Tired of fin­ish­ing in last place, Eli Lil­ly’s new R&D chief wants to shake things up

Dan Skovron­sky. LIL­LY PAD

Bern­stein’s Tim An­der­son has been hold­ing some in-depth dis­cus­sions with the ex­ec­u­tive team at Eli Lil­ly, in­clud­ing Dan Skovron­sky, the in­com­ing head of R&D. And it’s clear that Skovron­sky — who’s tak­ing Jan Lund­berg’s place June 1 — in­tends to get more ag­gres­sive in ear­ly-stage de­vel­op­ment as he works to com­plete­ly shed a well-earned rep­u­ta­tion for a go-slow clin­i­cal ap­proach that has fre­quent­ly put them at the end of a long line of ri­vals.

If you look at some of the most ex­cit­ing tar­gets in our in­dus­try, tar­gets that Lil­ly has worked on, things like CDK 4/6, IL-17, IL-23, PC­SK9, CGRP, in each of these we could eas­i­ly have been first,” Skovron­sky, the for­mer CEO of Avid Ra­dio­phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals, told An­der­son. “Our sci­en­tists were among the first work­ing on these tar­gets in the lab and mak­ing drugs against them. In many cas­es, we were slow get­ting up the courage to move in­to hu­man tri­als for var­i­ous rea­sons. We are look­ing to change that.”

Tim An­der­son

That means launch­ing more Phase I stud­ies, look­ing for ear­ly signs of whether they’re on the right track. Then they can de­cide to move for­ward quick­ly, or kill it in the case of weak da­ta.

“We want to be the first test­ing nov­el mech­a­nisms, so that is one change,” Skovron­sky not­ed. “You should see more Lil­ly Phase I tri­als and proof-of-con­cept tri­als on nov­el mech­a­nisms. An­oth­er change that you can ex­pect is that some­times I think Lil­ly has a rep­u­ta­tion for be­ing a fast fol­low­er or de­vel­op me-too drugs in the past. We do not think that is sus­tain­able for our in­dus­try. We need to be fo­cused on drugs with large ef­fect sizes. I think that is al­ways our in­tent, but we con­tin­ue to ratch­et up the pres­sure here to re­al­ly on­ly move for­ward the drugs that we be­lieve can de­liv­er that kind of large dif­fer­en­ti­at­ed ef­fect for pa­tients.”  

Quick trans­la­tion: Go big or go home. And no more lin­ger­ing.

“That means in Phase II proof-of-con­cept stud­ies you should ex­pect us to test new mech­a­nisms in a small num­ber of pa­tients look­ing for the large ef­fect size. If we do not get it, we will move on to the next mech­a­nism and not try and eke out an OK drug. We can talk about that with Alzheimer’s, di­a­betes and oth­er ar­eas; it is work­ing ob­vi­ous­ly in on­col­o­gy and im­munol­o­gy. So speed and large ef­fect sizes. Then the third thing is con­tin­ued evo­lu­tion on ex­ter­nal in­no­va­tion. In the past, we have been pret­ty good at bring­ing in drugs late in de­vel­op­ment, lots of Phase III part­ner­ships or Phase II af­ter proof of con­cept. I think where we are seek­ing to im­prove is on ear­li­er-stage deals. So we will con­tin­ue to do those late deals, but we al­so want to bring in more nov­el tar­gets, nov­el tech­nolo­gies, nov­el drugs in ear­li­er high­er risk stages of de­vel­op­ment.  Some of the changes we have al­ready an­nounced, for ex­am­ple, mov­ing busi­ness de­vel­op­ment in­to R&D should help fa­cil­i­tate that.  But you should ex­pect to see more of that in the fu­ture.”

Eli Lil­ly is one of the world’s top 15 R&D op­er­a­tors, with a string of new drug ap­provals in the last few years that fol­lowed a long and in­cred­i­bly frus­trat­ing de­vel­op­ment drought. It’s had some big set­backs along the way, in­clud­ing the ini­tial re­jec­tion of baric­i­tinib, now back on track at the FDA. Its painstak­ing progress in the clin­ic has de­liv­ered some im­pres­sive da­ta, but Skovron­sky knows that com­pe­ti­tion among the top play­ers is heat­ing up.

Now he’s signed off on a new mis­sion state­ment to fix what still ails Lil­ly.

Martin Shkreli [via Getty]

Pris­on­er #87850-053 does not get to add drug de­vel­op­er to his list of cred­its

Just days after Retrophin shed its last ties to founder Martin Shkreli, the biotech is reporting that the lead drug he co-invented flopped in a pivotal trial. Fosmetpantotenate flunked both the primary and key secondary endpoints in a placebo-controlled trial for a rare disease called pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration, or PKAN.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Hal Barron. GSK

GSK's Hal Bar­ron her­alds their sec­ond pos­i­tive PhI­II for cru­cial an­ti-BC­MA ther­a­py, point­ing to a push for quick OKs in a crowd­ed field

Hal Barron has his second positive round of Phase III data in hand for his anti-BCMA antibody drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916). And GSK’s research chief says the data paves the way for their drive in search of an FDA approval for treating multiple myeloma.

It’s hard to overestimate the importance of this drug for GSK, a cornerstone of Barron’s campaign to make a dramatic impact on the oncology market and provide some long-lost excitement for the pharma giant’s pipeline. They’re putting this BCMA program at the front of that charge — looking to lead a host of rivals all aimed at the same target.

