Stung by pa­tient deaths, a small Juno study points to a Goldilocks for­mu­la for CAR-T

For Juno, the hunt to find just the right mix­ture of T cells along with an ef­fec­tive reg­i­men to prep pa­tients for their CAR-T ther­a­py has had a lethal his­to­ry, tan­gling up de­vel­op­ment time­lines in a way that has ced­ed the lead in the field to ri­val Kite.

Stan­ley Rid­dell

But in a new, small study in­volv­ing one of their most ad­vanced CAR-Ts, an in­ves­tiga­tive team feels that they came up with just the right recipe. And that could have big im­pli­ca­tions for an­oth­er CAR-T pro­gram in which Juno holds high hopes for a come­back.

The drug in­volved in the study is called JCAR014, and the in­ves­ti­ga­tors say that they came up with a one-on-one mix of CD4+ helper cells with CD8+ killer cells that showed a re­mark­able abil­i­ty to wipe out can­cer cells that ex­press CD19, which has been the big ini­tial tar­get for all the play­ers in the van­guard of CAR-T work.

Sig­nif­i­cant­ly, the in­ves­ti­ga­tors al­so con­clud­ed that adding flu­dara­bine to cy­clophos­phamide (Cy/Flu) in a cock­tail to prep pa­tients cre­ates the right en­vi­ron­ment for the T cells to grow in the body. Half of the 18 pa­tients with non-Hodgkin lym­phoma who got the Cy/Flu com­bo had a com­plete re­sponse to the ther­a­py, com­pared to on­ly 8% of the group who re­ceived on­ly cy­clophos­phamide.

The team point­ed out that these re­sults could in­di­cate sim­i­lar out­comes for JCAR017, which is now in ear­ly stud­ies. Juno has tapped JCAR017 as a po­ten­tial “best-in-class” treat­ment for blood can­cers.

The mes­sage helped buoy the com­pa­ny’s stock to­day, send­ing shares up about 3%.

“With the de­fined com­po­si­tion treat­ment, we are able to get more re­pro­ducible da­ta about the ef­fects of the cells — both the ben­e­fi­cial im­pact against the can­cer and any side ef­fects to the pa­tient,” said Fred Hutch clin­i­cal re­searcher Stan Rid­dell, one of the se­nior au­thors of the pa­per, along with Dr. David Mal­oney. “We are then able to ad­just the dose to im­prove what we call the ther­a­peu­tic in­dex — im­pact against the tu­mor, with low­er tox­i­c­i­ty to the pa­tient.”

The ad­di­tion of flu­dara­bine to Juno’s lead CAR-T, JCAR015, was fin­gered for killing four pa­tients, a set­back for the biotech which trig­gered a brief but dam­ag­ing clin­i­cal hold by the FDA. The hold last­ed on­ly days, end­ing with the FDA sign­ing off on the biotech’s de­ci­sion to drop flu­dara­bine. But the hold end­ed up forc­ing Juno to de­lay its ex­pect­ed move to file for their first ap­proval back to 2018. Kite, mean­while, which is us­ing its own mix of T cells and Cy/Flu, has said it ex­pects to take the first batch of da­ta from its lead­ing study to the FDA af­ter an ini­tial re­view that comes in just a mat­ter of weeks.

This new study from Juno al­so rais­es ques­tions about its lead drug, JCAR015. If pa­tient out­comes are sig­nif­i­cant­ly low­ered by the ab­sence of flu­dara­bine, Juno’s first at­tempt at a com­mer­cial en­try against the com­pe­ti­tion could be se­vere­ly af­fect­ed.

CAR-Ts be­came a hot field a cou­ple of years ago, at­tract­ing hun­dreds of mil­lions in new in­vest­ments as the front run­ners raced to ad­vance new reme­dies for can­cer by adding a chimeric anti­gen re­cep­tor to a pa­tient’s T cells and then in­fus­ing them back in­to the pa­tient. But with Juno’s de­rail­ment and a re­cent de­ci­sion by No­var­tis to dis­solve its cell and gene ther­a­py unit and re­ab­sorb it in­to their big on­col­o­gy di­vi­sion, all eyes are on Kite now to see if it can claim the first ap­proval and mar­ket en­try.

The stakes are high.

Martin Shkreli [via Getty]

Pris­on­er #87850-053 does not get to add drug de­vel­op­er to his list of cred­its

Just days after Retrophin shed its last ties to founder Martin Shkreli, the biotech is reporting that the lead drug he co-invented flopped in a pivotal trial. Fosmetpantotenate flunked both the primary and key secondary endpoints in a placebo-controlled trial for a rare disease called pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration, or PKAN.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

We­bi­nar: Re­al World End­points — the brave new world com­ing in build­ing fran­chise ther­a­pies

Several biopharma companies have been working on expanding drug labels through the use of real world endpoints, combing through the data to find evidence of a drug’s efficacy for particular indications. But we’ve just begun. Real World Evidence is becoming an important part of every clinical development plan, in the soup-through-nuts approach used in building franchises.

I’ve recruited a panel of 3 top experts in the field — the first in a series of premium webinars — to look at the practical realities governing what can be done today, and where this is headed over the next few years, at the prodding of the FDA.

