In­vestors are in no mood to hear biotechs tout the suc­cess of a “key” sec­ondary end­point when the piv­otal Phase III flunks the pri­ma­ry goal. Just ask Savara. 

The Texas biotech $SVRA went look­ing for a sil­ver lin­ing as com­pa­ny ex­ecs blunt­ly con­ced­ed that Mol­gradex, an in­haled for­mu­la­tion of re­com­bi­nant hu­man gran­u­lo­cyte-macrophage colony-stim­u­lat­ing fac­tor (GM-CSF), failed to spur sig­nif­i­cant­ly im­proved treat­ment out­comes for pa­tients with a rare res­pi­ra­to­ry dis­ease called au­toim­mune pul­monary alve­o­lar pro­teinosis, or aPAP.

The p-val­ue was an aw­ful 0.17.

Re­searchers blamed a high place­bo ef­fect, teas­ing out the pos­i­tive as­pects of an im­proved nu­mer­i­cal out­come for sec­on­daries on the 6-minute walk test and a need for whole lung lavage — a pro­ce­dure used to clean the lungs of pa­tients. Those sec­on­daries al­so failed the sta­tis­ti­cal analy­sis.

Bruce Trap­nell Cincin­nati Chil­dren’s

But that didn’t stop Savara from sug­gest­ing that a suc­cess­ful score on a pa­tient-re­port­ed qual­i­ty of life as­sess­ment/out­comes test could help set the stage for an ap­proval. 

“Tak­en to­geth­er, the trends in re­duc­tion of A-aDO2, as well as the im­prove­ment in the dif­fu­sion ca­pac­i­ty, are very con­sis­tent with re­duc­tion of the sur­fac­tant bur­den that caus­es the clin­i­cal symp­toms of aPAP,” said Bruce Trap­nell, the lead in­ves­ti­ga­tor. “Most im­por­tant­ly, the im­pres­sive im­prove­ment in qual­i­ty of life, as mea­sured by the SGRQ, sug­gest that Mol­gradex not on­ly im­proved ob­jec­tive mea­sures of oxy­gena­tion, but al­so had a clin­i­cal­ly mean­ing­ful ther­a­peu­tic ef­fect. I be­lieve these da­ta demon­strate that Mol­gradex can be­come an im­por­tant phar­ma­co­log­i­cal treat­ment op­tion for pa­tients with aPAP.”

In­vestors weren’t buy­ing it, though. The stock cratered on the num­bers, plung­ing more than 70% af­ter the bell on Wednes­day.

Im­age: Shut­ter­stock

The top career staff at the FDA has vowed not to let politics overrule science when looking at vaccine data this fall. But Alex Azar, who happens to be their boss’s boss, apparently won’t even give them a chance to stand in the way.

In a new memorandum issued Tuesday last week, the HHS chief stripped the FDA and other health agencies under his purview of their rule making ability, asserting all such power “is reserved to the Secretary.” Sheila Kaplan of the New York Times first obtained and reported the details of the September 15 bulletin.

Having worked in parallel for years to move their respective PD-1 inhibitors up to the first-line treatment of gastrointestinal cancers, Merck and Bristol Myers Squibb finally have the data at ESMO for a showdown.

Comparing KEYNOTE-590 and CheckMate-649, of course, comes with the usual caveats. But a side-by-side look at the overall survival numbers also offer some perspective on a new frontier for the reigning checkpoint rivals, both of whom are claiming to have achieved a first.

President Donald Trump, who seems intent on announcing a COVID-19 vaccine before Election Day, could legally authorize a vaccine over the objections of experts, officials at the FDA and even vaccine manufacturers, who have pledged not to release any vaccine unless it’s proved safe and effective.

In podcasts, public forums, social media and medical journals, a growing number of prominent health leaders say they fear that Trump — who has repeatedly signaled his desire for the swift approval of a vaccine and his displeasure with perceived delays at the FDA — will take matters into his own hands, running roughshod over the usual regulatory process.

Moving into earlier and earlier treatment lines, Bristol Myers Squibb is reporting that adjuvant treatment with Opdivo has doubled the time that esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer patients stay free of disease.

With the CheckMate-577 data at ESMO, CMO Samit Hirawat said, the company believes it can change the treatment paradigm.

While a quarter to 30% of patients typically achieve a complete response following chemoradiation therapy and surgery, the rest do not, said Ronan Kelly of Baylor University Medical Center. The recurrence rate is also high within the first year, Hirawat added.

Does Seattle Genetics have another approval on its hands?

The last 12 months, not so great for the world, has been great for Seattle Genetics. The company landed two separate FDA approvals, signed a $4.5 billion deal with Merck and watched antibody-drug conjugates — the technology they spent years developing to broad industry skepticism — emerge suddenly as one of the most popular approaches in oncology. And on Monday at ESMO, the company and their partners at Genmab unveiled the data behind the ADC it hopes will provide its next major FDA approval.

A little under two years after a company rebranding, Immune Regulation is taking an even bigger step toward advancing its goals.

Formerly known as Peptinnovate, the British biotech announced a $53.4 million Series B early Monday morning, helping to further advance two clinical programs in rheumatoid arthritis and asthma. Though those are the two initial indications the company is focusing on, CEO Jonathan Rigby told Endpoints News he hopes the candidates can be applied to a broad swath of autoimmune disorders.

J&J’s one-two punch on EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer has turned up some promising — although decidedly early — results, fueling the idea that there’s yet room to one up on third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Twenty out of 20 advanced NSCLC patients had a response after taking a combination of an in-house TKI dubbed lazertinib and amivantamab, a bispecific antibody targeting both EGFR and cMET engineered on partner Genmab’s platform, J&J reported at ESMO. All were treatment-naïve, and none has seen their cancer progress at a median follow-up of seven months.