The top win­ners and losers on AS­CO ab­stract night: Loxo, Blue­print, Jounce, Mer­ck KGaA and more

Let the joust­ing be­gin.

The big ab­stract drop ahead of AS­CO — the an­nu­al Olympics of can­cer R&D — pro­vid­ed some ear­ly, quick snap­shots that helped dri­ve stocks up or down, or sim­ply pro­vid­ed a chance to tout some po­ten­tial in a hot­ly con­test­ed field.

As more and more bio­phar­ma mon­ey has been in­vest­ed in the on­col­o­gy field in re­cent years, AS­CO has been at­tract­ing a big­ger range of en­trants, and ab­stract night will help de­ter­mine who comes out on top dur­ing the melee ahead. I’ve picked out a few of the most no­tice­able ab­stracts, which you can see be­low.

Loxo takes an­oth­er round in its bruis­ing, toe-to-toe fight with Blue­print

Josh Bilenker

Loxo On­col­o­gy $LOXO was the big win­ner Wednes­day night as in­vestors be­gan to pick through a pile of AS­CO ab­stracts to see what gems could be culled from the num­bers.

The biotech’s stock soared 18% overnight as in­vestors spot­light­ed a 69% over­all re­sponse rate among 32 evalu­able RET-fu­sion pos­i­tive pa­tients tak­ing LOXO-292. Loxo’s claim to fame is that it de­vel­ops can­cer drugs that tar­get small, ge­net­i­cal­ly de­fined pa­tient groups with an ag­nos­tic ap­proach to tu­mor types. Reg­u­la­tors at the FDA have been en­thu­si­as­tic about this emerg­ing field, which bodes well for Loxo. And they backed that en­thu­si­asm up with da­ta demon­strat­ing a 65% re­sponse rate in NSCLC and 83% for pap­il­lary thy­roid can­cer. 84% (27/32) of the pa­tients had ra­di­ograph­ic tu­mor re­duc­tion rang­ing from 19% to 67%.

That’s good, but it may well get bet­ter. Loxo CEO Josh Bilenker has flagged that since the Jan­u­ary cut­off date for the ab­stract the da­ta are even bet­ter now, which we’ll see at AS­CO. Loxo helped stoke the en­thu­si­asm with a note high­light­ing that LOXO-292 has been se­lect­ed for best of show at AS­CO, which will keep the com­pa­ny in the spot­light.

Can­cer R&D, though, is the ul­ti­mate blood sport in biotech. And when some­thing goes up, it’s of­ten at the ex­pense of a ri­val. In this case, that’s Blue­print Med­i­cines — again — which has al­ready felt the sting of a neg­a­tive com­par­i­son with Loxo.

Blue­print Med­i­cines $BPMC has been ad­vanc­ing BLU-667, which has been at­tract­ing warm re­views by an­a­lysts — un­less they start com­par­ing it to the ri­val. That side-by-side com­par­i­son knocked their stock back at AACR, and it did it again last night as the num­bers once again fa­vored Loxo. Shares are down about 8% in pre-mar­ket trad­ing Thurs­day.

No­var­tis vs Gilead/Kite: Is Kym­ri­ah bet­ter and safer than Yescar­ta?

Few ri­val­ries have been as in­tense as the show­down be­tween these two pi­o­neers in the CAR-T field. No­var­tis’ Kym­ri­ah $NVS still has to over­come a nag­ging is­sue with one-time man­u­fac­tur­ing is­sues, but Gilead’s Yescar­ta $GILD is now be­ing com­pared with its ri­val, and at first blush may have some ex­plain­ing to do. 

A group in Bei­jing ran a small com­par­i­son study of the two types of CAR-Ts — which use the 4-1BB and CD28 co-stim­u­la­to­ry sig­nal­ing do­mains — for CD19-pos­i­tive B-cell acute lym­phoblas­tic leukemia and found that the Kym­ri­ah/4-1BB ap­proach ap­pears to have a dis­tinct set of ad­van­tages. 

In that 4-1BB arm there was a 100% over­all ob­jec­tive re­sponse rate, com­pared to 89% in the CD28 arm. In ad­di­tion, and more im­por­tant­ly, all 5 of the pa­tients suf­fer­ing from se­ri­ous Grade 3 or 4 cy­tokine re­lease syn­drome were in the CD28/Yescar­ta group. This ar­gu­ment has a long way to run, and Gilead won’t con­cede an inch of the race. But the com­par­isons have just be­gun.

