Re­gen­eron, Sanofi make their case for an­oth­er PD-1 drug — and they’re not set­tling for sixth place

Jo Lager, Sanofi

CHICA­GO — The two top im­muno-on­col­o­gy in­ves­ti­ga­tors for Re­gen­eron $REGN and Sanofi, Is­rael ‘Izzy’ Lowy and Jo Lager, came to Chica­go to of­fer a very promis­ing snap­shot of the ear­ly da­ta they’ve reaped from a study of their PD-1 drug REGN2810 for cu­ta­neous squa­mous cell car­ci­no­ma — the sec­ond dead­liest form of skin can­cer be­hind melanoma.

Like No­var­tis or In­cyte or some of the oth­er com­pa­nies work­ing on PD-(L)1 ther­a­pies in the large sec­ond wave form­ing in the pipeline fol­low­ing the first 5 that have been ap­proved, these two ma­jor league play­ers see this as a key build­ing block for the com­bos they want to de­vel­op. But it would be a mis­take, they say, to sim­ply write this one off as the lat­est check­point of this stripe look­ing to line up for the mar­ket.

Is­rael Lowy, Re­gen­eron

“I don’t think we’re the sixth,” Lowy told me in a con­ver­sa­tion over the week­end. “We’re the third.”

Re­gen­eron has some of the best an­ti­body spe­cial­ists in the busi­ness, which they’ve proved with a string of new drug ap­provals. Lowy says he’s learned a lot about PD-(L)1 while they’ve been work­ing on REGN2810. And some of their in­sights have ma­jor im­pli­ca­tions for every­one work­ing in the field.

One of the biggest lessons is that PD-1 is a sig­nif­i­cant­ly bet­ter path­way to fol­low than PD-L1, says Lowy.

The team cre­at­ed a PD-L1 as a com­ple­men­tary pro­gram in case their work on PD-1, but they feel now that PD-1 ther­a­pies of­fer a much more ef­fec­tive way to  un­leash an im­mune at­tack, some­thing that’s been un­der­scored by the dom­i­nance of Keytru­da and Op­di­vo  as well as Roche’s re­cent stun­ning set­back with the PD-L1 drug Tecen­triq.

And that’s why Re­gen­eron and Sanofi feel they can leapfrog ahead of some of the ear­ly en­tries.

Re­gen­eron and Sanofi al­so didn’t set out to cre­ate a bet­ter PD-1 than Keytru­da or Op­di­vo.

“One of the things was a ma­jor re­quire­ment for it to be at least as good as any­one else’s,” says Lowy, “not as­sum­ing that we could make an an­ti­body that was bet­ter. That be­ing said, we’re very hap­py with it. We screened many an­ti­bod­ies to pick the one that was our bet­ter can­di­date.”

Not on­ly is the first cut of the da­ta very good, this check­point is al­ready in a po­ten­tial­ly piv­otal Phase II tri­al.

Here’s what they found:

REGN2810 de­liv­ered an im­pres­sive over­all re­sponse rate of 46.2% — 12 of 26 pa­tients — which in­cludes 2 com­plete re­spons­es, 9 par­tial re­spons­es and 1 un­con­firmed par­tial re­sponse. The dis­ease con­trol rate hit 69.2%, cov­er­ing 18 of 26 pa­tients with 12 ORR and 6 with sta­ble dis­ease. The me­di­an pro­gres­sion-free sur­vival and over­all sur­vival rate were not reached at the da­ta cut­off date with a me­di­an fol­low-up of 6.9 months. Ten pa­tients re­main in re­sponse as of the da­ta cut­off date, with a range of 8 to 40 weeks du­ra­tion of re­sponse.

Ge­of­frey Porges, Leerink

Leerink’s Ge­of­frey Porges called the re­sults “com­pelling,” not­ing that the Re­gen­eron/Sanofi team could have a $300 mil­lion peak sales op­por­tu­ni­ty in the US alone. “(T)he com­pa­ny will al­most cer­tain­ly file an ap­pli­ca­tion with the two tri­als, and then take the risk of a pos­si­ble ad­vi­so­ry com­mit­tee re­view (new drug/new in­di­ca­tion for PD-1) about the clin­i­cal sig­nif­i­cance of the re­sult and the im­por­tance of the in­di­ca­tion.”