We don’t know what the data are yet, but DREAMM-2 falls on the heels of a promising set of data delivered 5 months ago for DREAMM-1. There investigators noted that complete responses among treatment-resistant patients rose to 15% in the extra year’s worth of data to look over, with a median progression-free survival rate of 12 months, up from 7.9 months reported earlier. The median duration of response was 14.3 months.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: An em­bold­ened As­traZeneca splurges $95M on a pri­or­i­ty re­view vouch­er. Where do they need the FDA to hus­tle up?

AstraZeneca is in a hurry.

We learned this morning that the pharma giant — not known as a big spender, until recently — forked over $95 million to get its hands on a priority review voucher from Sobi, otherwise known as Swedish Orphan Biovitrum.

That marks another step down on price for a PRV, which allows the holder to slash 4 months off of any FDA review time.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

We­bi­nar: Re­al World End­points — the brave new world com­ing in build­ing fran­chise ther­a­pies

Several biopharma companies have been working on expanding drug labels through the use of real world endpoints, combing through the data to find evidence of a drug’s efficacy for particular indications. But we’ve just begun. Real World Evidence is becoming an important part of every clinical development plan, in the soup-through-nuts approach used in building franchises.

I’ve recruited a panel of 3 top experts in the field — the first in a series of premium webinars — to look at the practical realities governing what can be done today, and where this is headed over the next few years, at the prodding of the FDA.

ZHEN SU — Merck Serono’s Senior Vice President and Global Head of Oncology
ELLIOTT LEVY — Amgen’s Senior Vice President of Global Development
CHRIS BOSHOFF — Pfizer Oncology’s Chief Development Officer

A premium subscription to Endpoints News is required to attend this webinar. Please upgrade to either an Insider or Enterprise plan for access. Already have Endpoints Premium? Please sign-in below. You can contact our Subscriptions team at help@endpointsnews.com with any issues.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Brian Kaspar. AveXis via Twitter

AveX­is sci­en­tif­ic founder fires back at No­var­tis CEO Vas Narasimhan, 'cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly de­nies any wrong­do­ing'

Brian Kaspar’s head was among the first to roll at Novartis after company execs became aware of the fact that manipulated data had been included in its application for Zolgensma, now the world’s most expensive therapy.

But in his first public response, the scientific founder at AveXis — acquired by Novartis for $8.7 billion — is firing back. And he says that not only was he not involved in any wrongdoing, he’s ready to defend his name as needed.

I reached out to Brian Kaspar after Novartis put out word that he and his brother Allen had been axed in mid-May, two months after the company became aware of the allegations related to manipulated data. His response came back through his attorneys.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Bob Smith, Pfizer

Pfiz­er is mak­ing a $500M state­ment to­day: Here’s how you be­come a lead play­er in the boom­ing gene ther­a­py sec­tor

Three years ago, Pfizer anted up $150 million in cash to buy Bamboo Therapeutics in Chapel Hill, NC as it cautiously stuck a toe in the small gene therapy pool of research and development.

Company execs followed up a year later with a $100 million expansion of the manufacturing operations they picked up in that deal for the UNC spinout, which came with $495 million in milestones.

And now they’re really going for it.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Video: Putting the AI in R&D — with Badhri Srini­vasan, Tony Wood, Rosana Kapeller, Hugo Ceule­mans, Saurabh Sa­ha and Shoibal Dat­ta

During BIO this year, I had a chance to moderate a panel among some of the top tech experts in biopharma on their real-world use of artificial intelligence in R&D. There’s been a lot said about the potential of AI, but I wanted to explore more about what some of the larger players are actually doing with this technology today, and how they see it advancing in the future. It was a fascinating exchange, which you can see here. The transcript has been edited for brevity and clarity. — John Carroll

Am­gen, Al­ler­gan biosim­i­lar of Roche's block­buster Rit­ux­an clears an­oth­er US piv­otal study 

Novartis $NVS may have given up, but Amgen $AMGN and Allergan $AGN are plowing ahead with their knockoff of Roche’s blockbuster biologic Rituxan in the United States.

Their copycat, ABP 798, was found to have a clinically equivalent impact as Rituxan — meeting the main goal of the study involving CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients. This is the second trial supporting the profile of the biosimilar. In January, it came through with positive PK results in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion re­vives bid to get drug list prices on TV ads

The Trump administration is not giving up just yet. On Wednesday, the HHS filed an appeal against a judge’s decision in July to overturn a ruling obligating drug manufacturers to disclose the list price of their therapies in television adverts — hours before it was stipulated to go into effect.

In May, the HHS published a final ruling requiring drugmakers to divulge the wholesale acquisition cost— of a 30-day supply of the drug — in tv ads in a bid to enhance price transparency in the United States. The pharmaceutical industry has vehemently opposed the rule, asserting that list prices are not what a typical patient in the United States pays for treatment — that number is typically determined by the type of (or lack thereof) insurance coverage, deductibles and out-of-pocket costs. Although there is truth to that claim, the move was considered symbolic in the Trump administration’s healthcare agenda to hold drugmakers accountable in a climate where skyrocketing drug prices have incensed Americans on both sides of the aisle.