On Mon­day, Gilead con­tact­ed us to of­fer this state­ment:

It is im­por­tant to note that Yescar­ta was not eval­u­at­ed in this study. The ab­stract dis­cuss­es da­ta from a study eval­u­at­ing oth­er CAR T prod­ucts us­ing 4-1BB and CD28 co-stim­u­la­to­ry sig­nal­ing do­mains, re­spec­tive­ly. Im­por­tant­ly, Yescar­ta is en­gi­neered us­ing Kite’s man­u­fac­tur­ing process. The CD28 CAR T eval­u­at­ed in this tri­al was not man­u­fac­tured by Kite and there have been no head-to-head stud­ies of Yescar­ta com­pared to ti­s­agen­le­cleu­cel.

Ever­core ISI an­a­lyst Umer Raf­fat this morn­ing called the re­sults of this study provoca­tive, but wants to see the de­tails. So do I.

Jounce shares plunge on the lat­est da­ta cut for JTX-2011

Eliz­a­beth Tre­hu

The biggest los­er overnight was Jounce Ther­a­peu­tics $JNCE, which took a nasty hit af­ter post­ing their up­date on their lead ther­a­py — JTX-2011. As a monother­a­py, 1 out of 7 pa­tients with gas­tric can­cer re­spond­ed, com­pared to 2 out of 19 who got the com­bo with Op­di­vo — an 11% re­sponse rate. The rate wasn’t much bet­ter in triple-neg­a­tive breast can­cer. 

In a re­lease, re­searchers hit the theme that these were heav­i­ly pre­treat­ed pa­tients, but on­look­ers were in a can­tan­ker­ous mood and didn’t like the un­der­whelm­ing num­bers. Shares plunged 26% and Wells Far­go down­grad­ed the stock.

Cel­gene struck a ma­jor deal to col­lab­o­rate with Jounce on this drug, and that wasn’t ig­nored this morn­ing.

“The pre­lim­i­nary da­ta from pa­tients across mul­ti­ple sol­id tu­mor types en­rolled in the ICON­IC tri­al show that JTX-2011 is well-tol­er­at­ed alone and in com­bi­na­tion with nivolum­ab and has demon­strat­ed ev­i­dence of bi­o­log­ic ac­tiv­i­ty and tu­mor re­duc­tions in heav­i­ly pre-treat­ed pa­tients who have failed all avail­able ther­a­pies. In ad­di­tion, a po­ten­tial sur­ro­gate bio­mark­er of re­sponse has been iden­ti­fied that may help to guide JTX-2011 de­vel­op­ment,” said Eliz­a­beth Tre­hu, chief med­ical of­fi­cer of Jounce Ther­a­peu­tics.

Nek­tar sees a big ero­sion in re­sponse rates for close­ly-watched I/O star NK­TR-214

Nek­tar $NK­TR scored one of the biggest deals in bio­phar­ma so far this year when Bris­tol-My­ers came in with a $3.6 bil­lion deal to part­ner on NK­TR-214. That part­ner­ship was an­nounced in the wake of the first glimpse of how ef­fec­tive a pair­ing of their drug could be with Op­di­vo, with 63% of a small group of ad­vanced melanoma pa­tients re­spond­ing to first-line ther­a­py. But in Nek­tar’s up­date this week re­searchers note that the re­sponse rate in the bas­ket study showed a re­duced melanoma im­pact, with a 52% re­sponse rate.

Re­nal cell car­ci­no­ma al­so dropped, falling to 54%, down from 71% re­port­ed in the com­pa­ny’s Q4 call in ear­ly March.

That’s by no means the kiss of death. Re­sponse rates tend to de­cline over time. But an­a­lysts will be watch­ing these num­bers close­ly to see just how far they drop for a drug that is now front and cen­ter in the late-stage on­col­o­gy pipeline. The stock is down 3% in pre-mar­ket trad­ing, with the ju­ry still out on this promis­ing ther­a­py.

Mer­ck KGaA plans to shine a light on its can­cer pipeline at AS­CO — with Pfiz­er jump­ing in

Mer­ck KGaA will be back at AS­CO look­ing to earn some re­spect for its can­cer drug pipeline. So far the bulk of the at­ten­tion has gone to Baven­cio, its PD-L1 check­point in­hibitor part­nered with Pfiz­er, which is fight­ing an up­hill bat­tle to gain mar­ket share against the lead­ers in the field. But the Ger­man Mer­ck has a pipeline in on­col­o­gy, and they will do their best to high­light their chances on a range of ther­a­pies in Chica­go.

