RIP amy­loid be­ta the­o­ry? Nope. Bio­gen part­ner launch­es a new PhI­II be­fore ad­u­canum­ab's corpse turned cold

A day af­ter Bio­gen rat­tled the bio­phar­ma world with the news that its lead late-stage ther­a­py ad­u­canum­ab proved worth­less in treat­ing Alzheimer’s — a dis­as­ter that may dri­ve a stake through the heart of the amy­loid be­ta the­o­ry once and for all — the big biotech’s part­ners at Ei­sai have come up with their next big move.


Right in the wake of a 35% plunge in their stock val­ue, Ei­sai $ESALY is start­ing a Phase III study in­volv­ing 1,566 Alzheimer’s pa­tients with mild cog­ni­tive im­pair­ment for the con­tro­ver­sial Alzheimer’s drug BAN2401. The an­ti-amy­loid an­ti­body was the cen­ter of a firestorm of crit­i­cism over a tardy re­veal that re­searchers had pulled high-risk pa­tients out of their last study, po­ten­tial­ly warp­ing the pos­i­tive re­sults that were claimed, leav­ing that drug un­der a dark cloud.

“We still be­lieve that amy­loid be­ta hy­poth­e­sis is po­ten­tial­ly the right ap­proach for the treat­ment of Alzheimer’s dis­ease,” an Ei­sai spokesman told Reuters.

That’s a po­si­tion that Bio­gen ex­ecs will find tough to jus­ti­fy to­day. A whole slate of ma­jor de­vel­op­ers — Eli Lil­ly and As­traZeneca, Mer­ck and Roche — have re­port­ed out de­ci­sive late-stage fail­ures over the last year that all point to one con­clu­sion: Tar­get­ing amy­loid be­ta alone in symp­to­matic pa­tients may hit your bio­mark­ers on ef­fect, but it doesn’t de­lay the ruth­less march of the dis­ease.

Ei­sai and Bio­gen may not have re­ceived the memo, but a whole host of an­a­lysts have writ­ten off BAN2401 as a los­er. As for this new move, don’t ex­pect any sup­port from Leerink’s Ge­of­frey Porges, who es­sen­tial­ly be­lieves any new work like this is dam­ag­ing to in­vestors and pa­tients. He not­ed this morn­ing:

We as­sume that the com­pa­ny (Bio­gen) takes the re­spon­si­ble de­ci­sion to ter­mi­nate all fur­ther in­vest­ments in be­ta amy­loid-di­rect­ed med­i­cines (which has not oc­curred), and saves their in­vestors the cash and saves pa­tients and in­ves­ti­ga­tors from the bur­den of such stud­ies. If Bio­gen does not make this de­ci­sion, then our ad­just­ed ex­pense fore­cast could be too low, with fur­ther neg­a­tive ef­fects on our val­u­a­tion even com­pared to our new PT.

What will be ahead for Bio­gen? Porges is tak­ing a hard line. It’s worth quot­ing him at length.

In our view, Bio­gen finds it­self in the un­en­vi­able po­si­tion of be­ing a wound­ed cash cow (which we are sur­prised man­age­ment and the board did not con­sid­er as a po­ten­tial out­come and pre­pare for). The next few months are like­ly to con­sist of a mix­ture of re­crim­i­na­tions, ex­pla­na­tions, ne­go­ti­a­tions, and pos­si­bly ter­mi­na­tions and lit­i­ga­tion. We ex­pect the com­pa­ny to be dis­tract­ed and ham­pered by those over­hangs for a cou­ple of quar­ters at least. Con­trary to pop­u­lar be­lief we don’t be­lieve that their board or man­age­ment will have the lat­i­tude to im­me­di­ate­ly piv­ot to ma­jor ac­qui­si­tions that would al­ter the com­pa­ny’s out­look ma­te­ri­al­ly (de­spite our sug­ges­tions in the past that such in­vest­ments were ad­vis­able). To­ward the end of this year, af­ter the dust of this dis­ap­point­ment has like­ly set­tled, we ex­pect Bio­gen to ex­plore both as­set sales and as­set pur­chas­es (af­ter oth­er changes have been made, or im­posed by in­vestors). We be­lieve that the case for re­struc­tur­ing and di­vesti­tures will be as com­pelling as the case for ac­qui­si­tions, par­tic­u­lar­ly in the con­text of such poor re­turns from the com­pa­ny’s re­cent cap­i­tal al­lo­ca­tion de­ci­sions.

Bio­gen shares $BI­IB tum­bled 29% on Thurs­day, wip­ing out $18 bil­lion in mar­ket cap. They won’t get any of that back based on the launch of the BAN2401 tri­al. To the con­trary. At a time they need to re­build con­fi­dence, there’s no sign that the part­ners learned any­thing this week.

Grow­ing ac­cep­tance of ac­cel­er­at­ed path­ways for nov­el treat­ments: but does reg­u­la­to­ry ap­proval lead to com­mer­cial suc­cess?

