Trou­bled poop-test­ing start­up uBio­me an­nounces plans for liq­ui­da­tion

Your fa­vorite, fun-lov­ing, poop-test­ing, bac­te­ria-div­ing, un­der fed­er­al in­ves­ti­ga­tion, bank­rupt start­up with the pos­si­bly fun­da­men­tal­ly flawed sci­ence is — alas — shut­ting down.

uBio­me has filed to con­vert its Chap­ter 11 bank­rupt­cy in­to a Chap­ter 7 liq­ui­da­tion, all but spelling the end for a once soar­ing com­pa­ny that part­nered with re­searchers at Har­vard and Stan­ford and wooed Sil­i­con Val­ley in­vestors, but ul­ti­mate­ly found it­self ow­ing po­ten­tial­ly hun­dreds of mil­lions to health­care com­pa­nies, lay­ing off half of its staff and un­der fed­er­al in­ves­ti­ga­tion for its billing prac­tices.

The news comes bare­ly a year af­ter the com­pa­ny an­nounced an $83 mil­lion fund­ing round and the hir­ing of for­mer No­var­tis CEO Joe Jimenez to head a new R&D arm in Cam­bridge, MA.

What went wrong?

From their 2012 crowd-sourced found­ing un­til the first lay­offs came this Jan­u­ary, it seemed Ubio­me could do no wrong. They were 23andMe for your gut, a young com­pa­ny with young, telegenic founders of­fer­ing a warm face to a hot new sci­ence. They promised to map your mi­cro­bio­me, the 3-pound bac­te­r­i­al ecosys­tem sci­en­tists on­ly re­cent­ly dis­cov­ered had wide im­pacts on your health, from di­ges­tion to men­tal health. Their web­site home page sent “A warm wel­come to you. And your 39 tril­lion bac­te­ria.”

Their pre­mier ser­vice was Ex­plor­er. Orig­i­nal­ly priced at $400, it of­fered to test your stool sam­ple and give back all sorts of health-re­lat­ed ad­vice. Since then, they’ve widened their fo­cus to in­clude vagi­nal health and STDs women face.

But while their blog of­fered fun tips about di­et, sleep and “could your sum­mer fling change your mi­cro­bio­me?” some re­searchers were sound­ing alarms. They of­fered the same warn­ing re­searchers gave about 23andMe’s first for­ays in­to health-re­lat­ed ad­vice: It’s too soon and the sci­ence isn’t there. (23andMe has since gained FDA ap­proval for sev­er­al health-re­lat­ed ser­vices).

Ian Lip­kin Co­lum­bia

“I don’t think we know enough yet about the mi­cro­bio­me to be able to ad­vice peo­ple as to how they should mod­i­fy their di­et or change their lifestyles based on a kit of this sort,” Co­lum­bia epi­demi­ol­o­gist Ian Lip­kin told The At­lantic’s James Ham­blin in a 2016 video, of­fer­ing a 10-year time­frame for when the sci­ence will be ready.

In that video, uBio­me told the quite svelte Ham­blin that based on his test that he had the mi­cro­bio­me of an over­weight, de­pressed man. He did not con­firm the de­pres­sion sug­ges­tion.

The first sign of trou­ble came in Jan­u­ary, when the start­up cut 55 jobs out of its 300-per­son work­force, re­port­ed­ly to fo­cus on drugs and part­ner­ships. In May, founders Jes­si­ca Rich­man and Zac Apte were placed on leave as the FBI be­gan an in­quiry in­to the com­pa­ny’s billing process. This sum­mer, Busi­ness In­sid­er re­port­ed the com­pa­ny had laid off half its staff and that its sci­ence may have been flawed from the start.

They filled for Chap­ter 11 at the be­gin­ning of Sep­tem­ber. Court doc­u­ments re­vealed they may owe hun­dreds of mil­lions to health­care com­pa­nies, BI re­port­ed.

Image courtesy of The Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson.

Pro­tect­ing the glob­al phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal in­no­va­tion ecosys­tem – what’s at stake?

We are living in a new era of healthcare that is rapidly advancing progress impacting patient outcomes and experiences. We’ve seen a remarkable pace of transformational innovation, applied research, and advanced clinical development over the last decade.

Despite this tremendous progress, there is much more work to be done, and patients are counting on us – now more than ever – to continue that momentum. At the heart of our industry is a focus on developing and delivering medicines for some of the world’s most challenging diseases, including those that have few or no effective treatments today.

Mi­rati’s drug sitra­va­tinib flops PhI­II in com­bo with Op­di­vo for cer­tain lung can­cer

Mirati Therapeutics’ path to a second drug approval will likely have to wait. The San Diego biotech company said Wednesday that its investigational lung cancer drug failed a Phase III trial testing it in combination with Bristol Myers Squibb’s Opdivo.

