RNA: From the mes­sen­ger to the med­i­cine

Biotech Voices is a collection of exclusive opinion editorials from some of the leading voices in biopharma on the biggest industry questions today. Think you have a voice that should be heard? Reach out to senior editors Kyle Blankenship and Amber Tong.

In the 1990s, my col­leagues and I were gene hunters. In the years be­fore the hu­man genome was ful­ly se­quenced, we searched tire­less­ly for the ge­net­ic roots of dis­ease. It was a decades-long en­deav­or to first de­fine a syn­drome, then lo­cate the re­spon­si­ble gene, de­ter­mine its se­quence, study its mu­ta­tions and ma­nip­u­late it for ther­a­peu­tic ben­e­fit.

At the time, RNA sci­ence wasn’t be­ing se­ri­ous­ly con­sid­ered. DNA was our star, and RNA was a bit play­er.

It’s a dif­fer­ent sto­ry to­day, now that mR­NA vac­cines that were de­vel­oped in record time are pro­tect­ing mil­lions of peo­ple from a dan­ger­ous ill­ness. There is a dawn­ing aware­ness of the po­ten­tial for RNA-based med­i­cines. The CEO of the Bill & Melin­da Gates Med­ical Re­search In­sti­tute, Pen­ny Heaton, calls mR­NA vac­cines the be­gin­ning of “a new gold­en age of vac­ci­nol­o­gy.”

But she could have been even more op­ti­mistic. Be­cause af­ter decades of re­search in­to this nu­cle­ic acid that was once seen as a hum­ble as­sis­tant to DNA, RNA sci­ence is of­fer­ing new in­sights in­to in­tractable con­di­tions whose caus­es were pre­vi­ous­ly a mys­tery. It’s al­so un­lock­ing pow­er­ful new treat­ments.

Genes tell the body what to do. But if their code is gar­bled or in­com­pre­hen­si­ble, dis­ease will get the up­per hand. RNA—present in every cell in the body—is the mes­sen­ger of these im­por­tant in­struc­tions. These mes­sages (RNA tran­scripts) can be edit­ed to achieve a sub­stan­tial ther­a­peu­tic ef­fect, and this has im­pli­ca­tions in a wide range of de­gen­er­a­tive dis­eases.

It’s hard to be­lieve we ever viewed RNA as a poor re­la­tion to DNA. It’s not just a gold­en age for vac­cines that we have en­tered, it’s the be­gin­ning of a whole new era for med­ical sci­ence.

The op­por­tu­ni­ty

Hun­dreds of dis­eases can be traced to dys­func­tion­al pro­teins in the body. While DNA es­sen­tial­ly in­structs cells to cre­ate or reg­u­late these pro­teins in a way that pro­motes health and sur­vival, there are of­ten mis­prints, ty­pos, dele­tions and oth­er er­rors in DNA’s in­struc­tions. Con­se­quent­ly, the body some­times fails to pro­duce nec­es­sary pro­teins, pro­duces tox­ic pro­teins or fails to prop­er­ly reg­u­late pro­tein pro­duc­tion. This means dis­ease.

It al­so means the po­ten­tial for RNA-based med­i­cines, which seek to cor­rect these er­rors, is vast. And these treat­ments of­fer some­thing that gene ther­a­py or gene edit­ing does not: the abil­i­ty to make changes to cells that are re­versible and will not last a life­time.

Un­like gene ther­a­pies or gene edit­ing, RNA can be made to func­tion the way con­ven­tion­al drugs do. It can achieve a ther­a­peu­tic re­sult with­out mak­ing a per­ma­nent change to the pa­tient’s cells. Gene ther­a­pies or gene edit­ing risk cre­at­ing off-tar­get ef­fects in neigh­bor­ing cells and or­gans, which can be­come per­ma­nent changes. By con­trast, the body can shed an RNA ther­a­py the way it can shed the ef­fects of a drug.

The abil­i­ty of RNA to clar­i­fy DNA in­struc­tions to pro­mote hu­man health, with­out per­ma­nent al­ter­ations to a per­son’s cells, is why the po­ten­tial for RNA-based med­i­cines goes far be­yond de­vel­op­ing the next gen­er­a­tion of vac­cines. Biotech com­pa­nies are ex­plor­ing the many pos­si­bil­i­ties to­day.

One suc­cess­ful com­mon ap­proach in­volves “knock­ing down” dys­func­tion­al pro­teins that can lead to dis­ease, for ex­am­ple de­gen­er­a­tive con­di­tions like amy­otroph­ic lat­er­al scle­ro­sis (ALS) or meta­bol­ic dis­or­ders. Biotech com­pa­nies have been mak­ing in­roads on these con­di­tions by edit­ing RNA in­struc­tions to elim­i­nate a “gain-of-func­tion” pro­tein. In these cas­es, weak­en­ing the pro­duc­tion of cer­tain tox­ic pro­teins lessens the dis­ease im­pact.

