Top Cel­gene ex­ec pins the blame for ozan­i­mod fi­as­co on the Re­cep­tos team — ac­quired 3 years ago

Cel­gene’s top ex­ecs have been reel­ing for months, stag­gered by the FDA’s de­ci­sion to kick back their ap­pli­ca­tion on ozan­i­mod, the big drug in the late-stage pipeline that is bad­ly need­ed as the com­pa­ny looks to build new rev­enue and lessen its de­pen­dence on Revlim­id price hikes. And now one of the lead­ers in­volved in the em­bar­rass­ing refuse-to-file set­back with ozan­i­mod isn’t just agree­ing that their ap­pli­ca­tion was in­ad­e­quate, he’s point­ing fin­gers di­rect­ly at the team they brought in when they ac­quired the drug with their $7.2 bil­lion Re­cep­tos buy­out.

Nadim Ahmed

“I think that 99% of folk at Cel­gene wouldn’t have sub­mit­ted, but we had Re­cep­tos out on the West Coast and, for what­ev­er rea­son, the de­ci­sion was made to sub­mit,” Cel­gene’s head of hema­tol­ogy and on­col­o­gy Nadim Ahmed told David Crow at the Fi­nan­cial Times. “We learned a les­son of hu­mil­i­ty and that when you do an ac­qui­si­tion it’s bet­ter to be more in­te­grat­ed rather than be com­plete­ly away from the moth­er ship.”

Cel­gene — helmed by a cur­rent ex-Ma­rine, who got the job from an­oth­er ex-Ma­rine — has been known for a for­ward-think­ing, can-do ap­proach to bio­phar­ma. Pre­sum­ably that ex­tends to the way it in­te­grates the com­pa­nies it buys. The Re­cep­tos team, though, ev­i­dent­ly nev­er mea­sured up to Cel­gene stan­dards, and reg­u­la­tors ex­pressed amaze­ment that the Cel­gene NDA was un­ac­cept­able.

Said Ahmed:

[The FDA] kin­da said ‘what hap­pened guys, this isn’t what we usu­al­ly ex­pect from Cel­gene?’ And we had to say, you know, ‘mea cul­pa it’s on us’.

Or them.

Ron­ny Gal

Com­plet­ing the blame-it-on-Re­cep­tos ap­proach, Ron­ny Gal at Bern­stein not­ed that lit­tle biotechs may cut cor­ners that a big cap com­pa­ny like Cel­gene wouldn’t dream of. And he cau­tioned that any ac­quir­er has to keep that in mind dur­ing the M&A process.

Of course, Cel­gene has had three years to fix any­thing that was wrong at Re­cep­tos. So some­body on the in­side al­so fell short. But we’re not hear­ing about that to­day.

Nick Galakatos, Blackstone global head of life sciences

Nick Galakatos and the Black­stone team now have a record $4.6B to in­vest in bio­phar­ma, with a big fo­cus on push­ing com­pa­nies over the top

Nick Galakatos and his team at Blackstone Life Sciences have seen their biggest opportunities swell up in mostly established players who don’t have all the money they need to accomplish everything on the to-do list. And right now, with the industry booming, that’s a long list with some hefty needs.

The Blackstone team has neatly tied up the largest private fund ever raised in life sciences for making big dreams come true in biopharma. Late Thursday, Blackstone put out word that they had closed their highly anticipated fund with the projected $4.6 billion all in.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 85,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: Bio­gen shares spike as ex­ecs com­plete a de­layed pitch for their con­tro­ver­sial Alzheimer's drug — the next move be­longs to the FDA

Biogen is stepping out onto the high wire today, reporting that the team working on the controversial Alzheimer’s drug aducanumab has now completed their submission to the FDA. And they want the agency to bless it with a priority review that would cut the agency’s decision-making time to a mere 6 months.

The news drove a 10% spike in Biogen’s stock $BIIB ahead of the bell.

Part of that spike can be attributed to a relief rally. Biogen execs rattled backers and a host of analysts earlier in the year when they unexpectedly delayed their filing to the third quarter. That delay provoked all manner of speculation after CEO Michel Vounatsos and R&D chief Al Sandrock failed to persuade influential observers that the pandemic and other factors had slowed the timeline for filing. Actually making the pitch at least satisfies skeptics that the FDA was not likely pushing back as Biogen was pushing in. From the start, Biogen execs claimed that they were doing everything in cooperation with the FDA, saying that regulators had signaled their interest in reviewing the submission.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 85,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Gilead boasts of pos­i­tive remde­sivir da­ta on mor­tal­i­ty — but their analy­sis pro­vokes the skep­tics

Gilead is surging again off data that suggest its antiviral remdesivir might improve survival.

