This is it? GSK rolls out a buzzy new R&D plan long on as­pi­ra­tions and short on per­for­mance goals

Glax­o­SmithK­line set out to kick­start some en­thu­si­asm for its pipeline this morn­ing. But CEO Em­ma Walm­s­ley and her new R&D chief Hal Bar­ron clear­ly have a lot more work cut out for them on that crit­i­cal point.

Its quar­ter­ly re­port high­lights a strat­e­gy in R&D that will be heav­i­ly fo­cused on the im­mune sys­tem and hu­man ge­net­ics — two well es­tab­lished fields that long ago at­tract­ed the at­ten­tion of just about every­one work­ing in drug de­vel­op­ment these days. And they signed up 23andMe — pay­ing $300 mil­lion to buy in and gain ex­clu­sive ac­cess to its da­ta base — to help ex­plore dis­ease rel­e­vant genes, herald­ing a “ma­jor ad­vance” while adding to a slate of al­liances on ge­net­ics the Lon­don-based gi­ant has al­ready com­plet­ed.

The phar­ma gi­ant says it will fo­cus more on CRISPR tech, with an em­pha­sis on ma­chine learn­ing and com­pu­ta­tion­al de­sign — a cou­ple of buzzy fea­tures that have al­so been mak­ing the rounds late­ly.

There’s a com­ment on cul­ture:

GSK al­so in­tends to pro­mote a cul­ture of in­creased ac­count­abil­i­ty and smart risk-tak­ing. This will in­clude re­defin­ing suc­cess and fos­ter­ing a cul­ture of truth-seek­ing ver­sus pro­gres­sion- seek­ing, and op­ti­mised port­fo­lio de­ci­sion-mak­ing, along­side im­ple­men­ta­tion of a new ro­bust gov­er­nance mod­el. Tar­get­ed busi­ness de­vel­op­ment to strength­en the Group’s pipeline and tech­nol­o­gy ca­pa­bil­i­ties will al­so be part of the new R&D ap­proach. 

And then there’s the po­ten­tial. Look­ing to make a come­back in phar­ma R&D, GSK tout­ed a BC­MA ther­a­py in de­vel­op­ment — hard­ly the first. HIV al­so war­rants a men­tion, though that will be cen­tered in its ma­jor­i­ty-owned sub­sidiary Vi­iV,  which has been mak­ing sig­nif­i­cant ad­vances along­side the vac­cines group.

With lit­tle in the way of specifics to of­fer from the phar­ma side in the near term, GSK is vague­ly promis­ing big things be­yond 2020.

In a con­fer­ence call with re­porters to­day — at least the ones that weren’t al­lowed a pre­view — Bar­ron and 23andMe chief Anne Wo­j­ci­c­ki hit the dis­cov­ery an­gle hard, high­light­ing what they see as an op­por­tu­ni­ty to find gene vari­ants for Parkin­son’s and can­cer and oth­er dis­eases that would make good new pro­grams.

I asked Bar­ron for his as­sess­ment of the R&D op­er­a­tion he had tak­en on. He em­pha­sized the pos­i­tive, but al­so ac­knowl­edged the weak­ness­es.

“I think it’s im­por­tant to look back at what GSK has done well,” he replied. There have been a num­ber of new ap­provals, he said, but with­out the kind of com­mer­cial im­pact that can gen­er­ate the num­bers the com­pa­ny needs. This new al­liance with 23andMe, he said, of­fered the chance to get at that — with new tar­gets that could be suit­able for mul­ti­ple ap­provals and bet­ter life cy­cle man­age­ment of im­por­tant new drugs.

I tried to fol­low up with a ques­tion on whether GSK had a dis­cov­ery or late-stage drug prob­lem, but got cut off on the call.

GSK brought in the leg­endary Genen­tech vet to turn around what is per­haps the slow­est, most woe­ful Big Phar­ma R&D group in the world. A ge­net­ics data­base deal with 23andMe will of­fer no short-term help, of­fer­ing a leg up for dis­cov­ery work that will be years in the mak­ing. And Bar­ron will try to or­ches­trate the turn­around from his base in the Bay Area, far from GSK’s cen­tral re­search op­er­a­tions around Philadel­phia and Steve­nage in the UK.

De­spite a bud­get of $6 bil­lion, Glax­o­SmithK­line has had lit­tle in the late-stage pipeline to boast about — and the late-stage pipeline is what is used to judge a com­pa­ny’s po­ten­tial in turn­ing out block­busters.

GSK’s phar­ma R&D group doesn’t make block­busters, though. Or hasn’t in years. And adopt­ing a strat­e­gy that any busi­ness school grad­u­ate could have whipped up one af­ter­noon won’t gin up miss­ing ex­cite­ment in the in­vest­ment com­mu­ni­ty.


Im­age: Hal Bar­ron. GSK

Take­da swoops in to buy lit­tle biotech part­ner and its celi­ac drug poised to 'change stan­dard of care'

Having spent three years carefully grooming PvP Biologics and its drug for celiac disease, Takeda is happy enough with the proof-of-concept data to buy it all.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 73,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Grow­ing ac­cep­tance of ac­cel­er­at­ed path­ways for nov­el treat­ments: but does reg­u­la­to­ry ap­proval lead to com­mer­cial suc­cess?

