FDA re­jects Kala's dry eye drug; Trou­bled In­sys finds a buy­er (of some as­sets) in Hik­ma

Kala Phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals, one of the pletho­ra of biotechs that trace their roots to the pro­lif­ic lab at MIT led by Bob Langer, on Thurs­day dis­closed that its ex­per­i­men­tal drug for short-term dry eye re­lief did not pass muster with the FDA. Last year, the com­pa­ny post­ed mixed da­ta from two stud­ies — STRIDE 1 and STRIDE 2. Kala $KALA is now bank­ing on the on­go­ing STRIDE 3 study to re­verse its for­tunes. It ex­pects STRIDE 3 to read out by the end of the year, and to re­sub­mit its mar­ket­ing ap­pli­ca­tion the first half of 2020.

While dis­ap­point­ing, the CRL is not com­plete­ly un­ex­pect­ed, COO Todd Baze­more said. The com­pa­ny had ini­ti­at­ed STRIDE 3 last year at the ad­vice of the FDA, and is con­fi­dent that they have now got­ten the in­clu­sion/ex­clu­sion cri­te­ria right by screen­ing out pa­tients with un­sta­ble symp­toms. Once they have the da­ta, he added, they can re­file an NDA un­der a type 2 sub­mis­sion, which en­tails a 6-month in­stead of 12-month re­view.

Point­ing to No­var­tis‘ re­cent $5.3 bil­lion pur­chase of Shire’s Xi­idra — whose ap­proval process in­spired Kala to take its chances the first time — Baze­more em­pha­sized the po­ten­tial of KPI-121: “There’s so few prod­ucts in this cat­e­go­ry, it’s a huge un­tapped cat­e­go­ry in which on­ly about a mil­lion and a half of the 30 mil­lion pa­tients are cur­rent­ly be­ing treat­ed with a pre­scrip­tion prod­uct.”

→ Em­bat­tled In­sys, en­gulfed in lit­i­ga­tion and fi­nan­cial­ly starved, has found a buy­er for its unit-dose nasal and sub­lin­gual spray man­u­fac­tur­ing equip­ment, as well as two pipeline prod­ucts — nalox­one nasal spray and ep­i­neph­rine nasal spray — in UK-based Hik­ma. “Hik­ma is the largest sup­pli­er of gener­ic nasal sprays in the US and we have been look­ing for ways to build up­on our strong man­u­fac­tur­ing plat­form and ex­pand our prod­uct port­fo­lio,” said Hik­ma’s pres­i­dent of gener­ics Bri­an Hoff­mann in a state­ment.

→ Los An­ge­les biotech BioVie, which in April post­ed pos­i­tive da­ta from a small study test­ing its in­fu­sion ther­a­py for se­ri­ous com­pli­ca­tion of ad­vanced liv­er cir­rho­sis, on Thurs­day amend­ed the terms of its im­pend­ing IPO. The com­pa­ny now plans to raise $15 mil­lion by of­fer­ing 1.3 mil­lion shares for $11.44/share, the as-con­vert­ed last close of its shares on the over-the-counter mar­ket. The com­pa­ny, which plans to list un­der the sym­bol BIVI, had pre­vi­ous­ly filed to of­fer 1.3 mil­lion priced at $11.88/share.

A new era of treat­ment: How bio­mark­ers are chang­ing the way we think about can­cer

AJ Patel was recovering from a complicated brain surgery when his oncologist burst into the hospital room yelling, “I’ve got some really great news for you!”

For two years, Patel had been going from doctor to doctor trying to diagnose his wheezing, only to be dealt the devastating news that he had stage IV lung cancer and only six months to live. And then they found the brain tumors.

“What are you talking about?” Patel asked. He had never seen an oncologist so happy.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Mihael Polymeropoulos, Vanda Pharmaceuticals CEO

Phar­ma com­pa­ny con­tin­ues its FDA law­suit spree, this time af­ter agency de­nies fast-track des­ig­na­tion

Vanda Pharmaceuticals is making a name for itself, at least in terms of suing the FDA.

The DC-headquartered firm on Monday filed its latest suit against the agency, with the company raising concerns over the FDA’s failure to grant a fast track designation for Vanda’s potential chronic digestive disorder drug tradipitant, which is a neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist.

Specifically, Vanda said FDA’s “essential point” in its one-page denial letter on the designation pointed to “the lack of necessary safety data,” which was “inconsistent with the criteria for … Fast Track designation.”

