Psy­che­del­ic drug re­search breaks out of deep freeze as re­searchers head for the clin­ic with am­bi­tious tri­al plans

David Nichols en­tered grad­u­ate school in 1969 with dreams of crack­ing LSD. He was a child of the 60s, his friends drop­ping tabs and go­ing on about the vi­sions they saw – the big bang, god, in­fin­i­ty pro­ject­ed – and how it changed them in ways on­ly ma­jor life events could. Nichols was go­ing to fig­ure out how it all worked.

David Nichols Pur­due

And then in 1970, Con­gress passed the Con­trolled Sub­stance Act. LSD, which the gov­ern­ment had stud­ied ex­ten­sive­ly for two decades, be­came a Sched­ule I drug. The dol­lars washed up. For 30 years, psy­che­delics be­came all but un­touch­able for clin­i­cal tri­als.

“The Con­trolled Sub­stances Act was passed, and I thought, ‘Oh, well there goes that [idea],” Nichols told End­point News.

Now half a cen­tu­ry lat­er, Johns Hop­kins Med­i­cine is open­ing up the na­tion’s first ma­jor cen­ter for psy­che­del­ic re­search, a $17 mil­lion, pri­vate­ly-backed bet that re­flects a 20-year-long sea change in how psy­che­del­ic re­search is viewed by clin­i­cians and the promise the drugs have shown in treat­ing a host of psy­chi­atric dis­or­ders. The Cen­ter for Psy­che­del­ic and Con­scious­ness Re­search at Johns Hop­kins Med­i­cine will al­so ex­plore the drugs’ im­pact on cre­ativ­i­ty and well-be­ing.

“Oh, it’s huge,” says Nichols, who as a pro­fes­sor at Pur­due Uni­ver­si­ty be­came one of the on­ly psy­che­del­ic re­searchers (he fo­cused on an­i­mals) and one of the top ad­vo­cates for re­open­ing clin­i­cal tri­als dur­ing the three-plus decades the drugs were al­most en­tire­ly mar­gin­al­ized. “Where mon­ey has been the ob­sta­cle, now mon­ey is no longer the prob­lem.”

Af­ter years in the side­lines, psy­che­delics  be­gan­to creep back in­to the phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal imag­i­na­tion in 2000, when Johns Hop­kins ob­tained ap­proval to ad­min­is­ter psy­che­delics to healthy hu­man sub­jects.

Sci­en­tists at a hand­ful of promi­nent in­sti­tu­tions have since en­tered the field, con­duct­ing tri­als on how psy­che­delics can treat long-in­tractable dis­or­ders – some­times with dra­mat­ic suc­cess: psilo­cy­bin (the chem­i­cal found in mag­ic mush­rooms) for ad­dic­tion and a slew of ail­ments, LSD for de­pres­sion, MD­MA for PTSD.

Ear­ly re­sults have ap­peared as a panacea to psy­chi­atric pa­tients who have gone years on SS­RIs and oth­er treat­ments with­out sig­nif­i­cant im­prove­ment and opened the door to a string of star­tups seek­ing to ad­vance and cap­i­tal­ize on the emerg­ing mar­ket. Re­searchers tout­ed the re­sults of one pair of NYU and Hop­kins stud­ies on psilo­cy­bin to treat “ex­is­ten­tial dread” in can­cer pa­tients as “mind-blow­ing,”

“I think we’re look­ing at a par­a­digm shift,” says Nichols, who found­ed the Heffter Re­search In­sti­tute in 1993 to ad­vo­cate for and even­tu­al­ly fund clin­i­cal tri­als. “I think it’ll be a rev­o­lu­tion­ary change for peo­ple who suf­fer from these dis­or­ders. We didn’t have any­thing that worked un­til now.”

Re­searchers char­ac­ter­ized the cen­ter as a sign of how main­stream the field has be­come and an an­nounce­ment that will on­ly le­git­imize it fur­ther.

But im­me­di­ate­ly, the mon­ey will fu­el sev­er­al clin­i­cal tri­als at Hop­kins – in­clud­ing those for opi­oid ad­dic­tion, Alzheimer’s dis­ease, PTSD and co-oc­cur­ring mood and al­co­hol prob­lems – equip­ping sci­en­tists with funds that re­main scarce for psy­che­del­ic re­search.

Al­most all psy­che­delics are still Sched­ule I drugs, mean­ing of­fi­cial­ly they have “no cur­rent­ly ac­cept­ed med­ical use” and the NIH will not fund stud­ies on them. The prob­lem has plagued the field since its resur­gence.

Al­bert Gar­cia Johns Hop­kins

“Usu­al­ly sci­ence is a lot of beg­ging for mon­ey,” Al­bert Gar­cia, who will lead the Hop­kins Alzheimer’s study, told End­points News, “and this means we won’t have to do that for a cou­ple years at least.”

