Tired of fin­ish­ing in last place, Eli Lil­ly’s new R&D chief wants to shake things up

Dan Skovron­sky. LIL­LY PAD

Bern­stein’s Tim An­der­son has been hold­ing some in-depth dis­cus­sions with the ex­ec­u­tive team at Eli Lil­ly, in­clud­ing Dan Skovron­sky, the in­com­ing head of R&D. And it’s clear that Skovron­sky — who’s tak­ing Jan Lund­berg’s place June 1 — in­tends to get more ag­gres­sive in ear­ly-stage de­vel­op­ment as he works to com­plete­ly shed a well-earned rep­u­ta­tion for a go-slow clin­i­cal ap­proach that has fre­quent­ly put them at the end of a long line of ri­vals.

If you look at some of the most ex­cit­ing tar­gets in our in­dus­try, tar­gets that Lil­ly has worked on, things like CDK 4/6, IL-17, IL-23, PC­SK9, CGRP, in each of these we could eas­i­ly have been first,” Skovron­sky, the for­mer CEO of Avid Ra­dio­phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals, told An­der­son. “Our sci­en­tists were among the first work­ing on these tar­gets in the lab and mak­ing drugs against them. In many cas­es, we were slow get­ting up the courage to move in­to hu­man tri­als for var­i­ous rea­sons. We are look­ing to change that.”

Tim An­der­son

That means launch­ing more Phase I stud­ies, look­ing for ear­ly signs of whether they’re on the right track. Then they can de­cide to move for­ward quick­ly, or kill it in the case of weak da­ta.

“We want to be the first test­ing nov­el mech­a­nisms, so that is one change,” Skovron­sky not­ed. “You should see more Lil­ly Phase I tri­als and proof-of-con­cept tri­als on nov­el mech­a­nisms. An­oth­er change that you can ex­pect is that some­times I think Lil­ly has a rep­u­ta­tion for be­ing a fast fol­low­er or de­vel­op me-too drugs in the past. We do not think that is sus­tain­able for our in­dus­try. We need to be fo­cused on drugs with large ef­fect sizes. I think that is al­ways our in­tent, but we con­tin­ue to ratch­et up the pres­sure here to re­al­ly on­ly move for­ward the drugs that we be­lieve can de­liv­er that kind of large dif­fer­en­ti­at­ed ef­fect for pa­tients.”  

Quick trans­la­tion: Go big or go home. And no more lin­ger­ing.

“That means in Phase II proof-of-con­cept stud­ies you should ex­pect us to test new mech­a­nisms in a small num­ber of pa­tients look­ing for the large ef­fect size. If we do not get it, we will move on to the next mech­a­nism and not try and eke out an OK drug. We can talk about that with Alzheimer’s, di­a­betes and oth­er ar­eas; it is work­ing ob­vi­ous­ly in on­col­o­gy and im­munol­o­gy. So speed and large ef­fect sizes. Then the third thing is con­tin­ued evo­lu­tion on ex­ter­nal in­no­va­tion. In the past, we have been pret­ty good at bring­ing in drugs late in de­vel­op­ment, lots of Phase III part­ner­ships or Phase II af­ter proof of con­cept. I think where we are seek­ing to im­prove is on ear­li­er-stage deals. So we will con­tin­ue to do those late deals, but we al­so want to bring in more nov­el tar­gets, nov­el tech­nolo­gies, nov­el drugs in ear­li­er high­er risk stages of de­vel­op­ment.  Some of the changes we have al­ready an­nounced, for ex­am­ple, mov­ing busi­ness de­vel­op­ment in­to R&D should help fa­cil­i­tate that.  But you should ex­pect to see more of that in the fu­ture.”

Eli Lil­ly is one of the world’s top 15 R&D op­er­a­tors, with a string of new drug ap­provals in the last few years that fol­lowed a long and in­cred­i­bly frus­trat­ing de­vel­op­ment drought. It’s had some big set­backs along the way, in­clud­ing the ini­tial re­jec­tion of baric­i­tinib, now back on track at the FDA. Its painstak­ing progress in the clin­ic has de­liv­ered some im­pres­sive da­ta, but Skovron­sky knows that com­pe­ti­tion among the top play­ers is heat­ing up.

Now he’s signed off on a new mis­sion state­ment to fix what still ails Lil­ly.

Paul Hudson, Getty Images

UP­DAT­ED: Sanofi CEO Hud­son lays out new R&D fo­cus — chop­ping di­a­betes, car­dio and slash­ing $2B-plus costs in sur­gi­cal dis­sec­tion

Earlier on Monday, new Sanofi CEO Paul Hudson baited the hook on his upcoming strategy presentation Tuesday with a tell-tale deal to buy Synthorx for $2.5 billion. That fits squarely with hints that he’s pointing the company to a bigger future in oncology, which also squares with a major industry tilt.

In a big reveal later in the day, though, Hudson offered a slate of stunners on his plans to surgically dissect and reassemble the portfoloio, saying that the company is dropping cardio and diabetes research — which covers two of its biggest franchise arenas. Sanofi missed the boat on developing new diabetes drugs, and now it’s pulling out entirely. As part of the pullback, it’s dropping efpeglenatide, their once-weekly GLP-1 injection for diabetes.

“To be out of cardiovascular and diabetes is not easy for a company like ours with an incredibly proud history,” Hudson said on a call with reporters, according to the Wall Street Journal. “As tough a choice as that is, we’re making that choice.”

