Ad­ran­gi’s Ker­ris­dale of­fered up one of their Nas­daq SWAT at­tacks on the drug and the com­pa­ny.

Ker­ris­dale set the chances of suc­cess in these tri­als at 0%.

“Prothena’s car­diac best re­sponse rate is mere­ly a byprod­uct of well-doc­u­ment­ed nat­ur­al vari­ance,” Ker­ris­dale not­ed, “and we be­lieve there is no chance of NEOD001 pro­duc­ing sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant re­sults in its cur­rent Phase 2b and Phase 3 tri­als.”

Next up for Prothena is their ex­per­i­men­tal Parkin­son’s drug, PRX002/RG7935, which is al­lied with Roche. It is their on­ly oth­er clin­i­cal stage pro­gram, fol­low­ing a de­ci­sion last fall to scrap a pro­gram for PRX003. 

Kin­ney says an­oth­er pre­clin­i­cal pro­gram will soon be ad­vanced in­to hu­man stud­ies, and there’s plen­ty of cash on hand. The biotech, which had 125 staffers on hand at the end of 2017, al­so list­ed $422 mil­lion in cash — lat­er aug­ment­ed with Cel­gene’s $150 mil­lion buy-in.

Turned back at the FDA, Im­muno­Gen is ax­ing 220 staffers, sell­ing pro­grams and hun­ker­ing down for a new PhI­II gam­ble

After being stymied by FDA regulators who were unconvinced by ImmunoGen’s $IMGN desperation shot at an accelerated OK based on a secondary endpoint, the struggling biotech is slashing its workforce, shuttering R&D projects and looking for buyers to pick up some of its experimental cancer assets as it goes back into a new Phase III with the lead drug.

We found out last month that the FDA had batted back their case for an accelerated approval of their antibody-drug conjugate mirvetuximab soravtansine, which had earlier failed a Phase III study for ovarian cancer. Now the other shoe is dropping.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 53,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Brent Saunders [Getty Photos]

UP­DAT­ED: Ab­b­Vie seals $63B deal to buy a trou­bled Al­ler­gan — spelling out $1B in R&D cuts

Brent Saunders has found his way out of the current fix he’s in at Allergan $AGN. He’s selling the company to AbbVie for $63 billion in the latest example of the hot M&A market in biopharma.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 53,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

As­traZeneca chal­lenges Roche on front­line SCLC af­ter seiz­ing an in­ter­im win — and Mer­ck may not be far be­hind

The crowded playing field in the PD-1/L1 marketing game is about to get a little more complex.

This morning AstraZeneca reported that its CASPIAN study delivered a hit in an interim readout for their PD-L1 Imfinzi combined with etoposide and platinum-based chemotherapy options for frontline cases of small cell lung cancer, a tough target which has already knocked back Bristol-Myers’ shot in second-line cases. The positive data  — which we won’t see before they roll it out at an upcoming scientific conference — give AstraZeneca excellent odds of a quick vault to challenging Roche’s Tecentriq-chemo combo, approved 3 months ago for frontline SCLC in a landmark advance.

“This is the first trial offering the flexibility of combining immunotherapy with different platinum-based regimens in small cell lung cancer, expanding treatment options,” noted AstraZeneca cancer R&D chief José Baselga in a statement.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 53,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Bridge­Bio takes crown for biggest biotech IPO of 2019, as fel­low uni­corn Adap­tive rais­es of­fer­ing size and price

Bridge­Bio Phar­ma and Adap­tive Biotech­nolo­gies have not just up­sized IPO of­fer­ings — the pair of uni­corns have al­so raised their of­fer­ing prices above the range, haul­ing in a com­bined $648.5 mil­lion.

Neil Ku­mar’s Bridge­Bio Phar­ma, found­ed in 2015, has a sta­ble of com­pa­nies fo­cused on dis­eases that are dri­ven by de­fects in a sin­gle gene — en­com­pass­ing der­ma­tol­ogy, car­di­ol­o­gy, neu­rol­o­gy, en­docrinol­o­gy, re­nal dis­ease, and oph­thal­mol­o­gy — and can­cers with clear ge­net­ic dri­vers. The start­up mill birthed a pletho­ra of firms such as Ei­dos, Navire, QED Ther­a­peu­tics and Pelle­Pharm, which func­tion as its sub­sidiaries.