Mod­er­na seeks to dis­miss Al­ny­lam suit over Covid-19 vac­cine com­po­nent, claim­ing wrong venue

RNAi therapeutics juggernaut Alnylam Pharmaceuticals made a splash in March when it sued and sought money from both Pfizer and Moderna regarding their use of Alnylam’s biodegradable lipids, which Alnylam claims have been integral to the way both companies’ mRNA-based Covid-19 vaccines work.

But now, Moderna lawyers are firing back, telling the same Delaware district court that Alnylam’s claims can only proceed against the US government in the Court of Federal Claims because of the way the company’s contract is set up with the US government. The US has spent almost $10 billion on Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine so far.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 142,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

(Credit: Shutterstock)

Cracks in the fa­cade: Is phar­ma's pan­dem­ic ‘feel good fac­tor’ wan­ing?

The discordant effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on pharma reputation continues. While the overall industry still retains a respectable halo from its Covid-19 quick response and leadership, a new patient group study reveals a different story emerging in the details.

On one hand, US patient advocacy groups rated the industry higher-than-ever overall. More than two-thirds (67%) of groups gave the industry a thumbs up for 2021, a whopping 10 percentage point increase over the year before, according to the PatientView annual study, now in its 9th year.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 142,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

FDA ac­cepts pri­or­i­ty re­view of CSL-uniQure he­mo­phil­ia B gene ther­a­py; Fo­s­un Phar­ma nets an­oth­er deal

The first potential gene therapy for hemophilia B has gotten one step closer to reaching patients as the FDA has accepted CSL Behring’s BLA for its uniQure-partnered one-time treatment. The therapy, dubbed etranacogene dezaparvovec, was accepted under “accelerated assessment” by the European Medicines Agency in March.

A priority review will be conducted for the gene therapy intended for patients with the hereditary bleeding disorder, CSL said Tuesday morning. The Pennsylvania biotech did not indicate the regulator’s decision date, but a priority review generally means the treatment’s fate will be handed down within six months rather than 10.

Michael Corbo, Pfizer CDO of inflammation & immunology

UP­DAT­ED: Plan­ning ahead for crowd­ed ul­cer­a­tive col­i­tis mar­ket, Pfiz­er spells out PhI­II da­ta on $6.7B Are­na drug

Pfizer has laid out the detailed results behind its boast that etrasimod — the S1P receptor modulator at the center of its $6.7 billion buyout of Arena Pharma — is the winner of the class, potentially leapfrogging an earlier entrant from Bristol Myers Squibb.

Pivotal data from the ELEVATE program in ulcerative colitis — which consists of two Phase III trials, one lasting 52 weeks and the other just 12 weeks — illustrate an “encouraging balance of efficacy and safety,” according to Michael Corbo, chief development officer of inflammation & immunology at Pfizer. The company is presenting the results as a late breaker at Digestive Disease Week.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 142,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Robert Califf (Michael Brochstein/Sipa USA via AP Images)

House Re­pub­li­cans at­tack Chi­na-on­ly da­ta in FDA sub­mis­sions, seek new in­ves­ti­ga­tion in­to re­search in­spec­tions

Three Republican representatives are calling on the FDA to take a closer look at the applications including only clinical data from China.

The letter to FDA commissioner Rob Califf late last week comes as the agency recently rejected Eli Lilly’s anti-PD-1 antibody, which attempted to bring China-only data but ran into a bruising adcomm that may crush the hopes of any other companies looking to bring cheaper follow-ons based only on Chinese data.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 142,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Amid mon­key­pox fears, biotechs spring to ac­tion; Mod­er­na’s CFO trou­ble; Cuts, cuts every­where; Craft­ing the right pro­teins; and more

Welcome back to Endpoints Weekly, your review of the week’s top biopharma headlines. Want this in your inbox every Saturday morning? Current Endpoints readers can visit their reader profile to add Endpoints Weekly. New to Endpoints? Sign up here.

It’s always a bittersweet moment saying goodbye, but as Josh Sullivan goes off to new adventures we are grateful for the way he’s built up the Endpoints Manufacturing section — which the rest of the team will now carry forward. If you’re not already, this may be a good time to sign up for your weekly dose of drug manufacturing news. Thank you for reading and wish you a restful weekend.

Bris­tol My­ers Squibb sues No­var­tis for roy­al­ties sur­round­ing the use of trans­genic mice

Two Big Pharma companies are going to the mat over genetically modified mice in a licensing dispute.

Bristol Myers Squibb is suing Novartis in New York over a dispute concerning an evaluation, research and commercialization agreement stretching back to the late ’90s initially inked between Novartis and BMS’ predecessor Medarex. The deal in question allowed Novartis to use Medarex’s patented transgenic mice to develop therapeutic drugs. Novartis agreed to pay Medarex – and subsequently BMS – a royalty on sales of drugs it developed using the mice.