Its c-Met re­cep­tor ty­ro­sine ki­nase in­hibitor tepo­tinib has earned some ku­dos from Bern­stein. And re­searchers post­ed da­ta on 15 pa­tients with ad­vanced non-small cell lung can­cer har­bor­ing MET ex­on 14 skip­ping mu­ta­tions, with 60% demon­strat­ing a con­firmed par­tial re­sponse. An­a­lysts be­lieve this drug could hit $650 mil­lion in sales by 2030 — not a block­buster but a sol­id suc­cess, which the com­pa­ny bad­ly needs af­ter a long drought in clin­i­cal de­vel­op­ment suc­cess­es.

On the com­bo front, where all the PD-1/PD-L1 play­ers are fo­cus­ing on in a va­ri­ety of ways, Mer­ck KGaA tout­ed their M7824, a TGF-ß trap/an­ti-PD-L1 bi-func­tion­al im­munother­a­py fu­sion pro­tein. High PD-L1 ex­press­ing pa­tients ex­hib­it­ed an ORR of 71.4%.

The next big step on Baven­cio lies in com­bo ther­a­pies, and there Mer­ck KGaA says it gained some ear­ly-stage ev­i­dence to back up a com­bi­na­tion of the check­point with lor­la­tinib in non-small cell lung can­cer — a key com­pet­i­tive front for these play­ers. And their com­bo came out way ahead in the JAVELIN Lung 101 study, which com­pared their check­point with Xalko­ri (crizo­tinib) and the lor­la­tinib match-up. Lor­la­tinib — a drug Pfiz­er has high hopes for — came out way ahead. From the ab­stract:

The con­firmed ob­jec­tive re­sponse rate with A+C in ALK− pts was 16.7% (95% CI, 2.1-48.4; par­tial re­sponse [PR] in 2 pts), and with A+L in ALK+ pts was 46.4% (95% CI, 27.5-66.1; PR in 12 pts; com­plete re­sponse in 1 pt).


Im­age: Poster ses­sion at AS­CO 2017. AS­CO

Nick Galakatos, Blackstone global head of life sciences

Nick Galakatos and the Black­stone team now have a record $4.6B to in­vest in bio­phar­ma, with a big fo­cus on push­ing com­pa­nies over the top

Nick Galakatos and his team at Blackstone Life Sciences have seen their biggest opportunities swell up in mostly established players who don’t have all the money they need to accomplish everything on the to-do list. And right now, with the industry booming, that’s a long list with some hefty needs.

The Blackstone team has neatly tied up the largest private fund ever raised in life sciences for making big dreams come true in biopharma. Late Thursday, Blackstone put out word that they had closed their highly anticipated fund with the projected $4.6 billion all in.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 85,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: Bio­gen shares spike as ex­ecs com­plete a de­layed pitch for their con­tro­ver­sial Alzheimer's drug — the next move be­longs to the FDA

Biogen is stepping out onto the high wire today, reporting that the team working on the controversial Alzheimer’s drug aducanumab has now completed their submission to the FDA. And they want the agency to bless it with a priority review that would cut the agency’s decision-making time to a mere 6 months.

The news drove a 10% spike in Biogen’s stock $BIIB ahead of the bell.

Part of that spike can be attributed to a relief rally. Biogen execs rattled backers and a host of analysts earlier in the year when they unexpectedly delayed their filing to the third quarter. That delay provoked all manner of speculation after CEO Michel Vounatsos and R&D chief Al Sandrock failed to persuade influential observers that the pandemic and other factors had slowed the timeline for filing. Actually making the pitch at least satisfies skeptics that the FDA was not likely pushing back as Biogen was pushing in. From the start, Biogen execs claimed that they were doing everything in cooperation with the FDA, saying that regulators had signaled their interest in reviewing the submission.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 85,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Gilead boasts of pos­i­tive remde­sivir da­ta on mor­tal­i­ty — but their analy­sis pro­vokes the skep­tics

Gilead is surging again off data that suggest its antiviral remdesivir might improve survival.

The new data come from an analysis Gilead conducted comparing the death rate and recovery time of patients in one of its remdesivir trials to a group of 800 patients “with similar baseline characteristics and disease severity” who received only standard-of-care around the same time. The result, they said, suggested that patients who received remdesivir had a 62% better chance at surviving than those who did not.

