Mir Imran, Rani Therapeutics

Rani Ther­a­peu­tics eyes po­ten­tial IPO as ro­bot­ic pill tech­nol­o­gy takes shape

Two ef­forts to trans­form in­jecta­bles in­to ro­bot­ic pills — a colos­sal mar­ket de­signed to en­hance treat­ment com­pli­ance, di­min­ish the need for physi­cian-led ther­a­peu­tic ad­min­is­tra­tion and pla­cate nee­dle-pho­bic pa­tients — got off the ground last year. Now, one of these ini­tia­tives, led by an in­ven­tor who played an in­flu­en­tial role in pi­o­neer­ing the first FDA-ap­proved au­to­mat­ic im­plantable car­diovert­er de­fib­ril­la­tor (ICD) has tak­en an­oth­er key step in its quest with a suc­cess­ful ear­ly-stage ef­fi­ca­cy and safe­ty study.

Cal­i­for­nia-based Rani Ther­a­peu­tics — un­der chief Mir Im­ran who start­ed his first com­pa­ny while in col­lege and cur­rent­ly holds more than 400 is­sued patents — on Thurs­day said its tech­nol­o­gy, chris­tened the Ra­niP­ill, had per­formed as ex­pect­ed in a tri­al with 58 healthy adult vol­un­teers.

The tech­nol­o­gy is de­cep­tive­ly sim­ple. The cap­sule has an en­teric coat­ing that pro­tects it from the acidic am­biance of the stom­ach, and once it moves in­to the in­tes­tine and pH lev­els rise, the coat­ing dis­solves and a chem­i­cal re­ac­tion takes place which in­flates a bal­loon. Pres­sure in the bal­loon push­es a dis­solv­able mi­cronee­dle filled with a drug — in this case, the com­pound oc­treotide, an off-patent bi­o­log­ic that treats the hor­mon­al dis­or­der acromegaly — in­to the in­testi­nal wall. In­testines don’t have pain re­cep­tors, and the in­testi­nal sub­strate — which is de­signed to ab­sorb nu­tri­ents — is high­ly vas­cu­lar­ized, mak­ing it the ide­al lo­ca­tion for the drug-en­gorged in­jec­tion to de­ploy.

In the tri­al, 52 sub­jects were treat­ed with the Ra­niP­ill ver­sion of oc­treotide, while the re­main­ing 6 par­tic­i­pants were giv­en an in­tra­venous in­jec­tion of an iden­ti­cal dose of oc­treotide.

“This was the first time we were de­liv­er­ing nee­dles from the in­testi­nal wall,” Im­ran not­ed in an in­ter­view with End­points News. “And our hy­poth­e­sis from the be­gin­ning was that you wouldn’t feel any­thing. And of course, that was borne out. And then the sec­ond end­point was bioavail­abil­i­ty, which turned out to be greater than 70%. Which is what ex­act­ly we had seen in our pre­clin­i­cal test­ing.”

The plan is to con­duct a prop­er head-to-head study in the com­ing year and demon­strate equiv­a­lence or non-in­fe­ri­or­i­ty to the in­jectable ver­sion. The ear­li­est Im­ran ex­pects the prod­uct to be avail­able, as­sum­ing all goes well clin­i­cal­ly, is 2022.

This oc­treotide tri­al will be the lit­mus test for its drug-de­liv­ery plat­form, open­ing the door to a pletho­ra of in­jectable treat­ments, from in­sulin to Hu­mi­ra, and across a wide range of dis­eases. But there’s a long road ahead. Each drug loaded in­to the cap­sule will re­quire a sep­a­rate study be­fore Rani can pe­ti­tion the FDA for ap­proval.

The com­pa­ny has a num­ber of such drugs in its pipeline, and ex­pects to kick off Phase I stud­ies lat­er in 2020. Found­ed in 2012, Rani Ther­a­peu­tics has raised $142 mil­lion in fund­ing from a slate of in­vestors in­clud­ing GV (the in­vest­ment arm of Al­pha­bet), and counts No­var­tis and Shire (now owned by Take­da) as its part­ners.

