Sen­ti sci­en­tif­ic co-founder Wil­son Wong de­signs the SUPRA — a new, high per­for­mance mod­el CAR-T

Wil­son Wong, one of the sci­en­tif­ic co-founders be­hind Tim­o­thy Lu’s new syn­thet­ic bi­ol­o­gy start­up Sen­ti, has de­signed a new CAR-T that he be­lieves has the po­ten­tial to over­come some of the big is­sues that con­tin­ues to plague the first gen­er­a­tion of drugs now on the mar­ket.

And he’s tricked it out with some in­ter­est­ing new fea­tures.

The Boston Uni­ver­si­ty T-cell en­gi­neer — work­ing with grad­u­ate stu­dent Jang Hwan Cho and MIT’s Jim Collins, a leg­end in syn­thet­ic bio cir­cles and a men­tor to Lu — pub­lished a pa­per in Cell to­day out­lin­ing their work on the re­design, which Sen­ti will now see if it can guide to­ward the clin­ic.

Jim Collins

Work­ing with mouse mod­els, Wong de­vised a CAR he’s dubbed the SUPRA —  which stands for split, uni­ver­sal and  pro­gram­ma­ble. The cen­tral part of its promise is that the re­vised CAR-T is built to go af­ter two mark­ers for the dis­ease, vast­ly im­prov­ing its chance of ex­tend­ing the use of these drugs in­to hard-to-hit sol­id tu­mors while im­prov­ing the speci­fici­ty of the drug to can­cer tis­sue.

It’s al­so a cus­tomiz­able ap­proach, with bet­ter built-in con­trol fea­tures that can be used to go af­ter spe­cif­ic types of blood can­cer and sol­id tu­mors.

“What’s nice,” he tells me, “is that you need two sig­nals to turn on the T cells, not one mag­ic bul­let. The can­cer mark­er can be less spe­cif­ic, re­ly­ing on the in­ter­sec­tion of the two.”

The oth­er key in­gre­di­ent is an added adap­tive mol­e­cule which can be in­clud­ed with the treat­ment to guide the T cells to can­cer cells. With­out these adap­tive mol­e­cules, the T cell won’t be ac­ti­vat­ed, he says. And as they’re cleared even­tu­al­ly, you can add a fresh sup­ply to en­gi­neer a fresh re­sponse to a cho­sen tar­get.

Add it up and you gain a ba­sic on/off switch that can be used to fine tune the ac­tiv­i­ty of the ther­a­py to con­trol tox­i­c­i­ty, pre­vent­ing the kind of over­ac­tiv­i­ty that can launch a dan­ger­ous re­ac­tion in pa­tients. And you can more eas­i­ly spur a fol­lowup re­sponse to pre­vent re­laps­es.

It’s pre­clin­i­cal, which means there’s still plen­ty of work that would need to be done be­fore it could be test­ed in a hu­man. How long?

Maybe two years, says the sci­en­tist, “but you nev­er know.”

The first two CAR-Ts on the mar­ket, Yescar­ta and Kym­ri­ah, work ac­cord­ing to a sim­ple de­sign plan, tak­ing pa­tient cells, en­gi­neer­ing them with a chimeric anti­gen re­cep­tor, and then un­leash­ing a swarm to at­tack can­cer cells.

But it’s lim­it­ed, and not just by the tox­i­c­i­ty of an un­con­trolled re­ac­tion. The first gen­er­a­tion pa­tients are al­so ex­posed to re­laps­es as the ac­tiv­i­ty wears down, and adding a new half-mil­lion dol­lar ther­a­py isn’t fea­si­ble.

The long-term plan is to cre­ate an off-the-shelf ther­a­py with uni­ver­sal fea­tures for each can­cer type, and the re­searchers now are ze­ro­ing in on the types of can­cers which are most like­ly to re­spond to the two-tar­get de­sign.

The grand idea here is that Wong wants to build a “pros­thet­ic im­mune sys­tem,” a mas­ter con­trol tech­nol­o­gy that could pro­vide a new sys­tem that would gov­ern the im­mune re­sponse to any dis­ease, which would have a pow­er­ful and ob­vi­ous role to play on reg­u­la­to­ry T cells that sup­press an im­mune re­sponse as well as in au­toim­mune dis­eases like rheuma­toid arthri­tis. 

That’s a sub­stan­tial­ly big­ger vi­sion than the work on CAR-T 2.0. But these steps fol­low a longer path for Wong that he’s keen to ex­plore.

Im­age: Wil­son Wong. BOSTON UNI­VER­SI­TY

The DCT-OS: A Tech­nol­o­gy-first Op­er­at­ing Sys­tem - En­abling Clin­i­cal Tri­als

As technology-enabled clinical research becomes the new normal, an integrated decentralized clinical trial operating system can ensure quality, deliver consistency and improve the patient experience.

The increasing availability of COVID-19 vaccines has many of us looking forward to a time when everyday things return to a state of normal. Schools and teachers are returning to classrooms, offices and small businesses are reopening, and there’s a palpable sense of optimism that the often-awkward adjustments we’ve all made personally and professionally in the last year are behind us, never to return. In the world of clinical research, however, some pandemic-necessitated adjustments are proving to be more than emergency stopgap measures to ensure trial continuity — and numerous decentralized clinical trial (DCT) tools and methodologies employed within the last year are likely here to stay as part of biopharma’s new normal.