The fu­ture be­yond clin­i­cal tri­als re­mains murky, though, and the ex­u­ber­ance of some re­searchers and ad­vo­cates has led to push­back by crit­ics of the sci­ence (psy­che­del­ic stud­ies are nec­es­sar­i­ly not dou­ble-blind) and those, in­clud­ing health writer and pro­po­nent of psy­che­del­ic re­search Michael Pol­lan, who say ad­vo­cates for mag­ic mush­room de­crim­i­nal­iza­tion send a mes­sage that the drugs are not dan­ger­ous.

“This is not some sort of mag­ic bul­let that will be solv­ing all these men­tal health prob­lems,” Gar­cia said.

In March, the FDA ap­proved its first psy­che­del­ic drug: Es­ke­t­a­mine for treat­ing de­pres­sion. And in 2017 and 2018, the agency grant­ed break­through sta­tus to an MD­MA pro­to­col for treat­ing PTSD and to UK start­up Com­pass Path­ways’ psilo­cy­bin pro­to­col for treat­ing de­pres­sion. But there’s been lit­tle in­di­ca­tion of change to the un­der­ly­ing fed­er­al law.

Sim­i­lar ques­tions re­main about pre­cise­ly how these drugs would come to mar­ket, es­pe­cial­ly as the field has caught the eye of in­vestors in Sil­i­con Val­ley and Eu­rope. The list of Hop­kins donors in­cludes TOMS founder Blake My­coskie and pop­u­lar en­tre­pre­neur Tim Fer­riss but oth­er in­vestors have fun­neled mon­ey in­to pri­vate, for-prof­it ven­tures like Com­pass and ATAI.

In­g­mar Gor­man

“Scal­ing and ac­ces­si­bil­i­ty of treat­ments are ques­tions on every­one’s mind at the mo­ment,” In­g­mar Gor­man, di­rec­tor of the Psy­che­del­ic Ed­u­ca­tion and Con­tin­u­ing Care Pro­gram at the Cen­ter for Op­ti­mal Liv­ing and co-prin­ci­pal in­ves­ti­ga­tor on a stage III MD­MA study for treat­ing PTSD, told End­points News in an email.

Psy­che­delics such as psilo­cy­bin won’t op­er­ate on the pill-a-day for­mu­la that dom­i­nates most cur­rent psy­chi­atrics. Rather, a pa­tient would go in a few times per year to re­ceive dos­es in a con­trolled en­vi­ron­ment with med­ical pro­fes­sion­als. It’s un­clear yet what the costs would be, though Nichols and oth­ers are op­ti­mistic wide­spread knowl­edge of how to man­u­fac­ture psilo­cy­bin, for in­stance, will make it dif­fi­cult to patent and keep prices down.

Eka­te­ri­na Malievska­ia Com­pass

Last year, Com­pass Path­ways made head­lines af­ter in­sid­ers ac­cused them in Quartz of try­ing to form a mo­nop­oly on the glob­al sup­ply of psilo­cy­bin. They de­nied the charges but said se­cur­ing a large sup­ply was es­sen­tial to their busi­ness mod­el of in­te­grat­ing their ther­a­pies sys­tems.

They told End­points they weren’t a psy­che­del­ic com­pa­ny, but sim­ply look­ing for the best ways to tack­le men­tal health prob­lems.

“Right now, I don’t see any­thing more promis­ing than re­search in psy­che­delics,” says CIO and co-founder Eka­te­ri­na Malievska­ia. “But things can change.”

Im­ple­ment­ing re­silience in the clin­i­cal tri­al sup­ply chain

Since January 2020, the clinical trials ecosystem has quickly evolved to manage roadblocks impeding clinical trial integrity, and patient care and safety amid a global pandemic. Closed borders, reduced air traffic and delayed or canceled flights disrupted global distribution, revealing how flexible logistics and supply chains can secure the timely delivery of clinical drug products and therapies to sites and patients.

In fi­nal days at Mer­ck, Roger Perl­mut­ter bets big on a lit­tle-known Covid-19 treat­ment

Roger Perlmutter is spending his last days at Merck, well, spending.

Two weeks after snapping up the antibody-drug conjugate biotech VelosBio for $2.75 billion, Merck announced today that it had purchased OncoImmune and its experimental Covid-19 drug for $425 million. The drug, known as CD24Fc, appeared to reduce the risk of respiratory failure or death in severe Covid-19 patients by 50% in a 203-person Phase III trial, OncoImmune said in September.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 94,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Pascal Soriot (AP Images)

UP­DAT­ED: As­traZeneca, Ox­ford on the de­fen­sive as skep­tics dis­miss 70% av­er­age ef­fi­ca­cy for Covid-19 vac­cine

On the third straight Monday that the world wakes up to positive vaccine news, AstraZeneca and Oxford are declaring a new Phase III milestone in the fight against the pandemic. Not everyone is convinced they will play a big part, though.