Oth­er com­pa­nies are aim­ing not to elim­i­nate pro­teins but sim­ply al­ter their pro­duc­tion by splic­ing the pre-mR­NA that pro­vides their in­struc­tion guide and di­rec­tions for reg­u­la­tion. This is the case at Sarep­ta, where I pre­vi­ous­ly served as CEO and chief med­ical of­fi­cer.

The com­pa­ny I lead now, Stoke Ther­a­peu­tics, is pi­o­neer­ing a whole dif­fer­ent RNA ap­proach. Stoke is fo­cused on hap­loin­suf­fi­cien­cies or dis­eases like Dravet syn­drome (a se­vere and pro­gres­sive ge­net­ic epilep­sy) and au­to­so­mal dom­i­nant op­tic at­ro­phy that are caused by “loss of func­tion” mu­ta­tions in one copy of a gene, which re­sult in in­suf­fi­cient pro­tein lev­els that are es­sen­tial to hu­man health. Rather than knock­ing down the dys­func­tion­al gene, as oth­er com­pa­nies seek to do, Stoke is de­sign­ing RNA-based med­i­cines to in­crease ex­pres­sion of the prop­er­ly func­tion­ing gene in the pair, “up-reg­u­lat­ing” its pro­tein pro­duc­tion and there­by com­pen­sat­ing for the non-func­tion­al copy of the gene. By se­lec­tive­ly restor­ing, or “stok­ing”, the pro­duc­tion of the nat­u­ral­ly oc­cur­ring pro­tein, Stoke’s TAN­GO (Tar­get­ed Aug­men­ta­tion of Nu­clear Gene Out­put) ap­proach has the po­ten­tial to ad­dress the un­der­ly­ing ge­net­ic cause of hap­loin­suf­fi­cient dis­eases.

RNA sci­ence is even carv­ing out a pres­ence in di­ag­nos­tics, with RNA analy­sis of liq­uid biop­sy for can­cer en­abling ear­li­er di­ag­no­sis.

Vac­cines did not ush­er in a whole new era of RNA-based med­i­cine. But they shined a light on this area, which has been de­vel­op­ing steadi­ly for two decades, and which is open­ing the door to a seem­ing­ly end­less ar­ray of ap­pli­ca­tions, dis­ease states and treat­ment path­ways that, once ex­plored, will al­ter how we un­der­stand and treat ge­net­ic dis­eases.

The need

Be­fore I took the helm at biotech­nol­o­gy com­pa­nies, I treat­ed pa­tients at the point of care. Most of my pa­tients were chil­dren with rare dis­eases.

I have seen what ge­net­ic dis­eases can do, and I know the frus­tra­tion that comes with talk­ing to par­ents about id­io­path­ic con­di­tions that de­grade their chil­dren’s qual­i­ty of life – or worse. Id­io­path­ic means we just can’t shed much light on the cause of dis­ease, even when its ef­fects are all too vis­i­ble. For a doc­tor, the frus­tra­tion that came with di­ag­no­sis and treat­ment of id­io­path­ic con­di­tions was too in­tense to de­scribe.

One of the great things about this new era of ge­net­ic med­i­cine we are liv­ing in is that we now know far more about the caus­es of dis­ease. Many con­di­tions are in­her­it­ed.

But too of­ten, un­der­stand­ing the cause has not led to a cure or even a less­en­ing of the con­di­tion. Gene ther­a­py and gene edit­ing have shown ini­tial promise, but we need ad­di­tion­al strate­gies if we are to trans­late ful­ly our in­creased un­der­stand­ing of dis­ease in­to pow­er­ful treat­ments.

RNA is the next leg of this ex­cit­ing jour­ney. As DNA’s tran­scriber and mes­sen­ger, its use in med­i­cine brings us clos­er to stop­ping dis­eases of all kinds right at their source.

In­side Track: Be­hind the Scenes of a Ma­jor Biotech SPAC

Dr. David Hung and Michelle Doig are no strangers to the SPAC phenomenon. As Founder and CEO of Nuvation Bio, a biotech company tackling some of the greatest unmet needs in oncology, Dr. Hung recently took the company public in one of this year’s biggest SPAC related deals. And as Partner at Omega Funds, Doig not only led and syndicated Nuvation Bio’s Series A, but is now also President of the newly formed, Omega-sponsored, Omega Alpha SPAC (Nasdaq: OMEG; oversubscribed $138m IPO priced January 6, 2021).

Barry Greene, Sage CEO

UP­DAT­ED: Sage's sec­ond chance at de­pres­sion hits the PhI­II pri­ma­ry, but ques­tions re­main over dura­bil­i­ty, side ef­fects

Looking to make a comeback after a big Phase III flop, Sage Therapeutics revealed data they believe could change the entire depression treatment landscape, given the vast array of failures in the field. But some results are spooking investors, sending Sage $SAGE shares down early Tuesday.