ZHEN SU — Merck Serono’s Senior Vice President and Global Head of Oncology
ELLIOTT LEVY — Amgen’s Senior Vice President of Global Development
CHRIS BOSHOFF — Pfizer Oncology’s Chief Development Officer

A premium subscription to Endpoints News is required to attend this webinar. Please upgrade to either an Insider or Enterprise plan for access. Already have Endpoints Premium? Please sign-in below. You can contact our Subscriptions team at with any issues.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Brian Kaspar. AveXis via Twitter

AveX­is sci­en­tif­ic founder fires back at No­var­tis CEO Vas Narasimhan, 'cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly de­nies any wrong­do­ing'

Brian Kaspar’s head was among the first to roll at Novartis after company execs became aware of the fact that manipulated data had been included in its application for Zolgensma, now the world’s most expensive therapy.

But in his first public response, the scientific founder at AveXis — acquired by Novartis for $8.7 billion — is firing back. And he says that not only was he not involved in any wrongdoing, he’s ready to defend his name as needed.

I reached out to Brian Kaspar after Novartis put out word that he and his brother Allen had been axed in mid-May, two months after the company became aware of the allegations related to manipulated data. His response came back through his attorneys.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Hal Barron. GSK

GSK's Hal Bar­ron her­alds their sec­ond pos­i­tive piv­otal for cru­cial an­ti-BC­MA ther­a­py, point­ing to a push for quick OKs in a crowd­ed field

Hal Barron has his second positive round of Phase III data in hand for his anti-BCMA antibody drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916). And GSK’s research chief says the data paves the way for their drive in search of an FDA approval for treating multiple myeloma.

It’s hard to overestimate the importance of this drug for GSK, a cornerstone of Barron’s campaign to make a dramatic impact on the oncology market and provide some long-lost excitement for the pharma giant’s pipeline. They’re putting this BCMA program at the front of that charge — looking to lead a host of rivals all aimed at the same target.

We don’t know what the data are yet, but DREAMM-2 falls on the heels of a promising set of data delivered 5 months ago for DREAMM-1. There investigators noted that complete responses among treatment-resistant patients rose to 15% in the extra year’s worth of data to look over, with a median progression-free survival rate of 12 months, up from 7.9 months reported earlier. The median duration of response was 14.3 months.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: An em­bold­ened As­traZeneca splurges $95M on a pri­or­i­ty re­view vouch­er. Where do they need the FDA to hus­tle up?

AstraZeneca is in a hurry.

We learned this morning that the pharma giant — not known as a big spender, until recently — forked over $95 million to get its hands on a priority review voucher from Sobi, otherwise known as Swedish Orphan Biovitrum.

That marks another step down on price for a PRV, which allows the holder to slash 4 months off of any FDA review time.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Bob Smith, Pfizer

Pfiz­er is mak­ing a $500M state­ment to­day: Here’s how you be­come a lead play­er in the boom­ing gene ther­a­py sec­tor

Three years ago, Pfizer anted up $150 million in cash to buy Bamboo Therapeutics in Chapel Hill, NC as it cautiously stuck a toe in the small gene therapy pool of research and development.

Company execs followed up a year later with a $100 million expansion of the manufacturing operations they picked up in that deal for the UNC spinout, which came with $495 million in milestones.

And now they’re really going for it.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Video: Putting the AI in R&D — with Badhri Srini­vasan, Tony Wood, Rosana Kapeller, Hugo Ceule­mans, Saurabh Sa­ha and Shoibal Dat­ta

During BIO this year, I had a chance to moderate a panel among some of the top tech experts in biopharma on their real-world use of artificial intelligence in R&D. There’s been a lot said about the potential of AI, but I wanted to explore more about what some of the larger players are actually doing with this technology today, and how they see it advancing in the future. It was a fascinating exchange, which you can see here. The transcript has been edited for brevity and clarity. — John Carroll

As­traZeneca’s Imfinzi/treme com­bo strikes out — again — in lung can­cer. Is it time for last rites?

AstraZeneca bet big on the future of their PD-L1 Imfinzi combined with the experimental CTLA-4 drug tremelimumab. But once again it’s gone down to defeat in a major Phase III study — while adding damage to the theory involving targeting cancer with a high tumor mutational burden.

Early Wednesday the pharma giant announced that their NEPTUNE study had failed, with the combination unable to beat standard chemo at overall survival in high TMB cases of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. We won’t get hard data until later in the year, but the drumbeat of failures will call into question what — if any — future this combination can have left.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Why would Am­gen want to buy Alex­ion? An­a­lysts call hot­ly ru­mored takeover un­like­ly, but seize the mo­ment

A rumor that Amgen is closing in on buyout deal for Alexion has sparked a guessing game on just what kind of M&A strategy Amgen is pursuing and how much Alexion is worth.

Mizuho analyst Salim Syed first lent credence to the report out of the Spanish news outlet Intereconomía, which said Amgen is bidding as much as $200 per share. While the source may be questionable, “the concept of this happening doesn’t sound too crazy to me,” he wrote.