By Mwango Kashoki, MD, MPH, Vice President-Technical, and Richard Macaulay, Senior Director, of Parexel Regulatory & Access

In recent years, we’ve seen a significant uptake in the use of regulatory options by companies looking to accelerate the journey of life-saving drugs to market. In 2018, 73% of the novel drugs approved by the U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA) were designated under one or more expedited development program categories (Fast Track, Breakthrough Therapy, Priority Review, and Accelerated Approval).ᶦ

Sanofi out­lines big API plans as coro­n­avirus out­break re­port­ed­ly threat­ens short­age of 150 drugs

As the world becomes increasingly dependant on Asia for the ingredients of its medicines, Sanofi sees business to be done in Europe.

The French drugmaker said it’s creating the world’s second largest active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) manufacturer by spinning out its six current sites into a standalone company: Brindisi (Italy), Frankfurt Chemistry (Germany), Haverhill (UK), St Aubin les Elbeuf (France), Újpest (Hungary) and Vertolaye (France). They have mapped out €1 billion in expected sales by 2022 and 3,100 employees for the new operations headquartered in France.

UP­DAT­ED: NGM Bio takes leap for­ward in crowd­ed NASH field

South San Francisco-based NGM Bio may have underwhelmed with its interim analysis of a key cohort from a mid-stage NASH study last fall — but stellar topline data unveiled on Monday showed the compound induced significant signs of antifibrotic activity, NASH resolution and liver fat reduction, sending the company’s stock soaring.

There are an estimated 50+ companies focused on developing drugs for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, or NASH, a common liver disease that has long flummoxed researchers. The first wave of NASH drug developers struggled with efficacy as well as safety — and companies big and small have crashed and burned.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 72,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Mickey Kertesz, KidsandArtOrg via YouTube

Soft­Bank's newest, $165M biotech in­vest­ment looks for in­fec­tious traces in the blood

SoftBank has found its newest biotech investment.

The Japanese bank has invested $165 million into Karius, a company that uses blood tests to diagnose infectious diseases, as part of its new Vision Fund 2. The full scope of the new fund has yet to be announced, but the first and newly-beleaguered Vision Fund poured $100 billion into technology companies, including the biotechs Vir Biotechnology and Roivant and the sequencing company 10x Genomics.

Methicillin-resistant Staph aureus (Shutterstock)

FDA grants ‘break­through’ sta­tus to an­tibi­ot­ic al­ter­na­tive as Con­tra­Fect rush­es to join fight against su­per­bug

An experimental drug that promises to be the first anti-infective agent to prove superior to vancomycin — an antibiotic approved in 1958 — has notched the FDA’s “breakthrough” status.

ContraFect said the designation was based on Phase II data in which exebacase was tested against a superbug known as methicillin-resistant Staph aureus, or MRSA. In a subgroup analysis, the clinical responder rate at day 14 was 42.8% higher than that among those treated with standard of care, the company said (p=0.010).

Zhong Nanshan, CGTN via YouTube

Har­vard joins coro­n­avirus fight with $115 mil­lion and a high-pro­file Chi­nese part­ner

For two months, as the novel coronavirus swelled from a few early cases tied to a Wuhan market to a global epidemic, most of the world’s focus and dollars have flowed toward emergency initiatives: building vaccines at a record pace, plucking experimental antivirals out of freezers to see what sticks and immunizing mice for new antibodies.

Now a new and well-funded collaboration between Harvard and a top Chinese research institute will play the long game. In a 5-year, $115 million initiative backed by China Evergrande Group, researchers from the Harvard Medical School, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Guangzhou Institute for Respiratory Health will study the virus in an effort to develop therapies against infections by the novel coronavirus, known as SARS–CoV-2, and to prevent new ones.

No­var­tis gets a boost in block­buster mul­ti­ple scle­ro­sis race with Roche

In the first step of what’s likely to be a long and uphill battle for the drugmaker, the FDA has accepted Novartis’s BLA submission for a new multiple sclerosis drug and given it priority review. The PDUFA date for the potential blockbuster drug is in June.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 72,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Juergen Horn

An­i­mal health vet Juer­gen Horn makes new an­ti­body play for pets, rak­ing $15M in Se­ries A haul

Zoetis forked over $85 million in 2017 to acquire Nexvet Biopharma and its pipeline of monoclonal antibodies. Juergen Horn, Nexvet’s former chief product development officer, has now secured $15 million for his own biologic company for animals: Invetx.

Buoyed by emerging advances in gene therapies for humans, scientists have started looking at harnessing the technology for animals setting up companies such as Penn-partnered Scout Bio and George Church-founded Rejuvenate Bio. But akin to Nexvet, Invetx is working on leveraging the time-tested science of monoclonal antibodies to treat chronic diseases that afflict man’s best friend.

As coro­n­avirus out­break reach­es 'tip­ping point,' GSK lends ad­ju­vant tech to Chi­nese part­ner armed with pre­clin­i­cal vac­cine

As the coronavirus originating out of Wuhan spreads to South Korea, Italy and Iran, stoking already intense fears of a pandemic, GlaxoSmithKline has found another pair of trusted hands to place its adjuvant system. China’s Clover Biopharmaceuticals will add the adjuvant to its preclinical, protein-based vaccine candidate against SARS-CoV-2.

Clover, which is based in the inland city of Chengdu, boasts of a platform dubbed Trimer-Tag that produces covalently-trimerized fusion proteins. Its candidate, COVID-19 S-Trimer, resembles the viral spike (S)-protein found in the virus.