Stephen Hahn’s nom­i­na­tion as the new com­mis­sion­er of the FDA was de­liv­ered right on sched­ule Fri­day, with the clock tick­ing down on the No­vem­ber 1 dead­line Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump faced in find­ing a per­ma­nent re­place­ment for Scott Got­tlieb. The pend­ing news had be­come the worst kept se­cret in Wash­ing­ton. But the full mean­ing of the move is still un­de­ter­mined.

The Chief Med­ical Ex­ec­u­tive at MD An­der­son had a rep for steer­ing straight in­to con­fronta­tion, when the fu­ture of the in­sti­tu­tion was at stake. More prob­lem­at­ic, per­haps, will be his role in dis­miss­ing Chi­nese re­searchers at a time the Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion has been bear­ing down on the Asian gi­ant. Just how Hahn will man­age drug de­vel­op­ment, which is my pri­ma­ry are­na of in­ter­est, is go­ing to take some time to fig­ure out.

In­ter­im chief Ned Sharp­less was the clear in­sti­tu­tion­al fa­vorite for get­ting the job full time af­ter a stint at the NCI. Pa­tient groups loved him and the in­dus­try deeply re­spect­ed his ex­per­tise, even if he nev­er gen­er­at­ed the kind of en­thu­si­asm Scott Got­tlieb achieved at the agency’s helm as the first com­mis­sion­er with re­al celebri­ty sta­tus.

As the process to con­firm Dr. Hahn be­gins, I will re­turn to @theN­CI to re­sume my role as @NCIDi­rec­tor. I am con­fi­dent Dr. Hahn will pro­vide strong lead­er­ship for the FDA. https://t.co/3vc­syj7Pf4

— Dr. Ned Sharp­less (@FDA­Com­mis­sion­er) No­vem­ber 1, 2019

Hahn’s nom­i­na­tion, though, won’t trig­ger any ob­vi­ous back­lash in bio­phar­ma. As a re­spect­ed ex­ec­u­tive at MD An­der­son with a track record in re­search and a ca­reer in on­col­o­gy that ex­tend­ed back through a stint at the pres­ti­gious Uni­ver­si­ty of Penn­syl­va­nia’s Perel­man School of Med­i­cine, he’ll be ex­pect­ed to main­tain the gold stan­dard in drug de­vel­op­ment.

Mar­garet Foti, chief ex­ec­u­tive of­fi­cer of AACR, set the tone with a pre­pared com­ment for the oc­ca­sion:

Dr. Hahn, who is board cer­ti­fied in both ra­di­a­tion and med­ical on­col­o­gy, is es­teemed for the breadth and depth of his sci­en­tif­ic knowl­edge and ex­per­tise, and he has con­sis­tent­ly ad­vo­cat­ed for a drug re­view process at the FDA that is both sci­ence-di­rect­ed and pa­tient-fo­cused.

The ques­tion is whether he’ll keep push­ing the en­ve­lope on greater reg­u­la­to­ry flex­i­bil­i­ty that has helped rev­o­lu­tion­ize can­cer drug de­vel­op­ment and changed the dy­nam­ics of R&D.

That’s some­thing no one seems to know much about. But they’ll get a chance to hear much more once the Sen­ate picks up the nom­i­na­tion.

Four months after the FDA put two clinical trials from Curis on clinical hold, the FDA is now apparently content with how the biotech will change up managing one of the studies.

The Massachusetts oncology biotech put out word early Thursday that the federal regulator lifted a partial clinical hold of the company’s Phase I/II study of emavusertib in lymphoma, following a new data package that the biotech recently submitted to the agency. Shares of the biotech $CRIS, hovering just above penny stock territory, shot up more than 55% in early trading before settling at close to a 30% share price boost.

The FDA will decide on Astellas’ menopausal symptom drug by Feb. 22 of next year, as the Japanese pharma disclosed it had paid about $97 million to get a priority review voucher to speed up the review.

Astellas said the agency has accepted the pharma’s application for fezolinetant for the treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) associated with menopause. VMS includes hot flashes and/or night sweats. The company said as many as 80% of women in the US experience those symptoms during or after the menopausal transition.