By Mwango Kashoki, MD, MPH, Vice President-Technical, and Richard Macaulay, Senior Director, of Parexel Regulatory & Access

In recent years, we’ve seen a significant uptake in the use of regulatory options by companies looking to accelerate the journey of life-saving drugs to market. In 2018, 73% of the novel drugs approved by the U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA) were designated under one or more expedited development program categories (Fast Track, Breakthrough Therapy, Priority Review, and Accelerated Approval).ᶦ

Mi­cro­bio­me Q&A: New study maps the vagi­na's 'op­ti­mal mi­cro­bio­ta' — and its im­pli­ca­tions for bio­phar­ma

The widely-held notion that the “optimal” vaginal microbiota is dominated by one strain of lactic-acid producing bacteria has now been challenged in a new paper, published in Nature Communications on Wednesday, which used advanced gene sequencing methods to map out the most comprehensive gene catalog of the human vaginal microbiome.

Things have changed in the more than 50 years since the concept of vaginal microbiota transplants was proposed and subsequently tainted by a Texas-based gynecologist who transplanted the vaginal fluid of women who had bacterial vaginosis into healthy females, suspecting he had isolated the bacteria responsible for the condition.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 73,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Fol­low­ing US, Chi­na hos­pi­tal ef­forts, Gilead plots its own PhI­II tri­als for close­ly watched Covid-19 drug

Gilead is launching its own Phase III trials of remdesivir, the repurposed antiviral that a WHO official called the “one drug right now we think may have real efficacy” against Covid-19 as the novel coronavirus originating from Wuhan, China ravages the world.

Announced just a day after the NIH and the University of Nebraska Medical Center registered their US-based trial online, Gilead’s program will comprise two studies enrolling around 1,000 patients beginning in March. They will recruit primarily in Asian countries but will also include patients from other locations with “high numbers of diagnosed cases,” the company said.

Bio­gen touts new ev­i­dence from the gene ther­a­py com­pa­ny it wa­gered $800M on

A year ago, Biogen made a big bet on a small gene therapy company. Now they have new evidence one of their therapies could work.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 73,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Anthony Fauci (AP Images)

UP­DAT­ED: NIH-part­nered Mod­er­na ships off its PhI-ready coro­n­avirus vac­cine can­di­date to a sea of un­cer­tain­ty

Off it goes.

Moderna has shipped the first batch of its mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 from its manufacturing facility in Norwood, Massachusetts, to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in Bethesda, Maryland, for a pioneering Phase I study.

It’s a hectic race against time. In the 42 days since Moderna selected the sequence they would use to develop their vaccine — a record time, no less — the number of confirmed cases around the world has surged astronomically from a few dozen to over 80,000, per WHO and Johns Hopkins estimates.

The candidate that they came up with, mRNA-1273, encodes for a prefusion stabilized form of the spike protein, which gives the virus its crown shape and plays a key role in transmission. The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, the Oslo-based group better known as CEPI, funded the manufacture of this batch.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 73,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

In at least one life-sci hub, gen­der and di­ver­si­ty ini­tia­tives haven’t made a dent

Gender and racial diversity at the top of UK life science companies has hardly budged over the last seven years despite repeated advocacy efforts, according to a new report.

The report, from the recruiting firm Liftstream, found that 14.8% of directors on life sciences boards were women and 21.1% of top executives were women. That’s a modest bump from the 9.8% of directors and 18.1% of executives Liftstream identified in their last report from 2014. The percentage of women CEOs moved from 8% to 9.8%.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 73,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Will a 'risk-of­f' mind­set has­ten cell ther­a­py M&A? Io­vance surges on buy­out chat­ter

Is it time for some cell therapy M&A?

Investors of Iovance Biotherapeutics certainly thought so, sending its stock $IOVA up as much as 40% after Bloomberg reported that the cancer-focused biotech is talking to potential buyers.

While 2019 saw a number of high-profile gene therapy company takeovers — led by Roche’s $4.3 billion bid of Spark as Astellas went for Audentes, Biogen snapped up Nightstar and Vertex absorbed Exonics — large players appeared to prefer partnering on the cell therapy front, particularly when it comes to cancer. Hal Barron put his weight behind Rick Klausner’s startup as he rebuilt GlaxoSmithKline’s cancer pipeline. Takeda turned to MD Anderson to license their natural killer cell therapy.

One less ri­val for Im­muno­vant, as Alex­ion aban­dons FcRn in­hibitor

Less than one year after Alexion parted with $25 million upfront to secure access to a second anti-FcRn asset, it is abandoning the experimental drug. The discontinuation, disclosed at the SVB Leerink Global Healthcare Conference in New York during a fireside chat, bodes well for rival Immunovant.

The drug (ABY-039), partnered for development with Sweden’s Affibody, was forsaken on the basis of early-stage data that was not viewed favorably, Baird and SVB Leerink analysts noted.