“We rec­og­nized long ago that block­ade of the PD-1 path­way is an es­sen­tial com­po­nent of any im­muno-on­col­o­gy pro­gram,” Lowy tells me. “Al­though a fab­u­lous ad­vance, it’s re­al­ly just the first chap­ter, or a pref­ace.”

“We want to have our own to fa­cil­i­tate the abil­i­ty to de­vel­op nov­el com­bi­na­tions with­out hav­ing to re­ly on any­one else’s agent,” he adds.

Re­gen­eron and Sanofi are well on their way. The rest of the in­dus­try might want to pay more at­ten­tion.

Nick Leschly via Getty

UP­DAT­ED: Blue­bird shares sink as an­a­lysts puz­zle out $1.8M stick­er shock and an un­ex­pect­ed de­lay

Blue­bird bio $BLUE has un­veiled its price for the new­ly ap­proved gene ther­a­py Zyn­te­glo (Lenti­Glo­bin), which came as a big sur­prise. And it wasn’t the on­ly un­ex­pect­ed twist in to­day’s sto­ry.

With some an­a­lysts bet­ting on a $900,000 price for the β-tha­lassemia treat­ment in Eu­rope, where reg­u­la­tors pro­vid­ed a con­di­tion­al ear­ly OK, blue­bird CEO Nick Leschly said Fri­day morn­ing that the pa­tients who are suc­cess­ful­ly treat­ed with their drug over 5 years will be charged twice that — $1.8 mil­lion — on the con­ti­nent. That makes this drug the sec­ond most ex­pen­sive ther­a­py on the plan­et, just be­hind No­var­tis’ new­ly ap­proved Zol­gens­ma at $2.1 mil­lion, with an­a­lysts still wait­ing to see what kind of pre­mi­um can be had in the US.


Glob­al Blood Ther­a­peu­tics poised to sub­mit ap­pli­ca­tion for ac­cel­er­at­ed ap­proval, with new piv­otal da­ta on its sick­le cell dis­ease drug

Global Blood Therapeutics is set to submit an application for accelerated approval in the second-half of this year, after unveiling fresh data from a late-stage trial that showed just over half the patients given the highest dose of its experimental sickle cell disease drug experienced a statistically significant improvement in oxygen-wielding hemoglobin, meeting the study's main goal.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 53,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

News­mak­ers at #EHA19: Re­gen­eron, Ar­Qule track progress on re­sponse rates

Re­gen­eron’s close­ly-watched bis­pe­cif­ic con­tin­ues to ring up high re­sponse rates

Re­gen­eron’s high-pro­file bis­pe­cif­ic REGN1979 is back in the spot­light at the Eu­ro­pean Hema­tol­ogy As­so­ci­a­tion sci­en­tif­ic con­fab. And while the stel­lar num­bers we saw at ASH have erod­ed some­what as more blood can­cer pa­tients are eval­u­at­ed, the re­sponse rates for this CD3/CD20 drug re­main high.

A to­tal of 13 out of 14 fol­lic­u­lar lym­phomas re­spond­ed to the drug, a 93% ORR, down from 100% at the last read­out. In 10 out of 14, there was a com­plete re­sponse. In dif­fuse large B-cell lym­phoma the re­sponse rate was 57% among pa­tients treat­ed at the 80 mg to 160 mg dose range. They were all com­plete re­spons­es. And 2 of these Cars were for pa­tients who had failed CAR-T ther­a­py.

Search­ing for the next block­buster to fol­low Darza­lex, J&J finds a $150M an­ti-CD38 drug from part­ner Gen­mab

Now that J&J and Genmab have thrust Darzalex onto the regulatory orbit for first-line use in multiple myeloma, the partners are lining up a deal for a next-gen follow-on to the leading CD38 drug.

Janssen — J&J’s biotech unit — has its eyes on HexaBody-CD38, a preclinical compound generated on Genmab’s tech platform designed to make drugs more potent via hexamerization.

