Brand name in­halers are very good at block­ing com­pe­ti­tion, bet­ter even than neb­u­liz­ers, study finds

While just three brand-name in­halers ap­proved be­tween 1986 and 2020 now face gener­ic com­pe­ti­tion (thanks in a large part to patent thick­ets and com­pa­nies shift­ing old ac­tive in­gre­di­ents to new de­vices), the same sort of long mo­nop­oly ex­ten­sions are not as preva­lent for neb­u­liz­ers, a new study pub­lished to­day in Na­ture Biotech­nol­o­gy ex­plains.

The Har­vard and Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­gary au­thors note that near­ly one-third of brand-name neb­u­liz­er so­lu­tions, which in­clude drugs for asth­ma or oth­er con­di­tions in an aerosol mist form, faced gener­ic com­pe­ti­tion be­fore ex­pi­ra­tion of FDA-list­ed patents, com­pared to just 2% of brand-name in­halers.

Endpoints News

Unlock this article instantly by becoming a free subscriber.

You’ll get access to free articles each month, plus you can customize what newsletters get delivered to your inbox each week, including breaking news.