With an average efficacy of 70%, the headline number struck analysts as less impressive than the 95% and 94.5% protection that Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna have boasted in the past two weeks, respectively. But the British partners say they have several other bright spots going for their candidate. One of the two dosing regimens tested in Phase III showed a better profile, bringing efficacy up to 90%; the adenovirus vector-based vaccine requires minimal refrigeration, which may mean easier distribution; and AstraZeneca has pledged to sell it at a fraction of the price that the other two vaccine developers are charging.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 94,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Bahija Jallal (file photo)

TCR pi­o­neer Im­muno­core scores a first with a land­mark PhI­II snap­shot on over­all sur­vival for a rare melanoma

Bahija Jallal’s crew at TCR pioneer Immunocore says they have nailed down a promising set of pivotal data for their lead drug in a frontline setting for a solid tumor. And they are framing this early interim readout as the convincing snapshot they need to prove that their platform can deliver on a string of breakthrough therapies now in the clinic or planned for it.

In advance of the Monday announcement, Jallal and R&D chief David Berman took some time to walk me through the first round of Phase III data for their lead TCR designed to treat rare, frontline cases of metastatic uveal melanoma that come with a grim set of survival expectations.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Bob Nelsen (Photo by Michael Kovac/Getty Images)

Bob Nelsen rais­es $800M and re­cruits a star-stud­ded board to build the 'Fox­con­n' of biotech

Bob Nelsen spent his pandemic spring in his Seattle home, talking on the phone with Luciana Borio, the scientist who used to run pandemic preparedness on the National Security Council, and fuming with her about the dire state of American manufacturing.

Companies were rushing to develop vaccines and antibodies for the new virus, but even if they succeeded, there was no immediate supply chain or infrastructure to mass-produce them in a way that could make a dent in the outbreak.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 94,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Am­gen sev­ers 14-year Cy­to­ki­net­ics part­ner­ship, bail­ing on ome­cam­tiv af­ter mixed PhI­II re­sults

Amgen is shrugging off a 14-year development alliance and the tens of millions of dollars spent to develop a new heart drug at Cytokinetics after a Phase III trial turned up weak data — leaving Cytokinetics to soldier on alone.

Omecamtiv mecarbil technically worked, meeting the primary composite endpoint in the Phase III GALACTIC-HF study. But it missed a key secondary endpoint, which analysts had been following as a key marker for success — reduction of cardiovascular (CV) death. While Cytokinetics celebrated the results, its stock tanked 43% upon the news, and analysts warned of an uncertain path ahead. Now, Amgen wants out.

Carl Hansen, AbCellera CEO (University of British Columbia)

From a pair of Air Jor­dans to a $200M-plus IPO, Carl Hansen is craft­ing an overnight R&D for­tune fu­eled by Covid-19

Back in the summer of 2019, Carl Hansen left his post as a professor at the University of British Columbia to go full time as the CEO at a low-profile antibody shop he had founded called AbCellera.

As biotech CEOs go, even after a fundraise Hansen wasn’t paid a whole heck of a lot. He ended up earning right at $250,000 for the year. His compensation package included a loan — which he later paid back — and a pair of Air Jordan tennis shoes. His newly-hired CFO, Andrew Booth, got a sweeter pay packet than that — which included his own pair of Air Jordans.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Leonard Schleifer, Regeneron CEO (Andrew Harnik/AP)

Trail­ing Eli Lil­ly by 12 days, Re­gen­eron gets the FDA OK for their Covid-19 an­ti­body cock­tail

A month and a half after becoming the experimental treatment of choice for a newly diagnosed president, Regeneron’s antibody cocktail has received emergency use authorization from the FDA. It will be used to treat non-hospitalized Covid-19 patients who are at high-risk of progressing.

Although the Rgeneron drug is not the first antibody treatment authorized by the FDA, the news comes as a significant milestone for a company and a treatment scientists have watched closely since the outbreak began.

News brief­ing: Ab­b­Vie part­ner Teneo­bio ex­pands tech li­cense with CAR-T play­er Po­sei­da; Ar­genx buys PRV from Bay­er for $98M

Teneobio may be best known for its pact with AbbVie and Gilead, but before its big break the bispecific player had licensed its antibodies for a different use: as binders in CAR-T therapies being developed by Poseida.

Now, the biotechs are expanding their partnership, with Poseida exercising four options to deploy Teneobio’s heavy chain only domain antibodies commercially.

The commercial licensing fees remained under wraps, but Teneobio is eligible for $250 million in milestones for these CAR-Ts against undisclosed targets.