Seek­ing an edge in the glob­al I/O race, Al­pham­ab On­col­o­gy loads up $100M-plus from mar­quee back­ers

Al­pham­ab On­col­o­gy be­lieves it has what it takes to stand out from the del­uge of check­point in­hibitors cur­rent­ly in de­vel­op­ment — not just in Chi­na but glob­al­ly. A syn­di­cate of well-heeled in­vestors now shares that con­fi­dence, in­fus­ing more than $100 mil­lion to fu­el an am­bi­tious dri­ve through the clin­ic.

Ting Xu

Ad­van­tech, PAG and Chi­na Ven­ture Cap­i­tal Fund led the Se­ries A, which is ex­pect­ed to sup­port Al­pham­ab’s lead as­set, KN035, all the way up to reg­is­tra­tional tri­als and fund late-stage pro­grams for three oth­er clin­i­cal drug can­di­dates. Or­biMed, Her­itage Provider Net­work and Jan­chor Part­ners al­so chipped in.

Spun out of Suzhou Al­pham­ab, Al­pham­ab On­col­o­gy in­her­it­ed all can­cer-re­lat­ed work done over the last nine years at the par­ent com­pa­ny un­der CEO Ting Xu, the founder of both en­ti­ties and a for­mer se­nior re­searcher at Bio­gen and Serono.

Back when the team start­ed its pro­grams sev­er­al years ago, Xu tells me in an email, they en­vi­sioned a high­ly com­pet­i­tive PD-(L)1 field. Their strat­e­gy in re­sponse fea­tures plays in both “I/O 1.0” — a sub­cu­ta­neous­ly ad­min­is­tered PD-L1 an­ti­body — and “I/O 2.0” with a bis­pe­cif­ic tar­get­ing both PD-L1 and CT­LA-4.

KN035, or en­vafolimab, the PD-L1 an­ti­body cur­rent­ly in piv­otal tri­als, rep­re­sents the most ad­vanced pro­gram in Al­pham­ab On­col­o­gy’s pipeline. Giv­en that fre­quent in­tra­venous ad­min­is­tra­tion is a ma­jor draw­back to com­pli­ance and con­ve­nience, Xu says, the “user-friend­li­ness” of a sub­cu­ta­neous prod­uct, with a short­er ad­min­is­tra­tion time and po­ten­tial for home-use, can make it at­trac­tive in the ad­ju­vant/neoad­ju­vant set­ting and as a main­te­nance ther­a­py.

It’s a com­pet­i­tive ad­van­tage al­so be­ing pur­sued by Bris­tol-My­ers Squibb through a pact with San Diego-based Halozyme, which is pro­vid­ing its hyaluronidase en­zyme-based tech to see if the check­point leader can de­liv­er its I/O drugs with a sub­cu­ta­neous jab.

Al­pham­ab is part­ner­ing with 3D Med­i­cines, a Chi­na-based pre­ci­sion med­i­cine com­pa­ny, on the clin­i­cal de­vel­op­ment while build­ing a com­mer­cial man­u­fac­tur­ing site to pre­pare for po­ten­tial ap­proval.

The PD-L1/CT­LA-4 bis­pe­cif­ic dubbed KN046, on the oth­er hand, is aimed at over­com­ing the safe­ty lim­i­ta­tions of cur­rent CT­LA-4 an­ti­bod­ies.

“We will ex­plore the op­por­tu­ni­ties in two fronts: In­crease the re­sponse rate in large in­di­ca­tions like NSCLC, HCC etc. while ad­dress­ing some PD-(L)1 non-re­sponse tu­mor types,” Xu adds.

Both pro­grams, like the rest of the pipeline, are be­ing po­si­tioned for the US, EU and Japan mar­kets in ad­di­tion to Chi­na. Some ear­ly-stage clin­i­cal tri­als will be con­duct­ed in Aus­tralia through an Al­pham­ab sub­sidiary there.

The new funds will al­so go to­ward an ag­gres­sive re­cruit­ment plan: At 100 staffers now, the com­pa­ny plans to dou­ble its size by the end of 2019.