The new data come from an analysis Gilead conducted comparing the death rate and recovery time of patients in one of its remdesivir trials to a group of 800 patients “with similar baseline characteristics and disease severity” who received only standard-of-care around the same time. The result, they said, suggested that patients who received remdesivir had a 62% better chance at surviving than those who did not.

Hal Barron, GSK

Win or lose on the mar­ket­ing OK, the FDA just gunned down GSK’s bright hopes for their BC­MA ther­a­py

The FDA’s ODAC — the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee — has a well-known bias in favor of adding new cancer drugs to the market, even if efficacy is at best marginal and serious safety issues demand careful management.

Doctors want as many arrows in their quiver as they can get. And when patients are dying after failing multiple drugs, why not give it a go one more time?

GlaxoSmithKline, though, is about to test out how their new BCMA antibody drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin can do after being mauled in an in-house FDA review, ahead of the Tuesday expert panel discussion. Even if the agency goes ahead with an expected green light, this drug will likely be constrained to a small niche — icing any plans they may have for making waves in oncology anytime soon.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Covid-19 roundup: BioN­Tech go­ing head-to-head with Mod­er­na as PhI­II mR­NA launch looms; Tri­al on Shin­zo Abe’s once-fa­vorite an­tivi­ral is in­con­clu­sive

It’s a race to the Phase III finish line now for the 2 leading mRNA vaccines in the pipeline for Covid-19.

BioNTech chief Ugur Sahin told the Wall Street Journal that his company will start Phase III testing of their vaccine later this month, setting them up to lateral the data to regulators before the end of this year.

That puts them essentially on the exact same schedule as Moderna is dedicated to. The Massachusetts rival to BioNTech also expects to launch Phase III this month. Lots of rumors have circulated about delays and conflict among the scientists advancing the Moderna jab, but the biotech has consistently stuck to its plan to start a late-stage pivotal this month.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 85,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Regeneron CEO Leonard Schleifer speaks at a meeting with President Donald Trump, members of the Coronavirus Task Force, and pharmaceutical executives in the Cabinet Room of the White House (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

OWS shifts spot­light to drugs to fight Covid-19, hand­ing Re­gen­eron $450M to be­gin large scale man­u­fac­tur­ing in the US

The US government is on a spending spree. And after committing billions to vaccines defense operations are now doling out more of the big bucks through Operation Warp Speed to back a rapid flip of a drug into the market to stop Covid-19 from ravaging patients — possibly inside of 2 months.

The beneficiary this morning is Regeneron, the big biotech engaged in a frenzied race to develop an antibody cocktail called REGN-COV2 that just started a late-stage program to prove its worth in fighting the virus. BARDA and the Department of Defense are awarding Regeneron a $450 million contract to cover bulk delivery of the cocktail starting as early as late summer, with money added for fill/finish and storage activities.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 85,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Nello Mainolfi (Kymera via YouTube)

Out to re­vive R&D, a resur­gent Sanofi pays $150M cash to part­ner up with a pi­o­neer­ing pro­tein degra­da­tion play­er

Frank Nestle was appointed Sanofi’s global head of immunology and inflammation research therapeutic area just days before dupilumab, the blockbuster-to-be IL-4 antibody, would be accepted for priority review. After four years of consolidating immunology expertise from multiple corners of the Sanofi family and recruiting new talents to build the discovery engine, he’s set eyes on a Phase I-ready program that he believes can grow into a Dupixent-sized franchise.

An­oth­er four biotechs scratch out the first num­ber and ask for more as IPO boom con­tin­ues

Four more biotechs are raising their offers in an already record year for biotech IPOs.

Softbank-backed Relay Therapeutics scratched out its original $200 million filing and proposed a $250 million raise that would make them a $1.5 billion company. CAR-T developer Poseida Therapeutics bumped itself up $74 million to $224 million. Off-the-shelf cell therapy startup Nkarta upped from $150 million to $215 million — and then priced even higher, at $252 million. France’s Inventiva did its own modest reset, raising its bar from $102 million to $108 million.

Top biotech an­a­lyst projects a gloomy out­look for Pfiz­er's JAK port­fo­lio

Many in the pharma world are hoping — better yet, expecting — JAK inhibitors to provide one of the next big boons for the industry. Few have invested as heavily in this area as Pfizer, which boasts a portfolio including Xeljanz and at least five mid-to-late stage candidates in the pipeline.

But a top Wall Street analyst is pumping the brakes on just how much good fortune is in store for the Big Pharma.