First, the primary: Sage and Biogen reported Phase III data for once-daily zuranolone Tuesday morning, saying the experimental drug hit its primary endpoint by spurring a statistically significant change from baseline in the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression total score. After 15 days, patients in the drug arm saw an average change of -14.1 points, compared to -12.3 on placebo.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 109,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Harith Rajagopalan (Fractyl)

Af­ter a decade in the Type 2 di­a­betes game, Fractyl Lab­o­ra­to­ries recharges with a fresh $100M and a new name

Harith Rajagopalan compared the way Type 2 diabetes is managed to sticking your fingers in a dam that’s leaking from a number of places.

You can take drugs to lower your blood sugar, cholesterol, or blood pressure, but you’re not addressing what he says is the core issue — the metabolic abnormality that causes the disease.

“We’re so busy plugging the holes in the dam, we don’t have time to see that the whole infrastructure is at risk,” he said. “That infrastructure is a full-body systemic metabolic abnormality called metabolic syndrome, that we’re ignoring while we’re so busy trying to treat all of the individual symptoms of the condition.”

Bio­gen sig­nals a big PhI­II fail­ure as the lead gene ther­a­py in their $800M Night­star buy­out goes down in flames

That $800 million buyout of Nightstar has turned into a bust for Biogen as the lead therapy in the deal failed a pivotal study, signaling a severe setback for the biotech’s ambitions in gene therapies.

The big biotech put out the word after the market closed on Monday that the gene therapy they picked up in the deal for a degenerative blindness called choroideremia failed the Phase III study, just a month after their #2 drug in the deal also flopped in a mid-stage study.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 109,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Hal Barron, GSK R&D chief (Endpoints News)

Hal Bar­ron gam­bles $625M cash on high-wire TIG­IT act, throw­ing Glax­o­SmithK­line in­to heat­ed race and com­plet­ing next-gen I/O trin­i­ty

Count Hal Barron and GlaxoSmithKline in for the TIGIT fight.

The stakes are as high as the risks: While a growing pack of Big Pharma rivals is lending credence to the hypothesis that TIGIT will be the next big immune checkpoint and cancer drug target, the first clinical trials have shown response rates that can be described as modest at best. But Barron’s bet is on the whole “axis” that the receptor sits on, with an eye on testing its new anti-TIGIT antibody not just in combo with PD-1 but also in triplets.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 109,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Michel Sade­lain puts his name and new cell en­gi­neer­ing tech be­hind 'ag­nos­tic' CAR-T start­up chas­ing epi­ge­net­ic anti­gens

It felt natural for Alain Maiore and Sebastian Amigorena to bring in Michel Sadelain as a co-founder of Mnemo Therapeutics. A CAR-T pioneer, Sadelain had been involved as an advisor since the early days — enthusiastic about Amigorena’s work in a genetic knockout that could enhance T cell memory and a new class of potential targets he’s discovered — and could introduce some well-known technologies to the toolbox. So they got the initial cash from Sofinnova Partners to plant roots in Paris and New York in early 2019; within a few months, they began to see more clearly just what the antigen discovery platform might unlock.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 109,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Lynn Fitch, Mississippi Attorney General (Rogelio V. Solis/AP Images)

Mis­sis­sip­pi sues Eli Lil­ly, Sanofi and No­vo over in­sulin prices as in­ter­change­able biosim­i­lars may ar­rive soon

Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch last week sued the top three insulin manufacturers, which collectively cover almost the entire US insulin market, alleging that they’ve colluded to raise their prices in lockstep, and in some cases by more than 1,000% for drugs that are decades old.

“Because of Manufacturer Defendants’ collusive price increases, nearly a century after the discovery of insulin, diabetes medications have become unaffordable for many diabetics,” the lawsuit says.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 109,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Andrew Hopkins, Exscientia CEO

Ex­sci­en­tia spends Soft­Bank's cash in bid to edge out AI ri­vals

Exscientia is sprinting to win the great AI biotech race.

The UK company, having long labored on small discovery deals with large pharmas, raised up to $525 million in a Series D led by the infamous Japanese conglomerate SoftBank in April and followed it up less than a month later with a Bristol Myers Squibb deal that paid $50 million cash and $1.2 billion in milestones.

Now, the Oxford spinout is splurging on a shiny new tool. On Monday they announced they purchased the three-year-old molecule-screening biotech Allcyte, a longtime collaborator, for $60.6 million in cash and stock.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 109,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

As Covid-19 shifts the world's at­ten­tion to biotech, Noubar Afeyan's Flag­ship builds $3.4B fund to fu­el new in­ven­tions. Here's the plan

A little more than a year ago, Flagship Pioneering rolled out a monster fund with $1.1 billion in it to bankroll the platform companies they were creating inside their own labs. But it turns out, that was just the prelude to a much, much larger raise, as both current investors — who’ve been reaping the rewards of some booming biotech stocks — join in with new investors betting on more in the years to come.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.