Photo credit: Jacquelyn Martin

Where are the in­ter­change­able biosim­i­lars?

In June 2017, Leah Christl, for­mer biosim­i­lar lead at FDA, told a con­fer­ence in Chica­go that in­ter­change­able biosim­i­lars were like­ly com­ing to the US mar­ket with­in two years.

And al­though no in­ter­change­able biosim­i­lar has been ap­proved by FDA yet, and Christl has since moved on to Am­gen, progress on in­ter­change­able biosim­i­lars has been slow in the in­ter­ven­ing years.

Most re­cent­ly, Boehringer In­gel­heim an­nounced that it has com­plet­ed, as of last April, a switch­ing study nec­es­sary for launch­ing an in­ter­change­able biosim­i­lar for Hu­mi­ra (adal­i­mum­ab), al­though the com­pa­ny did not of­fer any fur­ther de­tails on the tim­ing of its sub­mis­sion to FDA or whether there will be an ad­vi­so­ry com­mit­tee to re­view the da­ta. Boehringer al­ready has an adal­i­mum­ab biosim­i­lar ap­proved by FDA, which it will launch in the US on 1 Ju­ly 2023.

In ad­di­tion, next March, in­sulin prod­ucts will make the tran­si­tion from be­ing reg­u­lat­ed un­der the FD&C Act to the PHS Act, which, ac­cord­ing to for­mer FDA Com­mis­sion­er Scott Got­tlieb means in­ter­change­able in­sulin prod­ucts are like­ly com­ing. FDA held a meet­ing in May on in­ter­change­able in­sulins, which will be par­tic­u­lar­ly im­por­tant as on­ly three fol­low-on in­sulin prod­ucts — Basaglar, Lus­duna and Ad­mel­og — have been ap­proved since 2015.

But out­side of the one po­ten­tial adal­i­mum­ab in­ter­change­able and sev­er­al pos­si­ble in­sulin in­ter­change­able prod­ucts (none of which have been pub­licly dis­closed), no oth­er com­pa­nies have even dis­closed be­gin­ning a switch­ing study. And al­though how such switch­ing stud­ies nec­es­sary for achiev­ing this des­ig­na­tion was on­ly fi­nal­ized last May, with FDA’s guid­ance on biosim­i­lar in­ter­change­abil­i­ty, com­pa­nies have known about the switch­ing study re­quire­ments since at least when the draft was re­leased in Jan­u­ary 2017.

Bern­stein an­a­lyst Ron­ny Gal told Fo­cus via email that Am­gen and San­doz have said they will pur­sue in­ter­change­able biosim­i­lars but switch­ing stud­ies have not list­ed yet.

Got­tlieb al­so said re­cent­ly in an in­ter­view that he be­lieves the use of switch­ing stud­ies to get an in­ter­change­abil­i­ty claim “is fair­ly ef­fi­cient, but I think there’s things that you can con­tin­ue to look at in terms of us­ing re­al-world ev­i­dence [RWE] and look­ing at how you struc­ture those switch­ing stud­ies to po­ten­tial­ly make it more ef­fi­cient.”

An­tho­ny Maf­fia, head of reg­u­la­to­ry af­fairs, North Amer­i­ca at San­doz, told Fo­cus in a phone in­ter­view that he agrees with Got­tlieb on the pos­si­ble use of RWE, “but the way it’s ap­plied needs flush­ing out.”

He al­so said he thinks the in­ter­change­abil­i­ty des­ig­na­tion is “cre­at­ing an ad­di­tion­al bar­ri­er to ac­cess, and we keep em­pha­siz­ing that and feel strong­ly that it’s unique to the US and sets us apart from oth­er glob­al health au­thor­i­ties.”

A lot of the dis­cus­sion on the sav­ings from biosim­i­lars is al­so cen­tered on the fact that state phar­ma­cy laws (45 states and Puer­to Ri­co have passed leg­is­la­tion, ac­cord­ing to Am­gen) stip­u­late that biosim­i­lars may on­ly be sub­sti­tut­ed at the phar­ma­cy if FDA has des­ig­nat­ed them as in­ter­change­able to their ref­er­ence prod­ucts.