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Al­pham­ab On­col­o­gy rounds out HKEX's sec­ond biotech IPO year with $230M raise and high lo­cal in­ter­est

Alphamab Oncology has inspired a surge of local interest in what will likely be the Hong Kong Stock Exchange’s last biotech run of the year, pricing its IPO on the high end of the range and raising over $230 million (HK$1.83 billion).

After rejigging the offering structure and making up to 50% available for enthusiastic local investors, the biotech sold 179.4 million shares at $1.31 (HK$10.2) and saw its stock rise to $1.77 ($13.8) on the first day of trading.

For sale: Long-act­ing PhI­II GLP-1 di­a­betes drug that’s way be­hind ri­vals, now spurned by Sanofi

Almost exactly 4 years ago Sanofi came to the bargaining table with South Korea’s Hanmi bearing $434 million dollars in cash and offering about $4 billion in milestones to in-license their once-weekly GLP-1 injectable. The pact was intended to revive their ailing diabetes division. Instead, it turned into a very expensive grave to mark the end of Sanofi’s R&D ambitions in the field.

Sanofi CEO Paul Hudson used efpeglenatide’s demise — while committing to paying hundreds of millions of more dollars to push it through 5 late-stage studies — as a marker of the company’s determination to stay focused on first and best-in-class drugs.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Parkin­son's trans­plants emerge as stem cell pi­o­neer Jeanne Lor­ing joins race

Jeanne Loring hadn’t studied Parkinson’s in 22 years when she got an email from a local neurologist.

The neurologist, Melissa Houser, didn’t know Loring had ever published on the disease. She was just looking for a stem cell researcher who might hear her out. 

“I think I was just picked out a hat,” Loring told Endpoints News. 

At a meeting in Loring’s Scripps Research office, Houser and a Parkinson’s nurse practitioner, Sherrie Gould, asked her why there was so much research done in stem cell transplants for other neurodegenerative diseases but not Parkinson’s. They wanted to know if she would work on one. 

What does $6.9B buy these days in on­col­o­gy R&D? As­traZeneca has a land­mark an­swer

Given the way the FDA has been whisking through new drug approvals months ahead of their PDUFA date, AstraZeneca and their partners Daiichi Sankyo may not have to wait until Q2 of next year to get a green light on trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201).

The pharma giant this morning played their ace in the hole, showing off why they were willing to commit to a $6.9 billion deal — with $1.35 billion in a cash upfront — to partner on the drug.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Paul Hudson, Sanofi

Paul Hud­son promis­es a bright new fu­ture at Sanofi, kick­ing loose me-too drugs and fo­cus­ing on land­mark ad­vances. But can he de­liv­er?

Paul Hudson was on a mission Tuesday morning as he stood up to address Sanofi’s new R&D and business strategy.

Still fresh into the job, the new CEO set out to convince his audience — including the legions of nervous staffers inevitably devoting much of their day to listening in — that the pharma giant is shedding the layers of bureaucracy that had held them back from making progress in the past, dropping the duds in the pipeline and reprioritizing a more narrow set of experimental drugs that were promised as first-in-class or best-in-class.  The company, he added, is now positioned to “go after other opportunities” that could offer a transformational approach to treating its core diseases.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Large advertisements for the drug Vivitrol decorate the walls of Grand Central Station on June 15, 2017 in New York City. (Photo: Andrew Lichtenstein via Getty)

FDA slaps down Alk­er­mes for mis­lead­ing Viv­it­rol ads — don't for­get vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty to opi­oid over­dose

The ads piqued interest as soon as they started appearing in 2016: at Grand Central Station, on the Red Line in Cambridge, and on a billboard off the New Jersey Turnpike. All showed a young person, generally with his or her arms crossed, and the question, “what is Vivitrol?”

Vivitrol’s maker, Alkermes, was in the midst of a marketing and lobbying campaign to promote the anti-opioid addiction drug — a campaign that would face significant backlash for tarnishing competitors despite little evidence for Vivitrol’s superiority.

FDA in-house re­view spot­lights an is­sue with one of Hori­zon's end­points but notes ef­fi­ca­cy for lead drug

The FDA in-house review highlights a disagreement of investigators’ use of a key endpoint by Horizon Pharma in the late-stage trial for the top drug in its pipeline, but largely agreed that the antibody was effective.

Horizon submitted a BLA for thyroid eye disease (TED) drug teprotumumab in March, less than two years after they bought the drug (and the rest of a division) from Narrow River for $145 million upfront. With breakthrough status, priority review, orphan designation and in-house sales projections of up to $750 million, the one-time Roche reject became the marquee pipeline asset for a company that’s developed some of the world’s most expensive drugs.

Seat­tle Ge­net­ics de­tails pos­i­tive OS and PFS da­ta for tu­ca­tinib in breast can­cer

Seattle Genetics $SGEN is showing off more positive data around tucatinib, its pivotal-stage drug for HER2 positive breast cancer.

A month after hearing about solidly upbeat hazard ratios, we learned today that the estimated progression-free survival rate at one year was 33% in the tucatinib arm compared to 12% for patients taking trastuzumab and capecitabine alone.

Median PFS was 7.8 months (95% CI: 7.5, 9.6) in the tucatinib arm, compared to 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.2, 7.1) in the control arm.