Genmab is footing the bill on studies in multiple myeloma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; once it completes clinical proof of concept, Janssen has the option to license the drug for a $150 million exercise fee. There’s also $125 million worth of milestones in play.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 53,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Gene ther­a­pies seize the top of the list of the most ex­pen­sive drugs on the plan­et — and that trend has just be­gun

Anyone looking for a few simple reasons why the gene therapy field has caught fire with the pharma giants need only look at the new list of the 10 most expensive therapies from GoodRx.

Two recently approved gene therapies sit atop this list, with Novartis’ Zolgensma crowned the king of the priciest drugs at $2.1 million. Right below is Luxturna, the $850,000 pioneer from Spark, which Roche is pushing hard to acquire as it adds a gene therapy group to the global mix.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 53,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Savara shares are crushed as PhI­II tri­al flunks pri­ma­ry, key sec­on­daries — but they can’t stop be­liev­ing

In­vestors are in no mood to hear biotechs tout the suc­cess of a “key” sec­ondary end­point when the piv­otal Phase III flunks the pri­ma­ry goal. Just ask Savara. 

The Texas biotech $SVRA went look­ing for a sil­ver lin­ing as com­pa­ny ex­ecs blunt­ly con­ced­ed that Mol­gradex, an in­haled for­mu­la­tion of re­com­bi­nant hu­man gran­u­lo­cyte-macrophage colony-stim­u­lat­ing fac­tor (GM-CSF), failed to spur sig­nif­i­cant­ly im­proved treat­ment out­comes for pa­tients with a rare res­pi­ra­to­ry dis­ease called au­toim­mune pul­monary alve­o­lar pro­teinosis, or aPAP.

As an­oth­er an­tibi­otics biotech sinks in­to a cri­sis, warn­ings of a sec­tor ‘col­lapse’

Another antibiotics company is scrambling to survive today, forcing the company’s founding CEO to exit in a reorganization that eliminates its research capabilities as the survivors look to improve on minuscule sales of their newly approved treatment. And the news — on top of an alarming series of failures — spurred at least one figure in the field to warn of a looming collapse of the antimicrobial resistance research field.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 53,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

'We kept at it': Jef­frey Blue­stone plots late-stage come­back af­ter teplizum­ab shown to de­lay type 1 di­a­betes

Late-stage da­ta pre­sent­ed at the Amer­i­can Di­a­betes As­so­ci­a­tion an­nu­al meet­ing in 2010 pushed Eli Lil­ly to put a crimp on teplizum­ab as the phar­ma gi­ant found it un­able to re­set the clock on new­ly di­ag­nosed type 1 di­a­betes. At the same con­fer­ence but in dif­fer­ent hands nine years lat­er, the drug is mak­ing a crit­i­cal come­back by scor­ing suc­cess in an­oth­er niche: de­lay­ing the on­set of the dis­ease.

In a Phase II tri­al with 76 high-risk in­di­vid­u­als — rel­a­tives of pa­tients with type 1 di­a­betes who have di­a­betes-re­lat­ed au­toan­ti­bod­ies in their bod­ies — teplizum­ab al­most dou­bled the me­di­an time of di­ag­no­sis com­pared to place­bo (48.4 months ver­sus 24.4 months). The haz­ard ra­tio for di­ag­no­sis was 0.41 (p=0.006).

Bain’s biotech team has cre­at­ed a $1B-plus fund — with an eye to more Big Phar­ma spin­outs

One of the biggest investors to burst onto the biotech scene in recent years has re-upped with more than a billion dollars flowing into its second fund. And this next wave of bets will likely include more of the Big Pharma spinouts that highlighted their first 3 years in action.

Adam Koppel and Jeff Schwartz got the new life sciences fund at Bain Capital into gear in the spring of 2016, as they were putting together a $720 million fund with $600 million flowing in from external investors and the rest drawn from the Bain side of the equation. This time the external investors chipped in $900 million, with Bain coming in for roughly $180 million more.

They’re not done with Fund I, with plans to add a couple more deals to the 15 they’ve already posted. And once again, they’re estimating another 15 to 20 investments over a 3- to 5-year time horizon for Fund II.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 53,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.