“Un­less and un­til we change the way we pay for drugs more broad­ly, in­ter­change­ables are re­al­ly the cen­tral path to re­al com­pe­ti­tion and low­er prices,” Aaron Kessel­heim, di­rec­tor of the Pro­gram on Reg­u­la­tion, Ther­a­peu­tics and Law at Brigham and Women’s Hos­pi­tal, Har­vard Med­ical School, pre­vi­ous­ly ex­plained to Fo­cus.

But many bi­o­log­ics are ad­min­is­tered by physi­cians so the in­ter­change­abil­i­ty des­ig­na­tion will like­ly not be pur­sued in those in­stances. Oth­ers al­so have said in­ter­change­ables will not nec­es­sar­i­ly hit the mar­ket with as large of a dis­count as biosim­i­lars with­out the des­ig­na­tion.

In ad­di­tion, there is a lot of room for mis­in­for­ma­tion among phar­ma­cists and doc­tors. Hil­lel Co­hen, ex­ec­u­tive di­rec­tor of sci­en­tif­ic af­fairs at San­doz, pre­vi­ous­ly ex­plained how an in­ter­change­able biosim­i­lar is not more high­ly sim­i­lar than a non-in­ter­change­able biosim­i­lar, al­though the des­ig­na­tion may pro­vide the false per­cep­tion of a bet­ter prod­uct.

Maf­fia added that he thinks FDA “ab­solute­ly” must clar­i­fy when cer­tain com­pa­nies are spread­ing mis­in­for­ma­tion on biosim­i­lars. “We have to get to a com­mon set of lan­guage and that’s some­thing that FDA has a role in,” he said.


RAPS: First pub­lished in Reg­u­la­to­ry Fo­cus™ by the Reg­u­la­to­ry Af­fairs Pro­fes­sion­als So­ci­ety, the largest glob­al or­ga­ni­za­tion of and for those in­volved with the reg­u­la­tion of health­care prod­ucts. Click here for more in­for­ma­tion.

Tillman Gerngross, Adagio Therapeutics CEO

An­ti­body leg­end Till­man Gern­gross is el­bow­ing his way in­to the Covid-19 R&D cru­sade: 'I don’t see this end­ing any­time soon'

One of the most influential — and outspoken — scientists at work in the field of antibody discovery is jumping into the frenzied race to create new therapeutics to treat and prevent Covid-19. And he’s operating with the conviction that the current outbreak now once again spreading like wildfire will create plenty of demand for what he has in mind.

Dartmouth professor and Adimab CEO Tillman Gerngross tells me he’s raised $50 million from a group of close VCs to spin out a new company — Adagio Therapeutics — with a full C-suite team assembled to hire up a staff and keep rolling toward the clinic.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Tal Zaks, Moderna CMO (Moderna via YouTube)

UP­DAT­ED: NI­AID and Mod­er­na spell out a 'ro­bust' im­mune re­sponse in PhI coro­n­avirus vac­cine test — but big ques­tions re­main to be an­swered

The NIAID and Moderna have spelled out positive Phase I safety and efficacy data for their Covid-19 vaccine mRNA-1273 — highlighting the first full, clear sketch of evidence that back-to-back jabs at the dose selected for Phase III routinely produced a swarm of antibodies to the virus that exceeded levels seen in convalescent patients — typically in multiples indicating a protective response.

Moderna execs say plainly that this first stage of research produced exactly the kind of efficacy they hoped to see in humans, with a manageable safety profile.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 85,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Trans­port Sim­u­la­tion Test­ing for Your Ther­a­py is the Best Way to As­sure FDA Ex­pe­dit­ed Pro­gram Ap­proval

Modality Solutions is an ISO:9001-registered biopharmaceutical cold chain engineering firm with unique transport simulation capabilities that support accelerated regulatory approval for biologics and advanced therapeutic medicinal products (ATMP). Our expertise combines traditional validation engineering approaches with regulatory knowledge into a methodology tailored for the life sciences industry. We provide insight and execution for the challenges faced in your cold chain logistics network.