As it ramps up its clin­i­cal de­vel­op­ment, fund­ing is im­per­a­tive. “The fund­ing nev­er stops. We’re con­stant­ly do­ing that,” Im­ran said, adding that an IPO is a “dis­tinct pos­si­bil­i­ty” rough­ly a year from now. The com­pa­ny al­so ex­pects to an­nounce a new li­cens­ing part­ner by the end of the year or 2021, he said.

Trans­form­ing in­jecta­bles in­to pills is hard­ly a nov­el idea, but a string of phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal/chem­i­cal ef­forts to evade the en­zymes that break down the oral drug be­fore it can be ab­sorbed have large­ly hit a wall. Apart from the Ra­niP­ill, last year an an­i­mal study — led by MIT sci­en­tists — cap­tured the spot­light for the po­ten­tial of its blue­ber­ry sized ro­bot­ic pill de­signed to de­liv­er an in­sulin shot in­side the stom­ach.

Rat and pig da­ta on the oth­er ro­bot­ic pill — cre­at­ed by a team of re­searchers at MIT (in­clud­ing the pro­lif­ic drug de­liv­ery mae­stro Robert Langer) and No­vo Nordisk — has an al­ter­na­tive mech­a­nism of ac­tion.

The de­vice, called So­ma, en­cap­su­lates a nee­dle in­side a pill made of com­pressed freeze-dried in­sulin that is de­signed to ori­ent it­self when it comes in con­tact with the stom­ach lin­ing — in­spired by a leop­ard tor­toise, which bran­dish­es a shell that al­lows the African rep­tile to right it­self if it rolls on­to its back.

Up­on con­tact with the wet in­ner lin­ing of the stom­ach (which is al­so de­void of pain re­cep­tors), a sug­ar disk hold­ing the nee­dle in place is dis­solved, mak­ing way for the nee­dle to re­lease its con­tents. The prod­uct is then en­gi­neered to dis­in­te­grate and trav­el harm­less­ly through the di­ges­tive sys­tem and even­tu­al­ly be elim­i­nat­ed, the re­searchers wrote in their re­port in Sci­ence.

“There’s so many patent land­mines that we have placed. So we’re not re­al­ly con­cerned about MIT or any­one else,” Im­ran said.

Biotech Half­time Re­port: Af­ter a bumpy year, is biotech ready to re­bound?

The biotech sector has come down firmly from the highs of February as negative sentiment takes hold. The sector had a major boost of optimism from the success of the COVID-19 vaccines, making investors keenly aware of the potential of biopharma R&D engines. But from early this year, clinical trial, regulatory and access setbacks have reminded investors of the sector’s inherent risks.

RBC Capital Markets recently surveyed investors to take the temperature of the market, a mix of specialists/generalists and long-only/ long-short investment strategies. Heading into the second half of the year, investors mostly see the sector as undervalued (49%), a large change from the first half of the year when only 20% rated it as undervalued. Around 41% of investors now believe that biotech will underperform the S&P500 in the second half of 2021. Despite that view, 54% plan to maintain their position in the market and 41% still plan to increase their holdings.

Covid-19 vac­cine boost­ers earn big thumbs up, but Mod­er­na draws ire over world sup­ply; What's next for Mer­ck’s Covid pill?; The C-suite view on biotech; and more

Welcome back to Endpoints Weekly, your review of the week’s top biopharma headlines. Want this in your inbox every Saturday morning? Current Endpoints readers can visit their reader profile to add Endpoints Weekly. New to Endpoints? Sign up here.

You may remember that at the beginning of this year, Endpoints News set a goal to go broader and deeper. We are still working towards that, and are excited to share that Beth Snyder Bulik will be joining us on Monday to cover all things pharma marketing. You can sign up for her weekly Endpoints MarketingRx newsletter in your reader profile.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 119,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

No­var­tis de­vel­op­ment chief John Tsai: 'We go deep in the new plat­form­s'

During our recent European Biopharma Summit, I talked with Novartis development chief John Tsai about his experiences over the 3-plus years he’s been at the pharma giant. You can read the transcript below or listen to the exchange in the link above.