Two biotech uni­corns swell pro­posed IPOs, eye­ing a $600M-plus wind­fall

We’ve been wait­ing for the ar­rival of Bridge­Bio’s IPO to top off the wave of new biotech of­fer­ings sweep­ing through Nas­daq at the end of H1. And now we learn that it’s been sub­stan­tial­ly up­sized.

Ini­tial­ly pen­ciled in at a uni­corn-sized $225 mil­lion, the KKR-backed biotech has spiked that to the neigh­bor­hood of $300 mil­lion, look­ing to sell 20 mil­lion shares at $14 to $16 each. That’s an added 5 mil­lion shares, re­ports Re­nais­sance Cap­i­tal, which fig­ures the pro­posed mar­ket val­u­a­tion for Neil Ku­mar’s com­pa­ny at $1.8 bil­lion.

No­var­tis holds back the copy­cat brigade's at­tack on its top drug fran­chise — for now

A fed­er­al judge has put a gener­ic chal­lenge to No­var­tis’ block­buster mul­ti­ple scle­ro­sis drug Gilenya on hold while a patent fight plays out in court.

Judge Leonard P. Stark is­sued a tem­po­rary in­junc­tion ear­li­er this week, forc­ing My­lan, Dr. Red­dy’s Lab­o­ra­to­ries and Au­robindo Phar­ma to shelve their launch plans to al­low the patent fight to pro­ceed. He ruled that al­low­ing the gener­ics in­to the mar­ket now would per­ma­nent­ly slash the price for No­var­tis, even if it pre­vails. 

Novotech CEO Dr. John Moller

Novotech CRO Award­ed Frost & Sul­li­van Best Biotech CRO Asia-Pa­cif­ic 2019

Known in the in­dus­try as the Asia-Pa­cif­ic CRO, Novotech is now lead CRO ser­vices provider for the grow­ing num­ber of in­ter­na­tion­al biotechs se­lect­ing the re­gion for their stud­ies.

Re­flect­ing this Asia-Pa­cif­ic growth, Novotech staff num­bers are up 20% since De­cem­ber 2018 to 600 in-house clin­i­cal re­search peo­ple across a full range of ser­vices, across the re­gion.

Novotech’s ca­pa­bil­i­ties have been rec­og­nized by an­a­lysts like Frost & Sul­li­van, most re­cent­ly with the pres­ti­gious Asia-Pa­cif­ic CRO Biotech of the year award for best prac­tices in clin­i­cal re­search for biotechs for the fifth year. See oth­er awards here.

Af­ter rais­ing $158M, this up­start's founders have star back­ers and plans to break new ground in gene ther­a­py

Back in 2014, Stephanie Tagliatela opted to take an early exit out of her PhD program after working in Mark Bear’s lab at MIT, where she specialized in the synaptic connections between neuronal cells in the brain. She never finished that PhD, but she and fellow MIT student Kartik Ramamoorthi — who was on the founding team at Voyager — came away with some ideas for a gene therapy startup.

Today, fully 5 years later, she and Ramamoorthi are taking the wraps off of a $104 million mega-round designed to take the cumulative work of their preclinical formative stage for Encoded Therapeutics into human studies. They’ve now raised $158 million since starting out in Illumina’s incubator in the Bay Area, and they believe they are firmly on track to do something unique in gene therapy.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 53,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

FDA re­jects Ac­er's rare dis­ease drug, asks for new tri­al — shares crater

Ac­er Ther­a­peu­tics’ bid to re­pur­pose celipro­lol — a be­ta-block­er on the mar­ket for hy­per­ten­sion — as a treat­ment for a rare, in­her­it­ed con­nec­tive tis­sue dis­or­der has hit a se­vere set­back. The New­ton, Mass­a­chu­setts-based com­pa­ny on Tues­day said the FDA re­ject­ed the drug and has asked for an­oth­er clin­i­cal tri­al.

The com­pa­ny’s shares $AC­ER cratered near­ly 77% to $4.47 in Tues­day morn­ing trad­ing.