GSK’s Shin­grix leader Guil­laume Pfe­fer has jumped on board Flag­ship to helm a biotech hy­brid as Afeyan’s lat­est CEO-part­ner

After spending 4 years in a senior post with GlaxoSmithKline’s star team positioning Shingrix for a blockbuster approval, Guillaume Pfefer is headed back to the biotech world — in style.

Pfefer has signed on to join Noubar Afeyan’s busy group of partners at Flagship, and he’s taking the helm of an upstart — which today is being merged with another Flagship startup — with some grand plans of its own. The announcement this morning notes that Pfefer will run Kintai Therapeutics, one of the grads of the Flagship labs.

Source: Shutterstock

Who are the women blaz­ing trails in bio­phar­ma R&D and lead­ing the fight against Covid-19? Nom­i­nate them for End­points' spe­cial re­port

One of the many inequalities the pandemic has laid bare is the gender imbalance in biomedical research. A paper examining Covid-19 research authorship wondered out loud: Where are the women?

It’s a question that echoes beyond our current times. In the biopharma world, not only are women under-represented in R&D roles (particularly at higher levels), their achievements and talents could also be undermined by stereotypes and norms of leadership styles. The problem is even more dire for women of color.

Donald Trump and Anthony Fauci (AP Images)

Covid-19 roundup: Fau­ci fires back at White House cam­paign to un­der­mine him

Anthony Fauci has called the White House campaign to discredit him “a bit bizarre” and said he stands by his previous statements, even if he has since changed his views.

The NIAID chief — who has received an outpouring of support following reports that the Trump administration has sent a document akin to opposition research to multiple news outlets — spoke with his usual candor in interviews with The Atlantic.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 85,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

De­spite safe­ty, ef­fi­ca­cy con­cerns, FDA Ad­Com nar­row­ly rec­om­mends Mallinck­rodt drug

A day after the FDA detailed significant concerns about just how effective or safe an experimental Mallinckrodt liver drug was, an advisory committee decided by a single vote to recommend it for approval.

“I voted yes to approve, but I also wrote in, ‘but barely,’” Paul Ridker, a cardiologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and one of the panelists, said at the meeting, according to FierceBiotech. The vote was 8-7.

John Furey, Imvax CEO

A neu­ro­sur­geon spent the past 30 years de­vel­op­ing a neoanti­gen tu­mor vac­cine. Now he has $112M for a piv­otal test

As a neurosurgeon, David Andrews knew there wasn’t much he could do for his glioma patients after resecting — rarely fully — their tumor. Even with the best treatment and care available, median overall survival is just somewhere between 14 and 16 months.

Then in the 1990s, his mentor at Thomas Jefferson University introduced him to Renato Baserga, a pathologist who had been studying the effect of using antisense oligonucleotide to knock out the insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor in cancers. As IGF-R1 drives tumor growth and metastasis, the preclinical reasoning went, implanting a molecule targeting the receptor together with the tumor material near lymph nodes can slow down the spread of the cancer.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 85,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

The $1B Mer­ck-Bay­er drug that di­vid­ed car­di­ol­o­gists in March gets pri­or­i­ty re­view

Three months after Merck published in the New England Journal of Medicine data that left doctors and investors divided 0ver just how well its experimental heart drug worked, the FDA has handed that drug priority review. A decision is now due by January 20, 2021.

Merck first announced the drug, known as vericiguat, as a Phase III success last November. In 2016, Merck had paid $1 billion upfront for US rights to the Bayer-developed drug. Early projections foresaw a few hundred million a year in sales, but the unspecified late-stage success raised the possibility for far more. After all, Novartis’s flagship heart drug, Entresto, was earning $1.7 billion per year and was expected to reach up to $4 billion in annual sales.