MedTech clinical trials require a unique regulatory and study design approach and so engaging a highly experienced CRO to ensure compliance and accurate data across all stages is critical to development milestones.

In­no­v­a­tive MedTech De­mands Spe­cial­ist Clin­i­cal Tri­al Reg­u­la­to­ry Af­fairs and De­sign

Avance Clinical is the Australian CRO for international biotechs providing world-class clinical research services with FDA-accepted data across all phases. With Avance Clinical, biotech companies can leverage Australia’s supportive clinical trials environment which includes no IND requirement plus a 43.5% Government incentive rebate on clinical spend. The CRO has been delivering clinical drug development services for international biotechs for FDA and EMA regulatory approval for the past 24 years. The company has been recognized for the past two consecutive years with the prestigious Frost & Sullivan CRO Best Practices Award and a finalist in Informa Pharma’s Best CRO award for 2022.

Ted Love, Global Blood Therapeutics CEO

Up­dat­ed: Pfiz­er scoops up Glob­al Blood Ther­a­peu­tics and its sick­le cell ther­a­pies for $5.4B

Pfizer is dropping $5.4 billion to acquire Global Blood Therapeutics.

Just ahead of the weekend, word got out that Pfizer was close to clinching a $5 billion buyout — albeit with other potential buyers still at the table. The pharma giant, flush with cash from Covid-19 vaccine sales, apparently got out on top.

The deal immediately swells Pfizer’s previously tiny sickle cell disease portfolio from just a Phase I program to one with an approved drug, Oxbryta, plus a whole pipeline that, if all approved, the company believes could make for a $3 billion franchise at peak.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 147,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Uğur Şahin, BioNTech CEO (Kay Nietfeld/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images)

De­spite falling Covid-19 sales, BioN­Tech main­tains '22 sales guid­ance

While Pfizer raked in almost $28 billion last quarter, its Covid-19 vaccine partner BioNTech reported a rise in total dose orders but a drop in sales.

The German biotech reported over $3.2 billion in revenue in Q2 on Monday, down from more than $6.7 billion in Q1, in part due to falling Covid sales. While management said last quarter that they anticipated a Covid sales drop — CEO Uğur Şahin said at the time that “the pandemic situation is still very much uncertain” — Q2 sales still missed consensus by 14%.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 147,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

FDA commissioner Rob Califf (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP Images)

With drug pric­ing al­most done, Con­gress looks to wrap up FDA user fee leg­is­la­tion

The Senate won’t return from its summer recess until Sept. 6, but when it does, it officially has 18 business days to finalize the reauthorization of the FDA user fee programs for the next 5 years, or else thousands of drug and biologics reviewers will be laid off and PDUFA dates will vanish in the interim.

FDA commissioner Rob Califf recently sent agency staff a memo explaining how, “Our latest estimates are that we have carryover for PDUFA [Prescription Drug User Fee Act], the user fee funding program that will run out of funding first, to cover only about 5 weeks into the next fiscal year.”

Anna Protopapas, Mersana CEO

In $1.36B biobuck deal with GSK, Mer­sana touts 'biggest pre­clin­i­cal ADC deal ever'

Days after Enhertu reeled in another FDA nod, with the first-ever green light for HER2-low breast cancer, another antibody drug conjugate biotech claims it has secured the largest preclinical ADC pact to date for a single asset.

AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo made waves with their nearly $7 billion collaboration back in spring 2019, but at that point, Enhertu was already nearing the FDA’s doors with clinical data. The latest ADC tie-up to enter the biopharma fray centers around a preclinical asset, Mersana Therapeutics’ XMT-2056.

Pascal Soriot, AstraZeneca CEO (David Zorrakino/Europa Press via AP Images)

As­traZeneca and Dai­ichi Sankyo sprint to mar­ket af­ter FDA clears En­her­tu in just two weeks

Regulators didn’t keep AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo waiting long at all for their latest Enhertu approval.