John Carroll: I followed your career for quite some time. You’ve had more than 20 years in big pharma R&D and you’ve obviously seen quite a lot. I really was curious about what it was like for you three and a half years ago when you took over as R&D chief at Novartis. Obviously a big move, a lot of changes. You went to work for the former R&D chief of Novartis, Vas Narasimhan, who had his own track record there. So what was the biggest adjustment when you went into this position?

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Susan Galbraith, Executive VP, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca

As­traZeneca on­col­o­gy R&D chief Su­san Gal­braith: 'Y­ou're go­ing to need or­thog­o­nal com­bi­na­tion­s'

 

Earlier in the week we broadcast our 4th annual European Biopharma Summit with a great lineup of top execs. One of the one-on-one conversations I set up was with Susan Galbraith, the oncology research chief at AstraZeneca. In a wide-ranging discussion, Galbraith reviewed the cancer drug pipeline and key trends influencing development work at the pharma giant. You can watch the video, above, or stick with the script below. — JC

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Amit Etkin, Alto Neuroscience CEO (Alto via Vimeo)

A star Stan­ford pro­fes­sor leaves his lab for a start­up out to re­make psy­chi­a­try

About five years ago, Amit Etkin had a breakthrough.

The Stanford neurologist, a soft-spoken demi-prodigy who became a professor while still a resident, had been obsessed for a decade with how to better define psychiatric disorders. Drugs for depression or bipolar disorder didn’t work for many patients with the conditions, and he suspected the reason was how traditional diagnoses didn’t actually get at the heart of what was going on in a patient’s brain.

Roche's Tecen­triq cross­es the fin­ish line first in ad­ju­vant lung can­cer, po­ten­tial­ly kick­ing off gold rush

While falling behind the biggest PD-(L)1 drugs in terms of sales, Roche has looked to carve out a space for its Tecentriq with a growing expertise in lung cancer. The drug will now take an early lead in the sought-after adjuvant setting — but competitors are on the way.

The FDA on Friday approved Tecentriq as an adjuvant therapy for patients with Stage II-IIIA non small cell lung cancer with PD-(L)1 scores greater than or equal to 1, making it the first drug of its kind approved in an early setting that covers around 40% of all NSCLC patients.

Susan Galbraith speaking at Endpoints News' virtual EUBIO21 summit

Imfinzi/treme­li­mum­ab com­bo scores As­traZeneca an­oth­er OS win — this time in liv­er can­cer

Is the tide turning on AstraZeneca’s battered PD-L1/CTLA4 combo?

A single priming dose of the experimental tremelimumab, followed by Imfinzi every four weeks, beat Nexavar (sorafenib) in helping a group of liver cancer patients live longer in a Phase III study, the company reported, meeting the primary endpoint.

Specifically, the two drugs extended overall survival for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who had not received prior systemic therapy and were not eligible for localized treatment.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 119,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

FDA ad­comm votes unan­i­mous­ly in sup­port of a J&J Covid-19 boost­er two months af­ter one-dose shot

The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) on Friday voted 19-0 in favor of authorizing a second shot of J&J’s Covid-19 vaccine to follow at least two months after the initial dose.

Regulators don’t have to follow VRBPAC’s recommendation, but they almost always do. Considering that the CDC’s advisory committee has already been set to review the expanded EUA, VRBPAC’s recommendation is likely to be adopted.

FDA+ roundup: Marks on Wood­cock­'s tenure as act­ing com­mis­sion­er; FDA lead­ers of­fer per­spec­tive on bar­ri­ers to di­ver­si­ty in re­search

CBER director Peter Marks praised Janet Woodcock’s work as acting FDA commissioner, and while noting that Biden needs to nominate someone to fill the role permanently by Nov. 16, he said he has “no idea” when that actually might occur.

“Dr. Woodcock has been at the agency for over three decades and she, during that time, has proven herself to be a remarkably capable manager,” Marks said at the Alliance for Regenerative Medicine’s meeting Tuesday. “And she’s been managing as if she’s commissioner, unlike some previous acting [commissioners] who are afraid to actually do things. She doesn’t appear to be afraid to do things. I have not felt any different now from when we had a commissioner in place,” he added.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.