The lat­est up­date on NK­TR-214/Op­di­vo from Nek­tar and Bris­tol-My­ers will keep the con­tro­ver­sy burn­ing over the ORR rate

Nek­tar Ther­a­peu­tics $NK­TR man­aged to slide 1 out of its 38 evalu­able stage 4 melanoma pa­tients in­to the win col­umn with its close­ly-watched 3-month up­date on Op­di­vo/NK­TR-214’s ob­jec­tive re­sponse rate. That man­aged to nudge up the ORR from 50% — a fig­ure that rout­ed Nek­tar’s stock at AS­CO — to 53%, which isn’t like­ly to con­vince any of the crit­ics that the biotech and its part­ners at Bris­tol-My­ers Squibb have come up with the kind of com­bo that can change the stan­dard of care in the field.

But if you ex­pect any­one di­rect­ly in­volved in this study to step back from the en­thu­si­as­tic pro­jec­tions that were made on the first op­ti­mistic da­ta points, you’d be flat wrong.

Adi Diab

While the cru­cial ORR bare­ly budged, Adi Diab from MD An­der­son point­ed straight to a high­er com­plete re­sponse rate, at 24% — “which is not seen with an­oth­er com­bi­na­tion.” He’s al­so of­fer­ing a thumbs up to a 76% dis­ease con­trol rate — up from 71% at AS­CO — as ev­i­dence that they’re on to some­thing spe­cial.

Sev­er­al an­a­lysts — in­clud­ing some in the Ever­cor­eISI team — had been look­ing for some­thing in the 60%-plus range for the ORR to win back the en­thu­si­asm that has drained away for NK­TR-214, a drug that a needy Bris­tol-My­ers Squibb paid $1.85 bil­lion up­front to part­ner on ear­li­er in the year. The drug is de­signed to bind to the CD122 re­cep­tor on the sur­face of CD-8 and CD-4 pos­i­tive im­mune cells to whip up an at­tack on var­i­ous can­cers.

And Diab says they can see ex­act­ly that re­sponse in pa­tients with pos­i­tive bio­mark­er re­sults for the tu­mor mi­croen­vi­ron­ment.

As it stands, the re­searchers have a drug that ap­pears to have clear­ly waned in the more ma­ture 7.2-month me­di­an fol­lowup time for PIV­OT-02, drop­ping from 64% at the first cut of the da­ta at SITC last year. And just days ago Bris­tol-My­ers out­lined im­pres­sive 4-year over­all sur­vival re­sults from Check­Mate-067: 53% for Op­di­vo plus Yer­voy com­bo, 46% for Op­di­vo alone, and 30% for Yer­voy alone.

Diab, though, be­lieves that with bet­ter ex­pe­ri­ence us­ing the drug, and bet­ter ed­u­ca­tion for physi­cians and pa­tients, the re­sponse rate can climb back up to 60%-plus. As for Yer­voy, he adds, the CT­LA-4 has a well known tox pro­file that leads to a high rate of ad­verse events that of­ten pre­vent pa­tients from com­plet­ing treat­ment.

“We should not do com­par­isons with oth­er tri­als, it’s not kosher,” Diab tells me at one point in our con­ver­sa­tion. “But of course we’re go­ing to do it.”

There’s been some in­tense con­tro­ver­sy over their chances with this IL-2 drug, which us­es pe­gy­la­tion tech to elim­i­nate the draw­backs of the orig­i­nal ther­a­py – Pro­leukin — that made it too tox­ic to use at full mea­sure, in turn lim­it­ing its ef­fi­ca­cy.

One like­ly take­down of the Nek­tar de­fense should come soon from Aaron Wed­lund, the ex-Ker­ris­dale an­a­lyst who wrote a lengthy di­a­tribe on NK­TR-214, which he con­sid­ers will make IL-2 the next IDO, an­oth­er drug class once wide­ly hailed as the next big thing in can­cer drug com­bos now bad­ly tar­nished fol­low­ing a cat­a­stroph­ic Phase III com­bo fail­ure with Keytru­da.

Bris­tol-My­ers en­thu­si­as­ti­cal­ly bought in­to the next-gen IL-2 drug ap­proach as it’s been un­suc­cess­ful­ly de­fend­ing its PD-1/L1 crown against a hard-charg­ing Mer­ck, which has pushed Keytru­da and chemo com­bos in­to the fore­front of the lung can­cer mar­ket. IL-2, they said, would be the next log­i­cal step to PD-1 and CT­LA-4, with Yer­voy.

Any­thing that puts this drug back in the Pro­leukin cat­e­go­ry, with more IL-2 suc­ces­sors in the pipeline, won’t be wel­come by the de­vel­op­ers.

It’s im­por­tant to keep in mind that a bunch of short in­vestors had fun — and made mon­ey — pulling Nek­tar’s stock down from some stun­ning highs that it had en­joyed. Rais­ing doubts is good for spurring cor­rec­tions, and Nek­tar’s stock has tum­bled bad­ly. The ju­ry will re­main out, though, un­til the Phase III pro­gres­sion-free sur­vival da­ta comes due around the spring of 2020.

Un­til then, and maybe even af­ter, this de­bate will con­tin­ue to rage.

Secretary of health and human services Alex Azar speaking in the Rose Garden at the White House (Photo: AFP)

Trump’s HHS claims ab­solute au­thor­i­ty over the FDA, clear­ing path to a vac­cine EUA

The top career staff at the FDA has vowed not to let politics overrule science when looking at vaccine data this fall. But Alex Azar, who happens to be their boss’s boss, apparently won’t even give them a chance to stand in the way.