Onno van de Stolpe, Galapagos CEO (Thierry Roge/Belga Mag/AFP via Getty Images)

Gala­pa­gos chops in­to their pipeline, drop­ping core fields and re­or­ga­niz­ing R&D as the BD team hunts for some­thing 'trans­for­ma­tive'

Just 5 months after Gilead gutted its rich partnership with Galapagos following a bitter setback at the FDA, the Belgian biotech is hunkering down and chopping the pipeline in an effort to conserve cash while their BD team pursues a mission to find a “transformative” deal for the company.

The filgotinib disaster didn’t warrant a mention as Galapagos laid out its Darwinian restructuring plans. Forced to make choices, the company is ditching its IPF molecule ’1205, while moving ahead with a Phase II IPF study for its chitinase inhibitor ’4617.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 104,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Stéphane Bancel, Getty

Mod­er­na CEO brush­es off US sup­port for IP waiv­er, eyes more than $19B in Covid-19 vac­cine sales in 2021

Moderna is definitively more concerned with keeping pace with Pfizer in the race to vaccinate the world against Covid-19 than it is with Wednesday’s decision from the Biden administration to back an intellectual property waiver that aims to increase vaccine supplies worldwide.

In its first quarter earnings call on Thursday, Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel shrugged off any suggestion that the newly US-backed intellectual property waiver would impact his company’s vaccine or bottom line. Still, the company’s stock price fell by about 9% in early morning trading.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 104,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

'Chang­ing the whole game of drug dis­cov­ery': Leg­endary R&D vet Roger Perl­mut­ter leaps back in­to work as a biotech CEO

Roger Perlmutter needs no introduction to anyone remotely involved in biopharma. As the R&D chief first at Amgen and then Merck, he’s built a stellar reputation and a prolific career steering new drugs toward the market for everything from cancer to infectious diseases.

But for years, he’s also held a less known title: science partner at The Column Group, where he’s regularly consulted about the various ideas the VCs had for new startups.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 104,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Angela Merkel (AP Photo/Michael Sohn)

Covid-19 roundup: Pfiz­er sub­mits vac­cine for full ap­proval; Merkel op­pos­es Biden pro­pos­al to sus­pend IP for vac­cines

Pfizer and BioNTech said Friday that they’ve submitted a biologics license application to the FDA for full approval of their mRNA vaccine for those over the age of 16.

How long it will take the FDA to decide on the BLA will be set once it’s been formally accepted by the agency.

Peter Marks, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, previously told Endpoints News that the review of the BLA should take between three and four months, but it may be even faster than that.

UP­DAT­ED: EMA safe­ty com­mit­tee seeks more in­fo on heart in­flam­ma­tion fol­low­ing Pfiz­er Covid-19 vac­cine

The European Medicines Agency’s safety committee said Friday that it’s aware of cases of inflammation of the heart muscle and inflammation of the membrane around the heart, mainly reported following vaccination with Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine, known in Europe as Comirnaty.

“There is no indication that these cases are due to the vaccine,” the EMA’s Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee said.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 104,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

As­traZeneca caps PD-L1/CT­LA-4/chemo com­bo come­back with OS win. Is treme­li­mum­ab fi­nal­ly ready for ap­proval?

AstraZeneca’s closely-watched POSEIDON study continues to be the rare bright spot in its push for an in-house PD-L1/CTLA-4 combo.

Combining Imfinzi and tremelimumab with physicians’ choice of chemotherapy helped patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer live longer, the company reported — marking the first time the still-experimental tremelimumab has demonstrated an OS benefit.

For AstraZeneca and CEO Pascal Soriot, the positive readout — which is devoid of numbers — offers much-needed validation for the big bet they made on Imfinzi plus tremelimumab, after the PD-L1/CTLA-4 regimen failed multiple trials in head and neck cancer as well as lung cancer.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 104,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Ron DePinho (file photo)

A 'fly­over' biotech launch­es in Texas with four Ron De­Pin­ho-found­ed com­pa­nies un­der its belt

In his 13 years at Genzyme, Michael Wyzga noticed something about East Coast drugmakers. Execs would often jet from Boston or New York to San Francisco to find more assets, and completely miss the work being done in flyover states, like Texas or Wisconsin.

“If it doesn’t come out of MGH or MIT or Harvard, probably not that interesting,” he said of the mindset.

Now, he and some well-known industry players are looking to change that, and they’ve reeled in just over $38 million to do it.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 104,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

An­oth­er failed tri­al for Or­p­hazyme's 'pipeline-in-a-pro­duc­t' leaves shad­ow on drug's fu­ture

The tumultuous ride for Orphazyme continued on Friday as the company announced that a pivotal trial for its lead drug arimoclomol failed yet again, this time in the treatment of ALS, seeding doubt in a drug that had recently been cleared by the FDA for priority review. The latest failure casts a darker shadow on the upcoming decision despite Orphazyme’s upbeat outlook.

In a statement, the Danish biotech announced that the drug did not meet its primary or secondary endpoints evaluating function and survival. But the company has not announced any data surrounding the failure, instead saying that it will publish the complete results later this year.