The partners pulled a win on Friday in HER2-low breast cancer patients who’ve already failed on chemotherapy, just two weeks after submitting a supplemental BLA. While this isn’t the FDA’s fastest approval — Bristol Myers Squibb won an OK for its blockbuster checkpoint inhibitor Opdivo in just five days back in March — it comes well ahead of Enhertu’s original Q4 PDUFA date.

David Reese, Amgen R&D chief

UP­DAT­ED: In a fresh dis­ap­point­ment, Am­gen spot­lights a ma­jor safe­ty is­sue with KRAS com­bo

Amgen had hoped that its latest study matching its landmark KRAS G12C drug Lumakras with checkpoint inhibitors would open up its treatment horizons and expand its commercial potential. Instead, the combo spurred safety issues that blunted efficacy and forced the pharma giant to alter course on its treatment strategy, once again disappointing analysts who have been tracking the drug’s faltering sales and limited therapeutic reach.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 147,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

GSK and IQVIA launch plat­form of US vac­ci­na­tion da­ta, show­ing drop in adult rates

Throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, the issue of vaccine uptake has been a point of contention, but a new platform from GSK and IQVIA is hoping to shed more light on vaccine data, via new transparency and general awareness.

The two companies have launched Vaccine Track, a platform intended to be used by public health officials, medical professionals and others to strengthen data transparency and display vaccination trends. According to the companies, the platform is intended to aid in increasing vaccine rates and will provide data on trends to assist public health efforts.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 147,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Bernhardt Zeiher, outgoing Astellas CMO (Astellas)

Q&A: Astel­las' re­tir­ing head of de­vel­op­ment re­flects on gene ther­a­py deaths

For anyone who’s been following discussions about the safety alarms surrounding the adeno-associated viruses (AAV) commonly used to deliver gene therapy, Astellas should be a familiar name.

The Japanese pharma — which bought out Audentes Therapeutics near the end of 2019 and later built a gene therapy unit around the acquisition — rocked the field when it reported three patient deaths in a trial testing AT132, the lead program from Audentes designed to treat a rare muscle disease called X-linked myotubular myopathy (XLMTM).

When the company restarted the trial, it adjusted the dose and instituted a battery of other measures to try to prevent the same thing from happening again. But tragically, the first patient to receive the new regimen died just weeks after administration. The therapy remains under clinical hold, and just weeks ago, Astellas flagged another safety-related hold for a separate gene therapy candidate. In the process of investigating the deaths, the company has also taken flak about the way it disclosed information.

Big questions remain — questions that can have big implications about the future of AAV gene therapies.

Bernhardt Zeiher did not imagine any of it when he first joined Astellas as the therapeutic area leader in inflammation, immunology and infectious diseases. But his ascent to chief medical officer and head of development coincided almost exactly with Astellas’ big move into gene therapy, putting him often in the driver’s seat to grapple with the setbacks.

As Zeiher prepares to retire next month after a 12-year tenure — leaving the unfinished tasks to his successor, a seasoned cancer drug developer — he chatted with Endpoints News, in part, to discuss the effort to understand what happened, lessons learned and the criticism along the way.

The transcript has been lightly edited for length and clarity.

Endpoints: I want to also ask you a bit about the gene therapy efforts you’ve been working on. Astellas has really been at the forefront of discovering the safety concerns associated with AAV gene therapy. What’s that been like for you?

Zeiher: Well, I have to admit, it’s been a bit of a roller coaster. We acquired Audentes. Huge amount of enthusiasm. What we saw with AT132 — that was the lead program in XLMTM — was just remarkable efficacy. I mean, kids who went from being on ventilators, not able to eat for themselves, sit up, do things like that, to off ventilators, walking, you know, really — one investigator called it this Lazarus-like effect. It was just really dramatic efficacy. And then to have the safety events that occurred. So they actually occurred within that first year of the acquisition. So we had the three patient deaths. Me and my organization became very, very much involved. In fact, Ed Conner, who had been the chief medical officer, he left after some of the deaths, but I stepped in as the kind of acting chief medical officer, we had another chief medical officer who was involved, and then we had a fourth death, and I became acting again for a period of time.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.