FDA assembles adcomm to review GSK's Jemperli trial plans in rectal cancer
The FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee will meet this Thursday to discuss whether proposed studies would support an accelerated approval for GSK’s Jemperli in rectal cancer — despite initial concerns about the trial plans.
GSK’s PD-1 blocker Jemperli, also known as dostarlimab, was first approved back in 2021 for a specific subset of recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer patients who have a genetic feature called dMMR, or deficient mismatch repair. The label was expanded months later to include all adults with dMMR recurrent or advanced solid tumors who have progressed or stagnated on earlier therapy.
Now, GSK is looking to reach “locally advanced, treatment-naïve mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability-high rectal cancer” — and it’s hoping the results from two proposed single-arm trials will support an accelerated approval. One of those trials would enroll 30 patients in a single-center trial, and the other would enroll 100 patients across multiple trial sites.
ODAC is convening on Thursday to discuss the proposed trials, and on Tuesday, regulators released briefing documents spelling out their concerns.
After discussing the plans, adcomm members will vote on the question: “Will the data from the proposed single arm trials enrolling a total of 130 patients be sufficient to characterize the benefits and risks of dostarlimab in the curative intent setting for patients with dMMR/MSI-H LARC?”
While GSK has argued that the rarity of the disease would make randomized trials in the specific subset of locally advanced rectal cancer “infeasible,” the FDA noted in its briefing documents that the agency has “generally required randomized trials to support the safety and efficacy evaluation of dostarlimab.”
The FDA also included a brief analysis of GSK’s proposed endpoints for the trials, including an intermediate endpoint of clinical complete response rate (cCR) at 12 months.
However, FDA noted:
The use of cCR in LARC clinical decision-making is based on small, mostly retrospective, uncontrolled studies that vary in design and other important factors (e.g., chemotherapy regimen used, radiotherapy protocol, monitoring protocol for assessment of cCR, method of assessing clinical cCR, patient selection, etc.,) thus limiting the interpretability of findings.
Regulators continued that while preliminary data showed a cCR rate of 100% at one site, “it is unclear whether these results will be replicable across more sites,” noting the possibility of variability in local expertise. Also from the documents:
GSK proposes to use cCR36 as assessed by the investigator and event-free survival at 36 months as assessed by ICR to verify the clinical benefit of dostarlimab if accelerated approval is granted. Time-to-event endpoints are challenging to interpret in single-arm trials, and, given the heterogeneity of the data describing relapse in LARC, comparison to historical control may be challenging.