The class of 2017's win­ners and losers: A year of 'non­stop sci­en­tif­ic achieve­ments' rais­es trou­bling is­sues

Endpoints News presents this 7,000 word special report on the 46 new drugs approved in 2017 by CDER. Keep reading and learn how the big players fared in the latest grade card on productivity, and much more. Includes a searchable table of sponsors, indications, and approval pathways, such as Orphan, BTD and PRVs — and chart of FDA novel drug approvals dating back to 1996.


There was a lot to celebrate last year. Champagne corks were popped for dramatic advances in cell and gene therapies. Analysts applauded a lineup of potential blockbusters that won a green light from the FDA. And some patients who once faced death sentences or chronic devastating diseases now live in hope of a new wave of possible cures.

To top it off the FDA stretched hard in the last few weeks of 2017 and managed to accelerate a slate of Q1 PDUFA decisions in order to provide a marketing pass on the biggest batch of new drugs since 1996 — which still holds the one-year record for regulatory nods. After last year’s awful strikeout record and short approval list, who wouldn’t offer up thanks for a bountiful crop?

Feeling good now? OK, but there’s another side to that coin.

While big and small players enjoyed some dramatic wins in 2017, the laggards in the business with a weak rep for innovation continue to raise questions about the fundamental strategy in place for achieving a turnaround after a decade-long decline in Big Pharma’s ROI. These new therapies that are making the regulatory grade come with eye-popping price tags that will leave the entire industry in the glare of a public spotlight that can light up debates in Washington DC. And questions about a growing bubble in oncology R&D are likely to reverberate through the coming year.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

The Fac­tors Dri­ving a Rapid Evo­lu­tion of Gene & Cell Ther­a­py and CAR-T Clin­i­cal Re­search in APAC

APAC is the fastest growing region globally for cell & gene therapy trials representing more than a third of all cell & gene studies globally, with China leading in the region. 

APAC is the leading location globally for CAR-T trials with China attracting ~60% of all CAR-T trials globally between 2015-2022. The number of CAR-T trials initiated by Western companies has rapidly increased in recent years (current CAGR of about 60%), with multiple targets being explored including CD19, CD20, CD22, BCMA, CD30, CD123, CD33, CD38, and CD138.

The End­points 11; blue­bird's $3M gene ther­a­py; Bio­gen tout new neu­ro da­ta; Harsh re­views for can­cer drugs; and more

Welcome back to Endpoints Weekly, your review of the week’s top biopharma headlines. Want this in your inbox every Saturday morning? Current Endpoints readers can visit their reader profile to add Endpoints Weekly. New to Endpoints? Sign up here.

Reading about John Carroll’s pick of biotech’s most promising startups has become a treasured tradition. If you ever get curious about previous classes of the Endpoints 11, you can find all of them (plus a number of our other regular specials) here.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 150,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

EMA warns of short­ages of two Boehringer heart drugs due to a spike in de­mand

The EMA is putting EU member states on alert over the shortage of two drugs that counter heart attacks due to an uptick in demand.

On Friday, the EMA sent out a warning that two Boehringer Ingelheim drugs are experiencing a shortage: Actilyse and Metalyse. The drugs are used as emergency treatments for adults experiencing acute myocardial infarction, or a heart attack, by dissolving blood clots that have formed in the blood vessels.

The End­points 11: The top pri­vate biotechs in pur­suit of new drugs. Push­ing the en­ve­lope with pow­er­ful new tech­nolo­gies

Right around the beginning of the year, we got a close-up look at what happens after a boom ripples through biotech. The crash of life sciences stocks in Q1 was heard around the world.

In the months since, we’ve seen the natural Darwinian down cycle take effect. Reverse mergers made a comeback, with more burned out shells to go public at a time IPOs and road shows are out of favor. And no doubt some of the more recent arrivals on the investing side of the business are finding greener pastures.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar

Should SCO­TUS hear Am­gen's Repatha case? So­lic­i­tor gen­er­al says no

Back in April, Amgen said it was encouraged by the solicitor general’s anticipated review of its Supreme Court petition to rehear a Repatha patent case. They’re likely much less optimistic about the outcome now.

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar wrote in a recent 27-page brief that Amgen’s arguments “lack merit and further review is not warranted.”

The case traces back to a suit filed in 2014 against Sanofi and Regeneron’s Praluent, which ended up beating Amgen’s PCSK9 blockbuster Repatha to market by a month just a year later.

Phil Sharp, Nobel Prize laureate (L), and John Carroll, Endpoints News co-CEO (via Michael Last)

The End­points 11: Fire­side chat with No­bel Prize lau­re­ate Phil Sharp

The following Q&A has been edited for length and clarity.

John Carroll:

We’ve had a chance to talk a little bit before here about some of the things that you’ve done. Just really remarkably, a lot of the things that you’ve done early in your career puts you in the path with some amazing science that has had an absolutely huge impact in terms of what we’re seeing now on drug development and some of the new technologies that are coming out here, and not only the new technologies, but also some of the most remarkable people ever.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Klick Health gath­ers biotech and phar­ma lu­mi­nar­ies to dis­cuss in­dus­try in­no­va­tions, in­vest­ments and fu­ture

At Klick Health’s first Ideas Exchange conference with biotech and pharma industry insiders since before the pandemic began, it was no surprise many conversations included Covid topics. Yet while vaccines and treatments were discussed, so too were the effects on drug development, federal responses, health inequities — and what to do now and next.

George Yancopoulos, chief scientist and cofounder of Regeneron, opened the conference responding to a question from Acorda CEO Ron Cohen about the spotlight on the industry during Covid and some of the “flak” biopharma has taken in the past.

FDA's out­side ex­perts vote in fa­vor of Fer­ring's fe­cal trans­plant for C. dif­fi­cile, set­ting the stage for Seres

FDA’s outside advisors voted in favor of Ferring Pharmaceuticals’ RBX2660, an experimental poop-based drug implant that the company says would be the first microbiota-based live biotherapeutic to receive an FDA green light.

That was a point repeatedly discussed during the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, or VRBPAC, meeting Thursday when evaluating Ferring’s fecal microbiota transplant, or FMT, for reducing the recurrence of Clostridioides difficile infection in adults who have received antibiotics. Multiple members brought up the need for a regulated product amid a landscape of unregulated FMTs already happening in clinical care.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 150,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Jim Wells (UCSF)

An­ti­bod­ies once act­ed on­ly as pro­tein block­ers. Now, sci­en­tists are find­ing new ways to make them pro­tein de­stroy­ers

The first lab-made antibody medicine was approved in 1986 — it bound to an antigen known as CD3 on T cells and was meant to prevent kidney transplant rejection. While antibody technology improved, most antibodies were made as blocking agents, neutering clamps that attacked cells and proteins.

But then scientists got creative with their engineering. They made antibody-drug conjugates, or ADCs for short, which attached toxins or drugs to the antibodies, enabling them to kill cells. Then they made CAR-T therapies, which attached a patient’s T cell to the targeting fragment of an antibody, to destroy cancer cells.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.