The drug, sitravatinib, and Opdivo weren’t better than the chemo drug docetaxel at keeping patients alive, Mirati said in a press release. The spectrum-selective kinase inhibitor missed the primary goal of overall survival in patients with second- or third-line advanced non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 170,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

End­points 20(+2) un­der 40, 2023; Bio­phar­ma's high­est-paid CEOs; N-of-1 CRISPR sto­ry goes on af­ter tragedy; and more

Welcome back to Endpoints Weekly, your review of the week’s top biopharma headlines. Want this in your inbox every Saturday morning? Current Endpoints readers can visit their reader profile to add Endpoints Weekly. New to Endpoints? Sign up here.

We will be off Monday in observance of Memorial Day — and when we get back, it will be a straight march to ASCO, BIO and more. Enjoy the (long) weekend!

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 170,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Rich Horgan (R) with his late brother, Terry

Rich Hor­gan spear­head­ed a gene ther­a­py for his broth­er. The tri­al end­ed in tragedy, but the work con­tin­ues for more pa­tients

Rich Horgan’s quest to create a custom gene therapy for his brother, Terry, ended in tragedy. But Horgan doesn’t believe it’s the end of the story.

Terry, a 27-year-old patient with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, died last October just eight days after receiving the therapy in a clinical trial in which he was the only participant. The case raised questions about the safety of certain gene therapies and what would happen to other drug programs under a nonprofit that Horgan created, called Cure Rare Disease.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 170,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Bio­phar­ma's 20 high­est-paid CEOs of 2022, each bring­ing in $20M+ pay­days

Even in a down year for much of the biopharma market, 20 CEOs brought in pay packages valued at more than $20 million, an Endpoints News analysis found.

Endpoints collected data on more than 350 CEO compensation packages, covering a wide range of pharma, biotech, and life sciences companies. All told, the 20 largest earners made over $725 million in 2022 — an average package of $36.4 million. Three brought in paydays over $50 million, and one CEO broke the $100 million mark.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 170,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

The 20(+2) un­der 40: Your guide to the next gen­er­a­tion of biotech lead­ers

This year’s list of 20 biotech leaders under the age of 40 includes a huge range of ambitions. Some of our honorees are planning to create the next big drug giant. Others are pushing the bounds of AI. One is working to revolutionize TB testing. All are compelling talents who are still young in age, but already far along in achievement.

And, as in years past, we went over. The 20 are actually 22 because of two double profiles that reflect how important teamwork is in the industry. As one of our honorees, Joe Illingworth of DJS Antibodies, told me in our interview, “It takes a village to raise a biotech.”

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 170,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Teresa Bitetti, Takeda's president of the global oncology business unit

Take­da wins pri­or­i­ty re­view for $400M col­orec­tal can­cer drug, li­censed from Hutchmed in Jan­u­ary

Takeda and Hutchmed scored a priority review Thursday afternoon for a colorectal cancer drug, the companies announced.

The experimental drug in question is fruquintinib, previously approved in China in 2018 to treat metastatic colorectal cancer. Takeda and Hutchmed are aiming to bring fruquintinib to the US and other countries outside China in the same indication, and the FDA set its decision date for Nov. 30 of this year.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 170,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

David Ricks, Eli Lilly CEO (Carolyn Kaster/AP Images)

Lil­ly gears up trio of PhI­II tri­als for its oral GLP-1 amid No­vo Nordisk, Pfiz­er com­pe­ti­tion

As Novo Nordisk and Pfizer disclose some data on their oral weight loss drugs in Phase III and II, respectively, Eli Lilly is beefing up its stance in the obesity field with three late-stage clinical trials of its next-generation GLP-1 agonist orforglipron.

The moves, disclosed in updates to the federal clinical trials database this week, put the Indianapolis drugmaker ahead of Pfizer, whose science chief has said the company will “cherry-pick” which of its mid-stage candidates to take deeper into the clinic after data late this year or early next.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 170,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Douglas Love, Annexon CEO

An­nex­on’s GA drug miss­es on pri­ma­ry goal but win on vi­su­al acu­ity will be fo­cus of planned late-stage tri­al

Annexon’s complement inhibitor didn’t prove better than sham at reducing lesion growth in a leading cause of blindness, but the biotech still plans to move forward on the back of secondary endpoints showing visual acuity preservation, which will “certainly” be the primary goal in a late-stage trial to be discussed shortly with the FDA, CEO Douglas Love told Endpoints News. 

The California biotech’s ANX007 was not statistically significant compared to pooled sham, the comparator, at 12 months in patients with geographic atrophy, per a Wednesday presentation. In every-month dosing, the GA lesion area changed about 6.2% from baseline (p=0.526) and 1.3% (p=0.896) in the every-other-month group. In a March note, Jefferies analyst Suji Jeong said a reduction of 20% to 30% would be “encouraging.”

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.