That Alzheimer's drug that flunked a PhII? On sec­ond look, Bio­gen/Ei­sai say it's a win­ner

Sev­en months ago, Bio­gen and Ei­sai were forced to aban­don their plans for a quick piv­ot in­to Phase III as their Alzheimer’s drug BAN2401 failed a de­ci­sive Phase II. Now, with the full 18-month analy­sis in hand, the part­ners are say­ing they were right to per­sist.

Bio­gen’s stock $BI­IB surged 17.48% in pre-mar­ket trad­ing on an up­dat­ed snap­shot, a con­sid­er­able boost giv­en the size of the com­pa­ny. So far, the com­pa­ny has added rough­ly $10 bil­lion to its mar­ket cap since yes­ter­day. Mean­while BioArc­tic, the small Swedish biotech whose re­search al­liance with Ei­sai first gave birth to the prod­uct, saw their shares (CPH: $BIOA-B) sky­rock­et 209% as of press time.

Here’s what changed: When eval­u­at­ed by the Alzheimer’s Dis­ease Com­pos­ite Score (AD­COMS), the high­est dose of BAN2401 showed to cause “sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant slow­ing of dis­ease pro­gres­sion” af­ter 18 months of treat­ment. The tri­al re­cruit­ed 856 pa­tients with ear­ly Alzheimer’s dis­ease (and con­firmed amy­loid pathol­o­gy in the brain), a co­hort com­pris­ing those with mild cog­ni­tive im­pair­ment due to Alzheimer’s and oth­ers with mild Alzheimer’s de­men­tia.

Lynn Kramer, Ei­sai

What does this mean for a field fraught with fail­ures, a field that ab­sorbed the mil­lions of dol­lars thrown at it by big phar­mas and biotechs alike and churned out noth­ing in re­turn? While past fail­ures have re­peat­ed called the amy­loid hy­poth­e­sis — the idea that tar­get­ing the plaques ob­served in the brains of most Alzheimer’s pa­tients could change the tra­jec­to­ry of the dis­ease — in­to ques­tion, for Ei­sai CMO Lynn Kramer, their da­ta are “fur­ther val­i­dat­ing the amy­loid hy­poth­e­sis.” Some might al­so see it as a val­i­da­tion of ad­u­canum­ab, the much-tout­ed late-stage drug that’s al­so hit­ting the amy­loid be­ta path­way.

“We will dis­cuss these very en­cour­ag­ing re­sults with reg­u­la­to­ry au­thor­i­ties to de­ter­mine the best path for­ward,” Kramer said in a state­ment.

It would be a huge feat to demon­strate im­prove­ment in cog­ni­tion linked with a de­cline in amy­loid be­ta clus­ters. But un­til the full da­ta is out at a fu­ture med­ical con­fer­ence, ex­perts are care­ful­ly man­ag­ing their ex­pec­ta­tions.

“Giv­en the state of the field we have to be cau­tious­ly op­ti­mistic about a find­ing like this,” Mayo Clin­ic Alzheimer’s Dis­ease Re­search Cen­ter di­rec­tor Ron Pe­tersen told Forbes.

Leerink’s Ge­of­frey Porges is more skep­ti­cal, point­ing out how lit­tle in­for­ma­tion was giv­en in the press re­lease.

We do not feel that Bio­gen, Ei­sai or the whole amy­loid field de­serves much cred­it for this dis­clo­sure, par­tic­u­lar­ly giv­en the lack of ex­ter­nal val­i­da­tion of the AD­COMS end­point. There is very lit­tle de­tail about oth­er more val­i­dat­ed cog­ni­tive mea­sures in the joint press re­lease and we find no rea­son to be­lieve this ei­ther proves or dis­proves the amy­loid hy­poth­e­sis or has any im­pact on the like­li­hood that ad­u­canum­ab will suc­ceed in its on­go­ing phase III tri­al.

A few de­tails in the tri­al de­sign may al­so prove prob­lem­at­ic.

For one, the turn­around comes down to sta­tis­tics. When Bio­gen and Ei­sai re­port­ed in De­cem­ber that the study failed its pri­ma­ry end­point, it was re­fer­ring to a Bayesian analy­sis, in which the drug would have to hit a cer­tain prob­a­bil­i­ty for caus­ing a cer­tain out­come to be deemed ef­fec­tive. Be­cause of that, and an adap­tive tri­al de­sign, re­searchers could make changes dur­ing the tri­al and pa­tients could be switched to dif­fer­ent dos­es. That didn’t work, so they wait­ed un­til the stan­dard 18-month mark to eval­u­ate the re­sults again with “con­ven­tion­al sta­tis­ti­cal meth­ods.” Look­ing back with this new frame­work, the part­ners now say their drug showed sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant clin­i­cal ben­e­fit as ear­ly as six months.

The pos­i­tive out­come be­ing high­light­ed to­day al­so con­cerns on­ly the 10mg/kg bi­week­ly dose, which was one of five dos­es test­ed in the tri­al. It’s un­clear how many pa­tients end­ed up on that dos­ing scheme.

And fi­nal­ly there’s AD­COMS, the cho­sen mea­sure of cog­ni­tion, which was a nov­el end­point that com­bines a few stan­dard scales in Alzheimer’s.

But if there’s one thing we’re sure about, it’s that Bio­gen and Ei­sai are all in. The Japan­ese com­pa­ny re­cent­ly wa­gered more than $100 mil­lion on a be­spoke Alzheimer’s re­search cen­ter in its part­ner’s home of Cam­bridge, MA. And Bio­gen just tossed in an ex­tra $50 mil­lion for a big­ger slice of the roy­al­ties for ad­u­canum­ab.