In a new memorandum issued Tuesday last week, the HHS chief stripped the FDA and other health agencies under his purview of their rule making ability, asserting all such power “is reserved to the Secretary.” Sheila Kaplan of the New York Times first obtained and reported the details of the September 15 bulletin.

#ES­MO20: Push­ing in­to front­line, Mer­ck and Bris­tol My­ers duke it out with new slate of GI can­cer da­ta

Having worked in parallel for years to move their respective PD-1 inhibitors up to the first-line treatment of gastrointestinal cancers, Merck and Bristol Myers Squibb finally have the data at ESMO for a showdown.

Comparing KEYNOTE-590 and CheckMate-649, of course, comes with the usual caveats. But a side-by-side look at the overall survival numbers also offer some perspective on a new frontier for the reigning checkpoint rivals, both of whom are claiming to have achieved a first.

President Donald Trump (via AP Images)

Signs of an 'Oc­to­ber Vac­cine Sur­prise' alarm ca­reer sci­en­tists

President Donald Trump, who seems intent on announcing a COVID-19 vaccine before Election Day, could legally authorize a vaccine over the objections of experts, officials at the FDA and even vaccine manufacturers, who have pledged not to release any vaccine unless it’s proved safe and effective.

In podcasts, public forums, social media and medical journals, a growing number of prominent health leaders say they fear that Trump — who has repeatedly signaled his desire for the swift approval of a vaccine and his displeasure with perceived delays at the FDA — will take matters into his own hands, running roughshod over the usual regulatory process.

#ES­MO20: Bris­tol My­ers marks Op­di­vo's sec­ond ad­ju­vant win — eye­ing a stan­dard of care gap

Moving into earlier and earlier treatment lines, Bristol Myers Squibb is reporting that adjuvant treatment with Opdivo has doubled the time that esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer patients stay free of disease.

With the CheckMate-577 data at ESMO, CMO Samit Hirawat said, the company believes it can change the treatment paradigm.

While a quarter to 30% of patients typically achieve a complete response following chemoradiation therapy and surgery, the rest do not, said Ronan Kelly of Baylor University Medical Center. The recurrence rate is also high within the first year, Hirawat added.

Clay Siegall (Life Science Washington via YouTube)

#ES­MO20: Seat­tle Ge­net­ics eyes 4th ap­proval with new da­ta in a crowd­ed field

Does Seattle Genetics have another approval on its hands?

The last 12 months, not so great for the world, has been great for Seattle Genetics. The company landed two separate FDA approvals, signed a $4.5 billion deal with Merck and watched antibody-drug conjugates — the technology they spent years developing to broad industry skepticism — emerge suddenly as one of the most popular approaches in oncology. And on Monday at ESMO, the company and their partners at Genmab unveiled the data behind the ADC it hopes will provide its next major FDA approval.

Jonathan Rigby, Immune Regulation group CEO

Im­mune Reg­u­la­tion, tak­ing two clin­i­cal pro­grams to 're­set' the im­mune sys­tem, nets $53M+ Se­ries B

A little under two years after a company rebranding, Immune Regulation is taking an even bigger step toward advancing its goals.

Formerly known as Peptinnovate, the British biotech announced a $53.4 million Series B early Monday morning, helping to further advance two clinical programs in rheumatoid arthritis and asthma. Though those are the two initial indications the company is focusing on, CEO Jonathan Rigby told Endpoints News he hopes the candidates can be applied to a broad swath of autoimmune disorders.

Israel Lowy (Regeneron)

#ES­MO20: 'As good as any PD-1 out there': Re­gen­eron flash­es PD-(L)1 lung can­cer da­ta to ri­val Mer­ck

Regeneron entered the PD-(L)1 game late, so they devised a two-pronged strategy to catch up with Big Pharma rivals: They would push it into cancers where PD-1s had yet been tested, and they would prove that it’s as powerful in the big indications as any other on the market.

They cleared a hurdle on the first goal Friday, showing a 31% response in patients with the rare skin cancer basal cell carcinoma. And with the data they’re rolling out Monday, Regeneron cancer chief Israel Lowy is ready to declare success on the second.

Eli Lilly CSO Dan Skovronsky (file photo)

UP­DAT­ED: #ES­MO20: Eli Lil­ly shows off the da­ta for its Verzenio suc­cess. Was it worth $18 bil­lion?

The press release alone, devoid of any number except for the size of the trial, added nearly $20 billion to Eli Lilly’s market cap back in June. Now investors and oncologists will get to see if the data live up to the hype.

On Sunday at ESMO, Eli Lilly announced the full results for its Phase III MonarchE trial of Verzenio, showing that across over 5,000 women who had had HR+, HER2- breast cancer, the drug reduced the odds of recurrence by 25%. That meant 7.8% of the patients on the drug arm saw their cancers return within 2 years, compared with 11.3% on the placebo arm.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 90,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Greg Friberg (File photo)

#ES­MO20: Am­gen team nails down sol­id ear­ly ev­i­dence of AMG 510’s po­ten­tial for NSCLC, un­lock­ing the door to a wave of KRAS pro­grams

The first time I sat down with Amgen’s Greg Friberg to talk about the pharma giant’s KRAS G12C program for sotorasib (AMG 510) at ASCO a little more than a year ago, there was high excitement about the first glimpse of efficacy from their Phase I study, with 5 of 10 evaluable non-small cell lung cancer patients demonstrating a response to the drug.

After decades of failure targeting KRAS, sotorasib offered the first positive look at a new approach that promised to open a door to a whole new approach by targeting a particular mutation to a big target that had remained “undruggable” for decades.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 90,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.