Regeneron CEO Leonard Schleifer speaks at a meeting with President Donald Trump, members of the Coronavirus Task Force, and pharmaceutical executives in the Cabinet Room of the White House (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

OWS shifts spot­light to drugs to fight Covid-19, hand­ing Re­gen­eron $450M to be­gin large scale man­u­fac­tur­ing in the US

The US government is on a spending spree. And after committing billions to vaccines defense operations are now doling out more of the big bucks through Operation Warp Speed to back a rapid flip of a drug into the market to stop Covid-19 from ravaging patients — possibly inside of 2 months.

The beneficiary this morning is Regeneron, the big biotech engaged in a frenzied race to develop an antibody cocktail called REGN-COV2 that just started a late-stage program to prove its worth in fighting the virus. BARDA and the Department of Defense are awarding Regeneron a $450 million contract to cover bulk delivery of the cocktail starting as early as late summer, with money added for fill/finish and storage activities.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 85,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Hal Barron, GSK

Win or lose on the mar­ket­ing OK, the FDA just gunned down GSK’s bright hopes for their BC­MA ther­a­py

The FDA’s ODAC — the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee — has a well-known bias in favor of adding new cancer drugs to the market, even if efficacy is at best marginal and serious safety issues demand careful management.

Doctors want as many arrows in their quiver as they can get. And when patients are dying after failing multiple drugs, why not give it a go one more time?

GlaxoSmithKline, though, is about to test out how their new BCMA antibody drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin can do after being mauled in an in-house FDA review, ahead of the Tuesday expert panel discussion. Even if the agency goes ahead with an expected green light, this drug will likely be constrained to a small niche — icing any plans they may have for making waves in oncology anytime soon.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Covid-19 roundup: BioN­Tech go­ing head-to-head with Mod­er­na as PhI­II mR­NA launch looms; Tri­al on Shin­zo Abe’s once-fa­vorite an­tivi­ral is in­con­clu­sive

It’s a race to the Phase III finish line now for the 2 leading mRNA vaccines in the pipeline for Covid-19.

BioNTech chief Ugur Sahin told the Wall Street Journal that his company will start Phase III testing of their vaccine later this month, setting them up to lateral the data to regulators before the end of this year.

That puts them essentially on the exact same schedule as Moderna is dedicated to. The Massachusetts rival to BioNTech also expects to launch Phase III this month. Lots of rumors have circulated about delays and conflict among the scientists advancing the Moderna jab, but the biotech has consistently stuck to its plan to start a late-stage pivotal this month.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 85,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Andrew Kruegel, Kures president and co-founder (Columbia Tech Ventures via Vimeo)

Af­ter psilo­cy­bin and ke­t­a­mine, a new biotech comes along de­vel­op­ing a drug Scott Got­tlieb fought

Andrew Kruegel was six years into his chemistry work at Columbia University, when, one day in August 2016, he learned he might have only 30 days before the government made him destroy his research.

Kruegel had been studying kratom, a leaf long used in Southeast Asia as a stimulant or for pain. It had opioid-like properties, he found, but seemed to offer pain relief without the addictive potential or respiratory side effects of traditional opioids — a riddle that might help illuminate how human opioid receptors work.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 85,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

The home run count: The $100M+ mega-round boom in biotech in­spired a $7.3B feed­ing fren­zy — so far this year

Over the last 6 months there’s been a blizzard of money piling up drifts of the green stuff through the biotech landscape. And the forecast calls for more cash windfalls ahead.

Even as a global pandemic has killed more than half a million people, blighted economies and divided nations over the proper response, it’s also helped ignite an unprecedented burst of big-time investing. And not just in Covid-19 deals, as we’ve looked at before.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Atul Deshpande, Harbour BioMed chief strategy officer & head, US operations (Harbour BioMed)

An­oth­er biotech IPO set-up? Multi­na­tion­al biotech leaps from round to round, scoop­ing up cash at a blis­ter­ing pace

A short four months after announcing a $75 million haul in Series B+ fundraising, the multinational biotech Harbour BioMed pulled in another round of investments and eclipsed the nine-digit mark in the process.

Harbour completed its Series C financing, the company announced Thursday morning, raising $102.8 million and bringing its total investment sum to over $300 million since its founding in late 2016. The biotech plans to use the money to transition early-stage candidates from the discovery phase, fund candidates already in the clinic, and prep late-stage candidates for commercialization.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 85,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.