In a stun­ning set­back, Amarin los­es big patent fight over Vas­cepa IP. And its high-fly­ing stock crash­es to earth

Amarin’s shares $AMRN were blitzed Monday evening, losing billions in value as reports spread that the company had lost its high-profile effort to keep its Vascepa patents protected from generic drugmakers.

Amarin had been fighting to keep key patents under lock and key — and away from generic rivals — for another 10 years, but District Court Judge Miranda Du in Las Vegas ruled against the biotech. She ruled that:
(A)ll the Asserted Claims are invalid as obvious under 35 U.S.C.§ 103. Thus, the Court finds in favor of Defendants on Plaintiff’s remaining infringementclaim, and in their favor on their counterclaims asserting the invalidity of the AssertedClaims under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: Have a new drug that promis­es to fight Covid-19? The FDA promis­es fast ac­tion but some de­vel­op­ers aren't hap­py

After providing an emergency approval to use malaria drugs against coronavirus with little actual evidence of their efficacy or safety in that setting, the FDA has already proven that it has set aside the gold standard when it comes to the pandemic. And now regulators have spelled out a new approach to speeding development that promises immediate responses in no uncertain terms — promising a program offering the ultimate high-speed pathway to Covid-19 drug approvals.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

FDA puts pe­di­atric aGVHD drug on pri­or­i­ty re­view lane — will they go vir­tu­al with the ad­comm?

Despite worries about regulatory delays due to new work arrangements under Covid-19, the FDA appears intent to go full speed ahead with its everyday work, not only granting priority review to a stem cell therapy for acute graft versus host disease but also plotting an advisory committee meeting for it.

With a PDUFA date of September 30, the journey of the drug — remestemcel-L, or Ryoncil — could shed light on the agency’s capacity to facilitate drug development unrelated to Covid-19.

Covid 19 roundup: Trump push­es his new fa­vorite, untest­ed drug; CRISPR out­lines crip­pling im­pact of Covid-19

President Trump has a new favorite Covid-19 drug.

After a conversation with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, Politico reports, the president is pressuring the FDA to issue emergency use authorization for favipiravir, a flu drug that showed glimpses of success in China but remains unproven and carries a list of worrying side effects. The push comes after a week-plus in which the White House touted a potentially effective but unproven malaria medication despite the concerns of scientific advisors such as NIAID director Anthony Fauci. And Trump ally Rudy Giuliani has been talking up unproven cell therapy efforts on Twitter.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Once fu­ri­ous over No­var­tis’ da­ta ma­nip­u­la­tion scan­dal, the FDA now says it’s noth­ing they need to take ac­tion on

Back in the BP era — Before Pandemic — the FDA ripped Novartis for its decision to keep the agency in the dark about manipulated data used in its application for Zolgensma while its marketing application for the gene therapy was under review.

Civil and criminal sanctions were being discussed, the agency noted in a rare broadside at one of the world’s largest pharma companies. Notable lawmakers cheered the angry regulators on, urging the FDA to make an example of Novartis, which fielded Zolgensma at $2.1 million — the current record for a one-off therapy.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Covid-19 roundup: GSK, Am­gen tai­lor R&D work to fit the coro­n­avirus age; Doud­na's ge­nomics crew launch­es di­ag­nos­tic lab

You can add Amgen and GSK to the list of deep-pocket drug R&D players who are tailoring their pipeline work to fit a new age of coronavirus.

Following in the footsteps of a lineup of big players like Eli Lilly — which has suspended patient recruitment for drug studies — Amgen and GSK have opted to take a more tailored approach. Amgen is intent on circling the wagons around key studies that are already fully enrolled, and GSK has the red light on new studies while the pandemic plays out.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

ITeos nabs $125M as they prep Keytru­da com­bi­na­tion tri­al — if Covid-19 will let them

For iTeos, it turned out, $75 million could only last so long.

Two years after announcing their eye-catching Series B raise, the Belgian biotech is back with an even larger Series B-2: $125 million.

The now $200 million financing illustrates the vast capital available for those with promising new immuno-oncology compounds, particularly those that might be used in combination with existing therapies. In December, iTeos announced a collaboration with Merck to test its lead compound with Keytruda this year. The proceeds will push forward that trial and help fund the ongoing Phase I/II trials for that compound, EOS-850, and a second one, EOS-448.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Dai­ichi Sankyo sinks $200M in­to new gene ther­a­py tech from Ul­tragenyx

In a leap to the gene therapy space, Daiichi Sankyo has dropped $200 million to access Ultragenyx’s manufacturing technology, providing the rare disease biotech with plenty of cash and a stock boost amid a general cash crunch.

For $125 million in cash and a $75 million equity investment, Daiichi Sankyo has bought a non-exclusive license to the IP around two platforms with which it plans to develop AAV-based gene therapy products. The Japanese pharma is purchasing the stock $RARE at $60 per share, more than a third above its current price of $44.43.

It is 'kind of a proven tech­nol­o­gy': Hep B vac­cine mak­er joins glob­al hunt for coro­n­avirus vac­cine

Using lab-grown proteins that are engineered to mimic the architecture of viruses to induce an immune response, VBI Vaccines is joining the hunt for a coronavirus vaccine — harnessing technology that has initially been proved safe in early trials as a prophylactic for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection.

Unlike the raft of the companies in the Covid-19 vaccine race — including Moderna, CureVac and J&J — VBI is taking a pan-coronavirus approach, by developing a vaccine that will encompass Covid-19, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS).