US law­mak­ers now want to hear from the mid­dle­men PBMs to un­pack their role in drug pric­ing

The US Sen­ate Fi­nance Com­mit­tee is up­ping the ante on the is­sue of drug pric­ing with yet an­oth­er hear­ing — this time with phar­ma­cy ben­e­fit man­agers, the mid­dle­men that ne­go­ti­ate re­bates with drug­mak­ers in ex­change for for­mu­la­ry cov­er­age and the pur­port­ed vil­lains be­hind sky­rock­et­ing list prices (ac­cord­ing to big Phar­ma) in a hear­ing last month.

On Tues­day, Sen­a­tors Chuck Grass­ley and Ron Wyden in­vit­ed ex­ec­u­tives from five PBMs — Cigna, CVS, Hu­mana, Unit­ed­Health’s Op­tum­Rx and Prime Ther­a­peu­tics — to tes­ti­fy on April 3 in the third drug pric­ing hear­ing this year.

Chuck Grass­ley

The first hear­ing in Jan­u­ary fo­cused on in­sulin af­ford­abil­i­ty, while the sec­ond in Feb­ru­ary in­volved sev­en phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal ex­ec­u­tives, who square­ly placed the blame for sky­rock­et­ing list prices on the mid­dle­men, as­sert­ing that they are forced to hike the prices of pre­scrip­tion drugs in re­sponse to high­er re­bates that all-pow­er­ful PBMs ne­go­ti­ate.

Last week, large US PBM Ex­press Scripts $ES­RX shot back, sug­gest­ing the pow­er to low­er drug prices ul­ti­mate­ly lies with the man­u­fac­tur­ers. “We of­ten have asked drug com­pa­nies to sim­ply low­er their prices. In­stead, drug com­pa­nies have elect­ed to in­crease prices and in­crease re­bates. This is the op­tion drug mak­ers have cho­sen for them­selves and for the mar­ket­place,” the com­pa­ny said in a state­ment.

“The PBMs de­fense is of­ten fin­ger point­ing, blam­ing ex­or­bi­tant drug pric­ing on the man­u­fac­tur­ers and tak­ing no re­spon­si­bil­i­ty for the prob­lem. In fact, it is the PBMs who bear a great deal of the blame, and their prac­tices have led to se­vere in­fla­tion of the prices of both gener­ic and brand­ed med­ica­tions. This lim­its ac­cess to need­ed med­ica­tions for pa­tients.  It is our hope that the Com­mit­tee does not let them get away with pass­ing the buck,” said Robert Levin, pres­i­dent of the Al­liance for Trans­par­ent and Af­ford­able Pre­scrip­tions (AT­AP), in an emailed state­ment to End­points News.

The gen­er­al job de­scrip­tion for PBMs is to ad­min­is­ter drug ben­e­fits for em­ploy­ers and health plans and run big mail-or­der phar­ma­cies. But what goes on be­hind closed doors be­tween these firms and drug­mak­ers in terms of ne­go­ti­a­tions re­mains some­what of a mys­tery.

Ron Wyden

“Mid­dle­men in the health care in­dus­try owe pa­tients and tax­pay­ers an ex­pla­na­tion of their role. There’s far too much bu­reau­cra­cy and too lit­tle trans­paren­cy get­ting in the way of af­ford­able, qual­i­ty health care,” Grass­ley and Wyden said in a Tues­day state­ment.

All re­bates are passed through in Medicare and 95%+ on the com­mer­cial side with con­tin­ued ef­forts to move re­bate to sub­si­dize out of pock­et (OOP) costs for high­er uti­liz­ing se­niors at the point of sale, Leerink’s Ana Gupte not­ed. “(E)spe­cial­ly UNH which is now mov­ing their ef­forts from ful­ly in­sured em­ploy­ers in 2019 to self- in­sured com­menc­ing 2020. The large PBMs (CVS, CI (ES­RX), UNH) are al­ready im­ple­ment­ing al­ter­na­tive pay­ment mod­els that re­ly less on re­bates.”

Ear­li­er in the day, Unit­ed­Health said it was ex­pand­ing a change to how it han­dles re­bates from drug­mak­ers by re­quir­ing new em­ploy­er clients to pass the dis­counts on to peo­ple who take the med­ica­tions. The move will ap­ply to em­ploy­ers that ink new con­tracts af­ter Jan 1, 2020, the com­pa­ny said.

At the last hear­ing with phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal ex­ec­u­tives, drug­mak­ers ar­gued in fa­vor of cut­ting re­bates not just for Medicare but al­so on the com­mer­cial side to even the play­ing field for all drug man­u­fac­tur­ers, as suf­fi­cient in­cen­tive to low­er list prices.

“Al­though the phar­ma ex­ecs ex­pressed their pref­er­ence for a po­ten­tial re­bate re­struc­tur­ing to oc­cur in both gov­ern­ment and com­mer­cial sec­tors, we be­lieve any large-scale changes in com­mer­cial will be dif­fi­cult with a di­vid­ed Con­gress and the ex­pect­ed push back from large em­ploy­ers who al­ready pass along re­bates to re­duce costs for their em­ploy­ees,” Gupte said.

Con­quer­ing a silent killer: HDV and Eiger Bio­Phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals

Hepatitis delta, also known as hepatitis D, is a liver infection caused by the hepatitis delta virus (HDV) that results in the most severe form of human viral hepatitis for which there is no approved therapy.

HDV is a single-stranded, circular RNA virus that requires the envelope protein (HBsAg) of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) for its own assembly. As a result, hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection occurs only as a co-infection in individuals infected with HBV. However, HDV/HBV co-infections lead to more serious liver disease than HBV infection alone. HDV is associated with faster progression to liver fibrosis (progressing to cirrhosis in about 80% of individuals in 5-10 years), increased risk of liver cancer, and early decompensated cirrhosis and liver failure.
HDV is the most severe form of viral hepatitis with no approved treatment.
Approved nucleos(t)ide treatments for HBV only suppress HBV DNA, do not appreciably impact HBsAg and have no impact on HDV. Investigational agents in development for HBV target multiple new mechanisms. Aspirations are high, but a functional cure for HBV has not been achieved nor is one anticipated in the forseeable future. Without clearance of HBsAg, anti-HBV investigational treatments are not expected to impact the deadly course of HDV infection anytime soon.

Democratic presidential candidate, U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) speaks during the Nevada Democrats' "First in the West" event at Bellagio Resort & Casino on November 17, 2019 in Las Vegas, Nevada (Getty Images)

Eliz­a­beth War­ren pro­pos­es us­ing com­pul­so­ry li­cens­ing, an­titrust ac­tions to break bio­phar­ma’s con­trol of drug pric­ing — and here are the block­busters she’s tar­get­ing first

Nancy Pelosi’s drug pricing bill may have sparked some industrial strength headaches on the money side of biopharma, but Elizabeth Warren seems determined to become biopharma’s Nightmare on Pennsylvania Avenue.
Warren, one of the top-ranked candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination backing Medicare for all, is circulating a new plan that promises to break the industry’s grip on drug prices — and she has some very specific examples of how she would do it.
The Warren plan would rely on the federal government’s compulsory licensing powers to seize the IP of blockbuster drugs like Truvada and Harvoni to provide them at a fraction of what Gilead sells them for in the US. And she would throw some antitrust actions in as needed to rein in the price of Humira, AbbVie’s cash cow that continues to dominate the list of the most profitable therapeutics on the market.
Notably, she plans to rely on the powers already vested in the federal government, rather than suggest remedies that would require the assent of a deeply divided Congress.
In addition to the blockbusters on the list, Warren sends a clear signal that the same tactics would be used to beef up the supply of cheap antibiotics, as needed. And the same action could befall any other therapy patients can’t afford.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

No­var­tis is ax­ing 150 ear­ly dis­cov­ery jobs as CNI­BR shifts fo­cus to the de­vel­op­ment side of R&D

Novartis is axing some 150 early discover jobs in Shanghai as it swells its staff on the drug development side of the equation in China. And the company is concurrently beefing up its investment in China’s fast-growing biotech sector with a plan to add to its investments in local VCs.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 65,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Mer­ck’s $1B cash gam­ble pays off with a sur­pris­ing PhI­II car­dio suc­cess for Bay­er’s heart drug veri­ciguat

More than 3 years after Merck stepped up and paid $1 billion in cold, hard cash to gain the US commercial rights to Bayer’s high-risk heart drug vericiguat in a broad-ranging cardio alliance, the partners say their Phase III study has come through with promising data and a date with regulators.
We don’t have the data, and won’t until they put it out at an upcoming scientific session, but Merck touted the results, saying that their big Phase III VICTORIA study hit the primary endpoint  — with vericiguat combined with available therapies reducing “the risk of the composite endpoint of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death in patients with worsening chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) compared to placebo when given in combination with available heart failure therapies.”
Depending on the hard data, and how it breaks out with the combinations used, this drug could pose a threat to Novartis’ blockbuster drug Entresto, currently at $1.6 billion while analysts expect peak sales to hit $4 billion.
The drug is a soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulator, which Bayer and Merck have had high hopes for. Evidently, so did cardiologists. Cowen’s last analysis set potential sales at $400 million in 2024, but that number could go up significantly now.
Cowen’s Steve Scala noted this morning:
Vericiguat could be a lucrative product for Merck, and one with potentially under-appreciated value. At Cowen’s Therapeutics Conference in September 2019, 80% of specialists anticipated a positive result from VICTORIA whereas only 51% of investors shared this optimism.
Investigators recruited more than 5,000 patients at more than 600 centers in 42 countries for this study — one of the most expensive propositions in R&D. Millions of people in the US suffer from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction when the failing heart fails to contract properly to eject blood into the system. Bayer holds ex-US rights to the drug and also stands to earn cash from the $1.1 billion in milestones Merck agreed on for their collaboration.
Remarkably, the drug was pushed into Phase III despite failing the mid-stage trial — though investigators flagged a success at the high dose of 10 mg. In VICTORIA, researchers started patients at 2.5 mg and then titrated up to 5 and then 10 mg.

Alk­er­mes forges $950M biotech buy­out deal in a bold bet on an ear­ly-stage CNS drug plat­form

Alkermes $ALKS is investing $100 million cash and committing up to $850 million more in milestones in a big wager on a very early-stage CNS discovery platform. And the biotech is adding $20 million more to fund next year’s new research work on the platform it’s acquiring in today’s buyout with an eye to expanding the research work in oncology.

The biotech, helmed by Richard Pops, is buying Rodin Therapeutics, which had focused early on Alzheimer’s disease. Pops’ buyout, though, isn’t focused solely on the most troublesome sector in pharma R&D.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 65,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Left to right: Arthur Pappas, Robert Nelsen, Peter Kolchinsky Doug Cole and David Beier

In rare po­lit­i­cal for­ay, top biotech in­vestors urge Con­gress to re­ject drug pric­ing bill

Thirteen of the top biotech venture capitalists in the country wrote a letter last week warning lawmakers that if Congress passes a drug pricing bill House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has put before lawmakers, they won’t be able to invest in biomedical research at their current rate, and patients will suffer.

“If policies such as those included within H.R. 3, the Lower Drug Costs Now Act, are passed, our ability to continue to invest in future biomedical innovation will be severely constrained, thus crushing the hopes of millions of patient waiting for the next breakthroughs to treat or cure their cancers, rare genetic diseases, Alzheimer’s, or other serious and life-threatening conditions,” they wrote in a letter addressed to the highest-ranking Democrats and Republicans in the House and Senate and acquired by Endpoints News. 

Dicer­na scores broad, 'rest of liv­er' deal with No­vo Nordisk, bag­ging $225M in cash to hit some 30 tar­gets with RNAi plat­form

Turns out Dicerna wasn’t done with deals yet after locking in $200 million upfront from Roche for a hepatitis B cocktail two weeks ago.

Novo Nordisk has signed on as the latest partner to its GalXC RNAi platform, handing over $175 million in cash to claim any and all targets of interest in liver-related cardio-metabolic diseases that are not already reserved in previous pacts. The Danish drugmaker — which has signaled its interest to expand considerably beyond its core diabetes franchise into areas like NASH — is also purchasing $50 million worth of Dicerna’s equity at a 25% premium of $21.93 per share. More research payments and milestones extending to the billions are on the line.

Gene ther­a­py wins the in­side track at EMA; PPD files for IPO

→ Gene therapy maker Orchard Therapeutics has been granted an accelerated assessment for OTL-200 by the EMA’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). The gene therapy — in development in partnership with the San Raffaele-Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy (SR-Tiget) in Milan, Italy — being used towards the treatment of metachromatic leukodystrophy.

→ Pharmaceutical Product Development has announced that its parent company, PPD, Inc has submitted a draft to the SEC relating to the proposal of an IPO of the parent company’s common stock. Number of shares and price range have not yet been determined.

Pfiz­er gets biosim­i­lar ap­proved for Hu­mi­ra, set­ting up com­pe­ti­tion — in 2023

In the story lawmakers and drug pricing reform advocates have told about the drug industry, there are perhaps few greater villains than Humira and its maker AbbVie.

Between 2012 and 2018, AbbVie upped the drug’s annual after-rebates cost from $19,000 to $38,000 in the US, with sticker prices now over $60,000 per year — increases that led to accusations of price gouging, most recently from Democratic presidential frontrunner Elizabeth Warren.